Social Media and Website Use: The Experiences of Parents and Carers Accessing Care at the Oxford Craniofacial Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, medical professionals have been the providers of specialist information about rare medical conditions. Now, increasingly, patients and the public are using the internet to access and generate information about medical diagnoses. The global nature of the internet allows patients to connect across geographical borders, and to obtain and share information that would have been previously inaccessible to them. This research investigated the use of website and social media by parents of children with craniosynostosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based design was employed. Participants were parents of children with craniosynostosis attending multidisciplinary craniofacial clinics within the Oxford Craniofacial Unit. A questionnaire was administered which assessed social media and website use adapted from the questionnaire created by Khouri and colleagues (2016) and Huggons and colleagues (2019). The surveys were administered over an 18-month period (November 2020 to May 2022). RESULTS: The final sample comprised 82 parents [70 mothers; 10 fathers; 1 sister/carer and 1 parent (mother/father unspecified)]. The children were aged 11 months-16 years of age (average age 6 y and 3 mo). Children had a variety of diagnoses: 31 sagittal, 19 metopic, 14 syndromic craniosynostosis, 8 unicoronal, 6 multisuture, 3 bicoronal, and 1 unilambdoid.Results showed that 93% (n=76/82) of parents used the internet to find out more about craniosynostosis, with 72% (n=59/82) of parents specifically using social media to find out more about craniosynostosis. The social media platforms used included: Facebook 64% (n=53/82), Instagram 24% (n=20/82), Blogs 12% (n=10/82), Twitter 4% (n= 4/82), Tik Tok 2% (n=2/82), and Snapchat 0.01% (n=1/82).Parents reported that Facebook was the most helpful source of information about craniosynostosis (52%; n=43/82). Parents indicated the key timepoints they used social media included: when their child received a diagnosis (70%; n=58/82), before their child's surgery (34%; n=28/82), before their first craniofacial clinic appointment (83%; n=25/30), and when child was older (17%; n=14/84). Forty percent (n=33/82) of parents said that a diagnosis of craniosynostosis made no difference to their social media use, whereas 34% (n=28/82) of parents used social media more, and 20% (n=16/82) used it less. CONCLUSION: Results highlight that parents use social media and other websites to access information relating to craniosynostosis. Future research should examine whether parental use of social media changes across their child's lifespan and evaluate the quality of this information.

Speech and Language Development, Hearing, and Feeding in Patients With Genetically Confirmed Crouzon Syndrome With Acanthosis Nigricans: A 36-Year Longitudinal Retrospective Review of Patients at the Oxford Craniofacial Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans (CAN) is caused by the specific mutation c.1172C>A (p.Ala391Glu) in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene, and has an estimated prevalence of 1:1,000,000 births. Most cases occur de novo; however, autosomal dominant inheritance may occur. The clinical presentation typically includes craniosynostosis, midface and maxillary hypoplasia, choanal atresia/stenosis, hydrocephalus, and intracranial hypertension. Patients develop acanthosis nigricans, a hyperkeratotic skin disorder. The authors present the first known study to investigate the speech, language, hearing, and feeding of patients with CAN. METHODS: A retrospective case-note review of patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of CAN attending the Oxford Craniofacial Unit during a 36-year period (1987-2023) was undertaken. RESULTS: Participants were 6 patients with genetically-confirmed CAN (5 females, 1 male), all cases arose de novo. All patients had craniosynostosis (n = 5/6 multisuture synostosis, n = 1/6 left unicoronal synostosis). Hydrocephalus was managed through ventriculoperitoneal shunt in 67% (n = 4/6) of patients, and 67% (n = 4/6) had a Chiari 1 malformation. Patients had a complex, multifactorial feeding history complicated by choanal atresia/stenosis (100%; n = 6/6), and significant midface hypoplasia. All patients required airway management through tracheostomy (83%; n = 5/6); and/or continuous positive airway pressure (67%; n = 4/6). All patients underwent adenotonsillectomy (100%; n = 6/6). Initial failure to thrive, low weight, and/or height were seen in 100% (n = 6/6) patients; 80% (n = 4/5) had reflux; 100% (n = 6/6) had nasogastric, or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy based feeding during their treatment journey. All patients had hearing loss (100%; n = 6/6). Early communication difficulties were common: receptive language disorder (50%; n = 3/6); expressive language disorder (50%; n = 3/6); and speech sound disorder in 50% (n = 3/6)-necessitating the use of Makaton in 80% of patients (n = 3/5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAN experience significant respiratory, neurological, and structural obstacles to hearing, speech, language, and feeding. The authors present a recommended pathway for management to support patients in these domains.

Hearing, Speech, Language, and Communicative Participation in Patients With Apert Syndrome: Analysis of Correlation With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 Mutation.

Apert syndrome (AS) is caused by the heterozygous presence of 1 of 2 specific missense mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene. The 2 adjacent substitutions, designated p.Ser252Trp (S252W) and p.Pro253Arg (P253R), account for more than 98% of cases. Previous research has identified elevated hearing difficulties and incidence of cleft palate in this population. However, the influence of FGFR2 genotype on the speech, language, and communicative participation of children with AS has yet to be examined. METHODS: A retrospective case note analysis was completed for all patients with a genetically-confirmed Apert mutation who attended the Oxford Craniofacial Unit over a 43-year period (1978-2020). Medical records were analyzed for speech, language, hearing, and communication data in detail. The therapy outcome measures, based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health was used to classify patient's communicative participation. RESULTS: The authors identified 55 AS patients with genetically-confirmed mutation of the FGFR2 gene. One patient with a S252F mutation was excluded. There were 31 patients with the S252W mutation (male = 14; female = 17), age range of last hearing assessment (1-18 years), 64% (18/28) of patients had a cleft palate (including bifid uvula), 15 patients had conductive hearing loss, 1 patient had mixed hearing loss, 18 had otitis media with effusion (4 of whom had a cleft palate); 88% (21/24) of patients had receptive language difficulties, 88% (22/25) of patients had expressive language difficulties, 96% (27/28) of patients had a speech sound disorder. There were 23 patients with the P253R mutation (male = 13; female = 10); age range of last hearing assessment (1-13 years), 35% (8/23) patients had a cleft palate (including bifid uvula), 14 patients had a conductive hearing loss, 17 had otitis media with effusion (2 of whom had a cleft palate). Results indicated that 85% (17/20) of patients had receptive language difficulties, 80% (16/20) had expressive language difficulties, 100% (21/21) had a speech sound disorder. The S252W mutation was significantly-associated with the presence of cleft palate (including bifid uvula) (P  = 0.05).Data about the cumulative impact of all of these factors for communicative participation using the therapy outcome measures were available for 47 patients: (30 S252W; 17 P253R). Patients with a S252W mutation had significantly more severe difficulties with communicative participation when compared to individuals with a P253R mutation (P  = 0.0005) Cochran-Armitage trend test. CONCLUSIONS: Speech, language, communicative participation, and hearing difficulties are pervasive in patients with AS. The severity and functional impact of these difficulties are magnified in patients with the S252W mutation. Results reinforce the importance of considering patients with AS according to genotype.

Feeding, Communication, Hydrocephalus, and Intracranial Hypertension in Patients With Severe FGFR2-Associated Pfeiffer Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pfeiffer syndrome is associated with a genetic mutation of the FGFR2 (or more rarely, FGFR1) gene, and features the combination of craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, broad thumbs and broad great toes. Previous research has identified a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes in patients with Pfeiffer syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the multifactorial considerations for speech, language, hearing and feeding development in patients with severe genetically-confirmed Pfeiffer syndrome. METHODS: A 23-year retrospective case-note review of patients attending the Oxford Craniofacial Unit was undertaken. Patients were categorized according to genotype. Patients with mutations located in FGFR1, or outside the FGFR2 IgIII domain-hotspot, or representing known Crouzon/Pfeiffer overlap substitutions were excluded. Twelve patients with severe FGFR2-associated Pfeiffer syndrome were identified. RESULTS: Patients most commonly had pansynostosis (n = 8) followed by bicoronal (n = 3), and bicoronal and sagittal synostosis (n = 1). Seven patients had a Chiari I malformation. Four patients had a diagnosis of epilepsy. Ten patients had with hydrocephalus necessitating ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion.Feeding difficulties were common (n = 10/12) and multifactorial. In 5/12 cases, they were associated with pansynostosis, hydrocephalus, tracheostomy and tube feeding in infancy.Hearing data were available for 10 patients, of whom 9 had conductive hearing loss, and 8 required hearing aids. Results indicated that 3/4 patients had expressive language difficulties, 3/4 had appropriate receptive language skills. 6/12 patients had a speech sound disorder and abnormal resonance. CONCLUSION: This study has identified important speech, language, hearing and feeding issues in patients with severe FGFR2-associated Pfeiffer syndrome. Results indicate that a high rate of motor-based oral stage feeding difficulties, and pharyngeal stage swallowing difficulties necessitating regular review by specialist craniofacial speech and language therapists.

Effectiveness of 1:1 speech and language therapy for older children with (developmental) language disorder.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the effectiveness of therapy for older children with (developmental) language disorder (DLD), and particularly those with receptive language impairments, is very limited. The few existing studies have focused on particular target areas, but none has looked at a whole area of a service. AIMS: To establish whether for students with (developmental) language disorder attending a specialist school, 1:1 intervention with an SLT during one school term improves performance on targeted areas, compared with untreated control areas. Also, to investigate whether gender, receptive language status, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) status, or educational Key Stage affected their response to this intervention. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Seventy-two students (aged 9-17 years, 88% of whom had receptive language impairments) and all speech and language therapists (SLTs) in our specialist school for children with Language Disorder, most of whom have DLD participated in this study over one school term. During this term, the SLTs devised pre- and post-therapy measures for every student for each target they planned to treat 1:1. In addition, for each target area, a control measure was devised. The targets covered a wide range of speech, language and communication areas, both receptive and expressive. Post-therapy tests were administered 'blind'. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: During the term, SLTs and students worked 1:1 on 120 targets, the majority in the areas of expressive and receptive language. Targets and controls did not differ pre-therapy. Significant progress was seen both on targets (d = 1.33) and controls (d = 0.36), but the targeted areas improved significantly more than the controls with a large and clinically significant effect size (d = 1.06). There was no effect of language area targeted (targets improved more than their controls for all areas). Participants with versus those without receptive language difficulties, co-occurring ASD diagnosis or participants in different educational Key Stages did not differ significantly in terms of the progress they made on target areas. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Direct 1:1 intervention with an SLT can be effective for all areas of language for older children with (D)LD, regardless of their gender, receptive language or ASD status, or age. This adds to the relatively limited evidence base regarding the effectiveness of direct SLT intervention for school-aged children with (D)LD and for children with receptive language impairments. If direct 1:1 intervention can be effective with this hard-to-treat group, it may well also be effective with younger children with (D)LD. Thus, direct SLT services should be available for school-aged children with (D)LD, including older children and adolescents with pervasive difficulties.

Pretreatment information on dysphagia: exploring the views of head and neck cancer patients.

CONTEXT: Swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) are a common acute and chronic side effect of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Dysphagia is associated with medical concerns such as malnutrition and pulmonary health as well as quality of life outcomes. Providing information on the likely changes to swallowing is an important component of pretreatment preparation. There is little research providing the patients' perspective in this area. OBJECTIVES: This is a qualitative study to describe patients' views on pretreatment information regarding changes to eating, drinking, and swallowing after chemoradiotherapy treatment for HNC. METHODS: A purposive sample of 24 patients with HNC with a range of post-treatment dysphagia severity, up to two years after chemoradiotherapy, was selected to participate in focus groups or semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers, and results were verified with three participants. RESULTS: Half of the participants presented with mild dysphagia, with the remainder having moderate to severe dysphagia. Mean age was 59 years, and mean time post-treatment was 10 months. Data were grouped into three main themes and subthemes: expectations about treatment outcomes and whether information correlated with pretreatment information; presentation of information, including the format and delivery; and the difficulties with absorption and retention of information. CONCLUSION: Patients require information on the impact and prognosis for their swallowing ability. There was a general preference for verbal information, from someone knowledgeable about dysphagia. However, there are also individual preferences for the manner and pace at which this information is delivered. Further research is indicated to explore ways of providing information that is individually tailored to patients' needs and preferences.