[Inpatient psychotherapy of depressive disorders: options and challenges]. / Stationäre Psychotherapie depressiver Störungen: Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen.

BACKGROUND: The psychotherapy of depressive disorders has become established as a central component of inpatient treatment in psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals and furthermore constitutes an important component of the residency training in Germany; however, the number of studies examining the effectiveness and efficacy is limited. METHODS: This narrative review summarizes the current state of research on inpatient psychotherapy for depressive disorders. The results of meta-analyses as well as practice-based observational studies from routine treatment in Germany, disorder-specific special programs, and side effects of inpatient psychotherapy are summarized. RESULTS: The number of studies on the efficacy of inpatient psychotherapy of depressive disorders is overall low. The main finding of the largest recent meta-analysis indicates that psychotherapy in clinics and other facilities has a significant effect on depressive symptoms, with small to moderate effect sizes in randomized controlled studies. The effects are mostly maintained even after 9-15 months follow-up. An observational study from routine treatment with a very large sample size reported large pre-post and pre-follow-up effect sizes. It additionally revealed factors that appear to be difficult to change during inpatient psychotherapy, negatively affect treatment success and could be specifically addressed in future trials. Special programs, such as inpatient Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) and the inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) indicate acceptance and efficacy/effectiveness in an initial randomized controlled (IPT) study and in observational (CBASP) studies. Side effects of inpatient psychotherapy were reported by 60-94% of patients with depressive disorders, whereby a perceived dependence on the therapist or the therapeutic setting was identified as a frequent side effect. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results of the narrative review reveal that inpatient psychotherapy appears to be meaningful and effective for many patients with depressive disorders. Specific side effects, cost-effectiveness, and the question of differential indications (what works for whom?) should be further investigated.

What if we wait? Using synthetic waiting lists to estimate treatment effects in routine outcome data.

Objective: Due to the lack of randomization, pre-post routine outcome data precludes causal conclusions. We propose the "synthetic waiting list" (SWL) control group to overcome this limitation.Method: First, a step-by-step introduction illustrates this novel approach. Then, this approach is demonstrated using an empirical example with data from an outpatient cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) clinic (N = 139). We trained an ensemble machine learning model ("Super Learner") on a data set of patients waiting for treatment (N = 311) to make counterfactual predictions of symptom change during this hypothetical period.Results: The between-group treatment effect was estimated to be d = 0.42. Of the patients who received CBT, 43.88% achieved reliable and clinically significant change, while this probability was estimated to be 14.54% in the SWL group. Counterfactual estimates suggest a clear net benefit of psychotherapy for 41% of patients. In 32%, the benefit was unclear, and 27% would have improved similarly without receiving CBT.Conclusions: The SWL is a viable new approach that provides between-group outcome estimates similar to those reported in the literature comparing psychotherapy with high-intensity control interventions. It holds the potential to mitigate common limitations of routine outcome data analysis.

Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60.4% female) having received evidence-based psychotherapy based on the cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in five German psychotherapeutic clinics was analyzed. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for several outcome variables to determine effectiveness. Predictor analyses were performed on a subsample (N = 514; M = 34.3 years, SD = 12.2; 60.3% female). For this purpose, the number of potential predictors was reduced using factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis to identify robust predictors. Effect sizes of various outcome variables could be classified as large (g = 1.34 of OCD-symptom change). Predictors of changes in OCD and depressive symptoms were symptom severity at admission and general psychopathological distress. In addition, patients with higher social support and more washing compulsions benefited more from treatment. Subgroup analyses showed a distinct predictor profile of changes in compulsions and obsessions. The results indicate that an evidence-based psychotherapy program for OCD can be effectively implemented in routine inpatient care. In addition to well-established predictors, social support, and washing compulsions in particular were identified as important positive predictors. Specific predictor profiles for changes in obsessions and compulsions are discussed.

Unraveling the comorbidity of depression and anxiety in a large inpatient sample: Network analysis to examine bridge symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities in mental disorders are often understood by assuming a common cause. The network theory of mental disorders offers an alternative to this assumption by understanding comorbidities as mutually reinforced problems. In this study, we used network analysis to examine bridge symptoms between anxiety and depression in a large sample. METHOD: Using data from a sample of patients diagnosed with both depression and an anxiety disorder before and after inpatient treatment (N = 5,614, mean age: 42.24, 63.59% female, average treatment duration: 48.12 days), network models of depression and anxiety symptoms are estimated. Topology, the centrality of nodes, stability, and changes in network structure are analyzed. Symptoms that drive comorbidity are determined by bridge node analysis. As an alternative to network communities based on categorical diagnosis, we performed a community analysis and propose empirically derived symptom subsets. RESULTS: The obtained network models are highly stable. Sad mood and the inability to control worry are the most central. Psychomotor agitation or retardation is the strongest bridge node between anxiety and depression, followed by concentration problems and restlessness. Changes in appetite and suicidality were unique to depression. Community analysis revealed four symptom groups. CONCLUSION: The estimated network structure of depression and anxiety symptoms proves to be highly accurate. Results indicate that some symptoms are considerably more influential than others and that only a small number of predominantly physical symptoms are strong candidates for explaining comorbidity. Future studies should include physiological measures in network models to provide a more accurate understanding.

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy for inpatients with persistent depressive disorder: a naturalistic trial on a general acute psychiatric unit.

The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) was originally developed for outpatients with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). We adapted CBASP as inpatient treatment on a general acute psychiatric ward and evaluated its outcome and feasibility. Sixty PDD patients received a 12-week multidisciplinary CBASP program. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD24) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) served as primary and secondary outcome measures. Childhood maltreatment at baseline and change in interpersonal distress from pre to post were investigated as predictors of treatment outcome. A 6-month follow-up assessment was conducted. Feasibility was assessed through dropouts and satisfaction with the program. Fifty patients completed the program (16.7% dropouts). An ANOVA with three repeated measurements (pre, post, FU) in the ITT sample revealed a main effect of time. For the primary outcome, depressive symptoms decreased from pre (28.3) to post (11.5, response rate: 72.7%, d = 1.8), and from pre to FU (13.9, d = 1.2). Four patients relapsed. The secondary outcome confirmed the results; however, the response rate was lower (BDI-II: 31.7%, pre to post: d = 0.8, pre to FU: d = 0.3), and ten patients relapsed at FU. Reduction in interpersonal distress, but not childhood maltreatment, predicted BDI-II response. Key limitations of this naturalistic open trial are the lack of a comparison group and non-blinded HAMD24 ratings. Inpatient CBASP for PDD appears feasible on a general acute psychiatric ward with effect sizes comparable to specialized psychotherapy wards and to the outpatient setting.

Predictors of outcome during inpatient psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: a single-treatment, multi-site, practice-based study.

Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the effectiveness of a routine clinical care treatment and to identify predictors of treatment outcome in PTSD inpatients. Methods: A routinely collected data set of 612 PTSD inpatients (M = 42.3 years [SD = 11.6], 75.7% female) having received trauma-focused psychotherapy was analyzed. Primary outcome was the clinical symptom severity change score, secondary outcomes were assessed using functional, anxiety, and depression change scores. Hedges g-corrected pre-post effect sizes (ES) were computed for all outcomes. Elastic net regulation as a data-driven, stability-based machine-learning approach was used to build stable clinical prediction models. Results: Hedges g ES indicated medium to large effects on all outcomes. The results of the predictor analyses suggested that a combined predictor model with sociodemographic, clinical, and psychometric variables contribute to predicting different treatment outcomes. Across the clinical and functional outcome, psychoticism, total number of diagnoses, and bronchial asthma consistently showed a stable negative predictive relationship to treatment outcome. Conclusion: Trauma-focused psychotherapy could effectively be implemented in a routine inpatient setting. Some important prognostic variables could be identified. If the proposed models of predictors are replicated, they may help personalize treatment for patients receiving routine clinical care.

Umsetzbarkeit und Erleben: Erste Erfahrungen mit einer Kurzform der anwendungsorientierten Parcoursprüfung im MSc-Studiengang Psychologie.

EINLEITUNG: Voraussetzung für die Approbation im Rahmen der neuen Psychotherapeutenausbildung ist u.a. das Bestehen einer anwendungsorientierten Parcoursprüfung. Da diese Prüfung von Lehrenden und Studierenden als Herausforderung angesehen wird, wurde eine Kurzform der Parcoursprüfung im Rahmen einer Modulprüfung des MSc-Studiengangs Psychologie eingeführt und evaluiert. METHODE: Für die 15-minütige Parcoursprüfung wurden 9 Kompe-tenzbereiche basierend auf praxisorientierten Psychotherapieseminaren entwickelt, von denen 2 jeweils geprüft wurden. Zur Standardisierung der Benotung wurde ein Bewertungsbogen konzipiert. Eine Mitarbeiterin erhielt ein Training als Simulationspatientin. Für die Evaluation wurde ein Fragebogen entwickelt, welcher u.a. die Umsetzbarkeit und das subjektive Erleben dieses Prüfungsformats aus der Sicht der an der Prüfung beteiligten Personen erfasst. ERGEBNISSE: 14 Prüfungskandidierende ließen sich durch 3 Prüfende prüfen. Die Gesamtdurchschnittsnote betrug 1,19 (Bereich: 1,0-2,3). Die Auswertung der Fragebögen zeigte, dass alle drei Gruppen die Prüfung als geeignet, die praktischen Fertigkeiten abzubilden, objektiv und praxisnah empfanden. Von den Prüfungskandidierenden gaben 50% an, dass die Prüfung sie gestresst habe, während die Simulationspatientin sich nie und die Prüfenden sich gar nicht (78%) oder kaum (22%) gestresst fühlten. DISKUSSION: Die Ergebnisse dieser Pilotstudie weisen auf eine gute Umsetzbarkeit der Parcoursprüfung hin, wenngleich sie auch mit Stress für die Prüfungskandidierenden verbunden war. Die Pilotstudie wird limitiert durch eine kleine und wahrscheinlich verzerrte Stichprobe (motivierte Studierende) ohne Vergleichsgruppe. Abschließend werden die Vor- und Nachteile dieses Prüfungsmodells kritisch diskutiert.

INTRODUCTION: One of the requirements for the approbation as part of the new psychotherapist studies is, among other things, passing an objective structured clinical ex-amination (OSCE) involving simulating patients. Since teachers and students regard this new format as a challenge, a short form of the OSCE was implemented in the module examination of the current master's degree in psychology and evaluated by a pilot study. METHOD: For the 15-min course examination, 9 areas of competences were developed based on practice-oriented psychotherapy seminars, 2 of which were tested. In order to standardize the grading, a standardized evaluation form was developed. A colleague received training to simulate a patient. For evaluation, a questionnaire was conceptualized which measured, among other things, the feasibility and subjective experiences of and during the new format as rated by the persons involved in the exam. RESULTS: 14 examination candidates chose to be examined in this new format by 3 auditors. The overall averaged grade was 1.19 (range: 1.0­3). The evaluation of the questionnaire showed that all three groups rated the exam to be suitable for displaying practical skills, objective and close to the practical application. Of the examination candidates, 50% reported feelings of stress, while the simulating patient never and the auditors did not at all (78%) or rarely felt stressed (22%) during the different examinations. DISCUSSION: Overall, the results of this pilot study indicate a good feasibility of the OSCE, although the examination candidates rated it to be stressful at the same time. The pilot study is limited by the small and probably biased sample (motivated students) without a comparison group. To conclude, pros and cons of this examination format will be critically discussed.

Mental Pain as a Transdiagnostic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) refer to any report coming directly from patients about how they function or feel in relation to a health condition or its therapy. PROs have been applied in medicine for the assessment of the impact of clinical phenomena. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing physical pain in adults have been developed and used in clinical trials. However, insufficient attention has been dedicated to the assessment of mental pain. The aim of this paper is to outline the implications that assessment of mental pain may entail in psychiatry and medicine, with particular reference to a clinimetric index. A simple 10-item self-rating questionnaire, the Mental Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), encompasses the specific clinical features of mental pain and shows good clinimetric properties (i.e., sensitivity, discriminant and incremental validity). The preliminary data suggest that the MPQ may qualify as a PRO measure to be included in clinical trials. Assessment of mental pain may have important clinical implications in intervention research, both in psychopharmacology and psychotherapy. The transdiagnostic features of mental pain are supported by its association with a number of psychiatric disorders, such as depression, anxiety, eating disorders, as well as borderline personality disorder. Further, addressing mental pain may be an important pathway to prevent and diminish the opioid epidemic. The data summarized here indicate that mental pain can be incorporated into current psychiatric assessment and included as a PRO measure in treatment outcome studies.

[Difficult situations in psychotherapy and how therapists deal with them]. / Schwierige Situationen in der Psychotherapie und wie Therapeuten mit ihnen umgehen.

Difficult situations in psychotherapy and how therapists deal with them Objectives: In theory and research, it is assumed that therapeutic competences are especially relevant in difficult situations. In the present study, we collected and categorized situations that psychotherapists subjectively evaluated as difficult. Additionally, we inspected therapists' reactions to these situations and considered correlations between situations and reactions. Methods: In an online-survey, 101 therapists described difficult situations and their corresponding reactions. The reports were analyzed by qualitative content analysis (Mayring 2015) and resulted in two category systems for the difficult situations and the reactions. Results: Difficult situations reached from everyday conflicts to extreme situations (e. g. threats). The most frequent difficult situations were in context of therapeutic frame, aspects of disorder, and critics, demands, accusations of patients. The most frequent reactions concerned therapeutic frame, external help and supportive interventions. We found significant correlations between difficult situations due to aspects of disorder and asking for external help. Conclusions: Although categories were sometimes difficult to isolate and few cognitive behavioral therapists participated, the collection of difficult situations can be of help for therapists and their training.

Methodological Recommendations for Trials of Psychological Interventions.

Recent years have seen major developments in psychotherapy research that suggest the need to address critical methodological issues. These recommendations, developed by an international group of researchers, do not replace those for randomized controlled trials, but rather supplement strategies that need to be taken into account when considering psychological treatments. The limitations of traditional taxonomy and assessment methods are outlined, with suggestions for consideration of staging methods. Active psychotherapy control groups are recommended, and adaptive and dismantling study designs offer important opportunities. The treatments that are used, and particularly their specific ingredients, need to be described in detail for both the experimental and the control groups. Assessment should be performed blind before and after treatment and at long-term follow-up. A combination of observer- and self-rated measures is recommended. Side effects of psychotherapy should be evaluated using appropriate methods. Finally, the number of participants who deteriorate after treatment should be noted according to the methods that were used to define response or remission.

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy as group psychotherapy for chronically depressed inpatients: a naturalistic multicenter feasibility trial.

The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is a relatively new approach in the treatment of chronic depression (CD). Adapted as group psychotherapy for inpatients, CBASP is attracting increasing attention. In this naturalistic multicenter trial, we investigated its feasibility after 10 sessions of CBASP group therapy over a treatment time of at least 5 to a maximum of 10 weeks. Treatment outcome was additionally assessed. Across four centers, 116 inpatients with CD (DSM-IV-TR) attended CBASP group psychotherapy. Feasibility was focused on acceptance, and evaluated for patients and therapists after five (t1) and ten sessions (t2) of group psychotherapy. Observer- and self-rating scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 items, HDRS24; Beck Depression Inventory-II, BDI-II; World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment, WHOQOL-BREF) were applied before group psychotherapy (t0) and at t2. Dropouts were low (10.3%). Patients' evaluation improved significantly from t1 to t2 with a medium effect size (d = 0.60). Most of the patients stated that the group had enriched their treatment (75.3%), that the size (74.3%) and duration (72.5%) were 'optimal' and 37.3% wished for a higher frequency. Patients gave CBASP group psychotherapy an overall grade of 2 ('good'). Therapists' evaluation was positive throughout, except for size of the group. Outcome scores of HDRS24, BDI-II, and WHOQOL-BREF were significantly reduced from t0 to t2 with medium to large effect sizes (d = 1.48; d = 1.11; d = 0.67). In this naturalistic open-label trial, CBASP, when applied as inpatient group psychotherapy, was well accepted by patients and therapists. The results point towards a clinically meaningful effect of inpatient treatment with CBASP group psychotherapy on depression and quality of life. Other potential factors that could have promoted symptom change were discussed. A future controlled study could investigate the safety and efficacy of CBASP group psychotherapy for inpatients.

PsychotherapyPlus: augmentation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depressive disorder-study design and methodology of a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders worldwide. About 20-30% of patients do not respond to the standard psychopharmacological and/or psychotherapeutic interventions. Mounting evidence from neuroimaging studies in MDD patients reveal altered activation patterns in lateral prefrontal brain areas. Successful cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is associated with a recovery of these neural alterations. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is capable of influencing prefrontal cortex activity and cognitive functions such as working memory and emotion regulation. Thus, a clinical trial investigating the effects of an antidepressant intervention combining CBT with tDCS seems promising. The present study investigates the antidepressant efficacy of a combined CBT-tDCS intervention as compared to CBT with sham-tDCS or CBT alone. A total of 192 patients (age range 20-65 years) with MDD (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Score ≥ 15, 21-item version) will be recruited at four study sites across Germany (Berlin, Munich, Tuebingen, and Freiburg) and randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment arms: (1) CBT + active tDCS; (2) CBT + sham-tDCS; and (3) CBT alone. All participants will attend a 6-week psychotherapeutic intervention comprising 12 sessions of CBT each lasting 100 min in a closed group setting. tDCS will be applied simultaneously with CBT. Active tDCS includes stimulation with an intensity of 2 mA for 30 min with the anode placed over F3 and the cathode over F4 according to the EEG 10-20 system, if assigned. The primary outcome measure is the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to 6, 18, and 30 weeks after the first session. Participants also undergo pre- and post-treatment neuropsychological testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess changes in prefrontal functioning and connectivity. The study investigates whether CBT can be augmented by non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as tDCS in the treatment of MDD. It is designed as a proof-of-principle trial for the combined tDCS-CBT treatment, but also allows the investigation of the neurobiological underpinnings of the interaction between both interventions in MDD. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02633449.

[Definition and Decision-Making in the Determination and Detection of Side Effects of Psychotherapy]. / Definition und Entscheidungsschritte in der Bestimmung und Erfassung von Nebenwirkungen von Psychotherapie.

There is no generally accepted definition of side effects, which causes problems in research and clinical practice. Not even the distinction between main and side effects is always clear. Several judgments are needed in the assessment of side effects. First, it must be decided where to look for unwanted events. Events are defined by the temporal contingency with the treatment. Second, it must be made a judgement whether it is an unwanted or wanted event. Everything is unwanted, which would be problematic, if it would be possible to do without it. Thirdly, a causal relationship with the treatment must be made plausible. Fourthly, a decision must be made that the treatment has been adequate and not malpractice or other unethical behavior. Side effects can be defined as unwanted consequences of correct treatment. The relevance of side effects is depending on severity and duration.

[CBASP as an Inpatient Concept for Treatment-Resistant Chronic Depression: A Pilot Study of the Relationship between Adverse Effects and Treatment Outcome]. / CBASP als stationäres Behandlungskonzept der therapieresistenten chronischen Depression: Eine Pilotstudie zum Zusammenhang von Nebenwirkungen und Therapieerfolg.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient psychotherapy might trigger adverse effects among others due to short but intensive treatment. Thus, in this pilot study, certain adverse effects of the multidisciplinary inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) for treatment-resistant chronically depressed patients as well as their relationship to treatment outcome (response-, remission-, and relapse-rates) are examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 patients with treatment-resistant and chronic depression completed the structured 12-weeks inpatient treatment program. Adverse effects were assessed by 1) deterioration of depressive symptoms (measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HDRS) at discharge and 2) a self-report questionnaire measuring Adverse Effects of Inpatient Psychotherapy (ADEFIP), which were filled out 6 to 12 months after discharge by the patients. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 84% could be classified as responder, of whom 44% fulfilled the remission criterion. 16% were Non-Responder. According to HDRS, none of the patients showed objective deterioration of the depressive symptoms. Six months after discharge, 40% of the responders suffered from relapse. Concerning the ADEFIP, 66% of the patients reported transient deterioration of symptoms. These patients were less likely to achieve remission. Over 50% reported interpersonal conflicts with treatment team members or other patients without any relation to outcome. Finally, more than half of the patients reported significant changes in social relationships after discharge. These patients were less likely to relapse. Overall, 94% of the patients reported at least one of the in this study assessed adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations, this pilot study suggests that the CBASP inpatient program could indeed cause adverse effects. However, only subjective transient deterioration appeared to have a negative impact on the individual treatment outcome in the short-term. Results encourage further research concerning adverse treatment effects in the context of short- and long-term treatment outcome investigating how relevant adverse effects are.

[Overcoming treatment resistance in chronic depression : The role of inpatient psychotherapy]. / Überwindung der Therapieresistenz bei chronischer Depression : Die Bedeutung der stationären Psychotherapie.

BACKGROUND: Chronic depression poses a particular challenge for the psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care system. Owing to high rates of psychiatric comorbidities and multiple pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment resistance, novel treatment strategies are urgently required. AIM: In this article, we describe the clinical characteristics of chronic and treatment-resistant depression and review the pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment options currently available. We focus on the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), the first specific psychotherapy approach to chronic depression. Finally, we discuss the role of psychotherapeutic inpatient programs and stepped care concepts in chronic and treatment-resistant depression.

Overcoming treatment resistance in chronic depression: a pilot study on outcome and feasibility of the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy as an inpatient treatment program.

BACKGROUND: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), initially developed as an outpatient treatment for chronic depression (CD), has been adapted as a multidisciplinary 12-week inpatient program for CD. METHODS: Seventy inpatients with CD and treatment resistance were included in a noncontrolled trial. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale served as the primary outcome measure. Prospective naturalistic follow-up assessments were conducted 6 and 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: Dropout rate was 7.1%; 90.4% perceived the program as helpful. Pre-post comparisons yielded strong effect sizes; 75.7% of the intention-to-treat sample responded, and 40.0% remitted. Nonremission was associated with experiencing temporary deterioration of symptoms during treatment. After 6 months 75.0% and after 12 months 48.0% of patients sustained response. CONCLUSIONS: The CBASP program appears as a feasible acute treatment for treatment-resistant CD inpatients with promising outcome. However, the continuation of treatment after discharge should be optimized especially for patients with subjective deterioration during treatment.

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Escitalopram in Chronic Major Depression.

BACKGROUND: A specific psychotherapy for chronic depression, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), was compared to escitalopram (ESC). METHODS: Sixty patients with chronic major depression were randomized to 'CBASP' (22 sessions) or 'ESC plus clinical management' (ESC/CM) at two treatment sites. The primary outcome measure was the score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after 8 weeks of acute treatment assessed by blinded raters. In the case of nonimprovement (<20% reduction in the MADRS score), the other condition was augmented for the following 20 weeks of extended treatment. Secondary end points were, among others, depressive symptoms, remission (MADRS score of ≤9) and response rates (reduction of MADRS score of ≥50%) 28 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: An intent-to-treat analysis revealed that clinician-rated depression scores decreased significantly after 8 and 28 weeks with no significant differences between the groups. The response rates after 28 weeks of treatment were high (CBASP: 68.4%, ESC/CM: 60.0%), and the remission rates were moderate (CBASP: 36.8%, ESC/CM: 50.0%) with neither group being superior. Nonimprovers to the initial treatment caught up with the initial improvers in terms of depression scores and response and remission rates by the end of the treatment after being augmented with the respective other condition. CONCLUSIONS: CBASP and ESC/CM appear to be equally effective treatment options for chronically depressed outpatients. For nonimprovers to the initial treatment, it is efficacious to augment with medication in the case of nonresponse to CBASP and vice versa.