The efficacy of combining topiramate and 4-aminopyridine to reduce relapses and interictal progression in two cases of episodic ataxia type 2.

BACKGROUND: Episodic ataxia type 2 is an autosomal dominant channelopathy, caused by genetic variants in the voltage-dependent calcium channel a-1 subunit (CACNA1A), which is characterized by intermittent episodes of vertigo and ataxia. A slow progression of cerebellar signs is commonly observed in the course of the disease. Treatment with the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide is recommended. METHODS: We report the cases of two patients with EA-2 and migraine, linked to a novel CACNA1A mutation associated with disabling ictal and interictal disease, which did not respond to acetazolamide. RESULTS: A 30-year-old woman and a 50-year-old man, who was a ski instructor, reported disabling episodes of rotatory vertigo and progressive interictal ataxia. In both cases, the disease progressed despite treatment with acetazolamide. The concomitant use of topiramate and 4-aminopyridine significantly reduced the frequency and severity of relapses and migraine and improved the interictal cerebellar progression in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: We propose combined applications of topiramate and 4-aminopyridine in refractory cases and those with poor tolerance to acetazolamide and also in those with frequent associated migraine. The effectiveness of this combination of drugs for treating intermittent ataxic episodes and interictal signs in EA-2 has not been previously reported.

Preventive treatment can reverse cognitive impairment in chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of chronic migraine (CM) on the cognition and quality of life (QoL) of patients in the interictal period, and to analyse the degree of reversibility of any observed alterations following the use of preventive treatment. BACKGROUND: CM is a highly disabling disease, and migraineurs often have associated comorbidities, such as subjective memory problems, that are involved in the development of cognitive impairment. Our hypotheses are that patients suffering from chronic migraine experience objective cognitive alterations that are not only due to the pain that they suffer or their current emotional state. Furthermore, preventive treatment should be capable of reversing, or at least reducing, the impact of CM on the cognition and QoL of migraineurs. METHODS: The cognition and QoL of 50 control subjects and 46 patients with CM were assessed using a battery of tests, prior to the use of preventive treatment based on botulinum toxin or oral drugs and after 3 months of this treatment. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with CM had lower scores on the assessment of cognitive performance (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test [ROCF] (p<0.05), Trail Making Test [TMT] B) (p < 0.05) and QoL (p < 0.05). Three months after the use of preventive treatment, improvement was observed in all cognitive parameters (p < 0.05) and QoL (p < 0.05), except the ROCF copy task (p = 0.79). No statistically significant differences were observed when these outcomes were compared based on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms poor cognitive performance that is not explained by migraine pain itself, as it occurs in the interictal period, irrespective of the patient's emotional status. Our findings show that these effects are reversible in some cases with preventive treatment of CM, reaffirming the important impact of this condition on the QoL of these patients, and the need to establish preventive treatment guidelines.

Prophylactic treatment can modify vascular risk biomarkers in high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine patients: a pilot study.

To evaluate whether preventive treatment can modify endothelial and oxidative biomarkers of vascular disease risk in patients with high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine. In this observational, prospective pilot study, 88 prophylactic treatment-naïve patients with episodic and chronic migraine and 56 healthy sex/age matched controls underwent ultrasonography exams and blood tests at baseline, and again in the migraine patients after 3 months' treatment with metoprolol or topiramate. Biomarkers for endothelial function and oxidative stress were analyzed. At baseline, patients with migraine in the low-frequency episodic group had differences exclusively in nitrates 17.6 versus 27.33 µM; p = 0.046 compared to the controls. However, when comparing the group comprised of patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine versus controls, statistically significant differences appeared in hsCRP 2.68 versus 1.64 mg/dL; p = 0.049, vWF antigen (133% vs. 110%; p = 0.020, vWF activity (111% vs. 90%; p = 0.010) and isoprostane levels (181 vs. 238 µM; p = 0.05). Only in the chronic migraine subgroup did we found statistically significant differences in CIMT (0.60 vs. 0.54 mm; p = 0.042) which were significantly greater than in the controls. After treatment, patients who respond to preventive treatment exhibited significantly higher levels of nitrates (24.2-13.8 µM; p = 0.022) and nitrites (10.4-3.43 µM; p = 0.002) compared than non-responders. Moreover, biomarker levels improved in treatment-responsive patients with migraine; hsCRP levels decreased from 2.54 to 1.69 mg/dL (p < 0.05), vWF activity levels decreased from 124 to 103 IU/dL (p = 0.003) and prothrombin activity decreased from 1.01 to 0.93 (p = 0.01). These differences were also observed in the high-frequency and chronic migraine subgroup and reach statistical significance in the case of hsCRP, which decreased from 2.12 to 0.83 mg/dL (p = 0.048). Patients with migraines have differences in biomarker levels compared to controls, suggesting endothelial and oxidative dysfunction. The greatest differences in biomarker levels compared to controls are observed in migraine patients in the high-frequency and chronic migraine subgroups. Based on our results, preventive treatment is capable of modifying markers of endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in migraine patients, even in cases of chronic and high-frequency migraine.

Efficacy and Safety of Masitinib in Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Phase 3, Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Masitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting innate immune cells (mast cells and microglia) that are involved in the pathophysiology of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Study AB07002 assessed oral masitinib in patients with progressive MS who were progressing but not clinically active. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, 2 parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial assessing 2 dose levels of masitinib vs equivalent placebo was conducted at 116 hospital clinics and specialized MS centers in 20 countries. Randomization (2:1) with minimization was performed centrally using an automated system. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors remained masked to treatment group allocation. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or nonactive secondary progressive MS (nSPMS) without relapse for ≥2 years, aged 18-75 years, with baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.0-6.0, and regardless of time from onset were treated for 96 weeks. The primary end point was overall EDSS change from baseline using repeated measures (generalized estimating equation, timeframe W12-W96, measured every 12 weeks), with positive values indicating increased clinical deterioration. Efficacy and safety were assessed in all randomly assigned and treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients were randomized; 301 in the masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d parallel group and 310 in the uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group. Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) (n = 199) showed significant benefit over placebo (n = 101) according to the primary end point, 0.001 vs 0.098, respectively, with a between-group difference of -0.097 (97% CI -0.192 to -0.002); p = 0.0256. Safety was consistent with masitinib's known profile (diarrhea, nausea, rash, and hematologic events), with no elevated risk of infection. Efficacy results from the independent uptitrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/d parallel group were inconclusive, and no new safety signal was observed. DISCUSSION: Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/d) can benefit people with PPMS and nSPMS. A confirmatory phase 3 study will be initiated to substantiate these data. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The first participant was randomized to study AB07002 on August 25, 2011. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (#EudraCT 2010-021219-17) on July 1, 2011 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2010-021219-17/ES) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01433497) on September 14, 2011 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01433497). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/d decreased progression of disability, measured by the EDSS, in adults with PPMS or patients with nSPMS (with no exacerbations in the last 2 years).

Cognitive Dysfunctions and Assessments in Multiple Sclerosis.

Cognitive impairment has been reported at all phases and all subtypes of multiple sclerosis. It remains a major cause of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults suffering from the disease. The severity and type of cognitive impairment varies considerably among individuals and can be observed both in early and in later stages. The areas which have commonly shown more deficits are: information processing speed, complex attention, memory, and executive function. Even though an alteration in both the white matter and in the gray matter has been found in patients with multiple sclerosis and cognitive impairment, the underlying process still remains unknown. Standardized neurological examinations fail to detect emerging cognitive deficits and self-reported cognitive complaints by the patients can be confounded by other subjective symptoms. This review is a comprehensive and short update of the literature on cognitive dysfunctions, the possible confounders and the impact of quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Apraxia bucofacial cruzada / Crossed bucofaical apraxia

No disponible