Circumferential resection margin rates in esophageal cancer resection- oncological equivalency and comparable clinical outcomes between open versus minimally invasive techniques: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Radical surgery for esophageal cancer requires macroscopic and microscopic clearance of all malignant tissue. A critical element of the procedure is achieving a negative circumferential margin (CRM) to minimize local recurrence. The utility of minimally invasive surgery poses challenges in replicating techniques developed in open surgery, particularly for hiatal dissection in esophago-gastrectomy. In this study, the technical approach and clinical and oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy are described with particular reference to CRM involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort study included all patients undergoing either open or laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy between January 2004 to June 2022 in a single tertiary center. A standard surgical technique for hiatal dissection of the esophago-gastric junction developed in open surgery was adapted for a laparoscopic approach. Clinical parameters, length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications and mortality data were collected and analyzed by a Mann-Whitney U or Fisher's exact method. RESULTS: Overall 447 patients underwent an esophago-gastrectomy in the study with 219 open and 228 laparoscopic procedures. The CRM involvement was 18.8% in open surgery and 13.6% in laparoscopic surgery. The 90-day-mortality for open surgery was 4.1% compared with 2.2% for laparoscopic procedures. Median Intensive care unit (ITU), inpatient LOS and 30-day readmission rates were shorter for laparoscopic compared with open esophago-gastrectomy (ITU: 5 versus 8 days, P=0.0004; LOS: 14 versus 20 days, P=0.022; 30-day re-admission 7.46% versus 10.50%). Post-operative complication rates were comparable across both cohorts. The rates of starting adjuvant chemotherapy were 51.8% after open and 74.4% in laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: This study presents a standardized surgical approach to hiatal dissection for esophageal cancer. We present equivalence between open and laparoscopic esophago-gastrectomy in clinical, oncological and survival outcomes with similar rates of CRM involvement. We also observe a significantly shorter hospital length of stay with the minimally invasive approach.

Recurrence after abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease: relationship to disease site and surgical procedure.

PURPOSE: We investigated the hypothesis that there is an "aggressive" subtype of Crohn's disease characterized by early recurrence and that disease location and surgical procedure are associated with differing patterns of recurrence. METHODS: We analyzed 280 patient records totaling 482 major abdominal operations from a prospectively compiled Crohn's disease database. Patterns of recurrence, as defined by reoperation, were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests for the group as a whole, as well as according to disease location and operation performed using log-rank and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall survival curve followed a simple curve with no apparent early rise in recurrence. There was a significantly higher recurrence rate for ileal disease than for ileocolic or colic disease (median reoperation-free survival, 37.8 vs. 47.8 and 54.7 months, respectively; log-rank test = 13.6; P = 0.001), and there was a significantly shorter reoperation-free survival for those patients treated by strictureplasty alone or stricture-plasty combined with resection than for those treated by resection alone (41.7 and 48.6 vs. 51 months, respectively; log-rank test = 12; P = 0.002), but only disease site was confirmed as an independent risk factor for recurrence by multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there is no evidence for the existence of a separate, early recurring, aggressive disease type. Shorter reoperation-free survival after strictureplasty may reflect patterns of recurrence in ileal disease.