Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To determine the rate and associated factors for acquiring a decubitus series at CT colonography (CTC), in addition to the standard supine and prone series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTC examinations read centrally at one institution but performed at three different centers in 6,380 adults were reviewed to determine the frequency of an additional decubitus series. Results were analyzed according to study indication (primary screening vs. diagnostic for incomplete colonoscopy), practice site (academic vs. community), patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and temporal variation. At all sites, the CT technologist determined the need for an additional decubitus series, with infrequent radiologist input in select cases. RESULTS: The frequency for the CT technologist to obtain a decubitus series at screening was 9.7% (578/5,952), compared with 22.9% (98/428) following failed colonoscopy (P < 0.001). The decubitus rate for screening at the academic center (9.4%, 550/5,871) was significantly lower than the community hospitals (34.6% combined, 28/81) (P < 0.001). The rate progressively increased with age, from 5.0% under age 50 to 28.0% over age 80. No significant difference was seen between men and women (10.3 vs. 9.2%), but a strong correlation existed with increased BMI, rising to >25% for BMI over 40. Marked temporal variation existed at the academic center, with quarterly rates ranging from 0 to 17%. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency for performing a third series at CTC varies considerably according to indication, practice site, patient age, BMI, and time. These results have important implications for clinical practice, including the need for improved training and feedback for CT technologists.

Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Program Implementation and Impact: Initial Clinical Experience in a Community Based Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate is increasingly being performed at academic centers but implementation in community based health systems has lagged and literature regarding clinical impact in this setting is limited. We describe our experience developing a community based prostate magnetic resonance imaging program, including the evolution of interpretation and reporting methods, and the resulting clinical impact during a period of more than 5 years (August 2010 to December 2015). METHODS: Data collected for prostate magnetic resonance imaging included demographic, clinical, scanning, pathology and treatment/management information. Suspicion level on prostate magnetic resonance imaging was correlated with pathology results when available. Outcomes were compared across 3 reporting eras, ie early, mid and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2. RESULTS: A total of 537 prostate magnetic resonance images were obtained for diagnosed prostate cancer (60%) or screening (37%). During the study period the number of scans and ordering physicians increased. The proportion of patients with suspected extraprostatic extension (17.5%), lymph node metastasis (6.9%) and bone/other metastasis (4.3%) on prostate magnetic resonance imaging remained relatively constant. When stratified by era, there was a significant increase in low suspicion studies (p = 0.0002) and a trend toward a significant increase in cancer detection at biopsy (p = 0.09), reflecting increased specificity in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 era. CONCLUSIONS: While staging information with prostate magnetic resonance imaging was accurate early in the implementation of the program, lesion characterization improved with use of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 criteria and standardized reporting. Regular multidisciplinary participation in community based prostate magnetic resonance imaging programs may maximize clinical impact.