Study of Risk Factors for Readmission After Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Analysis of Nationwide Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer and to assess their impact on the 1-year mortality in a French multicentric population. BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity that increases the length of hospital stay and jeopardizes survival. Hospital readmissions lead to increased health system costs, making this a topic of great interest. METHODS: Data collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy for cancer between 2011 and 2019 were extracted from a French national medico-administrative database. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of baseline variables, including age, sex, liver-related comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor localization, and use of neoadjuvant therapy, along with hospital type and volume, with readmission status. Centers were divided into low and high volumes according to the cutoff of 26 cases/year. Logistic regression models were developed to determine whether the identified bivariate associations persisted after adjusting for the patient characteristics. The mortality rates during readmission and at 1 year postoperatively were also determined. RESULTS: Of 22,935 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 9129 (39.3%) were readmitted within 6 months. Readmission rates by year did not vary over the study period, and mean readmissions occurred within 20 days after discharge. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12], age >70 years (OR = 1.16), comorbidities (OR = 1.21), distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.11), and major postoperative complications (OR = 1.37) were predictors of readmission. Interestingly, readmission and surgery in low-volume centers increased the risk of death at 1 year by a factor of 2.15 [(2.01-2.31), P < 0.001] and 1.31 [(1.17-1.47), P < 0.001], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer is high with an increased rate of 1-year mortality.

Should Cytoreductive Surgery Alone for Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin be Centralized? A National Study of 4159 Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Addition of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (CRPM) did not show any survival benefit in the PRODIGE 7 trial (P7). This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative outcomes after CRS alone for CRPM patients is mediated by hospital volume and to determine the effect of P7 on French practice for CRPM patients treated respectively with CRS alone and CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: Data from CRPM patients treated with CRS alone between 2013 and 2020 in France were collected through a national medical database. The study used a cutoff value of the annual CRS-alone caseload affecting the 90-day postoperative mortality (POM) determined from our previous study to define low-volume (LV) HIPEC and high-volume (HV) HIPEC centers. Perioperative outcomes were compared between no-HIPEC, LV-HIPEC, and HV-HIPEC centers. The trend between years and HIPEC rates was analyzed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. RESULTS: Data from 4159 procedures were analyzed. The patients treated in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers were older compared with HV-HIPEC centers (p < 0.0001) and had a higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and less complex surgery (p < 0.0001). Whereas the major morbidity (MM) rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.79), the 90-day POM was lower in HV-HIPEC centers than in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers (5.4% vs 15% and 13.3%; p < 0.0001), with lower failure-to-rescue (FTR) (p < 0.0001). After P7, the CRS/HIPEC rate decreased drastically in Cancer centers (p < 0.001), whereas patients treated with CRS alone are still referred to expert centers. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of CRS alone should improve patient selection as well as FTR and POM. After P7, CRS/HIPEC decreased mostly in Cancer centers, without any impact on the number of CRS-alone cases referred to expert centers.

Intraoperative Mechanical Power and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Noncardiothoracic Elective Surgery Patients: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications is a major issue that affects outcomes of surgical patients. The hypothesis was that the intraoperative ventilation parameters are associated with occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Lille University Hospital, France. The study included 33,701 adults undergoing noncardiac, nonthoracic elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between January 2010 and December 2019. Intraoperative ventilation parameters were compared between patients with and without one or more postoperative pulmonary complications (respiratory infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, and aspiration pneumonitis) within 7 days of surgery. RESULTS: Among 33,701 patients, 2,033 (6.0%) had one or more postoperative pulmonary complications. The lower tidal volume to predicted body weight ratio (odds ratio per -1 ml·kgPBW-1, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.14; P < 0.001), higher mechanical power (odds ratio per 4 J·min-1, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.49; P < 0.001), dynamic respiratory system compliance less than 30 ml·cm H2O (1.30; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.46; P < 0.001), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 96% (odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.96; P < 0.001), and lower end-tidal carbon dioxide (odds ratio per -3 mmHg, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P = 0.023) were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients with postoperative pulmonary complications were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 6.6 to 10.1; P < 0.001), had longer hospital length of stay (subhazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.45), and higher in-hospital (subhazard ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 4.1 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and 1-yr mortality (subhazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.33 to 3.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the study's population, decreased rather than increased tidal volume, decreased compliance, increased mechanical power, and decreased end-tidal carbon dioxide were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.

Adjuvant chemotherapy omission after pancreatic cancer resection: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves the prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. However, previous studies have shown that a large proportion of patients do not receive or complete AC. This national study examined the risk factors for the omission or interruption of AC. METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PDAC in France between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted from the French National Administrative Database. We considered "omission of adjuvant chemotherapy" (OAC) all patients who failed to receive any course of gemcitabine within 12 postoperative weeks and "interruption of AC" (IAC) was defined as less than 18 courses of AC. RESULTS: A total of 11 599 patients were included in this study. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common procedure (76.3%), and 31% of the patients experienced major postoperative complications. OACs and IACs affected 42% and 68% of the patients, respectively. Ultimately, only 18.6% of the cohort completed AC. Patients who underwent surgery in a high-volume centers were less affected by postoperative complications, with no impact on the likelihood of receiving AC. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 4, and major complications were associated with OAC (OR = 2.19; CI95%[1.79-2.68]; OR = 1.75; CI95%[1.41-2.18] and OR = 2.37; CI95%[2.15-2.62] respectively). Moreover, age ≥ 80 years and CCI 2-3 or ≥ 4 were also independent risk factors for IAC (OR = 1.54, CI95%[1.1-2.15]; OR = 1.43, CI95%[1.21-1.68]; OR = 1.47, CI95%[1.02-2.12], respectively). CONCLUSION: Sequence surgery followed by chemotherapy is associated with a high dropout rate, especially in octogenarian and comorbid patients.

Risk-Benefit Balance of Simultaneous Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy and Concomitant Cholecystectomy: A Comprehensive Nationwide Cohort of 289,627 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relevance of concomitant laparoscopic metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) and cholecystectomy. BACKGROUND: Because of the massive weight loss it induces, MBS is associated with an increase in the frequency of gallstones. However, no consensus yet exists on the risk-to-benefit ratio of a concomitant cholecystectomy (CC) during MBS to prevent long-term biliary complications. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort research was conducted in 2 parts using information from a national administrative database (PMSI). The 90-day morbidity of MBS with or without CC was first compared in a matched trial (propensity score). Second, we observed medium-term biliary complication following MBS when no CC had been performed during MBS up to 9 years after MBS (minimum 18 months). RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2020, 289,627 patients had a sleeve gastrectomy (SG: 70%) or a gastric bypass (GBP: 30%). The principal indications of CC were symptomatic cholelithiasis (79.5%) or acute cholecystitis (3.6%). Prophylactic CC occurred only in 15.5% of the cases. In our matched-group analysis, we included 9323 patients in each arm. The complication rate at day 90 after surgery was greater in the CC arm [odds ratio=1.3 (1.2-1.5), P <0.001], independently of the reason of the CC. At 18 months, there was a 0.1% risk of symptomatic gallstone migration and a 0.08% risk of biliary pancreatitis. At 9 years, 20.5±0.52% of patients underwent an interval cholecystectomy. The likelihood of interval cholecystectomy decreased from 5.4% per year to 1.7% per year after the first 18 months the whole cohort, risk at 18 months of symptomatic gallstone migration was 0.1%, of pancreatitis 0.08%, and of angiocholitis 0.1%. CONCLUSION: CC during SG and GBP should be avoided. In the case of asymptomatic gallstones after MBS, prophylactic cholecystectomy should not be recommended.

Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management: Results From a French Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4). BACKGROUND: EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized. METHODS: Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM. RESULTS: Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of ≥8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.

Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated improved short-term outcomes of totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE); however, to what extent these outcomes can be extrapolated to a national level remains debatable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a nationwide basis, the short-term outcomes of TMIE and to analyze these results within the context of previously implemented hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE). METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent a curative Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in France between 2017 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was to compare 90-day postoperative mortality (POM) between OE, HMIE, and TMIE, while secondary endpoints were defined as the rate of postoperative complications. A matched and multivariate analysis was adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: Overall, 2675 patients were included (1003 OE vs. 1498 HMIE vs. 174 TMIE). In every center where TMIE was performed, HMIE had been previously adopted. The matched 90-day POM rate in the TMIE group was significantly lower compared with the OE group (2.3% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.046) but not compared with the HMIE group (2.3% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.156). There was no significant difference between TMIE and OE, or TMIE and HMIE, regarding the 30-day fistula rate (21.8% vs. 17%, p = 0.176; and 21.8% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.88, respectively). TMIE was associated with a reduced rate of pulmonary complications compared with OE (33.9% vs. 44%, p = 0.027) and HMIE (33.9% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.05). Low-volume centers were identified as a negative predictive factor for 90-day POM (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.75, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: TMIE is associated with a lower 90-day POM rate compared with OE and offers reduced rates of pulmonary complications compared with OE and HMIE. After previous adoption of the HMIE technique, TMIE can be safely implemented in high-volume centers nationwide.

Major interregional differences in France of COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality from January to June 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Even though France was severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have addressed the dynamics of the first wave on an exhaustive, nationwide basis. We aimed to describe the geographic and temporal distribution of COVID-19 hospitalisations and in-hospital mortality in France during the first epidemic wave, from January to June 2020. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the French national database for all acute care hospital admissions (PMSI). Contiguous stays were assembled into "care sequences" for analysis so as to limit bias when estimating incidence and mortality. The incidence rate and its evolution, mortality and hospitalized case fatality rates (HCFR) were compared between geographic areas. Correlations between incidence, mortality, and HCFR were analyzed. RESULTS: During the first epidemic wave, 98,366 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized (incidence rate of 146.7/100,000 inhabitants), of whom 18.8% died. The median age was 71 years, the male/female ratio was 1.16, and 26.2% of patients required critical care. The Paris area and the North-East region were the first and most severely hit areas. A rapid increase of incidence and mortality within 4 weeks was followed by a slow decrease over 10 weeks. HCFRs decreased during the study period, and correlated positively with incidence and mortality rates. DISCUSSION: By detailing the geographical and temporal evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic in France, this study revealed major interregional differences, which were otherwise undetectable in global analyses. The precision afforded should help to understand the dynamics of future epidemic waves.

Partial Versus Total Thyroidectomy: What Influences Most Surgeons' Decision? Analysis of a Nationwide Cohort of 375,810 Patients Over 10 Years.

National and international guidelines about thyroid surgery seem to be moving more and more towards less radical surgical procedures but everyday practice does not seem to always align with them. We describe for the first time the role of non-surgical parameters in the surgeon's choice for thyroid surgery. OBJECTIVE: The ain of this study was to describe thyroid surgery and to identify the factors leading to either a total or a partial thyroidectomy regardless of the severity of the thyroid disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: National and international guidelines about thyroid surgery seem to be moving more and more toward less radical surgical procedures but everyday practice does not seem to always align with them. METHODS: We based this nationwide retrospective cohort study on a national database that compiles discharge abstracts for every admission for thyroidectomy to French acute healthcare facilities (PMSI database 2010 to 2019). RESULTS: In this study, 375,810 patients (male: 23%; age = 53 ±â€Š15 years) had a thyroidectomy (partial: 28%) for cancer (17%), hyperthyroidism (16%), nonfunctioning goiter (64%), or other (3%). We noticed a global trend toward more partial thyroidectomy (P < 0.001) with a significant increase in the proportion of lobectomy in the post-ATA recommendations' period (P < 0.001) as well as in the "French Levothyrox crisis" period, in which we saw an unexpected rise of adverse events notifications associated with the marketing of a new formula of Levothyrox (P < 0.001) amid widespread media coverage. In a multivariate analysis, we also identified that complete resection was more frequently performed in centers with a caseload >40/year [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.48], for obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2; P < 0.001, OR = 1.42), and according to the indication of surgery (OR benign = 1, OR cancer = 2.25, OR hyperthyroidism = 4.13). CONCLUSION: We describe for the first time the role of non-surgical parameters in the surgeon's choice for thyroid surgery.

National early warning score to predict intensive care unit transfer and mortality in COVID-19 in a French cohort.

BACKGROUND: No risk stratification tool has been validated in hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), despite a high rate of intensive care requirement and in-hospital mortality. We aimed to determine whether the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) at admission can accurately predict in-hospital mortality and ICU transfer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from January 24 to April 16, 2020, at Lille University Hospital. All consecutive adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were initially admitted to non-ICU wards were included. The primary outcome was a composite criterion consisting of ICU transfer or in-hospital mortality. We evaluated the prognostic performance of NEWS by calculating the area under (AUC) the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal threshold value of NEWS, and its association with the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the 202 COVID-19 patients, the median age was 65 (interquartile range 52-78), 38.6% were women and 136 had at least one comorbidity. The median NEWS was 4 (2-6). A total of 65 patients were transferred to the ICU or died in the hospital. Compared with patients with favourable outcome, these patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities and higher NEWS. The AUC for NEWS was 0.68 (0.60-0.77) and the best cutoff value was 6. Adjusted odds ratio for NEWS ≥ 6 as an independent predictor was 3.78 (1.94-7.09). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalised COVID-19 patients, NEWS was an independent predictor of ICU transfer and in-hospital death. In daily practice, NEWS ≥ 6 at admission may help to identify patients who are at risk to deteriorate.

Centralization and Oncologic Training Reduce Postoperative Morbidity and Failure-to-rescue Rates After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Study on a 10-year National French Practice.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate at a national level the postoperative mortality (POM), major morbidity (MM) and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) across time and according to hospital-volume. BACKGROUND: CRS/HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy commonly used to treat peritoneal surface malignancies. However, this aggressive approach has the reputation to be associated with a high POM and MM. METHODS: All patients treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 in France were identified through a national medical database. Patients and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. A cut-off value of the annual CRS/HIPEC caseload affecting the 90-day POM was calculated using the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors mediating 90-day POM. RESULTS: A total of 7476 CRS/HIPEC were analyzed. Median age was 59 years with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3.1, both increasing over time (P < 0.001). Ninety-day POM was 2.6%. MM occurred in 44.2% with a FTR rate of 5.1%. The threshold of CRS/HIPEC number per center per year above which the 90-day POM was significantly reduced was 45 (3.2% vs 1.9%, P = 0.01). High-volume centers had more extended surgery (P < 0.001) with increased MM (55.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001) but lower FTR (3.1% vs 6.3%, P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with 90-day POM were: age >70 years (P = 0.002), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥8 (P = 0.006), lower gastro-intestinal origin, (P < 0.010), MM (P < 0.001), and <45 procedures/yr (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In France, CRS/HIPEC is a safe procedure with an acceptable 90-day POM that could even be improved through centralization in high-volume centers.

Referring Patients to Expert Centers After Pancreatectomy Is Too Late to Improve Outcome. Inter-hospital Transfer Analysis in Nationwide Study of 19,938 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the outcomes of interhospital transfer (IHT) patients after pancreatectomy, describe the characteristics of transferring hospitals, and determine the risk factors of transfer and mortality in IHT patients. BACKGROUND: Implementation of the centralization process is complex and currently unrealized in France. Alternatively, centralization of patients with postoperative complications to high volume centers could reduce postoperative mortality (POM) and failure to rescue (FTR). METHODS: All patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2018 were included. Hospitals' and patients' characteristics were analyzed to determine predictive factors for transfer and FTR. POM was defined as death occurring during the hospital stay and FTR as POM rate among patients with major complications. RESULTS: Overall, 19,938 patients who underwent pancreatectomy were included, 1164 (5.8%) of whom were transferred. IHT patients were mostly originated from low volume hospitals (60.3% vs 39.7%), from facilities without intensive care unit (46.9% vs 22.4%) or interventional radiology (22.8% vs 12.8%). Among IHT patients, 51% underwent reoperation before transfer and 34.9% experienced hemorrhage complications. The POM was 5.2% and varied significantly between transfer and nontransfer patients (13.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Patients who experienced major complications after pancreatectomy in low volume hospitals had greater odds of being transferred (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.46, confidence intervals (CI)95%[1.734; 3.516], P < 0.001). Also, transfer (OR = 2.17, CI95%[1.814; 2.709], P < 0.001) and especially transfer after pancreatectomy in low volume centers (OR = 3.76, CI95%[2.83; 5.01], P < 0.001) were associated with increased FTR rates. CONCLUSIONS: Transfers after pancreatectomy were associated with high rates of FTR, especially for patients undergoing surgery in low volume hospitals. Local expertise, resources, and volume of hospitals are mandatory to provide appropriate care after pancreatectomy.

Risk Factors of Redo Surgery After Unilateral Focused Parathyroidectomy: Conclusions From a Comprehensive Nationwide Database of 13,247 Interventions Over 6 Years.

BACKGROUND: Surgical removal of hyperfunctional parathyroid gland is the definitive treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Postoperative follow-up shows variability in persistent/recurrent disease rate throughout different centers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of redo surgery after targeted parathyroidectomy for pHPT. METHODS: We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study on the "Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes d'Information," the French administrative database that collects information on all healthcare facilities' discharges. We extracted data from 2009 to 2018 for all patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for pHPT between January 2011 to December 2016. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate within 2 years since first surgery. Patients who had a first attempt of surgery within the previous 24 months, familial hyperparathyroidism, multiglandular disease, and renal failure were excluded. Results were adjusted according to sex and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Operative volume thresholds to define high-volume centers were achieved by the Chi-Squared Automatic Interaction Detector method. RESULTS: In the study period, 13,247 patients (median age 63, F/M=3.6) had a focused parathyroidectomy by open (88.7%) or endoscopic approach. Need of remedial surgery was 2.8% at 2 years. In multivariate analysis, factors predicting redo surgery were: cardiac history (P=0.008), obesity (P=0.048), endoscopic approach (P=0.005), and low-volume center (P<0.001). We evaluated that an annual caseload of 31 parathyroidectomies was the best threshold to discriminate high-volume centers and carries the lowest morbidity/failure rate. CONCLUSION: Although focused parathyroidectomy represents a standardized operation, cure rate is strongly associated with annual hospital caseload, type of procedure (endoscopic), and patients' features (obesity, cardiac history). Patients with risk factors for redo surgery should be considered for an open surgery in a high-volume center.

Specificity of Procedure volume and its Association With Postoperative Mortality in Digestive Cancer Surgery: A Nationwide Study of 225,752 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine whether the improved outcome of a digestive cancer procedure in high-volume hospitals is specific or correlates with that of other digestive cancer procedures, and determine if the discriminant cut-off of hospital volume may influence postoperative mortality (POM) regardless of the procedure. BACKGROUND: Performing complex surgeries in tertiary centers is associated with improved outcome. However, the association between POM and hospital volume of nonspecific procedures is unknown. METHODS: Patients who underwent colectomy, proctectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, and hepatectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2017 were identified in the French nationwide database. Chi-square automatic interaction detector was used to identify the cut-off values of the annual caseload affecting the 90-day POM. A common threshold was estimated by minimization of chi-square distance taking into account the specific mortality of each procedure. RESULTS: Overall, 225,752 patients were identified. Hospitals were categorized according to the procedure volume (colectomy: ≥80 cases/yr, proctectomy: ≥35/yr, esophagectomy: ≥41/yr, gastrectomy: ≥16/yr, pancreatectomy: ≥26/yr, and hepatectomy: ≥76/yr). The overall 90-day POM was 5.1% and varied significantly with volume. The benefits of high volume were transferable across procedures. High-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer surgery significantly influenced the risk of death after hepatectomy (P < 0.001) and pancreatectomy (P < 0.001). The common threshold for all procedures that influenced POM was 199 cases/yr (odds ratio 1.29, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In digestive cancer surgery, the volume-POM relationship of one procedure was associated with the volume of other procedures. Thus, tertiary hospitals should be defined according to the common threshold of different procedures.

Adrenalectomy Risk Score: An Original Preoperative Surgical Scoring System to Reduce Mortality and Morbidity After Adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the determinants of postoperative outcomes of adrenal surgery in order to build a proposition for healthcare improvement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adrenalectomy is the recommended treatment for many benign and malignant adrenal diseases. Postoperative outcomes vary widely in the literature and their determinants remain ill-defined. METHODS: We based this retrospective cohort study on the "Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information" (PMSI), a national database that compiles discharge abstracts for every admission to French acute health care facilities. Diagnoses identified during the admission were coded according to the French adaptation of the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). PMSI abstracts for all patients discharged between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted. We built an Adrenalectomy-risk score (ARS) from logistic regression and calculated operative volume and ARS thresholds defining high-volume centers and high-risk patients with the CHAID method. RESULTS: During the 6-year period of the study, 9820 patients (age: 55 ±â€Š14; F/M = 1.1) were operated upon for adrenal disease. The global 90-day mortality rate was 1.5% (n = 147). In multivariate analysis, postoperative mortality was independently associated with age ≥75 years [odds ratio (OR): 5.3; P < 0.001], malignancy (OR: 2.5; P < 0.001), Charlson score ≥2 (OR: 3.6; P < 0.001), open procedure (OR: 3.2; P < 0.001), reoperation (OR: 4.5; P < 0.001), and low hospital caseload (OR: 1.8; P = 0.010). We determined that a caseload of 32 patients/year was the best threshold to define high-volume centers and 20 ARS points the best threshold to define high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: High-risk patients should be referred to high-volume centers for adrenal surgery.

Hospital surgical volume-outcome relationship of postoperative morbidity for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease: A French nationwide study of 4,205 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the development of medical therapy, nearly 50% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) undergo surgery during their lifetime. Several studies have suggested some risk factors for postoperative morbidity (POM) after ileocolic resection (ICR). However, the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM in CD has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM after ICR for CD. METHODS: All patients with CD who underwent ICR in France between 2013 and 2022 were identified in the French Database, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information. Using the Chi-square automatic interaction detector, we determined the cut-off value to split high-surgical volume (≥6 ICR/year) and low-surgical volume centers (<6 ICR/year). The primary outcome was the evaluation of major POM during hospitalization. POM was evaluated according to the surgical volume center. The Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) was used to categorize the comorbidities of patients. RESULTS: A total of 4,205 patients were identified, and the major POM during hospitalization was significantly (p = 0.0004) lower in the high-surgical volume (6.2%) compared to low-surgical volume centers (9.1%). After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with major POM were surgical hospital volume (P = 0.024), male sex (P = 0.029), ECI ≥1 (P < 0.001), and minor POM (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Major POM after ICR for CD is closely associated with surgical hospital volume. Centralization of surgery for CD is desirable, especially in patients with major comorbidities.

Epidemiology of congenital heart defects in France from 2013 to 2022 using the PMSI-MCO (French Medical Information System Program in Medicine, Surgery, and Obstetrics) database.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart defects are common and occur in approximately 0.9% of births. In France, the registries cover approximately 20% of the population but not the entirety of France; therefore, we aimed to update the incidence data for congenital heart defects in France from 2013 to 2022 using the medico-administrative database PMSI-MCO (French Medical Information System Program in Medicine, Surgery, and Obstetrics). We aimed to compare the frequency of risk factors in a population with congenital heart defects and a reference population. METHODS: From 2013 to 2022, we included children aged < 3 years diagnosed with congenital heart defects according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, in the PMSI-MCO database. We compared them with a population without congenital defects on several medical data items (e.g., parity, gemellarity, and mortality rate). Bivariate and multivariate analyses compared children with congenital heart defects and children without congenital malformation. RESULTS: We identified 83,879 children with congenital heart defects in France from 2013 to 2022 in the PMSI-MCO database and 7,739,840 children without such defects, including 7,218,952 without any congenital defects. We observed more deaths (7.49% vs. 0.68%, d = 0.59) and more twinning (8.67% vs. 1.23%, d = 0.35) among children with congenital heart defects. Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk of congenital heart defects in male individuals (OR [odds ratio] 1.056, 95% CI [confidence interval] [1.039-1.076]) and cases of medically assisted reproduction (OR 1.115, 95% CI [1.045-1.189]) and a reduced risk in the case of multiparity (OR 0.921, 95% CI [0.905-0.938]). CONCLUSIONS: According to the PMSI-MCO database, the incidence of congenital heart defects in France from 2013 to 2022 is 1% of births. Congenital heart defects are more frequent in cases of prematurity, twinning, primiparity, male sex, and maternal age > 40 years.

Aortic dissection: results of the invasive treatment in France between 2012 and 2018 according to the French national database.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate results of the invasive repair in the management of acute aortic dissection (AoD) in France. METHODS: Patients admitted to hospital with acute AoD from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patient demographics, severity score at admission, treatment strategy and in-hospital mortality were described. For patients undergoing intervention, perioperative complications rate was reported. A secondary analysis evaluating patients' outcome as regards of the annual caseload per center was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 14,706 patients with acute AoD were identified (male 64%, mean age 67, median modified Elixhauser score 5). The overall incidence increased during the study period (from 3.8 in 2012 to 4.4/100,000 in 2018) associated with a North-South gradient (respectively 3.6 vs. 4.7/100,000) and a winter peak; 45.5% (N.=6697) of patients received medical treatment alone. Among those with invasive repair, 6276 (78.3%) were defined as type A AoD (TAAD), whereas type B AoD (TBAD) accounted for 1733 patients (21.7%), of whom 1632 (94%) had TEVAR and 101 (6%) had other arterial procedures; 30-day mortality was respectively 18.9% in TAAD and 9.5% for TBAD. In high-volume centers (i.e. >20 AoD/year), a lower 3-month mortality of 22.3% was noted compared to 31.4% in the low-volume centres (P<0.001); 47% of patients reported ≥1 early major complication. TEVAR exhibited less complication (P<0.001) compared to other arterial reconstructions in TBAD. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute AoD increased in France over the period of the study and was associated with stable postoperative early mortality. Early postoperative mortality is significantly reduced in high-volume centers.