Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2822: 77-86, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907913

ABSTRACT

Foodborne viruses remain the largest cause of human gastroenteritis and one of the largest contributors to foodborne illnesses worldwide. Currently, quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) or real-time qPCR are the detection methods commonly used for quantification of foodborne viruses, but those methods have several disadvantages, such as relying on standard curves for quantification and the background noise from a bulk reaction. ddPCR uses an oil-water emulsion to form multiple droplets that partition small amounts of viral genetic material (DNA or RNA) into each of the droplets. These droplets then undergo amplification cycles and are analyzed using Poisson distributions. This allows for absolute quantification without the need for a standard curve, which makes ddPCR a precise tool in surveillance of foodborne viruses. Herein, we describe the process of detecting foodborne viruses using RNA isolated from various matrices. Up to 96 samples including the positive and negative controls can be analyzed on a single plate by ddPCR.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases , RNA Viruses , RNA, Viral , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics , Humans , Foodborne Diseases/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , RNA Viruses/genetics , RNA Viruses/isolation & purification , Food Microbiology/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
2.
J Virol Methods ; 324: 114860, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061674

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) generally causes acute liver infection in humans and its transmission could be waterborne, foodborne, bloodborne, or zoonotic. To date, there is no standard method for the detection of HEV from food and environmental samples. Herein, we explored the possibility of using magnetic beads for the capture and detection of HEV. For this purpose, we employed Dynabeads M-270 Epoxy magnetic beads, coated with different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against HEV capsid protein, and the Nanotrap Microbiome A Particle magnetic beads, which are coated with chemical affinity baits, to capture HEV-3 particles in suspension. Viral RNA was extracted by heat-shock or QIAamp viral RNA kit and subjected to quantification using digital-droplet RT-PCR (ddRT-PCR). We demonstrated that the mAb-coupled Dynabeads and the Nanotrap particles, both were able to successfully capture HEV-3. The latter, however had lower limit of detection (<140gc compared with <1400 gc) and significantly higher extraction efficiency in comparison to the mAb-coupled Dynabeads (41.1% vs 8.8%). We have also observed that viral RNA extraction by heat-shock is less efficient compared to using highly denaturing reagents in QIAmp viral RNA extraction kit. As such, magnetic beads have the potential to be used to capture HEV virions for research and surveillance purposes.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus , Hepatitis E , Humans , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(10)2023 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37896985

ABSTRACT

In recent years, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have emerged as a revolutionary technology for vaccine delivery. LNPs serve as an integral component of mRNA vaccines by protecting and transporting the mRNA payload into host cells. Despite their prominence in mRNA vaccines, there remains a notable gap in our understanding of the potential application of LNPs for the delivery of DNA vaccines. In this study, we sought to investigate the suitability of leading LNP formulations for the delivery of plasmid DNA (pDNA). In addition, we aimed to explore key differences in the properties of popular LNP formulations when delivering either mRNA or DNA. To address these questions, we compared three leading LNP formulations encapsulating mRNA- or pDNA-encoding firefly luciferase based on potency, expression kinetics, biodistribution, and immunogenicity. Following intramuscular injection in mice, we determined that RNA-LNPs formulated with either SM-102 or ALC-0315 lipids were the most potent (all p-values < 0.01) and immunogenic (all p-values < 0.05), while DNA-LNPs formulated with SM-102 or ALC-0315 demonstrated the longest duration of signal. Additionally, all LNP formulations were found to induce expression in the liver that was proportional to the signal at the injection site (SM102: r = 0.8787, p < 0.0001; ALC0315: r = 0.9012, p < 0.0001; KC2: r = 0.9343, p < 0.0001). Overall, this study provides important insights into the differences between leading LNP formulations and their applicability to DNA- and RNA-based vaccinations.

4.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1020134, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37006299

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The incidence of Lyme disease (LD) in Canada and the United States has risen over the last decade, nearing 480,000 cases each year. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, the causative agent of LD, is transmitted to humans through the bite of an infected tick, resulting in flu-like symptoms and often a characteristic bull's-eye rash. In more severe cases, disseminated bacterial infection can cause arthritis, carditis and neurological impairments. Currently, no vaccine is available for the prevention of LD in humans. Methods: In this study, we developed a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated DNA vaccine encoding outer surface protein C type A (OspC-type A) of B. burgdorferi. Results: Vaccination of C3H/HeN mice with two doses of the candidate vaccine induced significant OspC-type A-specific antibody titres and borreliacidal activity. Analysis of the bacterial burden following needle challenge with B. burgdorferi (OspC-type A) revealed that the candidate vaccine afforded effective protection against homologous infection across a range of susceptible tissues. Notably, vaccinated mice were protected against carditis and lymphadenopathy associated with Lyme borreliosis. Discussion: Overall, the results of this study provide support for the use of a DNA-LNP platform for the development of LD vaccines.


Subject(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi , Lyme Disease , Myocarditis , Vaccines, DNA , Humans , Mice , Animals , Bacterial Vaccines , Mice, Inbred C3H , DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL