Platinum desensitization in patients with carboplatin hypersensitivity: A single-institution retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The carboplatin desensitization (CD) protocol presented here allows patients with either a positive skin test or a prior hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to safely, rapidly and effectively continue with carboplatin infusions. Newly described factors can identify patients at risk for developing adverse events during CD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent CD between 2005 and 2014. The CD protocol uses a four-step dilution process over 3.5h. RESULTS: 129 patients underwent CD and completed a total of 788cycles. The desensitization protocol prevented HSRs in 96% (753 out of 788) of these cycles. Patients achieved an average of 6.1cycles (SD±4.55, range 0-23) with CD. The CD protocol allowed 73% (94 of 129) of the patients to undergo carboplatin infusion without reaction. Patients with moderate to life-threatening HSRs (grade 2 through 4) were 10.5years younger at initial CD than patients with grades 0 or 1 HSRs (52.3 vs. 63, P = 0.0307). One patient death occurred during her thirteenth desensitization cycle. The HSR in this case was complicated by pre-exisiting pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of its kind showing a safe, effective and rapid (3.5h) CD protocol. The majority of patients with a history of either carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction or a positive skin test completed the CD protocol without HSRs. Age was identified as a risk factor for HSR severity during CD. Age can be employed along with pre-load dependent cardiac conditions as a way to help risk stratify patients undergoing CD.

A survey of gynecologic oncologists regarding the end-of-life discussion: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the practices and attitudes of gynecologic oncologists regarding the end-of-life discussion. METHODS: A pilot survey was sent to 1105 members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO). The survey consisted of 20 questions and was sent via the website Survey Monkey. RESULTS: Response rate was 12.8%. Sixty percent of respondents were male, most ranged between 30 and 60 years of age and more than half performed 5-10 major surgeries per week. More than half of respondents (53.9%) deferred the End of Life discussion until the patient had sustained a major change in functional and/or medical status. Thirty percent initiated it at the first recurrence or progression of disease. Forty three percent of respondents characterized the discussion as an on-going process. Patients' age, social support, health insurance, and co-morbidities had no influence on the discussion, and neither did the tumor's site of origin or grade. More respondents initiated the discussion in advanced stage cancer (57%) and after salvage chemotherapy institution (54%). Forty four percent of respondents reported that "understanding and acceptance" was the initial response by patient when counseled about withdrawal of care. This increased to 86% when the issue was revisited. Confusion or reluctance to discuss the subject were initially reported to be 12% and 19%, respectively, but decreased to 2% and 3%, respectively, when withdrawal of care was subsequently addressed with the patient. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot survey sheds a light on attitudes and practices about the end-of-life discussion that deserve to be further studied.

Impact of carboplatin hypersensitivity and desensitization on patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to chemotherapy is an ongoing issue in cancer treatments. Strategies to induce tolerance and maximize chemotherapy efficacy include desensitization protocols. The precise impact of these protocols, however, in the long-term treatments remains unclear. We aim to compare overall survival (OS) in hypersensitive patients treated with carboplatin desensitization to patients without hypersensitivity reactions. We also sought to identify new risk factors for HSRs and reconfirm that the DNA repair enzyme, germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2), is a risk factor for hypersensitivity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Retrospective study in patients with ovarian cancer tested for gBRCA1/2 mutations who received more than six infusions of carboplatin from August 2005 to November 2016. Two-sided Fisher exact, Student's t test and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed to identify independent predictors of survival. Statistical significance was set with a two-sided p value of 0.05. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with gBRCA1/2 testing met inclusion. Forty patients (44%) were gBRCA1/2-deficient and 51 (56%) were gBRCA1/2-proficient. Patients with gBRCA1/2 deficiencies had a higher likelihood of developing carboplatin hypersensitivity, HR 6.433 (95% CI: 1.868-22.149). None of the patients with carboplatin hypersensitivity were given PARP inhibitors prior to the development of HSRs. The patients with recurrent advanced stage (III-IV) ovarian cancer had a higher likelihood of developing carboplatin hypersensitivity, HR 4.783 (1.008-22.689). Moreover, we found that hypersensitive patients who underwent carboplatin desensitization had a 48-month longer OS than patients without hypersensitivity to carboplatin not undergoing carboplatin desensitization (p = 0.0094). A subgroup analysis indicated that gBRCA1/2-proficient hypersensitive patients undergoing carboplatin desensitization had a 43-month longer OS than gBRCA1/2-proficient patients without HSRs (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that gBRCA1/2 deficiency and advanced stage are independent risk factors for development of carboplatin hypersensitivity in ovarian cancer patients. Our study also shows improved OS in hypersensitive patients receiving CD compared to non-hypersensitive patients, independent of gBRCA1/2.