ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature. METHODS: A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Fissure in Ano , Humans , Fissure in Ano/diagnosis , Fissure in Ano/surgery , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Colon , Chronic Disease , Anal Canal/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in octogenarian patients undergoing colorectal surgery in 12 Italian high-volume centers. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a consecutive series of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2018. Patients were grouped by age (≥ 80 years vs < 80 years), propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed, and the groups were compared regarding clinical outcomes and the mean number of ERAS items applied. RESULTS: Out of 1646 patients identified, 310 were octogenarians. PSM identified 2 cohorts of 125 patients for the comparison of postoperative outcomes and ERAS compliance. The 2 groups were homogeneous regarding the clinical variables and mean number of ERAS items applied (11.3 vs 11.9, p-ns); however, the application of intraoperative items was greater in nonelderly patients (p 0.004). The functional recovery was similar between the two groups, as were the rates of postoperative severe complications and 30-day mortality rate. Elderly patients had more overall complications. Furthermore, the mean hospital stay was higher in the elderly group (p 0.027). Multivariable analyses documented that postoperative stay was inversely correlated with the number of ERAS items applied (p < 0.0001), whereas age ≥ 80 years significantly correlated with the overall complication rate (p 0.0419). CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol is safe in octogenarian patients, with similar levels of compliance and surgical outcomes. However, octogenarian patients have a higher rate of overall complications and a longer hospital stay than do younger patients.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Octogenarians , Length of Stay , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: ERAS implementation improved outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The process of incorporating this pathway in clinical practice may be challenging. This observational study investigated the impact of systematic ERAS implementation on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal resections in a regional network of 10 institutions. METHODS: Implementation of ERAS pathway was designed using regular audits and a common protocol. All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2017 were considered eligible. A collective database including 18 ERAS items, clinical and surgical data, and outcomes was designed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following outcomes: morbidity, anastomotic leak, reinterventions, hospital stay, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 827 patients were included, and a mean of 11.3 ERAS items applied/patient was reported. Logistic regression indicated that an increased number of ERAS items applied reduced overall and severe morbidity (OR 0.86 and 0.87, respectively 95%CI 0.8197-0.9202 and 95%CI 0.7821-0.9603), hospitalization (OR 0.53 95%CI 0.4917-0.5845) and reinterventions (OR 0.84 95%CI 0.7536-0.9518) in the entire series. The same results were obtained for a prolonged hospitalization differentiating right-sided (OR 0.48 95%CI 0.4036-0.5801), left-sided (OR 0.48 95%CI 0.3984-0.5815), and rectal resections (OR 0.46 95%CI 0.3753-0.5851). An inverse correlation was found between the application of ERAS items and morbidity in right-sided and rectal procedures (OR 0.89 and 0.84, respectively 95%CI 0.7976-0.9773 and 95%CI 0.7418-0.9634). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic implementation of the ERAS pathway using multi-institutional audits can increase protocol adherence and improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/surgery , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Italy , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Program Evaluation , Reoperation , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Virtue® male sling (Coloplast, Humlebaek, Denmark) in a cohort of patients affected by post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: All 29 consecutive patients treated with a Virtue male sling at our Institution between July 2012 and October 2013 were included in the present prospective, non-randomized study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery using a 24-h pad weight test, the International Consultation on Incontinence short-form questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) questionnaire, a bladder diary, uroflowmetry and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and Patient Global Impression of Severity questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.5 years. A total of 72.4% of patients had preoperative mild incontinence (1-2 pads/day), while nine patients used 3-5 pads/day. There were a total of 17 complications, which occurred in 29 patients (58.6%); all were Clavien-Dindo grade I. At 12-month follow-up patients showed a significant improvement in 24-h pad test (128.6 vs 2.5 g), number of pads per day (2 vs 0), ICIQ-SF score (14.3 vs 0.9) and USP score for SUI (4 vs 0), and outcomes remained stable at 36 months. At last follow-up, the median score on the PGI-I questionnaire was 1 (very much better). CONCLUSION: The Virtue male sling is an effective treatment option for low to moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence.
Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prostatectomy , Suburethral Slings , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Suburethral Slings/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Between September 2014 and December 2015, 32 patients with inguinal hernia were treated using a new 3D mesh in our department. This mesh is characterized by a multilamellar flower-shaped central core with a flat, large-pore polypropylene ovoid disk that has to be implanted preperitoneally. Compared with the traditional Lichtenstein procedure, we observed a shorter mean duration of surgery and a significantly lower mean visual analogue scale (VAS) postoperative pain score recorded immediately after the procedure in the 3D mesh group. The mean VAS score recoded after 4 and 8 postoperative days showed better results in the 3D mesh group than the control group. Moreover, there was reduced postoperative morbidity in the 3D mesh group than the control group, even if no patients experienced severe complications.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/instrumentation , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Surgical Mesh , Case-Control Studies , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Humans , Polypropylenes/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. METHODS: All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.
Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transanal stapled procedures are increasingly being used. Several postoperative complications can be referred to their application, including those related to the presence of retained staples at the level of the staple line. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess whether the removal of the retained staples is a useful approach to improve some of the most common postoperative complications of these surgical techniques. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the One-Day Surgery Unit of St. Andrea Hospital. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent a stapled transanal procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. Patients included in the study were followed postoperatively for 1 year after surgery to identify the presence of retained staples. INTERVENTIONS: If identified, the retained staples were removed endoscopically or transanally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After the staple removal, patients were followed with biweekly office visit for 2 months to evaluate the progression of symptoms. RESULTS: From the 566 patients included in the study, 165 experienced postoperative complications, and in 66 of these cases, retained staples were found and removed. With the removal of retained staples, symptoms were almost all resolved or improved. In only 1 case did the retained staples removal not modify the symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The study design may have introduced potential selection bias. In addition, the study was limited by the lack of a specific questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the retained staples is an efficacious and safe procedure to solve or improve postoperative complications and should be always considered.
Subject(s)
Device Removal , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Sutures , Female , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report oncological outcomes after thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) laser ablation for penile cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 71 patients with ≤cT1 penile cancer (2013-2022). All patients underwent Tm:YAG ablation with a RevoLix 200W continuous-wave laser. First, Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested local tumor recurrence rates. Second, Kaplan-Meier plots tested progression-free survival (≥T3 and/or N1-3 and/or M1). RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 38 (22-58) months. Overall, 33 (50.5%) patients experienced local tumor recurrence. Specifically, 19 (29%) vs 9 (14%) vs 5 (7.5%) patients had 1 vs 2 vs 3 recurrences over time. In multivariable Cox regression models, a trend for higher recurrence rates was observed for G3 tumors (hazard ratio:6.1; P = .05), relative to G1. During follow-up, 12 (18.5%) vs 4 (6.0%) vs 2 (3.0%) men were retreated with 1 vs 2 vs 3 Tm:YAG laser ablations. Moreover, 11 (17.0%) and 3 (4.5%) patients underwent glansectomy and partial/total penile amputation. Last, 5 (7.5%) patients experienced disease progression. Specifically, TNM stage at the time of disease progression was: (1) pT3N0; (2) pT2N2; (3) pTxN3; (4) pT1N1 and (5) pT3N3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tm:YAG laser ablation provides similar oncological results as those observed by other penile-sparing surgery procedures. In consequence, Tm:YAG laser ablation should be considered a valid alternative for treating selected penile cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Aluminum , Laser Therapy , Lasers, Solid-State , Penile Neoplasms , Yttrium , Male , Humans , Female , Penile Neoplasms/surgery , Thulium , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients affected by high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) progression to muscle invasive status is considered as the main indicator of local treatment failure. We aimed to investigate the effect of progression and time to progression on overall survival (OS) and to investigate their validity as surrogate endpoints. METHODS: A total of 1,510 patients from 18 different institutions treated for T1 high grade NMIBC, followed by a secondary transurethral resection and BCG intravesical instillation. We relied on random survival forest (RSF) to rank covariates based on OS prediction. Cox's regression models were used to quantify the effect of covariates on mortality. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 49.0 months, 485 (32.1%) patients progressed to MIBC, while 163 (10.8%) patients died. The median time to progression was 82 (95%CI: 78.0-93.0) months. In RSF time-to-progression and age were the most predictive covariates of OS. The survival tree defined 5 groups of risk. In multivariable Cox's regression models accounting for progression status as time-dependent covariate, shorter time to progression (as continuous covariate) was associated with longer OS (HR: 9.0, 95%CI: 3.0-6.7; P < 0.001). Virtually same results after time to progression stratification (time to progression ≥10.5 months as reference). CONCLUSION: Time to progression is the main predictor of OS in patients with high risk NMIBC treated with BCG and might be considered a coprimary endpoint. In addition, models including time to progression could be considered for patients' stratification in clinical practice and at the time of clinical trials design.
Subject(s)
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , BCG Vaccine/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Failure , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Administration, Intravesical , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Prostate cancer (PCA) is the most frequent cancer in men. Exposure to infectious agents has been reported to have a putative role in tumorigenesis. Among the infectious agents, convincing evidence has been accumulated about the human polyomavirus BK (BKV). Tissue fresh specimens, serum, and urine samples were collected from 124 consecutive patients, 56 with PCA and 68 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Quantitative PCR assays were used to assess the presence of BKV and JC virus (JCV) genomes. BKV-positive tissue specimens were found in 32.1 and 22.1 % of PCA and BPH patients, respectively; in PCA group the number of positive BKV specimens/patients was significantly higher than in BPH group (3.06 vs. 1.73, p = 0.02). JCV genome was found in the biopsies collected from 28.1 and 24.2 % of PCA and BPH patients, respectively, with no significant difference in the rate of JCV specimens/patients between PCA and BPH groups. Our results support the putative causal association between BKV genome and PCA. Further studies are required to demonstrate the direct pathogenetic role of BKV in the PCA occurrence and progression in order to clear the tempting way of vaccine prophylaxis.
Subject(s)
BK Virus/isolation & purification , Polyomavirus Infections/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/virology , Tumor Virus Infections/complications , Aged , BK Virus/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Humans , JC Virus/genetics , JC Virus/isolation & purification , Male , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serum/virology , Urine/virologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe a new technique for the right template RPLND able to offer a optimal exposure of surgical field, minimal bowel mobilization, and enabling a more "openlike dissection" technique. METHODS: We used a variant of the aortic lymphadenectomy previously described by Magrina et al. for gynecologic malignancies. The patient is placed in a steep Trendelenburg, supine position and the robot column, at the patient's head. The trocar position is specular to that used for RALP and known for generating no collision between the robotic arms. The node dissection of the right template, including laterocaval and interaortocaval nodes, is carried out like in the "open" split-and-roll technique. RESULTS: The docking time was 15', the console time was 192', the blood loss was irrelevant (50 mL), and the number of retrieved nodes was 19. The exposure of the infrarenal vein region of the operatory field resulted optimal without extensive bowel mobilization. The dissection perfectly mimicked the open procedure. CONCLUSIONS: As the left RPLND template includes only para-aortic lymph nodes, the left full flank position seems adequate. On the contrary, it enables a less good exposure of the more extensive right RPLND template, requiring excellent robotic surgical skills to overpass related deadlocks. On the contrary, our technique allows adequate and safe performance of the robotic. It enables a good view of the retroperitoneal space reducing the need of bowel mobilization to obtain a good exposure of the operatory field. Moreover, the patient's supine position makes the procedure more similar to the open technique.
Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision/methods , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Robotics/methods , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Blood Loss, Surgical , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Retroperitoneal Space , Supine Position , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy is cause for considerable concern and may be related to contracture of continence muscles. OBJECTIVE: We compared glyceryl trinitrate 0.4% ointment with lidocaine chlorohydrate 2.5% gel as topical therapy to relieve the pain of anorectal muscular spasm after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. DESIGN: This was a single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital in Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: Patients with severe postoperative anal pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy, clinical evidence of anal hypertonia, and elevated anal resting pressure on manometric assessment were enrolled. Patients treated for concomitant anorectal disease were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive twice-daily, local topical application of glyceryl trinitrate or lidocaine for a total of 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity was measured on a visual analog scale at baseline and after 2, 7, and 14 days of therapy. Anal resting pressure was measured pre- and postoperatively and after 14 days of therapy. RESULTS: Of 480 patients undergoing stapled hemorrhoidopexy, 121 had severe postoperative pain (score >3) and underwent clinical examination; 45 patients (13 women, 28 men) had clinically evident anal hypertonia and underwent anorectal manometry; 41 patients had elevated anal resting pressure and entered the study. Mean pain scores were significantly lower with glyceryl trinitrate than with lidocaine on day 2 (2.5 ± 1.0 vs 4.0 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001); day 7 (1.4 vs 2.8, p < 0.0001); and day 14 (0.4 vs 1.4, p = 0.003). Anal resting pressure was significantly lower with glyceryl trinitrate than with lidocaine on day 14 (75.4 ± 7.4 mmHg vs 85.6 ± 7.9 mmHg, p < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: GTN-induced reduction in sphincter tone could not be evaluated during the initial period, when pain was most intense. Because anorectal manometry was performed only in patients with severe pain and clinical evidence of anal hypertonia, firm conclusions cannot be drawn as to frequency of hypertonia after SH. Bias may have been introduced because the surgical team could not be blinded. CONCLUSION: Topical 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate is effective in relieving pain and reducing anal resting pressure in patients with anal hypertonia after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Subject(s)
Anal Canal/pathology , Hemorrhoids/surgery , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Muscle Hypertonia/drug therapy , Nitroglycerin/administration & dosage , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Administration, Topical , Adult , Anal Canal/drug effects , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Hypertonia/etiology , Pain Measurement , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructed defecation syndrome is a widespread and disabling disease. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection performed with a new dedicated curved device in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 187 stapled transanal rectal resections performed from June 2007 to February 2011 was conducted. SETTINGS: The entire study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: : All the patients with symptomatic obstructed defecation syndrome and the presence of a rectocele and/or a rectorectal or rectoanal intussusception, in the absence of sphincter contractile deficiency, were included in the treatment protocol. INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed with the use of the Contour Transtar device. We analyzed the functional results of this technique, the incidence and features of the surgical and functional complications, and ways to prevent or treat them. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation was graded by using the Agachan-Wexner constipation score; use of aids to defecate and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperatively and 6 months after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also investigated. RESULTS: The constipation intensity was statistically reduced from the preoperative mean value of 15.8 (± 4.9) to 5.2 (± 3.9) at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). Of the 151 (80.3%) patients who took laxatives and the 49 (26.2%) who used enemas before treatment, only 25 (13.2%; p < 0.0001) and 7 (3.7%; p < 0.0001) continued to do so after surgery. None of the 17 (9.1%) patients who had previously helped themselves with digitations needed to continue this practice. Almost all patients showed a good satisfaction rate (3.87/5) after the procedure. LIMITATIONS: Limitations are the short follow-up of 1 year and the design of the study that may introduce potential selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that stapled transanal rectal resection performed with the use of the Contour Transtar is a safe and effective procedure to treat obstructed defecation syndrome.
Subject(s)
Constipation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Fecal Impaction , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Rectocele , Rectum , Anal Canal/surgery , Constipation/complications , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/physiopathology , Defecation , Defecography/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Fecal Impaction/complications , Fecal Impaction/diagnosis , Fecal Impaction/physiopathology , Fecal Impaction/surgery , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Manometry/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Recovery of Function , Rectocele/etiology , Rectocele/physiopathology , Rectocele/surgery , Rectum/physiopathology , Rectum/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Instruments , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Surgical Stapling/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Defecatory disorders are very common complications after left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resection. These disorders seem related primarily to colonic denervation after the resection. To evaluate the real benefits of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation via laparoscopic left hemicolectomy performed for diverticular disease in terms of reduced colonic denervation and improved postoperative intestinal functions, a randomized, single-blinded (patients) controlled clinical trial was conducted. METHODS: From January 2004 to January 2010, patients with symptomatic diverticular disease and a surgical indication were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to two treatment groups. The first group underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy, which preserved the IMA by sectioning the sigmoid arteries one by one near the colonic wall, In the second group, the IMA was sectioned immediately below the origin of left colic artery. Defecation disorders were assessed by anorectal manometry and by three questionnaires to evaluate constipation, incontinence, and quality of life 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the study. The 54 patients with preserved IMA showed a statistically lower incidence of defecation disorders such as fragmented evacuations, alternating bowel function, constipation, and minor incontinence, as well as less lifestyle alteration than the 53 patients with the IMA sectioned just below the left colic artery. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that preservation of the IMA should be recommended to reduce the incidence of defecatory disorders after left hemicolectomy for benign disease.
Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Diverticulum, Colon/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Constipation/surgery , Diverticulum, Colon/physiopathology , Fecal Incontinence/surgery , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Pressure , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery, despite its well-known advantages and continuous technological innovations, still has limitations such as the lack of tactile sensation and reduced view of the operative field. These limitations are particularly evident when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection due to the variability of the number and course of mesenteric vessels. Today, the patient's vascular anatomy can be mapped using computed tomography (CT) angiography and processing of the images with rendering software to reconstruct a three-dimensional model of the mesenteric vessels. To assess how prior knowledge of the patient's mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resections, we conducted a randomized, parallel, single-blinded controlled trial. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2012, all patients with surgical indication to undergo standardized right or left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resections were randomly assigned to two groups and subjected to CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels. In the first group the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery, while in the second group the surgeon was only able to view the 3D reconstruction after surgery. RESULTS: Evaluation of data from 112 patients shows statistically significantly lower operative time, episodes of difficult identification of right anatomy, and incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complication related to difficult or erroneous identification of mesenteric vessels in the group in which the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that prior knowledge of the patient's mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Mesenteric Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Veins/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Aged , Angiography/methods , Colectomy/methods , Colonic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Prospective Studies , Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unsuspected common bile duct stones (CBDS) are found in 4-5 % of patients with cholelithiasis. The optimal strategy for the treatment of asymptomatic CBDS, diagnosed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is not yet well established. A one-stage solution is preferable to solve the CBDS during the LC and to avoid the exposure of patients to the risks of a second procedure, such as complications or failure. METHODS: We attempted to remove CBDS by transcystic sphincter of Oddi pneumatic balloon dilation and common bile duct pressure-washing in all cases of intraoperative identification of CBDS since September 2008. RESULTS: In 29 cases, unsuspected CBDS was identified by intraoperative cholangiography; in 28 cases a single stone with a mean diameter of 4.3 mm (range = 3-6) was detected and in one case three 5-8-mm-diameter stones were identified. Clearance of the common bile duct was obtained in 27 cases (96 %), with a mean operative time of 54 min (range = 36-90) and mean length of hospital stay of 2.5 days. CONCLUSION: Treatment of unsuspected CBDS detected by intraoperative cholangiography during LC with this original technique was safe and effective and a viable alternative of the transcystic endoscopic approach.
Subject(s)
Cholelithiasis/surgery , Dilatation/methods , Sphincter of Oddi/surgery , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Adult , Aged , Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a day surgery setting in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and June 2011, in our institution 439 patients were selected for day surgery LC. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the procedure, postoperative complications, pain, nausea and vomiting were monitored at 4, 8, and 24 h after surgery. Patients admitted for an overnight stay or readmitted after discharging were also monitored. RESULTS: Over 8 years we performed 400 LC in day surgery setting and no conversion or major intraoperative complication were detected. A total of 387 patients (96.7%) were successfully discharged after 8-10 h of observation. Postoperative monitoring showed good pain control (mean VAS score 1.5) and only 3 (0.7%) of the 7 patients who experienced major pain were admitted. Twenty-seven patients (6.7%) experienced PONV and 9 (2.2%) of these required admission. None of the patients needed to be readmitted after discharging. The satisfaction questionnaire administered at 1 month office visit showed that 380 patients (95%) were satisfied with day surgery LC. CONCLUSIONS: Our success rate of 96.7% can be attributed to strict adherence to the patient selection criteria. The main reasons for hospital admission were pain and PONV; adequate control of these represents the key of success for day surgery LC. This study confirms the feasibility and safety of LC performed in day surgery setting.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholelithiasis/surgery , Patient Selection , Adult , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 1988, Longo proposed a new treatment for haemorrhoidal disease. In western countries day surgery procedures are becoming more and more common. We propose a new protocol for outpatient haemorrhoidopexy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, we performed 403 out-patient stapled haemorrhoidopexies under spinal anaesthesia, on patients with symptomatic grade III and IV haemorrhoid disease. We used PPH 01 and PPH 03 staplers (Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA). We assessed early and late postoperative pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and clinical postoperative examinations were performed 7 days, 6 months, and 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: The mean surgery time was about 20 min (range 13-39 min). Out of 403 patients, 41 were not dischargeable as a result of urine retention, severe pain or mild bleeding. Twenty-two patients reported transient faecal urgency, while no patient complained of anal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with 403 patients demonstrated that stapled haemorrhoidopexy is feasible and safe as a day surgery procedure. However, careful preoperative planning is necessary in order to evaluate the patients' health status and the consequent perioperative and postoperative risk. Our results are positive in terms of surgical safety and postoperative recovery time.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Hemorrhoidectomy/methods , Surgical Stapling , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemorrhoids/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Short hospitalization surgery is cost effective and convenient for both patients and healthcare system. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) conducted with the new curved device, Contour Transtar, has proved an effective and safe procedure for treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of STARR, performed as a day-case procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of all STARR performed as day-case surgery between September 2009 and February 2011. The entire study (intervention, data collection and data analysis) was conducted at the One-day Surgery Unit of the St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients with surgical indication to STARR for the presence of an obstructed defecation syndrome were included in the study. We excluded from day-case protocol, patients over 65 years old, with an ASA score of III-IV or with a BMI over 35. The surgical technique reflects the original technique proposed by Antonio Longo with the exception of the longitudinal prolapse opening, which was created with the use of an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps and not by an application of Transtar stapler. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing this procedure with short hospitalization, we investigated the presence and the time of presentation of post-operative complications. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent STARR as a day-case regimen, and none presented major complications or required an extension of hospital stay or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: STARR performed with Contour Transtar, in selected patients, is safe and feasible in day-case regimen if performed by expert surgeons and in a structure that allows the physician to keep the patient hospitalized or to re-admit and promptly treat those patients who present major surgical complication.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Constipation/surgery , Defecation , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Sutures , Adult , Aged , Constipation/physiopathology , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopy to perform lower anterior rectal resection is increasing worldwide because it allows better visualisation and rectal mobilisation and also reduces postoperative pain and recovery. The Contour Curved Stapler (CCS) is a very helpful device because of its curved profile that enables better access into the pelvic cavity and allows rectal closure and section to be performed in one shot. In this paper, we present an original technique to use this device, made for open surgery, in laparoscopy and the results of our experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of all patients who underwent lower laparoscopic anterior rectal resection and in which the CCS was used to perform section of the rectum between September 2005 and September 2011. To perform section of the rectum a Lapdisc(®) was inserted through a 6-7 cm supra-pubic midline incision to allow placement of the CCS into the pelvic cavity. Patients' biographical and surgical data such as sex, age, indication for surgery, infection, anastomotic leakage or stenosis and staple-line bleeding were prospectively collected in a computerised database and evaluated. RESULTS: Between September 2005 and September 2011, we performed 45 laparoscopic lower rectal resection using CCS, 27 male and 18 female with a mean age of 61 years (range 40-82 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 kg/m(2) (range 16.5-35 kg/m(2)). In 29 cases a temporary ileostomy was performed. Mean operative time was 131 min (range 97-210 min). In all cases it was possible to perform a lower section of the rectum with CCS. No intraoperative or postoperative staple line bleeding occurred. In two patients we observed anastomotic leaks and in one of these a temporary ileostomy was performed. None of the patients showed an anastomotic stenosis at 1-year follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that CCS enables section of the lower rectum to be easily performed, especially in adverse anatomical condition, and the technique proposed by us allows the use of this stapler without giving up the benefits of laparoscopic access.