Effectiveness and Safety of Endoanchors in Abdominal and Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to summarize the effectiveness and safety of endoanchor, a stabilizing device for the proximal endograft designed to prevent endoleak and stent migration in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Literature up to May 31, 2023 was searched and independently screened from 4 databases. Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included intraoperative and follow-up endoleak, stent migration, and reintervention rates; sac regression; and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen EVAR (n=1145) and 6 TEVAR studies (n=163) using the Heli-Fx EndoAnchor system were included from 2225 retrieved records. For EVAR patients (mean follow-up=11.9 months), the endoleak, graft migration, and reintervention rates were 3.97% (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36%-1.99%), 0.004% (95% CI=0.00%-0.76%), and 5.43% (95% CI=0.86%-12.54%), respectively. The endoleak rates for primary and revision EVAR were 0.16% (95% CI=0.00%-1.65%) and 3.60% (95% CI=0.14%-9.72%), respectively. Only 4 cases of 30-day mortality (n=4) were reported in the literature. For TEVAR patients, the endoleak, stent migration, and reintervention rates were 7.4% (95% CI=0.03%-0.13%), 0.2% (95% CI=0.00%-0.06%), and 17.1% (95% CI=0.01%-0.45%), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 0.9% (95% CI=0%-0.12%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoanchor fixation in EVAR and TEVAR is effective and safe in preventing and treating endoleak and stent migration. The mortality is minimal in EVAR but higher in TEVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT: Endoleak, graft migration, and reintervention in EVAR and TEVAR with endoanchor use were rare. Mortality in EVAR was low. The adjunctive deployment of endoanchors is an effective and safe means to prevent and treat endoleak and stent migration in EVAR and TEVAR. Yet, long-term efficacy and safety data and randomized controlled trials would be required to definitively recommend endoanchor use in routine clinical practice.

Efficacy and Durability of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular deep vein arteriaization (DVA) is a novel technique aimed at salvaging peripheral arterial disease unamenable to conventional surgical intervention. This study aims to review contemporary literature on the efficacy, safety, and durability of DVA on patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI). METHODS: The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using predefined search terms of "percutaneous deep vein arterialization" or "percutaneous deep venous arterialization" in PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and Embase. Only studies with 5 or more patients were included, and studies involving open or hybrid DVA were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success and primary amputation rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound healing, complication, reintervention, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Ten studies encompassing a total of 233 patients were included. Patients were primarily those deemed to have NO-CLI. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 1-63 months). The technical success rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2%-97.9%) and the major amputation rate was 21.8% (95% 21.1%-22.4%). The wound healing rate was 69.5% (95% CI 67.9-71.0%), complication rate was 13.8% (95% CI 11.7%-15.9%), reintervention rate was 37.4% (95% CI 34.9%-39.9%), and all-cause mortality rate was 15.7% (95% CI 14.1%-17.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that endovascular DVA is safe for patients with NO-CLI. Nonetheless, studies were small with follow-up period of less than 1 year. There is currently lack of level 1 evidence to recommend routine use in patients with NO-CLI.

Contemporary Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair for Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: To perform a systematic review on contemporary outcomes of endovascular repair and open surgical repair (OSR) for the treatment of mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search on the management of MAAs with endovascular repair or OSR was performed between January 1998 and January 2023. Patient demographics, early and late outcomes were analyzed with respect to treatment modality and MAA location. RESULTS: Forty-eight articles were included, encompassing a total of 1,358 patients (75.8% male; mean age 66.9 years; 1,372 aneurysms) treated by open (49.8%) or endovascular (50.2%) repair. Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. were the most prevalent pathogens in Asian and European countries respectively. An increasing number of descending thoracic MAAs were managed by endovascular repair (27.9% vs. 12.8%). Early mortality rates for supra- and infra-renal MAAs managed by endovascular repair were lower than OSR (suprarenal 5.4% vs. 43.2%; infrarenal 1.8% vs. 16.7%). Overall, endovascular repair demonstrated lower intraoperative (1.0% vs. 1.8%) and early mortality (6.5% vs. 15.9) rates than OSR. However, endovascular repair was associated with higher late sepsis rate (5.7% vs. 0.9%) and reintervention rate (17.6% vs. 7.3%). Pooled survival rates at 1- and 5-year were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggest that endovascular repair is an effective and safe alternative to OSR for descending thoracic, suprarenal, and infrarenal MAAs. However, endovascular repair is associated with higher risk of infection-related complications and reintervention during follow-up.

Risk factor analysis and treatment outcome of patients with spontaneous isolated celiac axis or superior mesenteric artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous isolated mesenteric artery (celiac axis or superior mesenteric artery [SMA]) dissection (IMAD) is a rare clinical entity. The aim of the present study was to examine the patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical and radiologic features, management, and prognosis and to identify the risk factors predictive of symptoms. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective review from November 2005 to November 2021 of prospectively collected data from patients with a diagnosis of IMAD. The clinical data and radiologic images were reviewed, and statistical analysis was performed to compare the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were identified. Of the 78 patients, 24 (31%) had had celiac dissections, 51 (65%) had had SMA dissections, and 3 (4%) had had both celiac and SMA dissections. The mean age was 57.7 years (range, 36-84 years), with a male predominance (86%). More than one half (55%) of the patients had had hypertension. In addition, 29 patients (37%) were symptomatic, and 24 (31%) had been admitted to the hospital. The symptomatic patients with celiac axis dissections were more likely to have thrombosis (P = .02), significant stenosis (P = .01) or branch extension (P = .02). The symptomatic patients with SMA dissections were more likely to have a smaller artery diameter (P = .07), a longer dissection length (P = .05), thrombosis (P < .001), significant stenosis (P < .001), or branch extension (P = .003). The symptomatic patients were more likely to have been treated with antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (P < .001). Only three patients had undergone an intervention. Seven patients (9%) had died of unrelated causes. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 5-year survival rate of 96% and 10-year survival rate of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: IMAD is an uncommon disease entity with a risk of visceral ischemia. Nonetheless, most of these patients can be treated conservatively with medication, with only a small minority requiring emergency surgery.

Theoretical Feasibility of Using Arch Branched Endograft Devices for Repair of Post Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Prior Ascending Aortic Replacement.

PURPOSE: Ascending aortic replacement is a common emergency procedure for treating acute type A aortic dissection. Secondary open or endovascular interventions for residual arch pathologies is difficult because of adhesions, short prosthetic grafts, and distorted anatomies. Aortic arch branched stent grafts have emerged as a potential solution for these patients if they have suitable anatomical conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical anatomical and technical feasibility of 2 currently used aortic arch branch endografts in patients who had prior replacement of the ascending aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had a prosthetic ascending aortic or hemiarch replacement for acute type A dissection in a single institution between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. Contrast computed tomography images on the most recent follow-up were analyzed on a 3-dimensional workstation. Morphological parameters were measured individually for the ascending aorta, aortic arch, supra-aortic branches, and access iliac arteries. The computed tomography scan of each patient was individually evaluated for anatomical suitability for the arch branched and double-branch devices according to set selection criteria. RESULTS: Computed tomography images of 56 patients (median age of 57 years, 45 males) were reviewed. Based on our evaluation, 26 patients (46.4%) were good candidates for an endovascular arch branched device. It would be feasible for 13 patients (23.2%), but prudent preoperative planning was required due to complicated anatomy. The other 17 patients (30.4%) were unsuitable because they met at least 1 exclusion criterion. Short prosthetic grafts, extreme graft angulations, and extensive dissections in the supra-aortic branches were the main reasons for exclusion. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair using arch branched endografts is feasible in patients with prior ascending aortic arch or hemiarch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection. The most common anatomical conditions that may influence the feasibility of the arch branched endograft procedure include insufficient proximal seal length, severe angulation of the graft, and extensive aortic dissection within the supra-aortic vessels.

Safety and Efficacy of Inner Branched Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a descriptive overview on the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular arch repair with inner branched endoprosthesis (bTEVAR) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Pre-defined search terms were used to interrogate PubMed and OVID Medline databases from January 1999 to July 2022. Patient characteristics, indication for treatment, procedural data, mortality rates, postoperative complications, and reintervention rate during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Nineteen articles were included, encompassing a total of 618 patients who received bTEVAR, most of which were double-branched (63.9%, n=395). The main indication for treatment was aneurysm secondary to chronic aortic dissection (38.8%, n=240/618) with a mean maximum diameter of 58.3±11.4 mm. Pooled mean technical success rate was 97.4±4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.1%-99.5%); 2 and 3 patients required conversion to chimney technique and open repair, respectively. Among the pooled rates of early complications, postoperative stroke was the highest (10.5%; 95% CI=6.8%-14.3%). Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality rate was 5.5% (95% CI=2.6%-9.7%). Forty patients (6.5%; 95% CI=2.5%-9.5%) required early reintervention. During a mean follow-up of 20.7±13.5 months, the mortality rate was 18.2% (n=108/593; 95% CI=8.6%-20.6%) where 12 (11.1%) were aortic-related. Pooled late reintervention rate was 9.6% (95% CI=4.8%-14.3%). Comparison of demographics and outcomes found no significant difference between single and double bTEVAR. CONCLUSION: Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a promising approach for aortic arch pathologies with a high technical success rate despite a steep learning curve. However, contemporary outcomes reflect that postoperative stroke remains the predominant concern. Further experience and long-term follow-up are required to sufficiently elucidate the safety and durability of bTEVAR in the management of aortic pathologies for high-risk patients. CLINICAL IMPACT: This systematic review summarized the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with different inner branched stent-grafts for the management of aortic arch pathologies. Pooled results from nineteen studies with 618 patients demonstrated a high technical success rate and an acceptable mortality rate. However, postoperative stroke remains the major concern. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate its durability.

Risk Factor Analysis and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Endovascular Revascularization for Intermittent Claudication or Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review long-term outcome and identify risk factors for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent as a primary treatment strategy for intermittent claudication (IC) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with data collected prospectively from Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System, departmental database, and Clinical Management System. All patients who underwent endovascular procedures for PAD between January 2011 and December 2020 were identified. The primary outcomes are overall survival and amputation-free survival. Predictive factors for OS and AFS were determined using Cox Model. RESULTS: A total number of 640 patients with PAD (IC, n = 243; CLTI, n = 377) underwent endovascular percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for PAD from January 2011 to December 2020. Patients with CLTI had a significantly higher 30 days readmission rate (18.8% vs. 6.5%, P < 0.001), emergency reoperation within 30 days (3.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and death within same admission (2.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.008) compared to IC patients. The overall survival and amputation-free survival rates were significantly lower in CLTI patients (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). On Cox multivariate analysis, CLTI was strongly predictive of all-cause mortality and amputation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.33 and HR 14.92, respectively). In patients with CLTI, chronic kidney disease was an independent predictor of mortality and amputation (HR 1.66 and HR 2.36, respectively). Smoking and ischemic heart disease were also independent predictors of mortality in this subgroup (HR 2.06 and HR 2.43, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with IC and CLTI both manifest from atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower limb arteries, these patients may have different clinical outcomes with significant mortality occurred in both IC and CLTI groups. In patients with IC, the risk of amputation was less than 1% at 5 years following revascularization.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique for plaque modification during endovascular revascularisation for peripheral artery disease (PAD) with severe calcification. The aim of this paper was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary data to elucidate the efficacy and safety of IVL in lower extremity PAD. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search with pre-defined search terms was performed using PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and EMBASE. REVIEW METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Patient characteristics, lesion calcification, pre-IVL and post-IVL diameter stenosis, complications, and stent rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Nine studies were included, encompassing a total of 681 patients (769 lesions) with IVL performed for PAD, of which 75.53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.08% - 83.03%) of the lesions were reported to have severe calcification. Comparison between pre-IVL and post-IVL diameter stenosis demonstrated a diameter stenosis reduction of 59.3% (95% CI 53.30% - 65.31%). Vascular complications were rare, with flow limiting or type D/E/F dissection occurring in only 1.25% (95% CI 0.60% - 2.61%) of cases. The overall pooled event rate for stent placement was 15.89% (95% CI 5.22% - 39.34%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports IVL as an effective and safe approach for calcified plaque modification in lower extremity PAD, achieving a diameter stenosis reduction of 59.3% (95% CI 53.30% - 65.31%) with minimal vascular complications. Routine use of this device is not recommended; further high quality evidence is required to elucidate the efficacy of IVL with respect to different clinical characteristics such as lesion location and length, and in comparison with other treatment modalities such as atherectomy.

Methods and Outcomes of Endovascular False Lumen Embolization for Thoracic Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: To provide a contemporary review on endovascular false lumen (FL) embolization for thoracic aortic dissection (AD) and evaluate its early outcome. METHODS: A systematic literature review on FL embolization for thoracic AD from January 2003 to December 2020 was performed under the instruction of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Each article was analyzed using a standardized protocol including predefined demographic characteristics, perioperative mortality, and major complications. RESULTS: A total of 29 papers with 229 patients were included into the analysis. The methods of FL occlusion used were the candy-plug technique, the knickerbocker technique, the "cork in the bottleneck" technique, and direct FL embolization with a combination of stent-grafts, coils, onyx, plugs, and glue. FL embolization procedure was performed in 79 patients (34.5%) with type A AD and 150 (65.5%) with type B AD. FL direct embolization was the most frequently used technique and it was applied in 198 (86.5%) patients. Candy-plug, knickerbocker, and "cork in the bottleneck" techniques were used in 26 (11.4%), 3 (1.3%), and 2 (0.9%) patients, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients except one (228/229, 99.6%) in which implantation of a stent to celiac trunk was not possible. There were 4 hospital deaths (1.7%). Neurological complications occurred in 6 patients (2.6%), including 4 (1.7%) spinal cord ischemia and 2 (0.9%) ischemic stroke. There were 1 (0.4%) iatrogenic retrograde dissection and 2 (0.9%) renal failure reported. The mean duration of follow-up was 16.5 months. There were 21 deaths (9.3%) during follow-up and 8 (3.6%) were aorta-related. Thirty three (14.7%) secondary interventions were performed. Five patients (2.2%) required an open completion thoracoabdominal procedure incorporating the stent-graft into the repair. Complete FL thrombosis was observed in 181 (80.4%) patients, 34 (15.1%) had partial thrombosis, and 10 (4.4%) had FL progression. CONCLUSIONS: FL embolization of the distal thoracic aorta is a promising technique in a group of patients to promote FL thrombosis and aortic remodeling in thoracic aorta.

Optical coherence tomography in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel adjunct in the field of medicine. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of OCT in the field of contemporary endovascular surgery in terms of its utility in diagnostics and interventions in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHOD: A systematic search of literature published from 1st January 2009 to 1st August 2019 was identified from PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane library database with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The pre-defined selection inclusion criteria were clinical applications of OCT in vascular surgery in relation to diagnostics and interventions. Keywords used included OCT, PAD, endovascular procedures and atherectomy. RESULTS: From an initial search of 310 articles, 27 articles were included in this systematic review: 15 articles were related to diagnostics: peripheral arterial disease was the most studied condition (n = 8), other conditions included in-stent restenosis (n = 4), fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 2) and acute limb ischaemia (n = 1); 12 articles were related to intervention: an OCT-guided crossing catheter was the most used assisting device (n = 10), with an OCT-guided atherectomy device used in four of these studies. CONCLUSION: Although there is currently no level 1 evidence to suggest routine use of OCT in the diagnosis and treatment of PAD, current literature suggests that the use of OCT is safe and effective. The OCT real-time vessel wall structural images clearly distinguish normal anatomy from plaque pathology, and are of great advantage both in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of target lesion, especially in reducing the amount of radiation in the endovascular procedure.

A midterm analysis of patients who received femoropopliteal helical interwoven nitinol stents.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report midterm outcomes (up to 72 months) of patients who received femoropopliteal helical interwoven nitinol stents (Supera Peripheral Stent System, Abbott Laboratories, Inc, Webster, Tex). METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients treated with femoropopliteal non-drug-eluting angioplasty and helical interwoven nitinol stents were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were followed up with 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months clinical, duplex, and radiographic assessments. Restenosis is defined as 50% or greater restenosis of the target lesion on duplex ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: From October 2011 to September 2018, 315 patients (198 males) with 360 legs and a median age of 78 years (range, 46-100 years) were included. Symptoms of claudication, rest pain, and tissue loss were found in 212 (58.9%), 53 (14.7%), and 150 (41.7%) legs, respectively. In 176 (48.9%) legs, stents were placed in the popliteal segments. The mean stented lesion length was 119.0 mm (range, 40-450 mm). The overall primary patency rates at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months were 90.6%, 80.5%, 73.8%, 68.9%, 65.3%, 63.1%, and 63.1%, respectively. The ankle-brachial pressure index increased from 0.58 ± 0.18 preoperatively to 0.87 ± 0.16 postoperatively. There were no stent fractures on follow-up. Patency rate was not statistically affected by indication of treatment, lesion calcification, or diabetes, but the length of stents and involvement of popliteal arteries were statistically significantly worse (log-rank test, P = .011 and P = .005). Stents with inner diameters of 4-mm had an initial lower patency compared with 5-mm stents, but the patency rates merged and crossed over at 46 months (log-rank test, P = .131). There was no procedural- or device-related morbidity or mortality, and there were nine major amputations after revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides long-term clinical data demonstrating that Supera stents are effective and durable.

Pilot Study Using Telemedicine Video Consultation for Vascular Patients' Care During the COVID-19 Period.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness and patients satisfaction of using telemedicine virtual communications to provide remote health care to vascular patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) period in China. METHODS: Video calls using WeChat software (Tencent, Shenzhen, China) between patients and vascular surgeons were conducted in a period when there were restrictions and limitations for people' travels in China. At the end of each video call, a short questionnaire was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction level. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 period from 19 February to March 16, 2020, a sample of 114 from 165 (69%) patients was reached after one phone call attempt. One hundred forty-two telemedicine remote communications were made between the two vascular surgeons and 114 patients. The mean age of this cohort of patients were 60 ± 15.2 (range 25 to 90) years old, and 74 (65%) were men. Twenty-five patients (22%) were outside of our province when they received the video call. The mean duration of the video call was 11.0 ± 8.9 minutes. All of the patients thought telemedicine was a good substitute for coming to hospital, and 95% (108/114) of them preferred to have remote telemedicine rather than postpone the appointment. All the patients agreed with the advantages of telemedicine including no infection risks, no need to travel, and no need to wait for long time. All the patients were "satisfied" or "highly satisfied" with the video call and they would like to use telemedicine for follow-up in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine virtual communications was effective to provide remote health care with a high patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 period. Telemedicine offers support to vulnerable vascular patients without the need for travel and face-to-face hospital consultation, and so avoided transmission and infection.

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization as a New Modality of Treatment for Carotid Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenosis is a significant cause of ischemic stroke, and studies have shown that transfemoral carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher perioperative stroke risk than open endarterectomy. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a novel technique in carotid stenting via direct transcervical carotid access without the risk of arch manipulation, offers a smaller wound compared with endarterectomy, and employs flow reversal to decrease the risk of antegrade embolic stroke. Contemporary evidence on the safety and efficacy of TCAR is reviewed. METHODS: A systematic literature review on TCAR from January 2009 to August 2019 was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. Clinical studies on TCAR with flow reversal with clinical outcomes of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death were included. RESULTS: Initial search of the literature yielded 161 articles, of which 8 studies were included comprising of 5 single-arm studies and 3 comparative studies. Studies demonstrated high technical success rates of TCAR from 90.6% to 100%, with low perioperative stroke, MI, and mortality rates of 0 to 4%, 0 to 0.7% and 0 to 2.7%, respectively. TCAR was significantly associated with a lower in-hospital stroke/transient ischemic attack rate when compared to transfemoral carotid stenting. There was no significant difference in perioperative stroke/MI/death when compared to endarterectomy although TCAR had a significantly lower risk of cranial nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: TCAR with flow reversal is a promising treatment option for carotid occlusive disease. Clinical trials are currently underway to provide a better report on outcomes of TCAR and for further comparison between TCAR and carotid endarterectomy.

Prevalence and Predictor of Pulmonary Embolism in a Cohort of Chinese Patients with Acute Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a cohort of Chinese patients with acute (<14 days) proximal (above-knee) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limbs, and to evaluate whether the location of thrombosis is associated with the existence of PE. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with acute proximal DVT from January 2014 to June 2018 at a single center was performed. Helical computed tomography angiography was performed to screen PE within 48 hr after admission. Multiple factors associated with PE were compared between the PE group and the non-PE group. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with acute proximal DVT were screened for PE. The mean age was 56.9 ± 18.1 (range 21-88) years, and 55% were male. The most common risk factors of DVT were immobilization (38%), malignancy (27%), and trauma or surgery (21%). Majority of the patients' thrombosis was located at the left leg (66%) and 8 patients had bilateral lower limb DVT. Femoral vein was involved in 52 patients (52%), while iliofemoral thrombosis was identified in 48 patients (48%). PE was identified in 58 patients (58%), including 3 massive and 55 nonmassive PE. There was no statistical difference between the PE group and the non-PE group in terms of age, sex, and risk factors. The D-dimer level was associated with the existence of PE (P = 0.038). Patients with iliofemoral thrombosis had a similar incidence of PE compared with those with femoral thrombosis alone (P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: PE occurred in more than half of patients with acute proximal DVT, despite the fact that most of them were asymptomatic. In this study, existence of PE did not correlate with pelvic thrombosis. Increasing D-dimer level was statistically associated with the presence of PE.

Predictors of Primary Functional Maturation of Autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula in a Cohort of Asian Patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) maturation. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing RCAVF creation from June 2013 to December 2018 at a single medical center. Comparison of the variables between the matured and nonmatured group was performed. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients (men, 173; 62.5%) with a mean age of 56.6 ± 16.9 years underwent primary RCAVF creation during the study period. The mean diameter of the cephalic vein and radial artery were 2.4 ± 0.6 mm (range 1.5 to 4.3 mm) and 2.3 ± 0.5 mm (range 1.5 to 4.0 mm), respectively. Primary functional maturation was achieved in 236 patients (236/277, 85%). There was no statistical significance between the matured and nonmatured group in terms of age (56.4 ± 14.8 vs. 58.1 ± 15.1, respectively; P = 0.498), coronary arterial disease (12% vs. 17%, respectively; P = 0.449), diabetes mellitus (42% vs. 39%, respectively; P = 0.864), smoking (26% vs. 22%, respectively; P = 0.699), or antiplatelet therapy (23% vs. 24%, respectively; P = 0.844). However, female gender (35% vs. 54%, respectively; P = 0.024), peripheral arterial disease (9% vs. 22%, respectively; P = 0.025), and small vein (2.4 ± 0.5 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.5 mm, respectively; P < 0.01) and artery (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.1 ± 0.4, respectively; P < 0.01) diameter were associated with the failure of maturation. The best cutoff diameter for the cephalic vein and radial artery was 1.85 mm and 2.05 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients undergoing RCAVF creation, vein and artery diameter on preoperative ultrasound mapping was the predictor of functional maturation. Female gender and presence of peripheral arterial disease were associated with failure of maturation.

Successful Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Brucella Mycotic Aneurysm Acquired from Ingestion of Sheep Placenta.

An aortic aneurysm infected by Brucella is rarely seen. In this case report, we describe a Brucella mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm acquired from ingestion of sheep placenta. Clinical symptoms included fever, fatigue, and abdominal pain. Diagnosis was confirmed by blood culture and computed tomography (CT) angiography. The patient had increased abdominal pain during hospitalization, and repeated CT showed a rapidly enlarging mycotic aneurysm. Emergent endovascular repair was successfully performed using a bifurcated stent graft, and combined intravenous and oral antibiotics were administrated. The patient was asymptomatic after operation, and follow-up CT showed thrombosis in the aneurysmal sac and significant decrease of aneurysmal size.

Evidence for Cerebral Embolic Prevention in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Embolic stroke is a formidable complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Mechanical strategies to reduce the risk of ischemic embolic lesions include embolic protection devices (EPDs) and carbon dioxide flushing (CDF). This study aims to assess the efficacy for EPD and CDF uses in TAVI and TEVAR. METHODS: A literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis. All searches were performed via PubMed, OvidSP, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library. Conference abstracts and proceedings were included. Those that were out of scope of interest and review articles were excluded. RESULTS: Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the 456 articles searched. Regarding EPD use in TAVI, systematic review comparing EPD with no-EPD showed smaller total volume of cerebral lesions and smaller volume per lesion in patients with EPD in all studies. They also performed better in postoperative neurocognitive assessments but could not demonstrate clinical prevention of embolic stroke in all studies. While for EPD use in TEVAR, capture of embolic debris and absence of early postoperative neurocognitive deficit were demonstrated in all cases of 2 prospective pilot studies. Concerning CDF in TEVAR, significant reduction in gaseous emboli released during stent-graft deployment was shown by 1 in vitro study. Successful CDF application in all patients, with only 1 case of postoperative nondisabling stroke, was also demonstrated by 1 cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of medical literature has demonstrated the safety and feasibility of EPD use in TAVI. Although improvements in clinical outcomes have yet been demonstrated, there was level I evidence showing reduced embolic lesions in imaging. The use of EPD and CDF in TEVAR was suggested, but evidence remained inadequate to support routine clinical use.

Septic Carotid Endarterectomy Patch as a Result of Preoperative Tooth Extraction.

Infected carotid patches are rare. We present a gentleman who had an elective carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch closure for symptomatic carotid stenosis under regional anesthesia, and he presented 1 month later with a discharging sinus at the lower aspect of the neck wound. Computed tomography scan showed a rim-enhancing collection next to the carotid bifurcation. He subsequently underwent patch excision and repair with autologous saphenous vein graft, with good recovery. Of significance was that he had a dental extraction for a loose tooth 1 day before the index operation as advised by the anesthetist. Streptococcus viridans species, which are part of the normal flora of oral cavity, were isolated from the tissue culture. This is the first case in the world's literature of a patient who had S. viridans carotid patch infection that may be related to his preoperative tooth extraction.

Current Evidence on Management of Aortic Stent-graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stent-graft infection (SGI) is rare but remains one of the most challenging and threatening complications. This systematic review aimed to identify the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of endograft infection after abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: A systematic literature review of all published literature from January 1991 to September 2016 on SGI was performed under the instruction of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Aorta, aneurysm, endovascular, stent-graft, endograft and infection were the keywords used in our comprehensive search in PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, V 22.0. RESULTS: A total of 185 potential relevant articles were identified, but only 11 studies with 402 patients met the inclusion criteria. Majority of the patients were male (308/402, 77%), with a mean age ranging from 65 to 73 years. Most of the endografts were implanted for EVAR (351/402, 87%), while the other 51 (13%) endografts were infected following TEVAR. Among the 402 patients, 39 (9.7%) patients presented with aortic rupture. Ninety-two of 380 (24.2%) patients with available data had aortoenteric fistula (AEF). Sixty-nine patients (17%) died in hospital or within 30 days after operation. One hundred fourteen patients (28%) died during follow-up. The most commonly used stent grafts were Zenith (Cook Inc, Bloomington, IN) (22%) and Excluder (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) (20%). Of the 402 patients in this series, 108 patients (27%) had negative culture, and multiple microorganisms were identified in 103 patients (26%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Staphylcoccus species (30.1%), Streptococcus (14.8%), and fungus (9.2%). Forty-two patients (42/401, 10%) received conservative treatment, whereas 359 (90%) patients underwent surgical treatment, including stent graft removal with in situ reconstruction or extra-anatomical bypass, and secondary endovascular procedure. Patients in the surgical group had a higher survival rate compared with conservative group (58% vs. 33%, P = 0.002). The survival rate was higher in the patients with infected EVAR than TEVAR (58% vs. 27%, P = 0.000). Patient with AEF had a worse prognosis (survival rate 72% vs. 33%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that surgical treatment is a better option compared with conservative management in selected patients with aortic endograft infection. The outcome was worse in patients with infected TEVAR and AEF.

The Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Contemporary Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as rapid prototyping or additive manufacturing, is a novel adjunct in the medical field. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of 3D printing technology in the field of contemporary vascular surgery in terms of its technical aspect, practicability, and clinical outcome. METHODS: A systematic search of literatures published from January 1, 1980 to July 15, 2017 was identified from the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library database with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The predefined selection inclusion criterion was clinical application of 3D printing technology in vascular surgery of large and small vessel pathology. RESULTS: Forty-two articles were included in this systematic review, including 2 retrospective cohorts and 1 prospective case control study. 3D printing was mostly applied to abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 20) and thoracic aorta pathology (n = 8), other vessels included celiac, splenic, carotid, subclavian, femoral artery, and portal vein (n = 10). The most commonly quoted materials were acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (n = 2), polylactic acid (n = 4), polyurethane resin (n = 3) and nylon (n = 3). The cost per replica ranged from USD $4-2,360. Cost for a commercial printer was around USD $2,210-50,000. CONCLUSION: 3D printing was recognized and gradually incorporated as a useful adjunct in the field of vascular and endovascular surgery. The production of an accurate anatomic patient-specific replica was shown to bring significant impact in patient management in terms of anatomic understanding, procedural planning, and intraoperative navigation, education, and academic research as well as patient communication. Further analysis on cost-effectiveness was indicated to guide decisions on applicability of such promising technology on a routine basis.