Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 148
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Lancet ; 401(10380): 917-927, 2023 03 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reirradiation in standard fractionation for locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after a previous course of high-dose radiotherapy is often associated with substantial late toxicity, negating its overall benefit. We therefore aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hyperfractionation compared with standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done in three centres in Guangzhou, China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with histopathologically confirmed undifferentiated or differentiated, non-keratinising, advanced locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive hyperfractionation (65 Gy in 54 fractions, given twice daily with an interfractional time interval of at least 6 h) or standard fractionation (60 Gy in 27 fractions, given once a day). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used in both groups. A computer program generated the assignment sequence and randomisation was stratified by treatment centre, recurrent tumour stage (T2-T3 vs T4), and recurrent nodal stage (N0 vs N1-N2), determined at the time of randomisation. The two primary endpoints were the incidence of severe late complications defined as the incidence of grade 3 or worse late radiation-induced complications occurring 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy until the latest follow-up in the safety population, and overall survival defined as the time interval from randomisation to death due to any cause in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456506. FINDINGS: Between July 10, 2015, and Dec 23, 2019, 178 patients were screened for eligibility, 144 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to hyperfractionation or standard fractionation (n=72 in each group). 35 (24%) participants were women and 109 (76%) were men. After a median follow-up of 45·0 months (IQR 37·3-53·3), there was a significantly lower incidence of grade 3 or worse late radiation-induced toxicity in the hyperfractionation group (23 [34%] of 68 patients) versus the standard fractionation group (39 [57%] of 68 patients; between-group difference -23% [95% CI -39 to -7]; p=0·023). Patients in the hyperfractionation group had better 3-year overall survival than those in the standard fractionation group (74·6% [95% CI 64·4 to 84·8] vs 55·0% [43·4 to 66·6]; hazard ratio for death 0·54 [95% CI 0·33 to 0·88]; p=0·014). There were fewer grade 5 late complications in the hyperfractionation group (five [7%] nasal haemorrhage) than in the standard fractionation group (16 [24%], including two [3%] nasopharyngeal necrosis, 11 [16%] nasal haemorrhage, and three [4%] temporal lobe necrosis). INTERPRETATION: Hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy could significantly decrease the rate of severe late complications and improve overall survival among patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Our findings suggest that hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy could be used as the standard of care for these patients. FUNDING: Key-Area Research and Development of Guangdong Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Special Support Program for High-level Talents in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project, and the National Ten Thousand Talents Program Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talents, Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Male , Humans , Female , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Hemorrhage
2.
Opt Express ; 32(4): 5898-5907, 2024 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439305

ABSTRACT

Quantum ghost image technique utilizing position or momentum correlations between entangled photons can realize nonlocal reconstruction of the image of an object. In this work, based on polarization entanglement, we experimentally demonstrate quantum ghost imaging of vector images by using a geometric phase object. We also provide a corresponding theoretical analysis. Additionally, we offer a geometrical optics path explanation of ghost imaging for vector fields. The proposed strategy offers new insights into the fundamental development of ghost imaging and also holds great promise for developing complex structured ghost imaging techniques. Our work expanding the principle of ghost imaging to spatially varying vector beams will lead to interesting developments of this field.

3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 576, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730348

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) is a rare malignancy with special biological features. Controversies exist regarding the treatment approach and prognostic factors in the IMRT era. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and management approaches in NACC. METHODS: Fifty patients with NACC at our institution between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Sixteen patients received primary radiotherapy (RT), and 34 patients underwent primary surgery. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and October 2020, a total of 50 patients with pathologically proven NACC were included in our analysis. The median follow-up time was 58.5 months (range: 6.0-151.0 months). The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) and progression-free survival rate (PFS) were 83.9% and 67.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients whose primary treatment was surgery and RT were 90.0% and 67.3%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.028). The 5-year PFS rates of patients whose primary treatment was surgery or RT were 80.8% and 40.7%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.024). Multivariate analyses showed that nerve invasion and the pattern of primary treatment were independent factors associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the relative insensitivity to radiation, primary surgery seemed to provide a better chance of disease control and improved survival in NACC. Meanwhile, postoperative radiotherapy should be performed for advanced stage or residual tumours. Cranial nerve invasion and treatment pattern might be important factors affecting the prognosis of patients with NACC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/mortality , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/surgery , Male , Female , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Young Adult , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies , Adolescent , Progression-Free Survival
4.
Lancet Oncol ; 24(6): 611-623, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37269842

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis of chemotherapy for nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC) collaborative group previously showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to concomitant chemoradiotherapy had the highest survival benefit of the studied treatment regimens in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the publication of new trials on induction chemotherapy, we updated the network meta-analysis. METHODS: For this individual patient data network meta-analysis, trials of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma that completed accrual before Dec 31, 2016, were identified and updated individual patient data were obtained. Both general databases (eg, PubMed and Web of Science) and Chinese medical literature databases were searched. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. A frequentist network meta-analysis approach with a two-step random effect stratified by trial based on hazard ratio Peto estimator was used. Global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency, and p score to rank treatments, with higher scores indicating higher benefit therapies. Treatments were grouped into the following categories: radiotherapy alone, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42016042524. FINDINGS: The network comprised 28 trials and included 8214 patients (6133 [74·7%] were men, 2073 [25·2%] were women, and eight [0·1%] had missing data) enrolled between Jan 1, 1988, and Dec 31, 2016. Median follow-up was 7·6 years (IQR 6·2-13·3). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (p=0·18), and inconsistency was borderline (p=0·10). The three treatments with the highest benefit for overall survival were induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0·75; 95% CI 0·59-0·96; p score 92%), induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by chemoradiotherapy (0·81; 0·69-0·95; p score 87%), and chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (0·88; 0·75-1·04; p score 72%), compared with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (p score 46%). INTERPRETATION: The inclusion of new trials modified the conclusion of the previous network meta-analysis. In this updated network meta-analysis, the addition of either induction chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival over chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: Institut National du Cancer and Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/drug therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Induction Chemotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Nasopharynx
5.
Lancet Oncol ; 23(12): e544-e551, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36455583

ABSTRACT

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to constrain health-care staff and resources worldwide, despite the availability of effective vaccines. Aerosol-generating procedures such as endoscopy, a common investigation tool for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, are recognised as a likely cause of SARS-CoV-2 spread in hospitals. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is considered the most accurate biomarker for the routine management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A consensus statement on whether plasma EBV DNA can minimise the need for or replace aerosol-generating procedures, imaging methods, and face-to-face consultations in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma is urgently needed amid the current pandemic and potentially for future highly contagious airborne diseases or natural disasters. We completed a modified Delphi consensus process of three rounds with 33 international experts in otorhinolaryngology or head and neck surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and clinical oncology with vast experience in managing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, representing 51 international professional societies and national clinical trial groups. These consensus recommendations aim to enhance consistency in clinical practice, reduce ambiguity in delivering care, and offer advice for clinicians worldwide who work in endemic and non-endemic regions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, in the context of COVID-19 and other airborne pandemics, and in future unexpected settings of severe resource constraints and insufficiency of personal protective equipment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Herpesvirus 4, Human , SARS-CoV-2 , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/therapy , DNA , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy
6.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(3): 381-390, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of surgery compared with reirradiation in the primary treatment of patients with resectable, locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who have previously received radiotherapy is a matter of debate. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety outcomes of salvage endoscopic surgery versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in three hospitals in southern China. We included patients aged 18-70 years with a Karnofsky Performance Status score of at least 70 who were histopathologically diagnosed with undifferentiated or differentiated, non-keratinising, locally recurrent NPC with tumours confined to the nasopharyngeal cavity, the post-naris or nasal septum, the superficial parapharyngeal space, or the base wall of the sphenoid sinus. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG group) or IMRT (IMRT group). Randomisation was done manually using a computer-generated random number code and patients were stratified by treatment centre. Treatment group assignment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival, compared between the groups at 3 years. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. Safety analysis was done in patients who received treatment according to the treatment they actually received. This trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-11001573, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2011, and Jan 16, 2017, 200 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either ENPG (n=100) or IMRT (n=100). At a median follow-up of 56·0 months (IQR 42·0-69·0), 74 patients had died (29 [29%] of 100 patients in the ENPG group and 45 [45%] of 100 patients in the IMRT group). The 3-year overall survival was 85·8% (95% CI 78·9-92·7) in the ENPG group and 68·0% (58·6-77·4) in the IMRT group (hazard ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·29-0·76; p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse radiation-related late adverse event was pharyngeal mucositis (in five [5%] of 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 26 [26%] of 101 patients who underwent IMRT). Five [5%] of the 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 20 [20%] of the 101 patients who underwent IMRT died due to late toxic effects specific to radiotherapy; attribution to previous radiotherapy or trial radiotherapy is unclear due to the long-term nature of radiation-related toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Endoscopic surgery significantly improved overall survival compared with IMRT in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. These results suggest that ENPG could be considered as the standard treatment option for this patient population, although long-term follow-up is needed to further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this strategy. FUNDING: Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/mortality , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/surgery , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Survival Rate
7.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 934, 2021 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412621

ABSTRACT

The human microbiome is defined as the microorganisms that reside in or on the human body, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa, and their genomes. The human microbiome participates in the modulation of human metabolism by influencing several intricate pathways. The association between specific bacteria or viruses and the efficacy of cancer treatments and the occurrence of treatment-related toxicity in cancer patients has been reported. However, the understanding of the interaction between the host microbiome and the cancer treatment response is limited, and the microbiome potentially plays a greater role in the treatment of cancer than reported to date. Here, we provide a thorough review of the potential role of the gut and locally resident bacterial microbiota in modulating responses to different cancer therapeutics to demonstrate the association between the gut or locally resident bacterial microbiota and cancer therapy. Probable mechanisms, such as metabolism, the immune response and the translocation of microbiome constituents, are discussed to promote future research into the association between the microbiome and other types of cancer. We conclude that the interaction between the host immune system and the microbiome may be the basis of the role of the microbiome in cancer therapies. Future research on the association between host immunity and the microbiome may improve the efficacy of several cancer treatments and provide insights into the cause of treatment-related side effects.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/immunology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Immune System/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Animals , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/microbiology
8.
PLoS Pathog ; 14(7): e1007208, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30052682

ABSTRACT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human cancer-related virus closely associated with lymphoid and epithelial malignancies, and EBV glycoprotein B (gB) plays an essential role in viral entry into both B cells and epithelial cells by promoting cell-cell fusion. EBV gB is exclusively modified with high-mannose-linked N-glycans and primarily localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with low levels on the plasma membrane (PM). However, the mechanism through which gB is regulated within host cells is largely unknown. Here, we report the identification of F-box only protein 2 (FBXO2), an SCF ubiquitin ligase substrate adaptor that preferentially binds high-mannose glycans and attenuates EBV infectivity by targeting N-glycosylated gB for degradation. gB possesses seven N-glycosylation sites, and FBXO2 directly binds to these high-mannose moieties through its sugar-binding domain. The interaction promotes the degradation of glycosylated gB via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Depletion of FBXO2 not only stabilizes gB but also promotes its transport from the ER to the PM, resulting in enhanced membrane fusion and viral entry. FBXO2 is expressed in epithelial cells but not B cells, and EBV infection up-regulates FBXO2 levels. In summary, our findings highlight the significance of high-mannose modification of gB and reveal a novel host defense mechanism involving glycoprotein homeostasis regulation.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/metabolism , F-Box Proteins/metabolism , Host-Parasite Interactions/physiology , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Viral Envelope Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Herpesvirus 4, Human/metabolism , Herpesvirus 4, Human/pathogenicity , Humans
9.
Int J Cancer ; 145(10): 2873-2883, 2019 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31044420

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC). The levels of CTCs and EBV DNA were measured at baseline and after first-line chemotherapy in 148 mNPC patients prospectively enrolled between December 2014 and August 2016. We also collected 122 non-mNPC cases within the same time frame for examining CTCs and EBV DNA at baseline. In 270 NPC patients, we observed improved specificity (86.0% vs. 41.0%) and inferior sensitivity (42.3% vs. 81.3%) of CTCs as compared to EBV DNA for diagnosis of distant metastasis. mNPC patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups, respectively, based on CTC of 12 at baseline and 1 after first-line chemotherapy and EBV DNA of 10,000 at baseline and 4,000 after first-line chemotherapy. Conversion of baseline unfavorable CTCs and EBV DNA to favorable after first-line chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to patients with unfavorable CTCs and EBV DNA at both time points. Among patients with a complete/partial response as per imaging evaluation, favorable CTCs and EBV DNA levels after first-line chemotherapy were associated with significantly longer PFS and OS. In conclusion, our data demonstrated the number of CTCs and EBV DNA before, after and during first-line chemotherapy were strong predictive markers for mNPC patients. When utilized in conjunction with imaging studies, CTCs and EBV DNA could provide additional prognostic information.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Herpesvirus 4, Human/isolation & purification , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , DNA, Viral/blood , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/blood , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/blood , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
10.
Eur Radiol ; 29(10): 5590-5599, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30874880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore and evaluate the feasibility of radiomics in stratifying nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) into distinct survival subgroups through multi-modalities MRI. METHODS: A total of 658 patients (training cohort: 424; validation cohort: 234) with non-metastatic NPC were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. Each slice was considered as a sample and 4863 radiomics features on the tumor region were extracted from T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Consensus clustering and manual aggregation were performed on the training cohort to generate a baseline model and classification reference used to train a support vector machine classifier. The risk of each patient was defined as the maximum risk among the slices. Each patient in the validation cohort was assigned to the risk model using the trained classifier. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to measure the prognosis performance, and differences between subgroups were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The training cohort was clustered into four groups with distinct survival patterns. Each patient was assigned to one of the four groups according to the estimated risk. Our method gave a performance (C-index = 0.827, p < .004 and C-index = 0.814, p < .002) better than the T-stage (C-index = 0.815, p = .002 and C-index = 0.803, p = .024), competitive to and more stable than the TNM staging system (C-index = 0.842, p = .003 and C-index = 0.765, p = .050) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Through investigating a large one-institutional cohort, the quantitative multi-modalities MRI image phenotypes reveal distinct survival subtypes. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics phenotype of MRI revealed the subtype of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with distinct survival patterns. • The slice-wise analysis method on MRI helps to stratify patients and provides superior prognostic performance over the TNM staging method. • Risk estimation using the highest risk among slices performed better than using the majority risk in prognosis.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cohort Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Support Vector Machine
12.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(4): 461-473, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29501366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is currently considered to be the standard treatment regimen for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but has well known side-effects such as gastrointestinal reactions, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity. Nedaplatin was developed to decrease the toxic effects induced by cisplatin, and in this trial we assessed whether a nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen was non-inferior to a cisplatin-based regimen in patients with locoregional, stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial at two centres in China. Patients aged 18-65 years with non-keratinising stage II-IVB (T1-4N1-3 or T3-4N0) nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a Karnofsky score of at least 70, and adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenously either nedaplatin 100 mg/m2 or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 for three cycles concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Randomisation was done manually using a computer-generated random number code and patients were stratified by treatment centre and clinical stage. Patients and clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 2 years; non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference in 2-year progression-free survival between the two groups did not exceed 10%. Analyses were by both intention to treat and per protocol, including all patients who received at least one complete cycle of chemotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01540136, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Jan 16, 2012, and July 16, 2014, we randomly assigned 402 patients to nedaplatin-based (n=201) or cisplatin-based (n=201) concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year progression-free survival was 89·9% (95% CI 85·8-94·0) in the cisplatin group and 88·0% (83·5-94·5) in the nedaplatin group, with a difference of 1·9% (95% CI -4·2 to 8·0; pnon-inferiority=0·0048). In the per-protocol analysis (cisplatin group, n=197; nedaplatin group, n=196), 2-year progression-free survival was 89·7% (95% CI 85·4-94·0) in the cisplatin group and 88·7% (84·2-94·5) in the nedaplatin group, with a difference of 1·0% (95% CI -5·2 to 7·0; pnon-inferiority=0·0020). A significantly higher frequency of grade 3 or 4 vomiting (35 [18%] of 198 in the cisplatin group vs 12 [6%] of 200 in the nedaplatin group, p<0·0001), nausea (18 [9%] vs four [2%], p=0·0021), and anorexia (53 [27%] vs 26 [13%], p=0·00070) was observed in the cisplatin group compared with the nedaplatin group. 11 (6%) patients in the nedaplatin group had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia compared with four (2%) in the cisplatin group (p=0·065). Patients in the cisplatin group had a higher frequency of any grade or grade 3 or 4 late auditory or hearing toxicities than did patients in the nedaplatin group (grade 3 or 4: three [2%] in the nedaplatin group vs 11 [6%] in the cisplatin group, p=0·030). No patients died from treatment-related causes. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy represents an alternative doublet treatment strategy to cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locoregional, advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Further investigations are needed to explore the potential use of this treatment as induction or adjuvant chemotherapy or in combination with other agents. FUNDING: National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City, National Key Basic Research Program of China, Special Support Plan of Guangdong Province, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangdong Province, Health & Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City, National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period, PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Cultivation Foundation for the Junior Teachers in Sun Yat-sen University, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anorexia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma/secondary , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Female , Hearing Disorders/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Nausea/chemically induced , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Radiotherapy Dosage , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Vomiting/chemically induced , Young Adult
13.
Int J Cancer ; 141(6): 1265-1276, 2017 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577306

ABSTRACT

To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with cisplatin (CDDP) versus cetuximab (CTX) and nimotuzumab (NTZ) for Stage II-IVb Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). A total of 1,837 patients with stage II-IVb NPC who received IMRT plus CTX or NTZ, or CDDP between January 2009 and December 2013 were included in the current analysis. Using propensity scores to adjust for potential prognostic factors, a well-balanced cohort of 715 patients was created by matching each patient who underwent IMRT plus concomitant NTZ/CTX with four patients who underwent IMRT plus concomitant CDDP (1:4). Efficacy and safety were compared between the CTX/NTZ and CDDP groups of this well-balanced cohort. Furthermore, we conducted multivariate analysis and subgroup analysis based on all the 1,837 eligible cases. There was no significant difference between CTX/NTZ group and CDDP group in terms of DFS (3-year, 86.7% vs. 86.2%, p > 0.05), LRRFS (96.2% vs. 96.3%, p > 0.05), DMFS (91.1% vs. 92.3%, p > 0.05) and OS (91.7% vs. 91.9%, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant interaction effect between patients with IMRT plus CTX/NTZ and N3 node stage on LRRFS with the highest risk of loco-regional relapse (HR 8.85, p = 0.001). Significantly increased hematologic toxicities, gastrointestinal reactions were observed in the CDDP group (p < 0.05). Patients of 3.4-4.7% experienced severe hematologic toxicities during the treatment with concomitant CTX and NTZ. Increased rate of CTX related-skin reaction and mucositis was observed in the CTX group. CTX/NTZ used concurrently with IMRT may be comparable to those of the standard CDDP-IMRT combination for maximizing survival for patients with stage II-IVb NPC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
Radiology ; 282(1): 171-181, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479804

ABSTRACT

Purpose To evaluate the prognostic value of the restaging system after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods This study was approved by the clinical research committee and a written informed consent was required before enrolling in the study. Prospectively enrolled were 412 consecutive patients with stage III-IVb NPC treated with NACT followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients were staged before NACT and restaged after NACT. The progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. Results Post-NACT T classification (PFS, P = .001) and N classification (PFS, P < .001; DMFS, P = .001) resulted in better survival curve separations than pre-NACT T classification and N classification. Patients downstaged from N2-N3 to N0-N1 disease had a better prognosis than did patients who continued to have N2-N3 diseases (3-year PFS, 83.8% vs 66.6%, P = .001; 3-year DMFS, 88.0% vs 78.4%, P = .026). Multivariate analysis revealed that post-NACT T classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 2.36; P = .003) and post-NACT N classification (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.03; P = .002) were independent prognostic factors for PFS; also, post-NACT N classification (HR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.07; P = .025) was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS. Multivariate analysis in patients with N2-N3 disease demonstrated that the N downstaging effects of NACT was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.81; P = .006) and DMFS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.97; P = .039). Conclusion The post-NACT stage is more representative of prognosis than the pre-NACT stage in advanced-stage NPC patients, which suggests that major clinical decisions should be based on the post-NACT stage. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Survival Rate , Taxoids , Treatment Outcome
15.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 567, 2017 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome and toxicities in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with/without adding cetuximab. METHODS: A total of 62 patients treated with CCRT plus cetuximab were matched with 124 patients treated with CCRT alone by age, sex, pathological type, T category, N category, disease stage, radiotherapy (RT) technique, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Treatment toxicities were clarified and compared between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 186 well-balanced stage II to IV NPC patients were retrospectively analyzed (median follow-up, 76 months). Compared to CCRT alone, adding cetuximab resulted in more grade 3 to 4 radiation mucositis (51.6% vs. 23.4%; P < 0.001). No differences were found between the CCRT + cetuximab group and the CCRT group in 5-year OS (89.7% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.386), 3-year PFS (83.9% vs. 88.7%, P = 0.115), the 3-year LRFS (95.0% vs. 96.7%, P = 0.695), and the 3-year DMFS (88.4% vs 91.9%, P = 0.068). Advanced disease stage was the independent prognostic factor predicting poorer OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Adding cetuximab to CCRT did not significantly improve benefits in survival in stage II to IV NPC and exacerbated acute mucositis and acneiform rash. Further investigations are warranted.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biomarkers , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Carcinoma/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome
17.
BMC Cancer ; 16(1): 777, 2016 10 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is a rare malignant disease that lacks a unique clinical staging system to predict the survival of EMP patients and to design individualized treatment. Instead, clinicians have chosen to use the multiple myeloma (MM) staging system. METHODS: Forty-eight EMP patients treated between 1996 and 2014 were included in this study. The new clinical stages were established according to independent survival factors using Cox regression model. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis and a larger primary tumor (≥5 cm) were the only two independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (P < 0.05). Stage I was defined as the disease without those two poor prognostic factors. Stage II was defined as the presence of either factor, and Stage III was defined as the presence of both factors. OS was significantly different in each stage of the new staging system (P < 0.001), with a median follow-up time for Stage I, Stage II and Stage III of 68, 23 and 14 months. The new staging system had enhanced prognostic value compared to the MM staging system (the area under ROC 0.763 versus 0.520, P = 0.044). Although no difference was observed between treatments in Stage I, the combination treatment was associated with a significantly beneficial OS in the late stages (5-year OS: 15.3 % versus 79.5 %; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The new staging system exhibited a promising prognostic value for survival and could aid clinicians in choosing the most suitable treatment for EMP patients.


Subject(s)
Plasmacytoma/pathology , Plasmacytoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Tumor Burden , Young Adult
18.
BMC Cancer ; 16(1): 774, 2016 10 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients with advanced local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with or without reirradiation. METHODS: A total of 44 patients treated without reirradiation (non-RT + chemotherapy) were matched with 44 patients treated with reirradiation (re-RT+/-chemtherapy) by age, sex, Karnosky performance score (KPS), rT stage, rN stage, and time interval between initial radiation and recurrence (TI). Overall survival (OS) rate and time to progression (TTP) rate were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: From March 2008 to December 2013, a total of 88 well-balanced rT3-4 N0-1 NPC patients were retrospectively analyzed. After a median follow-up of 27 months (range: 6-85), the 5-year OS rate and TTP rate was 23.4 %, 39.0 % in the non-RT + chemotherapy group and 27.5 %, 49.8 % in the re-RT+/-chemtherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that significant toxic effect was the only significant prognosticator correlated with OS (HR: 2.15, 95 % CI = 1.02-4.53, p = 0.044). No statistically significant survival differences were observed between the two treatment groups in either univariate or multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Compared with reiradiation, treating advanced local recurrent NPC with chemotherapy alone warrants further validation in the view of its similar survival and more acceptable toxicities.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/diagnosis , Carcinoma/therapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Cause of Death , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Re-Irradiation , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
Tumour Biol ; 36(10): 7775-87, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25944165

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients (n = 1261) who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic NPC between January 2008 and December 2010 were recruited. The peripheral platelet and lymphocyte counts were retrieved, and the PLR was calculated. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess their association with PLR: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The elevated PLR, using the third quartile values (153.64) as the optimal cutoff values, was found to be associated with the significant decline in CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.63, P < 0.001), OS (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.28-2.56, P < 0.001), and DMFS (HR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.15-2.23, P = 0.005) that remained significant during the multivariable analyses (CCS HR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.26-2.67, P < 0.001; OS HR 1.83, 95 % CI 1.28-2.61, P < 0.001; DMFS HR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.11-2.19, P = 0.011). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PLR could be used to stratify prognosis effectively for patients with early- or advanced-stage NPC, and Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels of ≥1500 copies/mL. In conclusions, elevated PLR values were associated with poor CSS, OS, and DMFS for patients with NPC; this easily accessed variable based on a large amount of cases multivariate analysis is valuable for predicting prognosis in patients with NPC.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets/pathology , Lymphocytes/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Carcinoma , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
20.
BMC Cancer ; 15: 977, 2015 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26675209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of cumulative dose of cisplatin on clinical outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was evaluated. METHODS: This study included 491 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed NPC who were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with IMRT. The patients were divided into three groups: low- (cumulative dose≤100 mg/m2), medium- (cumulative dose>100 mg/m2 and ≤200 mg/m2), and high- (cumulative dose>200 mg/m2) dose groups. Subgroups of patients included pre-treatment levels of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA (EBV DNA)<4000 copies/ml and pre-treatment EBV DNA≥4000 copies/ml. To test for independent significance, the Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model were used. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups were 64.1%, 91.1%, and 89.4%, respectively (P=0.002). Based on multivariate analysis, patients who were in the medium- and high-dose groups had compared with the low-dose group, with an odds ratio of 0.135 (95% CI 0.045-0.405, P<0.001) and 0.225 (95% CI 0.069-0.734, P=0.013), respectively. For the low-risk patients, the cumulative dose of cisplatin significantly associated with a lower OS (P<0.001). The medium-dose group had reduced odds of death compared with the low-dose group, with an odds ratio of 0.062 (95% CI 0.001-0.347, P=0.002), according to multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative dose of cisplatin is associated with OS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) among NPC patients who received IMRT.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Carcinoma , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL