Longitudinal analysis of liver transplant candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Wailitst lost is an critical issue and we investigated the long-term effect of insufficient liver functional reserve at liver transplantation evaluation on waitlist outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Clinical data of patients with HCC waitlisted for liver transplantation were retrospectively collected from a single hospital cohort during the period from 2014 to 2021. Parameters of liver reserve, including cirrhosis, Child-Pugh grade, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, were analyzed for patient survival, after adjustment for tumor factors. RESULTS: Of 292 eligible patients, 94.2% had cirrhosis, 55.8% had Child-Pugh grade B or C, and the median MELD score was 13.2. The median follow-up time was 2.2 years, with a dropout rate of 62.7%. Eighty-nine candidates (30.5%) eventually received liver transplant, including 67 from live donors. The estimated 1-year mortality rate reached 40.6% in 203 patients who remained on the waitlist without receiving a transplant, of whom 143 died. Most deaths were attributed to liver failure (37.1%) and cancer death (35.7%). After we adjusted for tumor confounders, including alpha fetoprotein, primary HCC stage, tumor number at evaluation, and sequential cancer treatment before and while waiting, hazard ratios (HRs) for patient survival were 1.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.41) for cirrhotic stage B or C, 1.07 (1.04-1.10) for MELD scores, and 1.14 (1.04-1.25) for tumor size at transplant evaluation. Transplantation was a protective disease modifier with adjusted HR 0.22 (0.14-0.33). CONCLUSION: Insufficient liver functional reserve poses more risk than expected to liver transplant waitlist outcomes with HCC.

Hepatitis C treatment and long-term outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to investigate the survival outcomes of antiviral agents (direct-acting antivirals [DAAs] or interferon [IFN]) in patients with hepatitis C virus who underwent liver resection for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 247 patients, between 2013 and 2020, being treated with DAAs (n = 93), IFN (n = 73), or no treatment (n = 81). Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 50.4 months, the rates of 5-year OS and RFS in the IFN, DAA, and no treatment groups were 91.5% and 55.4%, 87.2% and 39.8%, and 60.9% and 26.7%, respectively. One hundred and twenty-eight (51.6%) patients developed recurrence; recurrence was mostly (86.7%) intrahepatic, and 58 (23.4%) developed early recurrence, most of which received no antiviral treatment. The OS and RFS were similar between patients who received antiviral treatment before (50.0%) and after surgery, but longer survival was observed in patients achieving sustained virologic response. In multivariate analysis, antiviral treatment was protective for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.475, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.242-0.933) with significance but not RFS, in contrast to microvascular invasion (OS HR 3.389, 95% CI: 1.637-7.017; RFS HR 2.594, 95% CI: 1.520-4.008). In competing risk analysis, DAAs (subdistribution HR 0.086, 95% CI: 0.007-0.991) were protective against hepatic decompensation events but not recurrence events. CONCLUSION: In patients with hepatitis C virus, antiviral treatment suggested OS benefit for primary hepatocellular carcinoma after resection, and DAAs might be protective against hepatic decompensation. Following adjustment for oncological factors, IFN and DAA treatment was not significantly advantageous relative to the other.

Interval dynamics of transplantability for hepatocellular carcinoma after primary curative resection: risk factors for nontransplantable recurrence.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the changes in transplantability between primary and recurrent Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic resection (HR) and the risk factors for nontransplantable recurrence (NTR). METHODS: Consecutive 3122 patients who received HR for primary HCC between 2001 and 2019 were analyzed for changes in transplantability. Predictors of survival and NTR were evaluated using a competing risk analysis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 78.3 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 82.6%. Also, 58.2% of them developed recurrence after a median of 45.6 months. Recurrence occurred in 1205 and 611 patients with primary transplantable and nontransplantable HCC, respectively, of whom 26.1% and 63.2%, respectively, had NTR. Tumor diameter >3 cm [subdistribution hazard ratios (95% CI), 2.00 (1.62-2.48)], major resection [1.20 (1.00-1.43)], pathological grade >2 [1.28 (1.07-1.52)], microvascular invasion [1.74 (1.45-2.08)], and early recurrence (<1 year) [9.22 (7.83-10.87)] were associated with NTR. The overall transplantable pool increased from 72.3% to 77.5%. CONCLUSION: Microvascular invasion and early recurrence were risk factors for NTR. Nonetheless, the transplantable pool increased after HR, 41.8% of the patients had no recurrence and may not require liver transplantation. If the patient's liver function is acceptable, HR should be considered the treatment of choice for HCC.

Risk factors, patterns, and outcome predictors of late recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: A large cohort study with long-term follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection significantly influences long-term patient survival outcomes, and yet it remains understudied. This study aims to explore the risk factors and patterns of late recurrence and predictors of subsequent outcome. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 1,701 consecutive patients who achieved a disease-free survival period exceeding 2 years after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between 2001 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with late recurrence and death after recurrence were conducted using Cox's models. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 60.2 years, with 76.8% being male. During a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 653 patients (38.4%) experienced late recurrence, with median time to recurrence being 4.0 years (interquartile range, 2.7-6.0). Factors such as age >60, chronic hepatitis C, cirrhosis, high albumin-bilirubin grade, absence of family history, multiple tumors, satellite nodules, alpha-fetoprotein levels <400 ng/mL, and minor hepatic resection were identified as risk factors for late recurrence. Among patients with late recurrence, 131 (20.1%) underwent surgical treatment, 272 (41.7%) received radiofrequency ablation, and 27 (4.1%) exhibited extrahepatic lesions. A higher-high albumin-bilirubin grade, recurrent tumor >3 cm, and nonsurgical treatment emerged as predictors of death after late recurrence. CONCLUSION: Over one-third of patients who remain disease-free for more than 2 years postresection will experience late recurrence during subsequent follow-up. For 2-year disease-free survivors, risk factors for late recurrence differ from early recurrence. Treating underlying hepatitis is of paramount importance, given its association with both the risk of late recurrence and survival outcomes post-recurrence.

Viral Status and Treatment Efficacy in Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Primary Resection.

BACKGROUND: The impact of viral background on long-term effectiveness of different treatment modalities for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was not fully analyzed. METHOD: Consecutive 726 patients who developed intrahepatic recurrence after primary hepatectomy for HCC between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) and rerecurrence-free survival (R-RFS) and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 56 months, the 5-year PRS rates of the patients who underwent rehepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) were 79.4%, 83.0%, and 54.6%, respectively. The treatment benefit for PRS was consistently observed in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and non-B, non-C subgroups, but not hepatitis C virus (HCV). For patients with late recurrence of HCC, R-RFS was superior in HBV subgroup and HCV subgroup which received antiviral treatment (compared to naïve HCV subgroup). Survival difference triaged by viral status was lost in the counterpart with early recurrence. Overall, RFA improved PRS and R-RFS in patients receiving antiviral treatment. CONCLUSION: To achieve long-term survival after HCC recurrence, rehepatectomy and RFA were comparably effective, particularly among those with HBV. Antiviral treatment complemented survivals of patients with HCV after RFA, particularly in late first recurrence.

Multielectrode Radiofrequency Ablation for Resectable Metachronous Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer.

The outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM) has been thought to be inferior to metastasectomy. However, the recent development of multielectrode RFA (multi-RFA) systems has made the ablation zone larger and more complete. Thus, we assessed the survival benefits of this modality in cases of metachronous CRLM. This retrospective study assessed patients diagnosed with resectable metachronous CRLM between 2013 and 2016; 132 patients were categorized by treatment for liver metastases: multi-RFA (n = 68), hepatectomy (n = 34), or systemic treatment only (n = 30). Therapeutic effectiveness, outcomes, and intervention-related complications were compared between groups. Median overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IHRFS) were 69.8, 85.2, and 59.7 months for the hepatectomy group; 53.4, 41.3, and 32.3 months for the multi-RFA group; and 19.1, 7.1, and 7.1 months for the systemic treatment group. No significant differences were observed between the multi-RFA and hepatectomy groups after a median follow-up of 59.8 months. This study demonstrated that multi-RFA and hepatectomy provide similar survival benefits for patients with resectable CRLM. Multi-RFA may represent a reliable treatment option for the management of resectable liver metastases.