Pharmacogenomic allele coverage of genome-wide genotyping arrays: a comparative analysis.

The use of genome-wide genotyping arrays in pharmacogenomics (PGx) research and clinical implementation applications is increasing but it is unclear which arrays are best suited for these applications. Here, we conduct a comparative coverage analysis of PGx alleles included on genome-wide genotyping arrays, with an emphasis on alleles in genes with PGx-based prescribing guidelines. Genomic manifest files for seven arrays including the Axiom Precision Medicine Diversity Array (PMDA), Axiom PMDA Plus, Axiom PangenomiX, Axiom PangenomiX Plus, Infinium Global Screening Array, Infinium Global Diversity Array (GDA) and Infinium GDA with enhanced PGx (GDA-PGx) Array, were evaluated for coverage of 523 star alleles across 19 pharmacogenes included in prescribing guidelines developed by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Specific attention was given to coverage of the Association of Molecular Pathology's Tier 1 and Tier 2 allele sets for CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NUDT15, TPMT and VKORC1 . Coverage of the examined PGx alleles was highest for the Infinium GDA-PGx (88%), Axiom PangenomiX Plus (77%), Axiom PangenomiX (72%) and Axiom PMDA Plus (70%). Three arrays (Infinium GDA-PGx, Axiom PangenomiX Plus and Axiom PMDA Plus) fully covered the Tier 1 alleles and the Axiom PangenomiX array provided full coverage of Tier 2 alleles. In conclusion, PGx allele coverage varied by gene and array. A superior array for all PGx applications was not identified. Future comparative analyses of genotype data produced by these arrays are needed to determine the robustness of the reported coverage estimates.

Effect of CYP2D6 genetic variation on patient-reported symptom improvement and side effects among children and adolescents treated with amphetamines.

OBJECTIVES: Amphetamine-based medications are recommended as a first-line pharmacotherapy for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. However, the efficacy and tolerability of these medications vary across individuals, which could be related to interindividual differences in amphetamine metabolism. This study examined if genotype-predicted phenotypes of the cytochrome P450 isozyme CYP2D6 were associated with self-reported side effects and symptom improvement in youth treated with amphetamines. METHODS: Two hundred fourteen participants aged 6-24 who had a history of past or current amphetamine treatment were enrolled from Western Canada. Amphetamine dose and duration information was collected from the participants along with questions regarding adherence, concomitant medications, symptom improvement and side effects. DNA was extracted from saliva samples and genotyped for CYP2D6 . Binomial logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype with and without correction for phenoconversion on self-reported symptom improvement and side effects. RESULTS: Genotype-predicted CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had significantly higher odds of reporting symptom improvement when compared to intermediate metabolizers (OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.15-11.7, P  = 0.029) after correction for phenoconversion and adjusting for sex, age, dose, duration, and adherence. There was no association between CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype and self-reported side effects. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that phenoconverted and genotype-predicted CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype is significantly associated with higher odds of symptom improvement in children and adolescents treated with amphetamine. If replicated, these results could inform the development of future dosing guidelines for amphetamine treatment in children and adolescents.

The emergence, implementation, and future growth of pharmacogenomics in psychiatry: a narrative review.

Psychotropic medication efficacy and tolerability are critical treatment issues faced by individuals with psychiatric disorders and their healthcare providers. For some people, it can take months to years of a trial-and-error process to identify a medication with the ideal efficacy and tolerability profile. Current strategies (e.g. clinical practice guidelines, treatment algorithms) for addressing this issue can be useful at the population level, but often fall short at the individual level. This is, in part, attributed to interindividual variation in genes that are involved in pharmacokinetic (i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. receptors, signaling pathways) processes that in large part, determine whether a medication will be efficacious or tolerable. A precision prescribing strategy know as pharmacogenomics (PGx) assesses these genomic variations, and uses it to inform selection and dosing of certain psychotropic medications. In this review, we describe the path that led to the emergence of PGx in psychiatry, the current evidence base and implementation status of PGx in the psychiatric clinic, and finally, the future growth potential of precision psychiatry via the convergence of the PGx-guided strategy with emerging technologies and approaches (i.e. pharmacoepigenomics, pharmacomicrobiomics, pharmacotranscriptomics, pharmacoproteomics, pharmacometabolomics) to personalize treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Gene-drug pairings for antidepressants and antipsychotics: level of evidence and clinical application.

Substantial inter-individual discrepancies exist in both therapeutic effectiveness and adverse effects of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, which can, in part, be explained by genetic variation. Here, we searched the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base for gene-antidepressant and gene-antipsychotic pairs with the highest level of evidence. We then extracted and compared the associated prescribing recommendations for these pairs developed by the Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium, the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group or approved product labels in the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Finally, we highlight key economical, educational, regulatory, and ethical issues that, if not appropriately considered, can hinder the implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice. Our review indicates that evidence-based guidelines are available to assist with the implementation of pharmacogenetic-guided antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing, although the maximum impact of these guidelines on patient care will not be realized until key barriers are minimized or eliminated.

Effect of kava (Piper methysticum) on peripheral gene expression among individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Kava is a South Pacific plant-based medicine with anxiolytic properties, but little is known about the impact kava has on gene expression or whether gene expression can serve as a marker of kava response. This study aimed to determine whether kava treatment alters the expression of genes with physiological relevance to anxiety pathophysiology and whether the baseline expression of these physiologically relevant genes modifies the efficacy of kava treatment. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the expression of 48 genes relevant to the pathophysiology of anxiety collected from a double-blind randomized controlled trial that assessed the efficacy of kava treatment in generalized anxiety disorder. Peripheral blood gene expression was measured in 71 (34 kava, 37 placebo) adults at baseline and in 40 (19 kava, 21 placebo) after 8 weeks of treatment by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results revealed that kava decreased the expression of a subunit of the GABAA -rho receptor gene (GABRR2) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), a gene related to catecholamine metabolism. Kava efficacy was not found to be modified by baseline (pretreatment) expression of relevant genes. Although these results did not withstand statistical correction for multiple comparisons and require external validation, they support the notion that kava's mechanism of action includes interaction with GABAergic and catecholaminergic systems.

Dispensing patterns of mental health medications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada: An interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the general population in all aspects of life. Estimates of mental health medication dispensing in Alberta were investigated to elucidate areas of need within mental health and pharmacy practice during the pandemic. METHODS: We employed an interrupted time series analysis using linear regression models to estimate community and outpatient medication dispensing trends of 46 medications used to treat mental health disorders. Three parameters were examined. The first was the medication dispensing slope before COVID-19. The second was the immediate effect of COVID-19 on dispensing (i.e., the difference in dispensing rate between the month before and after the first case of COVID-19) and the third was the medication dispensing slope during COVID-19. RESULTS: Dispensing rates of 61% (n = 34) of the examined medications remained similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, eight medications (i.e., amitriptyline, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, desvenlafaxine, venlafaxine, and oxazepam) showed an immediate and significant increase in dispensing rate following the onset of the pandemic that was sustained over the first 13-months of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Initial increases in dispensing patterns of antidepressants may be attributed to a "stockpiling phenomenon" but the sustained higher levels of dispensing suggest an unfavorable shift in the population's mental health. Monitoring of medication dispensing patterns during COVID-19 may serve as a useful indicator of the population's mental health during the current pandemic and better prepare community pharmacists in future pandemic planning, medication dispensing strategies, and care of chronic medical conditions.

Psychotropic prescribing rates and pharmacogenomic testing implications for autism in the Canadian primary care sentinel surveillance network.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate prescribing rates of psychotropic drugs to individuals with autism and the proportion of these individuals who could benefit from pharmacogenetic testing. METHODS: Prescribing data for 92 psychotropic drugs, including 31 antidepressants, 22 antipsychotics, 14 mood stabilizer/antiepileptics, 17 anxiolytic/hypnotics and eight antiadrenergic/psychostimulant were retrieved from medical records of 787 (613 males) autistic individuals who sought treatment from a primary care office enrolled in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network between 2012 and 2014. Each prescribed drug was cross-referenced with pharmacogenomic-based prescribing guidelines published by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group, and the Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety. RESULTS: More than half (58%) of the participants were prescribed a psychotropic drug and 37% were prescribed two or more psychotropic drugs concurrently. Among the 83 psychotropic drugs examined, 54 (65%) were prescribed to one or more participants during the study's observation period. The ten most frequently prescribed psychotropics were methylphenidate (16.3%), risperidone (12.8%), lorazepam (12.1%), fluoxetine (7.9%), sertraline (7.1%), quetiapine (6.9%), aripiprazole (6.1%), lisdexamfetamine (5.8%), citalopram (5.6%) and clonazepam (4.8%). Seventeen (32%) of the 54 psychotropic drugs prescribed were linked to a pharmacogenomic-based prescribing guideline, including risperidone, sertraline, aripiprazole and citalopram. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest primary care providers in Canada prescribe a wide range of psychotropics to their patients with autism, some of which may benefit from the integration of pharmacogenomic information into their treatment planning.

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of clozapine-induced myocarditis.

One of the concerns limiting the use of clozapine in schizophrenia treatment is the risk of rare but potentially fatal myocarditis. Our previous genome-wide association study and human leucocyte antigen analyses identified putative loci associated with clozapine-induced myocarditis. However, the contribution of DNA variation in cytochrome P450 genes, copy number variants and rare deleterious variants have not been investigated. We explored these unexplored classes of DNA variation using whole-genome sequencing data from 25 cases with clozapine-induced myocarditis and 25 demographically-matched clozapine-tolerant control subjects. We identified 15 genes based on rare variant gene-burden analysis (MLLT6, CADPS, TACC2, L3MBTL4, NPY, SLC25A21, PARVB, GPR179, ACAD9, NOL8, C5orf33, FAM127A, AFDN, SLC6A11, PXDN) nominally associated (p < 0.05) with clozapine-induced myocarditis. Of these genes, 13 were expressed in human myocardial tissue. Although independent replication of these findings is required, our study provides preliminary insights into the potential role of rare genetic variants in susceptibility to clozapine-induced myocarditis.

The impact of smoking status on cognition and brain morphology in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is associated with worse cognition and decreased cortical volume and thickness in healthy cohorts. Chronic cigarette smoking is prevalent in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), but the effects of smoking status on the brain and cognition in SSD are not clear. This study aimed to understand whether cognitive performance and brain morphology differed between smoking and non-smoking individuals with SSD compared to healthy controls. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank. Cognitive functioning was measured in 299 controls and 455 SSD patients. Cortical volume, thickness and surface area data were analysed from T1-weighted structural scans obtained in a subset of the sample (n = 82 controls, n = 201 SSD). Associations between smoking status (cigarette smoker/non-smoker), cognition and brain morphology were tested using analyses of covariance, including diagnosis as a moderator. RESULTS: No smoking by diagnosis interactions were evident, and no significant differences were revealed between smokers and non-smokers across any of the variables measured, with the exception of a significantly thinner left posterior cingulate in smokers compared to non-smokers. Several main effects of smoking in the cognitive, volume and thickness analyses were initially significant but did not survive false discovery rate (FDR) correction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the general absence of significant FDR-corrected findings, trend-level effects suggest the possibility that subtle smoking-related effects exist but were not uncovered due to low statistical power. An investigation of this topic is encouraged to confirm and expand on our findings.

Perspectives on the Clinical Use of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Late-Life Mental Healthcare: A Survey of the American Association of Geriatric Psychiatry Membership.

OBJECTIVE: To assess perspectives on pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing among members of the American Association of Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the AAGP. MEASUREMENTS: Anonymous web-based survey consisting of 41 items covering experiences, indications, barriers, facilitators and ethical, legal and social implications for PGx testing. RESULTS: A total of 124 surveys were completed (response rate = 13%). Most respondents (60%) had used PGx testing but an equal proportion (58%) was uncertain about the clinical usefulness of PGx testing in late-life mental health. Despite self-reported confidence in the ability to order and interpret PGx testing, 60% of respondents felt there was not enough clinical evidence for them to use PGx testing in their practice. This was compounded by uncertainties related to their ethical obligation and legal liability when interpreting and using (or not using) PGx testing results. Respondents strongly affirmed that clinical and legal guidelines for PGx testing in older adults are needed and would be helpful. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest additional PGx research and physician education in late-life mental healthcare settings is required to reconcile uncertainties related to the clinical efficacy and ethico-legal aspects of PGx testing as well as address current knowledge barriers to testing uptake. These efforts would be further facilitated by the development of clinical practice guidelines to ensure equitable access to testing and standardized implementation of PGx-informed prescribing in older adults.

Disruptions in white matter microstructure associated with impaired visual associative memory in schizophrenia-spectrum illness.

Episodic memory ability relies on hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity. However, few studies have examined relationships between memory performance and white matter (WM) microstructure in hippocampal-prefrontal pathways in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSDs). Here, we investigated these relationships in individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and chronic schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs) using tractography analysis designed to interrogate the microstructure of WM tracts in the hippocampal-prefrontal pathway. Measures of WM microstructure (fractional anisotropy [FA], radial diffusivity [RD], and axial diffusivity [AD]) were obtained for 47 individuals with chronic SSDs, 28 FEP individuals, 52 older healthy controls, and 27 younger healthy controls. Tractography analysis was performed between the hippocampus and three targets involved in hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity (thalamus, amygdala, nucleus accumbens). Measures of WM microstructure were then examined in relation to episodic memory performance separately across each group. Both those with FEP and chronic SSDs demonstrated impaired episodic memory performance. However, abnormal WM microstructure was only observed in individuals with chronic SSDs. Abnormal WM microstructure in the hippocampal-thalamic pathway in the right hemisphere was associated with poorer memory performance in individuals with chronic SSDs. These findings suggest that disruptions in WM microstructure in the hippocampal-prefrontal pathway may contribute to memory impairments in individuals with chronic SSDs but not FEP.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of L-Methylfolate Augmentation in Depressive Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Partial response to pharmacotherapy is common in major depressive disorder (MDD) and many patients require alternative pharmacotherapy or augmentation, including adjunctive L-methylfolate. Given that L-methylfolate augmentation is rarely included in major clinical practice guidelines, we sought to systematically review evidence for L-methylfolate augmentation in adults with MDD and to examine its efficacy meta-analytically. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed for articles up to December 31, 2020, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Included studies were published in peer-reviewed, English-language journals and examined L-methylfolate adjunctive therapy in depressive disorders or its effect on antidepressant response. A fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were conducted. RESULTS: Qualitative assessment of nine articles (N=6,707 patients) suggests that adjunctive L-methylfolate improved antidepressant response. In the meta-analysis of categorical Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 response, (three studies, N=483) adjunctive L-methylfolate was associated with a small effect versus antidepressant monotherapy (relative risk: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08 to 1.46, p=0.004). A meta-analysis of four studies (N=507) using a continuous measure of depressive symptoms showed a similar effect of adjunctive L-methylfolate (standardized mean difference=- 0.38, 95% CI=- 0.59 to-0.17, p=0.0003). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive L-methylfolate may have modest efficacy in antidepressant-treated adults with MDD.

Identification of high-impact gene-drug pairs for pharmacogenetic testing in Alberta, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To facilitate decision-making and priority-setting related to Alberta's Pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing implementation strategy by identifying gene-drug pairs with the highest potential impact on prescribing practices in Alberta. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Annual drug dispensing data for Alberta from 2012 to 2016 for 57 medications with PGx-based prescribing guidelines were obtained, along with population estimates and demographics (age and ethnicity). Frequencies of actionable PGx genotypes by ethnicity were obtained from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB). Annual dispensing activity for each of the 57 medications was calculated for the full population (all ages) and children/youth (0-19 years). Alberta ethnicity data were cross-referenced with genetic frequency data for each of the main ethnic groups from PharmGKB to estimate the proportion of individuals with actionable genotypes. Actionable genotype proportions and drug dispensing frequencies were collectively used to identify high impact gene-drug pairs. RESULTS: We found (a) half of the drugs with PGx-based prescribing guidelines, namely, analgesics, proton pump inhibitors, psychotropics, and cardiovascular drugs, were dispensed at high frequencies (>1% of the entire population), (b) the dispensing rate for about one-third of these drugs increased over the 5-year study period, (c) between 1.1 and 45% of recipients of these drugs carried actionable genotypes, and (d) the gene-drug pairs with greatest impact in Alberta predominatly included CYP2C19 or CYP2D6. CONCLUSIONS: We uncovered specific patterns in drug dispensing and identified important gene-drug pairs that will inform the planning and development of an evidenced-based PGx testing service in Alberta, Canada. Adaptation of our approach may facilitate the process of evidence-based PGx testing implementation in other jurisdictions.

Anxiety symptom remission is associated with genetic variation of PTPRZ1 among patients with major depressive disorder treated with escitalopram.

OBJECTIVES: Genome-wide analyses of antidepressant response have suggested that genes initially associated with risk for schizophrenia may also serve as promising candidates for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) efficacy. Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor-type, zeta-1 (PTPRZ1) has previously been shown to be associated with schizophrenia, but it has not been investigated as a predictor of antidepressant efficacy. The main objective of the study was to assess whether SSRI-mediated depressive and anxiety symptom remission in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) are associated with specific PTPRZ1 variants. METHODS: Two independent cohorts were investigated, the first sample (N = 344) received an SSRI (i.e. fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, or paroxetine) for 8 weeks. The second sample (N = 160) only received escitalopram for 8 weeks. Hamilton Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores at 8-weeks post-baseline in both cohorts were used to determine remission status. Five PTPRZ1 variants (rs12154537, rs6466810, rs6466808, rs6955395, and rs1918031) were genotyped in both cohorts. RESULTS: Anxiety symptom remission was robustly associated with PTPRZ1 rs12154537 (P = 0.004) and the G-G-G-G haplotype (rs12154537-rs6466810-rs6466808-rs6955395; P = 0.005) in cohort 2 but not cohort 1 (mixed SSRI use). Associations with depressive symptom remission did not survive correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PTPRZ1 variants may serve as a marker of escitalopram-mediated anxiety symptom remission in MDD.

Review and Consensus on Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry.

The implementation of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in psychiatry remains modest, in part due to divergent perceptions of the quality and completeness of the evidence base and diverse perspectives on the clinical utility of PGx testing among psychiatrists and other healthcare providers. Recognizing the current lack of consensus within the field, the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics assembled a group of experts to conduct a narrative synthesis of the PGx literature, prescribing guidelines, and product labels related to psychotropic medications as well as the key considerations and limitations related to the use of PGx testing in psychiatry. The group concluded that to inform medication selection and dosing of several commonly-used antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, current published evidence, prescribing guidelines, and product labels support the use of PGx testing for 2 cytochrome P450 genes (CYP2D6, CYP2C19). In addition, the evidence supports testing for human leukocyte antigen genes when using the mood stabilizers carbamazepine (HLA-A and HLA-B), oxcarbazepine (HLA-B), and phenytoin (CYP2C9, HLA-B). For valproate, screening for variants in certain genes (POLG, OTC, CSP1) is recommended when a mitochondrial disorder or a urea cycle disorder is suspected. Although barriers to implementing PGx testing remain to be fully resolved, the current trajectory of discovery and innovation in the field suggests these barriers will be overcome and testing will become an important tool in psychiatry.

Use of antidepressants with pharmacogenetic prescribing guidelines in a 10-year depression cohort of adult primary care patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the usage patterns of antidepressants with published CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-based prescribing guidelines among depressed primary care patients and estimate the proportion of patients taking antidepressants not recommended for them based on their CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotype-predicted metabolizer status. METHODS: Medication use and pharmacogenetic testing results were collected on 128 primary care patients enrolled in a 10-year depression cohort study. At each 12-month interval, we calculated the proportion of patients that: (1) reported use of one or more of the 13 antidepressant medications (i.e. amitriptyline, citalopram, escitalopram, clomipramine, desipramine, doxepin, fluvoxamine, imipramine, nortriptyline, paroxetine, sertraline, trimipramine, venlafaxine) with published CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-based prescribing guidelines, (2) were taking an antidepressant that was not recommended for them based on their CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotype-predicted metabolizer phenotype, and (3) switched medications from the previous 12-month interval. RESULTS: The annual proportion of individuals taking an antidepressant with a CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-based prescribing guidelines ranged from 45 to 84%. The proportion of participants that used an antidepressant that was not recommended for them, based on available CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, ranged from 18 to 29% and these individuals tended to switch medications more frequently (10%) compared to their counterparts taking medication aligned with their metabolizer phenotype (6%). CONCLUSION: One-quarter of primary care patients used an antidepressant that was not recommended for them based on CYP2D6- and CYP2C19-based prescribing guidelines and switching medications tended to be more common in this group. Studies to determine the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping on reducing gene-antidepressant mismatches are warranted.

Impact of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 genotype- and phenoconversion-predicted enzyme activity on clozapine exposure and symptom severity.

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzymes. Among 66 adult schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine-based combination therapies, we explored the impact of genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 activity on dose-adjusted clozapine concentrations and symptom severity, with and without correction for inhibitors and inducers of these enzymes. Uncorrected activity scores were not associated with dose-adjusted clozapine concentrations or symptom severity. CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activity scores corrected for known inducers (i.e., smoking) and inhibitors (e.g., concomitant medications) were associated with dose-adjusted clozapine levels and in the case of CYP1A2, symptom severity. However, smoking status and certain inhibitors of clozapine metabolism (i.e., esomeprazole) explained significantly more variance in dose-adjusted clozapine levels relative to corrected activity scores. These findings highlight the clinical importance of nongenetic factors (smoking, concomitant medications) and suggest that the added utility of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 activity scores to guide clozapine dosing is currently limited.

Cognitive reserve attenuates age-related cognitive decline in the context of putatively accelerated brain ageing in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: In schizophrenia, relative stability in the magnitude of cognitive deficits across age and illness duration is inconsistent with the evidence of accelerated deterioration in brain regions known to support these functions. These discrepant brain-cognition outcomes may be explained by variability in cognitive reserve (CR), which in neurological disorders has been shown to buffer against brain pathology and minimize its impact on cognitive or clinical indicators of illness. METHODS: Age-related change in fluid reasoning, working memory and frontal brain volume, area and thickness were mapped using regression analysis in 214 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 168 healthy controls. In patients, these changes were modelled as a function of CR. RESULTS: Patients showed exaggerated age-related decline in brain structure, but not fluid reasoning compared to controls. In the patient group, no moderation of age-related brain structural change by CR was evident. However, age-related cognitive change was moderated by CR, such that only patients with low CR showed evidence of exaggerated fluid reasoning decline that paralleled the exaggerated age-related deterioration of underpinning brain structures seen in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In schizophrenia-spectrum illness, CR may negate ageing effects on fluid reasoning by buffering against pathologically exaggerated structural brain deterioration through some form of compensation. CR may represent an important modifier that could explain inconsistencies in brain structure - cognition outcomes in the extant literature.

Commercial Pharmacogenetic Tests in Psychiatry: Do they Facilitate the Implementation of Pharmacogenetic Dosing Guidelines?

INTRODUCTION: Expert groups have created dosing guidelines to facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetic knowledge into clinical practice and commercial pharmacogenetic tests are becoming increasingly accessible. However, the extent to which these commercial tests facilitate the implementation of dosing guidelines is not clear. METHODS: Gene-drug pairs included on 22 commercial pharmacogenetic test panels were extracted and cross-referenced with the 74 gene-drug pairs with dosing guidelines in the Pharmacogenetics Knowledgebase, with particular attention given to the 28 gene-drug pairs relevant to psychiatry. RESULTS: On average, 70% of the 28 gene-drug pairs most relevant to psychiatry were covered by the examined tests. Six gene-drug pairs (CYP2D6-venlafaxine, CYP2D6-paroxetine, CYP2D6-amitriptyline, CYP2C19-sertraline, CYP2C19-citalopram, CYP2C19-amitriptyline) were included by all tests. Gene-drug pairs included on less than half of the test panels included HLA-B-phenytoin (14%), HLA-A-carbamazepine (24%), HLA-B-carbamazepine (29%), and CYP2D6-zuclopenthixol (43%). DISCUSSION: Most commercial pharmacogenetic tests we examined are well-equipped to facilitate implementation of the majority of dosing guidelines relevant to psychiatry but are limited in their ability to facilitate implementation of the full spectrum of dosing guidelines currently available.

Parenting × Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress?

It is unclear how individual differences in parenting and brain development interact to influence adolescent mental health outcomes. This study examined interactions between structural brain development and observed maternal parenting behavior in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and psychological well-being. Whether findings supported diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility frameworks was tested. Participants completed observed interactions with their mothers during early adolescence (age 13), and the frequency of positive and aggressive maternal behavior were coded. Adolescents also completed structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at three time points: mean ages 13, 17, and 19. Regression models analyzed interactions between maternal behavior and longitudinal brain development in the prediction of late adolescent (age 19) outcomes. Indices designed to distinguish between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility effects were employed. Results supported differential susceptibility: less thinning of frontal regions was associated with higher well-being in the context of low levels of aggressive maternal behavior, and lower well-being in the context of high levels of aggressive maternal behavior. Findings suggest that reduced frontal cortical thinning during adolescence may underlie increased sensitivity to maternal aggressive behavior for better and worse and highlight the importance of investigating biological vulnerability versus susceptibility.