Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Here we trained an automatic phenotype assessment tool to recognize syndromic ears in two syndromes in fetuses-=CHARGE and Mandibulo-Facial Dysostosis Guion Almeida type (MFDGA)-versus controls. METHOD: We trained an automatic model on all profile pictures of children diagnosed with genetically confirmed MFDGA and CHARGE syndromes, and a cohort of control patients, collected from 1981 to 2023 in Necker Hospital (Paris) with a visible external ear. The model consisted in extracting landmarks from photographs of external ears, in applying geometric morphometry methods, and in a classification step using machine learning. The approach was then tested on photographs of two groups of fetuses: controls and fetuses with CHARGE and MFDGA syndromes. RESULTS: The training set contained a total of 1489 ear photographs from 526 children. The validation set contained a total of 51 ear photographs from 51 fetuses. The overall accuracy was 72.6% (58.3%-84.1%, p < 0.001), and 76.4%, 74.9%, and 86.2% respectively for CHARGE, control and MFDGA fetuses. The area under the curves were 86.8%, 87.5%, and 90.3% respectively for CHARGE, controls, and MFDGA fetuses. CONCLUSION: We report the first automatic fetal ear phenotyping model, with satisfactory classification performances. Further validations are required before using this approach as a diagnostic tool.

2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2330, 2024 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282012

ABSTRACT

The field of dysmorphology has been changed by the use Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the development of Next Generation Phenotyping (NGP). The aim of this study was to propose a new NGP model for predicting KS (Kabuki Syndrome) on 2D facial photographs and distinguish KS1 (KS type 1, KMT2D-related) from KS2 (KS type 2, KDM6A-related). We included retrospectively and prospectively, from 1998 to 2023, all frontal and lateral pictures of patients with a molecular confirmation of KS. After automatic preprocessing, we extracted geometric and textural features. After incorporation of age, gender, and ethnicity, we used XGboost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), a supervised machine learning classifier. The model was tested on an independent validation set. Finally, we compared the performances of our model with DeepGestalt (Face2Gene). The study included 1448 frontal and lateral facial photographs from 6 centers, corresponding to 634 patients (527 controls, 107 KS); 82 (78%) of KS patients had a variation in the KMT2D gene (KS1) and 23 (22%) in the KDM6A gene (KS2). We were able to distinguish KS from controls in the independent validation group with an accuracy of 95.8% (78.9-99.9%, p < 0.001) and distinguish KS1 from KS2 with an empirical Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.805 (0.729-0.880, p < 0.001). We report an automatic detection model for KS with high performances (AUC 0.993 and accuracy 95.8%). We were able to distinguish patients with KS1 from KS2, with an AUC of 0.805. These results outperform the current commercial AI-based solutions and expert clinicians.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple , Artificial Intelligence , Face/abnormalities , Hematologic Diseases , Vestibular Diseases , Humans , Mutation , Retrospective Studies , Hematologic Diseases/diagnosis , Hematologic Diseases/genetics , Phenotype , Histone Demethylases/genetics , Genotype
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL