ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) is recommended in individuals with multiple risk factors, the type and number of risk factors necessary to trigger screening is unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the relationship between number of risk factors and prevalence of BE. METHODS: Through October 17, 2018 we searched studies that described the prevalence of BE in the general population and based on presence of risk factors that included GERD, male gender, age >50 years, family history of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, and obesity (defined as body mass index >35). Risk of BE based on number of risk factors was assessed using meta-regression while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 2741 studies, 49 were included in the analysis (307,273 individuals, 1948 with biopsy specimen-proven BE). Indications varied by study. The prevalence of BE for various populations was as follows: low-risk general population, .8% (95% confidence interval [CI], .6%-1.1%); GERD, 3% (95% CI, 2.3%-4%); GERD plus presence of any other risk factor, 12.2% (95% CI, 10.2%-14.6%); family history, 23.4% (95% CI, 13.7% -37.2%); age >50, 6.1% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.1%); obesity, 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2%-3%); and male sex, 6.8% (95% CI, 5.3%-8.6%). Prevalence of BE varied significantly between Western and non-Western populations. In a meta-regression, controlling for the region of the study, age, and gender, there was a positive linear relationship between the number of risk factors and the prevalence of BE. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study provide estimates of BE prevalence based on the presence and the number of risk factors. These results add credence to current guidelines that suggest screening in the presence of multiple risk factors.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Family Health , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Age Factors , Barrett Esophagus/ethnology , Humans , Obesity/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
Background and study aims Wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) is an emerging technique that may increase dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus (BE). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients who underwent surveillance for BE assessing the additional yield of WATS to forceps biopsy (FB). Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane library, ending in January 2021.âThe primary outcomes of interest were the relative and absolute increase in dysplasia detection when adding WATS to FB. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Q statistic. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and classic fail-safe test. Results A total of seven studies were included totaling 2,816 patients. FB identified 158 dysplasia cases, whereas WATS resulted in an additional 114 cases. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of all dysplasia detection was 1.7 (1.43-2.03), P <â0.001, I 2 â=â0. For high-grade dysplasia (HGD), the pooled RR was 1.88 (1.28-2.77), P â=â0.001, I 2 â=â33â%. The yield of WATS was dependent on the prevalence of dysplasia in the study population. Among studies with high rates of dysplasia, the absolute increase in dysplasia detection (risk difference, RD) was 13â% (8â%-18â%, P â<â0.0001, number needed to treat [NNT]â=â8). The pooled RD in HGD was 9â% (2â%-16â%), P <â0.001, NNTâ=â11.âFor studies with a low prevalence of dysplasia, RD for all dysplasia was 2â% (1â%-3â%), P â=â0.001, NNTâ=â50. For HGD, the RD was 0.6â% (0.2â%-1.3â%), P â=â0.019, NNTâ=â166. Conclusions In populations with a high prevalence of dysplasia, adding WATS to FB results in a significant increase in dysplasia detection.