Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor and Related Pediatric Tumors: Multimodality Imaging Review with Pathologic Correlation.

Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) are rare but lethal solid neoplasms that overwhelmingly affect infants and young children. While the central nervous system is the most common site of occurrence, tumors can develop at other sites, including the kidneys and soft tissues throughout the body. The anatomic site of involvement dictates tumor nomenclature and nosology. While the clinical and imaging manifestations of MRTs and other more common entities may overlap, there are some site-specific distinctive imaging characteristics. Irrespective of the site of occurrence, somatic and germline mutations in SMARCB1, and rarely in SMARCA4, underlie the entire spectrum of rhabdoid tumors. MRTs have a simple and remarkably stable genome but can demonstrate considerable molecular and biologic heterogeneity. Related neoplasms encompass an expanding category of phenotypically dissimilar (nonrhabdoid tumors driven by SMARC-related alterations) entities. US, CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT or PET/MRI facilitate diagnosis, initial staging, and follow-up, thus informing therapeutic decision making. Multifocal synchronous or metachronous rhabdoid tumors occur predominantly in the context of underlying rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndromes (RTPSs). These autosomal dominant disorders are driven in most cases by pathogenic variants in SMARCB1 (RTPS type 1) and rarely by pathogenic variants in SMARCA4 (RTPS type 2). Genetic testing and counseling are imperative in RTPS. Guidelines for imaging surveillance in cases of RTPS are based on age at diagnosis. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Cardiac Tumors: Updated 2021 WHO Tumor Classification.

Cardiac tumors, although rare, carry high morbidity and mortality rates. They are commonly first identified either at echocardiography or incidentally at thoracoabdominal CT performed for noncardiac indications. Multimodality imaging often helps to determine the cause of these masses. Cardiac tumors comprise a distinct category in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors. The updated 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the heart incorporates new entities and reclassifies others. In the new classification system, papillary fibroelastoma is recognized as the most common primary cardiac neoplasm. Pseudotumors including thrombi and anatomic variants (eg, crista terminalis, accessory papillary muscles, or coumadin ridge) are the most common intracardiac masses identified at imaging. Cardiac metastases are substantially more common than primary cardiac tumors. Although echocardiography is usually the first examination, cardiac MRI is the modality of choice for the identification and characterization of cardiac masses. Cardiac CT serves as an alternative in patients who cannot tolerate MRI. PET performed with CT or MRI enables metabolic characterization of malignant cardiac masses. Imaging individualized to a particular tumor type and location is crucial for treatment planning. Tumor terminology changes as our understanding of tumor biology and behavior evolves. Familiarity with the updated classification system is important as a guide to radiologic investigation and medical or surgical management. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Teaching the Future Radiologist: TED-Inspired Radiology Didactics.

TED (acronym for technology, entertainment and design) conferences are an astonishingly successful modern-day platform for "ideas worth spreading". These continue to engage, enlighten and entertain an ever-expanding audience base. TED speakers highlight simple yet relevant ideas, often challenging entrenched perspectives and proposing hitherto unexplored solutions. In this perspective, the authors propose modeling some aspects of Radiology didactics along certain fundamental principles of TED and outline techniques to accomplish this. We overview how this shift can engage diverse learners and enhance retention of key information. We include evidence on such pedagogical techniques boosting learners' working memory and providing strategies for creative problem solving. Finally, we caution educators against criticisms of the TED format, including prioritizing style over content, "dumbing down" information to make it fit a prescribed format and sometimes offering insufficient scientific rigor.