Patient and specimen identification in a tertiary care pediatric hospital: Barcodes do not scan themselves.

BACKGROUND: Despite the safety improvements linked to the use of barcodes for patient and specimen identification, patient misidentification remains a leading cause of transfusion-associated reactions including fatalities. A wealth of evidence supports the use of barcodes in general, but there is less published evidence of real-world barcode compliance. This project investigates barcode scanning compliance for patient and specimen identification at a tertiary care pediatric/maternity hospital. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Transfusion laboratory specimen collection noncompliance events between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019 were retrieved from the hospital laboratory information system. Data were analyzed including stratification of collections by collector role and collection event. A survey of blood collectors was conducted. RESULTS: Collection compliance for 6285 blood typing specimens was evaluated. Full barcode scanning identification of both patient and specimen was utilized in only 33.6% of total collections. The remaining two thirds of collections were overridden by the blood collector: no barcode scanning occurred in 31.3%, while the specimen accession label was scanned but not the patient armband in 32.3% of total collections. There were significant differences between phlebotomists and nurses, with more phlebotomists performing the full scanning and specimen scanning only, while more nurses obtained specimens without patient or specimen scanning (p < .001). Blood collectors identified hardware challenges and training gaps as key contributors to barcode noncompliance. DISCUSSION: Our study highlights an instance of poor barcode scanning compliance for patient and specimen identification. We formulated improvement strategies and launched a quality improvement project to address factors influencing noncompliance.

Factors influencing women's perceptions of choice and control during pregnancy and birth: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Women across the world value choice and control throughout their maternity care experiences. In response to this health policy and frameworks are adapting and developing. The concepts of choice and control are extrinsically complex and open to interpretation by healthcare professionals and service users, with the two not necessarily aligning. Depending on a number of factors, women's experiences of choice and control within the same maternity care system may be very different. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing women's perceptions of choice and control during pregnancy and birth in Ireland. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using an adapted version of the UK national maternity experience survey (National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit). During March - July 2017, a sample of 1277 women were recruited from the postnatal wards of three maternity units and a tertiary maternity hospital. Poisson regression was used to assess the association between twelve factors and a series of measures of the women's perception of choice and control. RESULTS: Most women reported not having choice in the model or location of their maternity care but most reported being involved enough in decision-making, especially during birth. Women who availed of private maternity care reported higher levels of choice and control than those who availed of public maternity care. This factor was the most influential factor on almost all choice and control measures. CONCLUSION: Most women experiencing maternity care in Ireland report not having choice in the model and location of care. These are core elements of the Irish maternity strategy and significant investment will be required if improved choice is to be provided. Availing of private maternity care has the strongest influence on a woman's perceived choice and control but many women cannot afford this type of care, nor may they want this model of care.

The experiences of mothers with preterm infants within the first-year post discharge from NICU: social support, attachment and level of depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: The estimated global premature birth rate for 2014 was 10.6%, equating to an estimate of 14.84 million live premature births. The experience of premature birth does not impact solely on the infant and mother as individuals but occurs in the context of a critical point in time when they are developing a relationship with one another. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between social support, mother to infant attachment, and depressive symptoms of mothers with preterm infants within the first 12 months' post discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). METHODS: A correlational cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected using a four-part online survey which included the Perinatal Social Support Questionnaire (PICSS), Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (MPAS) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) with mothers of preterm infants (n = 140). RESULTS: The prevalence of postnatal depression was 37.9% (95% CI: 29.8 to 46.4%). In univariable analyses, history of depression (p = 0.005), aged 35-39 years (p = 0.006), no formal social support (p = 0.040), less informal social supports (p = 0.018), lower overall maternal attachment (p < 0.001) and lower overall functional social support (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher level of depressive symptoms. Lower scores on two of the maternal attachment subscales (quality of attachment and absence of hostility) and all four of the functional social support subscales were significantly associated with a higher level of depressive symptoms (p < 0.001 for all). In the multivariable analysis, prior history of depression (p = 0.028), lower score of maternal attachment (p < 0.001) and lower emotional functional social support (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a higher level of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Women who experience a premature birth, have a prior history of depression, poor infant attachment and poor emotional social support have a higher level of depressive symptoms. Results emphasise the need for professionals to encourage mobilisation of maternal formal and informal social supports. It is important to intervene early to address maternal emotional well-being and enhance the developing mother-preterm infant relationship.

Signals of global symmetry are important for abnormality detection in mammograms.

Purpose: Expert radiologists can detect the "gist of abnormal" in bilateral mammograms even three years prior to onset of cancer. However, their performance decreases if both breasts are not from the same woman, suggesting the ability to detect the abnormality is partly dependent on a global signal present across the two breasts. We aim to detect this implicitly perceived "symmetry" signal by examining its effect on a pre-trained mammography model. Approach: A deep neural network (DNN) with four mammogram view inputs was developed to predict whether the mammograms come from one woman, or two different women as the first step in investigating the symmetry signal. Mammograms were balanced by size, age, density, and machine type. We then evaluated a cancer detection DNN's performance on mammograms from the same and different women. Finally, we used textural analysis methods to further explain the symmetry signal. Results: The developed DNN can detect whether a set of mammograms come from the same or different woman with a base accuracy of 61%. Indeed, a DNN shown mammograms swapped either contralateral or abnormal with a normal mammogram from another woman, resulted in performance decreases. Findings indicate that abnormalities induce a disruption in global mammogram structure resulting in the break in the critical symmetry signal. Conclusion: The global symmetry signal is a textural signal embedded in the parenchyma of bilateral mammograms, which can be extracted. The presence of abnormalities alters textural similarities between the left and right breasts and contributes to the "medical gist signal."

Breastfeeding skills training for health care professionals: A systematic review.

Background: Breastfeeding is a public health issue and the response to the low rates in the Global North needs to be multi-faceted. Within this context healthcare professionals have an important role to play in the overall multi-dimensional promotion and support of breastfeeding. As a learned skill, there is a fundamental need to improve breastfeeding skills amongst healthcare professionals. Aim: To identify, analyse and evaluate studies on breastfeeding skills education for health care professionals. Methods: The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies from June 2006 to July 2021 that examined the provision of breastfeeding skills-based education for qualified or student healthcare professionals were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and risk of bias independently assessed by two reviewers. Findings: Of 5,497 papers originally identified, 11 were included in the review. Nine studies were interventional, whilst two were observational. Participants included paediatric residents, midwives, nurses, care co-ordinators and other health care staff. Training took place in classrooms, practical workshops, or clinical settings. Observational or experiential teaching components in combination with theoretical knowledge were found to produce better outcomes than classroom-based interventions. However, the findings need to be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias regarding study design-specific criteria. Discussion: There is both a paucity of studies, and from those available, a lack of quality in terms of educational interventions specifically offering skills-based training to healthcare professionals. Breastfeeding education needs to incorporate practical breastfeeding skills not just theoretical training. Lack of standardisation currently exists across guiding frameworks, course content, educator qualification and assessment strategies which impedes the optimisation of breastfeeding education and subsequent support for mothers. Serious or high risk of bias was identified in all but one of the studies included in the review. Conclusion: There is a need for high quality research evidence to optimise the design and delivery of skills-based breastfeeding education for healthcare professionals. This would have the potential to contribute to the broad suite of interventions necessary to improve support for breastfeeding.