Utility of GLI1 RNA Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization in Distinguishing Basal Cell Carcinoma From Histopathologic Mimics.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy and is a leading cause of nonmelanoma skin cancer-related morbidity. BCC has several histologic mimics which may have treatment and prognostic implications. Furthermore, BCC may show alternative differentiation toward a variety of cutaneous structures. The vast majority of BCCs harbor mutations in the hedgehog signaling pathway, resulting in increased expression of the GLI family of transcription factors. GLI1 immunohistochemistry has been shown to discriminate between several tumor types but demonstrates high background signal and lack of specificity. In this study, we evaluated the utility of GLI1 RNA chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) as a novel method of distinguishing between BCC and other epithelial neoplasms. Expression of GLI1 by RNA CISH was retrospectively evaluated in a total of 220 cases, including 60 BCCs, 37 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) including conventional, basaloid, and human papillomavirus infection (HPV)-associated tumors, 16 sebaceous neoplasms, 10 Merkel cell carcinomas, 58 benign follicular tumors, and 39 ductal tumors. The threshold for positivity was determined to be greater than or equal to 3 GLI1 signals in at least 50% of tumor cells. Positive GLI1 expression was identified in 57/60 BCCs, including metastatic BCC, collision lesions with SCC, and BCCs with squamous, ductal, or clear cell differentiation or with other unusual features compared to 1/37 SCCs, 0/11 sebaceous carcinomas, 0/5 sebaceomas, 1/10 Merkel cell carcinomas, 0/39 ductal tumors, and 28/58 follicular tumors. With careful evaluation, GLI1 RNA CISH is highly sensitive (95%) and specific (98%) in distinguishing between BCC and nonfollicular epithelial neoplasms. However, GLI1 CISH is not specific for distinguishing BCC from most benign follicular tumors. Overall, detection of GLI1 RNA by CISH may be a useful tool for precise classification of histologically challenging basaloid tumors, particularly in the setting of small biopsy specimens, metaplastic differentiation, or metastatic disease.

Detection of antibody-coated Mucor in skin biopsy by direct immunofluorescence.

Cutaneous mucormycosis may be caused by direct inoculation or hematogenous spread of mucormycetes in immunocompromised patients. Skin biopsy is characterized by a deep fungal infection with frequent angioinvasion. The fungal hyphae can usually be identified on H&E stain. We report a case of cutaneous angioinvasive mucormycosis in which the fungi were also visualized on direct immunofluorescence. A 57-year-old patient with relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome status-post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, diabetes mellitus, and graft-versus-host disease presented with painful, palpable, dark-red to violaceous retiform purpuric plaques. Light microscopy of punch biopsy revealed numerous broad, ribbon-like, pauci-septate hyphae in the dermis with angioinvasion, consistent with mucormycosis. Direct immunofluorescence performed on a concurrent biopsy to exclude immune complex vasculitis showed smooth IgG, IgA (weak), IgM (faint), and C3 deposition on the hyphal structures, compatible with antibody-coated fungi. Tissue culture subsequently confirmed Mucor species. Although mucormycosis was readily diagnosable on routine light microscopy in this case, recognition of the unique phenomenon of antibody-coated fungi can be crucial when the invasive fungi are sparse or only present in the direct immunofluorescence specimen.

Considerations in geriatric dermatopathology.

This review provides an overview of considerations in geriatric dermatopathology. The nuances of specimen collection and reporting in this population, including the importance of obtaining adequate tissue, providing detailed clinical information and ethical considerations surrounding specimen collection will be discussed. The histopathologic changes associated with aging and the morphologic features of common lesions related to photoaging are outlined followed by a discussion of common interpretation pitfalls, specifically entities at risk of overinterpretation and those related to hyper- and hypopigmentation. Finally, the recent literature is reviewed regarding special cases and what this implies for future research both in dermatology and dermatopathology.