Metastatic pituitary tumors: an institutional case series.

PURPOSE: Pituitary carcinomas are a rare entity that respond poorly to multimodal therapy. Patients follow a variable disease course that remains ill-defined. METHODS: We present an institutional case series of patients treated for pituitary carcinomas over a 30-year period from 1992 to 2022. A systematic review was conducted to identify prior case series of patients with pituitary carcinomas. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with a mean age at pituitary carcinoma diagnosis of 52.5 years (standard deviation [SD] 19.4) met inclusion criteria. All 14 patients had tumor subtypes confirmed by immunohistochemistry and hormone testing, with the most common being ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas (n = 12). Patients had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.4 years (range 0.7-10.0) and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.4 years (range 2.3-24.0) from pituitary adenoma diagnosis. Median PFS and OS were 0.6 years (range 0.0-2.2) and 1.5 years (range 0.1-9.6) respectively upon development of metastases. Most patients (n = 12) had locally invasive disease to the cavernous sinus, dorsum sellae dura, or sphenoid sinus prior to metastasis. Common sites of metastasis included the central nervous system, liver, lung, and bone. In a pooled analysis including additional cases from the literature, treatment of metastases with chemotherapy or a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.02), while failing to significantly improve OS (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Pituitary carcinomas are highly recurrent, heterogenous tumors with variable responses to treatment. Multidisciplinary management with an experienced neuro-endocrine and neuro-oncology team is needed given the unrelenting nature of this disease.

The Surgeon, or The Extraction of the Stone of Madness, by Jan Sanders van Hemessen (c 1500-1566).

The Surgeon, or The Extraction of the Stone of Madness is one of the most striking representations of neurosurgery in art. The focus of the painting is occupied by a surgeon who, with a concentrated gaze and wry smile, attempts to remove a stone from the forehead of an anguished young man who is tied to a chair, crying in agony. The artist of this dramatic work is the relatively obscure Jan Sanders van Hemessen (c 1500-1566). Hemessen lived in a time of artistic ferment in the Netherlands as conservative local traditions gave way to new ideas imported from Italy, which marked the beginning of the Romanism period. Romanists were aspiring young Netherlandish artists who traveled to Rome, Florence, Milan, and Venice to study the works of High Renaissance masters such as Michelangelo, Raphael, and Leonardo da Vinci. With these lessons in mind, they combined the typical features of early Netherlandish painting-a high degree of realism, the use of symbolic iconography, and a focus on genre painting and still life-with the dramatic gestures, heroic postures, chiaroscuro, space and volume, and grand humanistic themes of the Italian Renaissance. Hemessen's interpretation of the allegory of the stone of madness reveals these Italian influences while also retaining the early Netherlandish tradition of realism and iconography, in which the objective world represents a realm of symbolic implication carrying allegorical moralistic messages. The predominant interpretation of The Surgeon, or The Extraction of the Stone of Madness is as a metaphor for stupidity and gullibility, a common theme in Netherlandish art of this time. As such, Hemessen's painting symbolizes the limits of the medical profession and underscores the persistent hope for neurosurgery to treat psychiatric disease in the future.

Long-term outcomes of posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformation type 1: which patients are most prone to failure?

PURPOSE: The role of an osseous-only posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) remains controversial. We reviewed long-term outcomes for patients with CM1 undergoing a PFD to evaluate if there was any difference for failure when compared to patients undergoing a PFD with duraplasty (PFDD). METHODS: Consecutive patients surgically treated at a single tertiary pediatric neurosurgery clinic over a 25-year period with at least 5 years of follow-up were evaluated. PFD patients were compared to those that initially received a PFDD. Demographics, surgical indications, surgical approach, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included in this study of which 25 (41.67%) underwent PFD and 35 (58.33%) underwent PFDD. Mean age at surgery was 7.41 years (range 0.4 to 18 years) with a mean follow-up of 8.23 years (range 5 to 21 years). Those that received a PFD had a lower rate of radiographic syrinx improvement (p = 0.03), especially in the setting of holocord syringes. Failure rate was significantly higher in the PFD group (20% vs 2.90%, p = 0.03). However, complications were significantly higher in the PFDD group (17.14% vs 4.0%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PFD provides a safe treatment option with similar clinical improvements and lower post-operative complication rate compared to PFDD, albeit at the cost of greater chance of reoperation, especially in the setting of a holocord syrinx. Patients with a holocord syrinx should be considered for a PFDD as their initial procedure.

High-volume facilities are not always low risk: comparing risk-standardized mortality rates versus facility volume as quality measures in surgical neuro-oncology.

OBJECTIVE: Risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) have recently been shown to outperform facility case volume as a proxy for surgical quality in lung and gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate RSMR as a surgical quality metric in primary CNS cancer. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, a population-based oncology outcomes database sourced from more than 1500 institutions in the United States, and included adult patients 18 years of age and older who were diagnosed with glioblastoma, pituitary adenoma, or meningioma and were treated with surgery. For each group, RSMR quintiles and annual volume were calculated in a training set (2009-2013) and these thresholds were applied to the validation set (2014-2018). In this paper, the authors compared the effectiveness and efficiency of facility volume-based versus RSMR-based hospital centralization models and evaluated the overlap between the two systems. A patterns-of-care analysis was also performed to explore socioeconomic predictors of being treated at better-performing treating facilities. RESULTS: A total of 37,838 meningioma, 21,189 pituitary adenoma, and 30,788 glioblastoma patients were surgically treated from 2014 to 2018. There were substantial differences between RSMR and facility volume classification schemes among all tumor types. In an RSMR-based centralization model, an average of 36 patients undergoing glioblastoma surgery would need to relocate to a low-mortality hospital to prevent one 30-day mortality following surgery, whereas 46 would need to relocate to a high-volume hospital. For pituitary adenoma and meningioma, both metrics were inefficient in centralizing care to reduce surgical mortality. Additionally, overall survival for glioblastoma patients was better modeled in an RSMR classification scheme. Analyses to investigate the impact of care disparities found that Black and Hispanic patients, patients earning less than $38,000, and uninsured patients were more likely to be treated at high-mortality hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: RSMR is more effective and efficient than a traditional volume-based approach for preventing early postoperative death in glioblastoma surgery. These data have important implications for future quality-related studies in neurosurgical oncology and may be relevant for healthcare/insurance payments, hospital evaluation assessments, healthcare disparities, and the standardization of care across hospitals.

Defining the Post-Operative Progression of Degenerative Scoliosis: An Analysis of Cases without Instrument Failure.

OBJECTIVE: The expected post-operative changes in radiographic alignment over time remain poorly defined in patients surgically treated for degenerative scoliosis without instrument failure. Here we aim to describe the optimal natural progression of radiographic degenerative scoliosis at multiple timepoints in patients treated with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: We identified an initial retrospective cohort of 114 patients treated with a TLIF for degenerative scoliosis between 2018 and 2022, with 39 patients ultimately meeting the imaging inclusion criteria. Patients who completed a primary or revision procedure with no evidence of instrument failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, or proximal junctional failure at last follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements of spinopelvic alignment were manually extracted from X-Ray scoliosis films. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (mean age 62.6 ± 8.7, mean follow-up 2.9 years), of which 23 underwent a primary TLIF (Primary) and 16 a revision procedure (Revision), were analyzed. Patients in the Primary group experienced a durable improvement in Thoracolumbar Cobb angle (-25° ± 15°), Thoracic Kyphosis (10° ± 13°), and Pelvic Incidence/lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL) (-19° ± 19°) through the first year of follow-up. In the Revision group, at one year follow-up, all measures of spinopelvic alignment except PI/LL mismatch had reverted to pre-operative levels. Thoracolumbar Cobb angle decreased to a significantly greater degree in the Primary group compared to the Revision group. CONCLUSION: Primary TLIF operations without instrument failure consistently improve radiographic outcomes in three key measures through the first year. For revision procedures, there appears to be modest radiographic benefit at follow-up.

Does waiting for surgery matter? How time from diagnostic MRI to resection affects outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Maximal safe resection is the standard of care for patients presenting with lesions concerning for glioblastoma (GBM) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Currently, there is no consensus on surgical urgency for patients with an excellent performance status, which complicates patient counseling and may increase patient anxiety. This study aims to assess the impact of time to surgery (TTS) on clinical and survival outcomes in patients with GBM. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 145 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wild-type GBM who underwent initial resection at the University of California, San Francisco, between 2014 and 2016. Patients were grouped according to the time from diagnostic MRI to surgery (i.e., TTS): ≤ 7, > 7-21, and > 21 days. Contrast-enhancing tumor volumes (CETVs) were measured using software. Initial CETV (CETV1) and preoperative CETV (CETV2) were used to evaluate tumor growth represented as percent change (ΔCETV) and specific growth rate (SPGR; % growth/day). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the date of resection and were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients (median TTS 10 days), 56 (39%), 53 (37%), and 36 (25%) underwent surgery ≤ 7, > 7-21, and > 21 days from initial imaging, respectively. Median OS and PFS among the study cohort were 15.5 and 10.3 months, respectively, and did not differ among the TTS groups (p = 0.81 and 0.17, respectively). Median CETV1 was 35.9, 15.7, and 10.2 cm3 across the TTS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Preoperative biopsy and presenting to an outside hospital emergency department were associated with an average 12.79-day increase and 9.09-day decrease in TTS, respectively. Distance from the treating facility (median 57.19 miles) did not affect TTS. In the growth cohort, TTS was associated with an average 2.21% increase in ΔCETV per day; however, there was no effect of TTS on SPGR, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), postoperative deficits, survival, discharge location, or hospital length of stay. Subgroup analyses did not identify any high-risk groups for which a shorter TTS may be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: An increased TTS for patients with imaging concerning for GBM did not impact clinical outcomes, and while there was a significant association with ΔCETV, SPGR remained unaffected. However, SPGR was associated with a worse preoperative KPS, which highlights the importance of tumor growth speed over TTS. Therefore, while it is ill advised to wait an unnecessarily long time after initial imaging studies, these patients do not require urgent/emergency surgery and can seek tertiary care opinions and/or arrange for additional preoperative support/resources. Future studies are needed to explore subgroups for whom TTS may impact clinical outcomes.

Socioeconomic differences between medically and surgically treated prolactinomas: a retrospective review of 598 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic status (SES) is known to affect presentations and outcomes in pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resections, but there is a paucity of literature examining its impact specifically on patients with prolactinomas, who may be treated medically or surgically. The authors sought to determine whether SES was associated with differences in treatment choice or outcomes for prolactinoma patients. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patient records at a high-volume academic pituitary center for prolactinoma diagnoses. Patients were split into medically and surgically treated cohorts. Race, ethnicity, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and zip code-based income data were collected and examined as socioeconomic covariates. Outcomes of interest included pretreatment likelihood of surgical cure, medical versus surgical treatment allocation, and posttreatment remission rates. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 568 prolactinoma patients (351 medically treated and 217 surgically treated). Patients receiving surgery were more likely to have Medicaid or private insurance (p < 0.001) and have lower incomes (p < 0.001) than medically treated patients. Lower-income surgical patients were more likely to require surgical intervention for an indication such as tumor decompression than higher-income patients (p = 0.023). Surgical patients with a PCP had a higher estimated likelihood of surgical cure (p = 0.008), while no SES-based differences in surgical remission likelihood existed in the medical cohort. After surgery, surgical patients who achieved remission had significantly higher income than those who did not (p < 0.001). Other SES factors were not associated with surgical remission, and among medically treated patients, remission rates were not affected by any SES factor. Income was inversely related to prolactinoma size in both cohorts (surgical, p < 0.001; medical, p = 0.005) but was associated more prominently in surgical patients (surgical, -0.65 mm per $10,000; medical, -0.37 mm per $10,000). CONCLUSIONS: While surgical prolactinoma patients were prone to income and PCP-related disparities, no SES disparities were found among medically treated patients. Income had a more pronounced association with tumor size in the surgical cohort and likely contributed to the increased need for surgical intervention seen in low-income surgical patients. Addressing socioeconomic healthcare disparities is needed among surgical prolactinoma patients to increase rates of early presentation and improve the outcomes of low-SES populations.

Impact of extent of resection and adjuvant therapy in diffuse gliomas of the spine.

BACKGROUND CONTENT: Diffuse gliomas of the spine (DGS)-consisting of intradural intramedullary glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma-are exceedingly rare tumors that account for about 2% of primary spinal cord tumors. Much is unknown about their optimal treatment regimen due to a relative lack of clinical outcome data. PURPOSE: To provide an updated analysis on treatment and outcomes in DGS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Observational cohort study using The National Cancer Database (NCDB), a multicenter prospectively collected oncology outcomes database. A systematic literature review was also performed to compare the resulting data to previous series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with histologically confirmed DGS from 2004 to 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term overall survival and short-term 30/90-day postsurgical mortality, 30-day readmission, and prolonged hospital length of stay. METHODS: Impact of extent of resection and adjuvant therapy on overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze covariables and their prognostic impact on short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 747 cases that met inclusion criteria, there were 439 astrocytomas, 14 oligodendrogliomas, and 208 glioblastomas. Sixty percent (n=442) of patients received radiation, and 45% (n=324) received chemotherapy. Tumor histology significantly impacted survival; glioblastoma had the poorest survival (median survival time [MS]: 12.3 months), followed by astrocytoma (MS: 70.8 months) and oligodendroglioma (MS: 71.6 months) (p<.001). Gross total resection (GTR) independently conferred a survival benefit in patients with glioblastoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.194, p<0.001) and other WHO grade four tumors (HR: 0.223, p=.003). Adjuvant chemotherapy also improved survival in patients with glioblastoma (HR: 0.244, p=.007) and WHO grade four tumors (HR: 0.252, p<.001). Systematic literature review identified 14 prior studies with a combined DGS mortality rate of 1.3%, which is lower than the 4% real-world outcomes calculated from the NCDB. This difference may be explained by selection biases in previously published literature in which only centers with favorable outcomes publish their results. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a paucity of data regarding treatment paradigms and outcomes for DGS. Our analysis, the largest to date, demonstrates that GTR and adjuvant therapy independently improve survival for certain high-grade subgroups of DGS. This best-available data informs optimal management for such patients.

Neurosurgical Outcomes for Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, and the results from the National Cancer Database, the largest multicenter national cancer registry, have not previously been comprehensively reported. OBJECTIVE: To capture pediatric neurosurgical outcomes and investigate possible disparities of care. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for pediatric patients who were diagnosed with CNS tumors from 2004 to 2018. Primary outcomes included 30/90 days postoperative mortality (30M/90M), readmission within 30 days of discharge (30R), and length of inpatient stay (LOS). RESULTS: Twenty four thousand nine hundred thirty cases met the inclusion criteria, of which were 4753 (19.1%) juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas, 3262 (13.1%) medulloblastomas, 2200 (8.8%) neuronal/mixed neuronal-glial tumors, and 2135 (8.6%) ependymal tumors. Patients aged 0 to 4 years had significantly poorer outcomes than patients in older age groups (90M: 3.5% vs 0.7%-0.9%; 30R: 6.5% vs 3.6%-4.8%; LOS: 12.0 days vs 6.0-8.9 days). Tumor size was a strong predictor of poor outcomes with each additional cm in diameter conferring a 26%, 7%, and 23% increased risk of 90M, 30R, and prolonged LOS, respectively. Data over the study period demonstrated year over year improvements of 4%, 3%, and 2%, respectively, for 90M, 30R, and prolonged LOS. Facilities with a high volume of pediatric tumor cases had improved 90M (1.1% vs 1.5%, P = .041) and LOS (7.6 vs 8.6 days, P < .001). Patients with private health insurance had better outcomes than patients with government insurance. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variability in surgical morbidity and mortality of pediatric CNS tumors. Additional investigation is warranted to reduce outcome differences that may be based on socioeconomic factors.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections After Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Abstract Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become an increasingly popular and effective treatment modality for various conditions of the lumbar spine. However, complications after this procedure can be costly. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of these types of complications. The present study identifies independent risk factors for SSI after single-level ALIF to identify high-risk patients better. Patients and Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify single-level ALIF patients from 2005 to 2016. Multilevel fusions and non-anterior approach procedures were excluded. Mann-Pearson χ2 tests analyzed categorical variables, whereas one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent t-tests analyzed differences in mean values of continuous variables. Risk factors for SSI were identified via a multivariable logistic regression model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated utilizing the predicted probabilities. Results: A total of 10,017 patients met inclusion criteria; 80 (0.80%) had developed SSI and 9,937 (99.20%) had not. On multivariable logistic regression models, class 3 obesity (p = 0.014), dialysis (p = 0.025), long-term steroid use (p = 0.010), and wound classification 4 (dirty/infected) (p = 0.002) all independently increased the risk for SSI in single-level ALIF. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC; C-statistic) was 0.728 (p < 0.001), indicating relatively strong reliability of the final model. Conclusions: Several independent risk factors including obesity, dialysis, long-term steroid use, and dirty wound classification all increased risk for SSI after single-level ALIF. By identifying these high-risk patients, surgeons and patients can have more informed pre-operative discussions. In addition, identifying and optimizing these patients prior to operative intervention may help to minimize infection risk.

Risk Factors for Significant Postoperative Hemorrhage After Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection: A Case-Control Study of 1066 Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hemorrhage is a rare but potentially serious complication after pituitary surgery. The risk factors for this complication are mostly unknown, and further knowledge would help guide postoperative management. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perioperative risks and clinical presentation of significant postoperative hemorrhage (SPH) after endonasal surgery for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: A population of 1066 patients undergoing endonasal (microscopic and endoscopic) surgery for pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resection at a high-volume academic center was reviewed. SPH cases were defined as postoperative hematoma evident on imaging requiring return to the operating room for evacuation. Patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed with uni- and multivariable logistic regression, and postoperative courses were descriptively examined. RESULTS: Ten patients were found to have SPH. On univariable analysis, these cases were significantly more likely to present with apoplexy ( P = .004), have larger tumors ( P < .001), and lower gross total resection rates ( P = .019). A multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size (odds ratio 1.94, P = .008) and apoplexy at presentation (odds ratio 6.00, P = .018) were significantly associated with higher odds of SPH. The most common symptoms for patients with SPH were vision deficits and headache, and the median time for symptom onset was 1 day after surgery. CONCLUSION: Larger tumor size and presentation with apoplexy were associated with clinically significant postoperative hemorrhage. Patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy are more likely to experience a significant postoperative hemorrhage and should be carefully monitored for headache and vision changes in the days after surgery.

Spinal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer at Mass General Brigham: A Twenty-Year Case Series With Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: We present an institutional case series of patients treated for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) spinal metastases to investigate the outcomes between no treatment, radiation, surgery, and surgery/radiation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with CRC spinal metastases presenting to affiliated institutions between 2001 and 2021 wereidentified. Information related to patient demographics, treatment modality, treatment outcomes, symptom improvement, and survival was collected by chart review. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatments by log-rank significance testing. A literature review was conducted to identify other cases series of CRC patients with spinal metastases. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (mean age 58.5) with CRC spinal metastases across a mean of 3.3 levels met inclusion criteria: 14 (15.7%) received no treatment, 11 (12.4%) received surgery alone, 37 (41.6%) received radiation alone, and 27 (30.3%) received both radiation and surgery. Patients treated with combination therapy had the longest median OS of 24.7 months (range 0.6-85.9), which did not significantly differ from the median OS of 8.9 months (range 0.2-42.6) observed in patients who received no treatment (P = 0.075). Combination therapy provided objectively longer survival time in comparison to other treatment modalities but failed to reach statistical significance. The majority of patients that received treatment (n = 51/75, 68.0%) experienced some degree of symptomatic or functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic intervention has the potential to improve the quality of life in patients with CRC spinal metastases. We demonstrate that surgery and radiation are useful options for these patients, despite their lack of objective improvement in OS.

Advances and Evolving Challenges in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention is a critical tool to address adult spinal deformity (ASD). Given the evolution of spinal surgical techniques, we sought to characterize developments in ASD correction and barriers impacting clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a literature review utilizing PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to examine advances in ASD surgical correction and ongoing challenges from patient and clinician perspectives. ASD procedures were examined across pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases. RESULTS: Several factors influence the effectiveness of ASD correction. Standardized radiographic parameters and three-dimensional modeling have been used to guide operative planning. Complex minimally invasive procedures, targeted corrections, and staged procedures can tailor surgical approaches while minimizing operative time. Further, improvements in osteotomy technique, intraoperative navigation, and enhanced hardware have increased patient safety. However, challenges remain. Variability in patient selection and deformity undercorrection have resulted in heterogenous clinical responses. Surgical complications, including blood loss, infection, hardware failure, proximal junction kyphosis/failure, and pseudarthroses, pose barriers. Although minimally invasive approaches are being utilized more often, clinical validation is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The growing prevalence of ASD requires surgical solutions that can lead to sustained symptom resolution. Leveraging computational and imaging advances will be necessary as we seek to provide comprehensive treatment plans for patients.

Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics reveal cancer-associated fibroblasts in glioblastoma with protumoral effects.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) were presumed absent in glioblastoma given the lack of brain fibroblasts. Serial trypsinization of glioblastoma specimens yielded cells with CAF morphology and single-cell transcriptomic profiles based on their lack of copy number variations (CNVs) and elevated individual cell CAF probability scores derived from the expression of 9 CAF markers and absence of 5 markers from non-CAF stromal cells sharing features with CAFs. Cells without CNVs and with high CAF probability scores were identified in single-cell RNA-Seq of 12 patient glioblastomas. Pseudotime reconstruction revealed that immature CAFs evolved into subtypes, with mature CAFs expressing actin alpha 2, smooth muscle (ACTA2). Spatial transcriptomics from 16 patient glioblastomas confirmed CAF proximity to mesenchymal glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), endothelial cells, and M2 macrophages. CAFs were chemotactically attracted to GSCs, and CAFs enriched GSCs. We created a resource of inferred crosstalk by mapping expression of receptors to their cognate ligands, identifying PDGF and TGF-ß as mediators of GSC effects on CAFs and osteopontin and HGF as mediators of CAF-induced GSC enrichment. CAFs induced M2 macrophage polarization by producing the extra domain A (EDA) fibronectin variant that binds macrophage TLR4. Supplementing GSC-derived xenografts with CAFs enhanced in vivo tumor growth. These findings are among the first to identify glioblastoma CAFs and their GSC interactions, making them an intriguing target.

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Comprehensive Overview.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), also called pseudotumor cerebri syndrome, is a disorder defined as elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) of unknown cause. It is a diagnosis of exclusion in most cases, and all other forms of elevated ICP must be ruled out. With its increasing prevalence, it is much more likely for physicians, otolaryngologists included, to encounter this condition. It is important to have a clear understanding of the typical and atypical presentation of this disease, along with its evaluative workup and management options. This article reviews IIH with a focus on those factors that are specifically relevant to otolaryngologic care.

Effect of facility volume on giant pituitary adenoma neurosurgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Giant pituitary adenomas (PAs), defined as 4 cm or greater at their maximum diameter, are commonly treated with neurosurgical intervention as the first-line therapy. However, existing studies are from high-volume institutions whose outcomes may not be representative of many cancer centers. In the present study, the authors use a large cancer registry to evaluate demographics, national treatment trends, and outcomes by facility volume to address knowledge gaps for this uncommon tumor. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with PAs who had undergone resection from 2004 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the prognostic impact of covariates on short-term outcomes including 30-day readmission (30R), 30-day mortality (30M), 90-day mortality (90M), and prolonged length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS). Propensity score matching was used for validation. RESULTS: Among the 39,030 patients who met the study inclusion criteria, 3696 giant PAs were identified. These tumors had higher rates of subtotal resection (55% vs 24%, p < 0.001), adjunctive radiotherapy (15% vs 5%, p < 0.001), and hormonal therapy (8% vs 4%, p < 0.001) than nongiant PAs. The giant PAs also had worse 30M (0.6% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001), 90M (1.0% vs 5.0%, p < 0.001), 30R (4.0% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001), and LOS (22.2% vs 42.1%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for giant PA, decreased tumor size, younger age, race other than African American, lower comorbidity score, and high-volume facility (HVF; defined as ≥ 2.5 giant PA cases per year) were statistically significant predictors of favorable outcomes. Specifically, 30M, 90M, 30R, and LOS were decreased by 50%, 43%, 55%, and 32%, respectively, when giant PAs were treated at HVFs (each p < 0.05). HVFs more often used the endoscopic approach (71% vs 46%, p < 0.001) and less adjuvant radiotherapy (11% vs 16%, p < 0.001). Propensity score matching validated 30M, 30R, and LOS outcome differences in a cohort of 1056 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of superior outcomes when giant PAs are treated at HVFs. These results likely reflect the relation between physician experience and outcomes for these uncommon tumors, which suggests the need for institutional collaboration as a potential goal in their surgical management.

The Impact of Magnetoencephalography-Directed Stereo-Electroencephalography Depth Electrode Implantation on Seizure Control Outcome in Children.

Introduction The use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing epileptic foci and directing surgical treatment of medically refractory epilepsy is well established in clinical practice; however, it has not yet been incorporated into the routine planning of stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) (SEEG) depth electrode trajectories during invasive intracranial evaluation for epileptic foci localization. In this study, we assess the impact of MEG-directed SEEG on seizure outcomes in a pediatric cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a single-institution cohort of pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery. The primary endpoint was the reduction in seizure burden as determined by dichotomized Engel scores (favorable outcome: Engel scores I and II; poor outcome: Engel scores III and IV). Results Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (24 males and 13 females). The median age at seizure onset was three years, the median age at surgery was 14.1 years, and the median follow-up length was 30.8 months. Concordance was noted in 7/10 (70%) patients who received MEG-directed SEEG. Good clinical outcomes were achieved in 70% of MEG-directed SEEG patients, compared to 59.4% in their counterparts; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.72). We noted no statistically significant association between sex, disease laterality, or age at surgery and good clinical outcomes. Conclusions Patients who underwent MEG-directed SEEG had favorable clinical outcomes, which demonstrated the practicability of this technique for determining SEEG electrode placement. Although no significant difference in clinical outcomes was obtained between the two groups, this may have been due to low statistical power. Future prospective, multi-institutional investigations to assess the benefit of MEG-directed SEEG are warranted.

The Relationship Among Surgeon Experience, Complications, and Radiographic Outcomes in Spine Deformity Surgery: The Experience of a Junior Surgeon.

OBJECTIVE: To examine complication rates and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) by a junior surgeon. METHODS: A study was conducted of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent an open posterior interbody fusion of the thoracic and/or lumbar regions by a single surgeon for ASD between 2018 and 2022. Patient characteristics, complications, and common radiographic parameters of spinopelvic alignment were collated. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with an average of 4.2 comorbidities underwent surgical correction of ASD. Thirty-seven patients (33.0%) experienced 52 major complications and 50 patients (44.6%) experienced 66 minor complications. Twenty-three patients (20.5%) required a revision operation. Both sagittal vertical axis (P < 10-14) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P < 10-7) significantly improved postoperatively. Number of levels (P < 0.05), operative time >650 minutes (P < 0.01), estimated blood loss >1500 mL (P < 0.01), length of intensive care unit stay >1 day (P < 0.05), and hospitalization length >5 days (P < 0.05) all significantly increased the risk of a major complication. No patient factors significantly increased the risk of minor complications or revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Observed complication and revision rates in this cohort were consistent with rates reported in the literature. No preoperative patient risk factors significantly increased risk of complications or need for revision, suggesting that no patient population is at increased risk undergoing surgery by a junior surgeon. The relatively high rate of complications observed in this cohort may be a result of high baseline morbidity.

Pituitary adenoma in the elderly: surgical outcomes and treatment trends in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Decision-making in how to manage pituitary adenomas (PAs) in the elderly (age ≥ 65 years) can be challenging given the benign nature of these tumors and concerns about surgical morbidity in these patients. In this study involving a large multicenter national registry, the authors examined treatment trends and surgical outcomes in elderly compared to nonelderly patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for adults aged ≥ 18 years with PA diagnosed by MRI (in observed cases) or pathology (in surgical cases) from 2004 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the prognostic impact of age and other covariates on 30- and 90-day postsurgical mortality (30M/90M), prolonged (≥ 5 days) length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS), and extent of resection. RESULTS: A total of 96,399 cases met the study inclusion criteria, 27% of which were microadenomas and 73% of which were macroadenomas. Among these cases were 25,464 elderly patients with PA. Fifty-three percent of these elderly patients were treated with surgery, 1.9% underwent upfront radiotherapy, and 44.9% were observed without treatment. Factors associated with surgical treatment compared to observation included younger age, higher income, private insurance, higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity (CD) score, larger tumor size, and receiving treatment at an academic hospital (each p ≤ 0.01). Elderly patients undergoing surgery had increased rates of 30M (1.4% vs 0.6%), 90M (2.8% vs 0.9%), prolonged LOS (26.1% vs 23.0%), and subtotal resection (27.2% vs 24.5%; each p ≤ 0.01) compared to those in nonelderly PA patients. On multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, and CD score were independently associated with worse postsurgical mortality. High-volume facilities (HVFs) had significantly better outcomes than low-volume facilities: 30M (0.9% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001), 90M (2.0% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001), and prolonged LOS (21.8% vs 30.3%, p < 0.001). A systematic literature review composed of 22 studies demonstrated an elderly PA patient mortality rate of 0.7%, which is dramatically lower than real-world NCDB outcomes and speaks to substantial selection bias in the previously published literature. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings confirm that elderly patients with PA are at higher risk for postoperative mortality than younger patients. Surgical risk in this age group may have been previously underreported in the literature. Resection at HVFs better reflects these historical rates, which has important implications in elderly patients for whom surgery is being considered.

Comparison of One-day Combined versus Staged Anterior and Posterior Cervical Decompression, Fixation, and Fusion.

AIM: To compare the perioperative outcomes between single-day combined or separate-day staged surgeries for cervical spinal stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients admitted at a single institution between July 2015 and April 2019, who underwent either single-day combined or separate-day staged surgeries during the same hospitalization period. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications were compared between the patient groups. RESULTS: Eighty patients (combined surgery: n=68, staged surgery: n=12) were included. Dysphagia was the most commonly reported postoperative complication in 44/80 patients (55%). There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics between the two groups. The staged surgery group had significantly longer total time in the operating room (7.2 vs. 8.5 hours, p=0.002), longer duration of general anesthesia (6.7 vs. 7.6 hours, p=0.006), and higher incidence of postoperative delirium (12.1% vs. 50% p=0.005) than the combined surgery group. The mean hospital length of stay was similar in the two groups (combined surgery: 7.5 days vs. staged surgery: 15.1 days, p=0.09). CONCLUSION: Staged anterior and posterior cervical decompressions, stabilizations, and fusions are associated with longer total time in the operating room, longer duration of general anesthesia, and higher incidence of postoperative delirium than combined surgeries.