Comparison of Adherence to the 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guideline in a Teaching Versus Nonteaching Outpatient Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available regarding prescribers' adherence rate to the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol guideline, especially that from a teaching versus a nonteaching setting. OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate adherence rates to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline in a teaching versus a nonteaching practice site. In addition, the impact of a pharmacist-led seminar on adherence rate to the guideline was assessed. METHODS: This study is a 2-part retrospective chart review. Part 1 consists of patients who were initiated on statin therapy between December 2013 and November 2014. Patients were analyzed to determine if they received concordant statin therapy as recommended by the guideline. For the second part, we evaluated the impact of a seminar on the adherence rate to the guideline. RESULTS: Of the 325 patients who received a statin prescription, 233 were included in the study. Prescriber adherence to the guideline was 42.9%, which was significantly lower than the 65.8% observed in a study previously conducted at a teaching outpatient clinic ( P < 0.0001). For the second part of our study, prescriber adherence to the guideline 3 months before the pharmacist-led seminar was 53.5%, and this adherence rate remained virtually unchanged at 54.2% at 3 months after the educational session. CONCLUSION: The overall adherence rate to the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline from this nonteaching outpatient clinic was significantly lower than that previously observed in a teaching outpatient clinic. The single pharmacist-led seminar did not significantly affect prescribers' adherence rate to the guideline.

Evaluating Pharmacist-Led Heart Failure Transitions of Care Clinic: Impact of Analytic Approach on Readmission Rate Endpoints.

Studies evaluating pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) services for heart failure patients reported profound decreases in hospital readmissions. Most studies restricted their analysis to clinic attendees (as-treated analysis), which can introduce selection and immortal time bias. In this study, we evaluated the impact of including only clinic attendees vs all clinic referrals in assessing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led heart failure transitions of care (PharmD HF TOC) clinic program on 30-day readmissions. This is a retrospective, observational study of patients discharged from a heart failure hospitalization at a large urban academic medical center from August 2016 to December 2018. Primary exposure was the provision of a PharmD HF TOC clinic appointment in the intent-to-treat analysis and the attendance of the clinic in the as-treated analysis. Primary outcome was all-cause readmissions within 30 days of discharge. There were 766 and 1015 patients included in the as-treated and intent-to-treat analyses, respectively. In the as-treated analysis, 30-day all-cause readmissions were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (12.4% vs 19.6%, P = 0.018). In contrast, the intent-to-treat analysis did not reveal a significant difference in 30-day all-cause readmissions between the intervention group and the control group (18.2% vs 19.6%, P = 0.643). Pharmacist-led heart failure TOC program is associated with a reduction in 30-day all-cause readmissions only when restricting the analysis to clinic attendees. Future studies evaluating the effectiveness of post-discharge TOC services need to carefully consider the biases inherent in the evaluation methods employed.

Inclisiran: Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acid Injectable for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia.

Elevated plasma lipid levels, especially low-density lipoprotein, are correlated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and increased risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke. Statins are first-line agents for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of major cardiovascular events, but patients with a genetic susceptibility or established ASCVD oftentimes remain subtherapeutic on statin therapy alone. Biotechnological advancements in medication therapy have led to the development of inclisiran, a recently approved twice-yearly injectable agent to help patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and clinical ASCVD on a maximally tolerated statin to reach LDL-C targets. Inclisiran has demonstrated robust LDL-C reduction in clinical trials in combination with a favorable safety profile; however, the effect on cardiovascular clinical outcomes still remains under evaluation.

Bempedoic Acid: A New Avenue for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia.

Uncontrolled dyslipidemia, specifically elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, is a major risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease. Currently, statin therapy remains as first-line treatment for reducing both serum cholesterol levels and cardiovascular risk. However, certain patients are unable to achieve desired serum cholesterol levels despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. As a result, several nonstatin therapy avenues have been evaluated for their potential benefits in reducing cholesterol and cardiovascular risk. Bempedoic acid is one such nonstatin therapy option, which has been explored over the past few years to potentially assist patients in further reducing serum cholesterol. Bempedoic acid is a novel prodrug that inhibits cholesterol synthesis upstream of statins by inhibiting adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase. Bempedoic acid has been studied as a single, once daily 180 mg dose. Administered as monotherapy or in combination with statin or ezetimibe, bempedoic acid significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Furthermore, bempedoic acid was generally well tolerated by patients and rates of adverse events were similar to placebo with few exceptions. Despite proven reductions in cholesterol and favorable safety profile, bempedoic acid will likely remain a third- or fourth-line agent for the treatment of dyslipidemia behind other nonstatin therapies until the improvement of cardiovascular outcomes is demonstrated in future clinical trials.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Friend or Foe?

When the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wreaked an unprecedented havoc of an escalating number of deaths and hospitalization in the United States, clinicians were faced with a myriad of unanswered questions, one of the them being the implication of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with COVID-19. Animal data and human studies have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) increase the expression of ACE2. ACE2 is an enzyme found in the heart, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and lung and is a coreceptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2), the virus responsible for COVID-19. Therefore, one can speculate that discontinuing ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy may lead to decreased ACE2 expression, thereby attenuating the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, and mitigating the disease progression of COVID-19. However, several studies have also shown that ACE2 exhibits reno- and cardioprotection and preserves lung function in acute respiratory distress syndrome, which would favor ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy. This article is to examine and summarize the 2 opposing viewpoints and provide guideline recommendations to support the use or discontinuation of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in patients with COVID-19.

Inhaled Insulin: A Clinical and Historical Review.

Insulin is the most effective blood glucose lowering agent and remains one of the cornerstones of diabetes management. However, many individuals with diabetes are either reluctant to initiate or are nonadherent to their insulin therapy for various reasons, including fear of frequent injections. Technosphere Insulin (TI) is a novel inhaled insulin powder that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the management of diabetes. The results from 2 phase III clinical trials have shown that TI was noninferior to subcutaneous insulin aspart and superior to inhaled placebo in lowering HbA1c in patients with diabetes mellitus types 1 and 2, respectively. Across both studies, TI appears to be generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being hypoglycemia and cough. However, long-term pulmonary safety concerns have not been addressed and additional studies are needed. Overall, TI appears to be a promising noninvasive prandial insulin alternative for individuals with diabetes who are at risk for medication nonadherence due to aversion to frequent injections. This article provides a review of the historical development of TI, its safety and efficacy data, and its advantages and disadvantages over traditional injectable insulins.

Celiprolol: A Unique Selective Adrenoceptor Modulator.

Celiprolol is a ß-blocker with a unique pharmacologic profile: it is a ß1-andrenoceptor antagonist with partial ß2 agonist activity. Given this combination of effects, celiprolol may be better described as a selective adrenoreceptor modulator. It has antihypertensive and antianginal properties and is indicated for those uses in various countries around the world. In the United States, however, the proposed indication for this drug will be for the treatment of vascular type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a rare connective tissue disorder characterized by fragile arterial structure and an increased risk of life-threatening vascular complications. By reducing heart rate and pulsatile pressure, celiprolol may reduce the mechanical stress on collagen fibers within the arterial wall and be of benefit in patients with vascular type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The largest investigation of celiprolol in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome was prematurely terminated due to significant benefit with celiprolol in reducing arterial events in patients with this condition. Celiprolol, therefore, represents a ß-blocker that is unique from others in its class in both its pharmacology and clinical applications.

Edoxaban: A Novel Factor Xa Inhibitor for the Management of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism.

Warfarin has been a highly prevalent agent for over 70 years; however, its use has been limited by drug-drug interactions, adverse events, and the need for frequent monitoring. To minimize these complications, several non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have been approved, including the latest agent, edoxaban. Edoxaban is a factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban was largely studied in the Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) and Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (Hokusai-VTE) trials, both showing noninferiority when compared with warfarin. Similar to other oral anticoagulants, the most serious adverse effects of edoxaban are related to bleeding. However, there are currently no approved reversal agents. Andexanet alfa and ciraparantag are the latest agents being studied for reversal. This article provides an overview of the safety and efficacy along with the advantages and disadvantages of edoxaban.

Evaluation of adherence to current guidelines for treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults in an outpatient setting.

PURPOSE: Adherence to the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol guideline at an outpatient clinic was evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective chart review study was conducted from December 1, 2013, through November 30, 2014, at an urban outpatient clinic. Estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was calculated based on the pooled cohort equation for all patients. Patients were categorized into one of four statin-benefit groups, in descending order of ASCVD risk. The recommended intensity of a statin and the therapeutic response were determined for each patient. If statin therapy was indicated, patients were assigned to the moderate-intensity, moderate- or high-intensity, or high-intensity group according to guideline recommendations. These guideline-recommended statin intensities were then compared to the patient's prescribed statin to determine guideline concordance. Therapeutic response, expressed as the percent decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, was determined based on recommended statin intensity. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients were initiated on statin therapy; 193 were included for data analysis. Overall adherence to the guideline was 65.8%, with the highest rate in the group of patients with the lowest risk of ASCVD (97.8%). The group with the lowest rate of adherence to recommendations was patients with clinical ASCVD (46.9%). Only 31.6% of patients had a follow-up lipid panel performed, and even fewer achieved a therapeutic response. CONCLUSION: A majority of patients were initiated on the appropriate intensity of statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline. Of the small number of patients who had follow-up visits, few achieved a therapeutic response based on their prescribed statin therapy.

Patiromer: The First Potassium Binder Approved in Over 50 Years.

For over 50 years, there have been limited options for the management of hyperkalemia, especially among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetic nephropathy, hypertension, and heart failure, who were receiving concomitant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor therapy. Hyperkalemia is a potential, life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that frequently challenges clinicians from maximizing the mortality benefit and organ-protective properties of RAAS inhibitors especially in CKD and heart failure populations. Patiromer is a novel nonabsorbed, cation-exchange polymer that binds and exchanges potassium for calcium, predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract. It has demonstrated potassium-lowering effects in normo- or hyperkalemic patients on concomitant RAAS inhibitors with heart failure, diabetic nephropathy, and CKD, in the PEARL-HF, AMETHYST-DN, and OPAL-HK studies, respectively. Across all studies, it appears to be generally effective and well tolerated, with adverse events predominantly gastrointestinal in nature. Additional investigational studies are needed to explore its use for an extended duration of treatment and in larger patient populations, as well as exploring drug-drug interactions. Overall, patiromer demonstrates a promising role in the chronic management of hyperkalemia that will allow optimization of RAAS inhibitor therapy, thus delaying progression of CKD and improving the mortality benefit in heart failure patients.

Peak antifactor xa activity produced by dalteparin treatment in patients with renal impairment compared with controls.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between impaired renal function and antifactor Xa activity in patients receiving dalteparin. DESIGN: Open-label prospective study. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient units of a large teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Eleven patients with renal impairment and 11 control subjects with normal renal function. INTERVENTION: Subjects were administered dalteparin at a dosage of approximately 100 U/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Peak steady-state antifactor Xa levels were compared between the groups. Mean +/- SD levels were similar for patients with and without renal impairment: 0.47 +/- 0.25 and 0.55 +/- 0.20 U/ml, respectively. A test of equivalency showed statistical significance (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: No meaningful difference in peak antifactor Xa activity was found between patients with renal impairment and control subjects. To the extent that peak antifactor Xa levels can be used as markers for adjusting doses of dalteparin, these data suggest that such adjustments are not necessary for patients with renal impairment who are not receiving dialysis.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension: a review in pharmacotherapy.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease that remains incurable. The past 2 decades have witnessed many advances in PAH-directed therapies. More recently, 3 new oral agents have become available in the United States within the past 2 years. Treprostinil is now available in extended-release oral tablets. Macitentan is the third endothelin receptor antagonist approved for use, demonstrating benefits on morbidity and mortality among patients with PAH in an event-driven study. Riociguat is the first soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that has been approved for use in the United States. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety of these 3 agents and the roles they play in the management of PAH. Additionally, we review the limitations of using surrogate markers such as change in 6-minute walk distance to assess disease progression.

New antiobesity agents: lorcaserin (Belviq) and phentermine/topiramate ER (Qsymia).

Obesity is a risk factor for a wide range of conditions, including cardiovascular disease. Although lifestyle modifications remain the cornerstone for the management of obesity, pharmacologic agents may be a helpful addition to patients who have comorbidities and do not respond adequately to diet and exercise. Lorcaserin and phentermine/topiramate ER are 2 long-awaited agents, approved in 2012 for obesity management, 13 years since orlistat received US Food and Drug Administration approval in 1999. Lorcaserin is a serotonin agonist, whereas phentermine/topiramate is a combination of a sympathomimetic agent and an antiepileptic drug; both these agents have been shown to reduce weight significantly and improve cardiovascular and metabolic parameters, such as blood pressure, lipids, and HbA1C. This article reviews the pharmacology and clinical efficacy and safety of each of these agents. The differences among the three available agents for long-term management of obesity will also be examined.

The polypill: a potential global solution to cardiovascular disease.

Despite groundbreaking advances in health care, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, making it one of the most pressing global health issues to face the modern world. In 2002, Wald and Law proposed the concept of the polypill as a potential solution to this global health epidemic. The polypill represents a powerhouse pill that would consist of a combination of several key medications commonly prescribed for CVD prevention, such as a statin, diuretic, beta blocker, or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, in one pill. It was suggested that it could be a novel, tactical measure in the approach to CVD prevention in that it greatly simplifies the healthcare delivery system. Not only does it increase medication compliance for those currently receiving health care, but it also has the potential to access those in underserved healthcare sectors of the world, primarily low- and middle-income countries, which have been identified as areas of highest CVD risk. A major drawback of the polypill is that there are limited data demonstrating its safety and efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Thus far, research shows that the polypill has promise but needs to be approached with a few considerations, such as desired target patient population and formulation. This article will examine the published and ongoing studies associated with the polypill, outline the advantages and disadvantages of using the polypill as a global CVD prevention strategy, and discuss the design and availability of the polypill in the United States.

Linagliptin: the newest dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are some of the newest medications in our armamentarium for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Through inhibition of the DPP-4 enzyme, these agents increase the amount of circulating incretin hormones, leading to an increase in insulin release and a suppression of glucagon secretion. Linagliptin is the third DPP-4 inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States. It has been studied as monotherapy and as an adjunctive therapy to other oral agents in a dual or triple combination regimen. Linagliptin lowers glycosylated hemoglobin by about 0.4% when used as monotherapy and by about 0.5% to 1.1% when used in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic agents. Since linagliptin is mostly eliminated via the enterohepatic system (80%) and not to a significant extent through renal excretion, dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with renal impairment. Linagliptin also has a favorable safety profile; nasopharyngitis is one of the more common observed side effects. Given its encouraging safety and efficacy profile, linagliptin is a good alternative to the other 2 agents in this class, especially for patients with renal impairment. This article provides a review of the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of linagliptin. The differences among the 3 available DPP-4 inhibitors will also be examined.

Clopidogrel and genetic testing: is it necessary for everyone?

Clopidogrel is a widely used antiplatelet agent to treat and prevent a variety of atherothrombotic diseases. More than a decade after its initial Food and Drug Administration approval, studies have emerged raising concerns regarding its possible reduced efficacy in patients who have impaired conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite (ie, poor metabolizers). Research has implicated genetic variations in the CYP2C19 isozyme as at least partly responsible for the variable antiplatelet response seen with clopidogrel. Studies have shown that patients possessing genetic variants of the CYP2C19 isozyme may be at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events due to impaired clopidogrel efficacy, although this has not been definitively demonstrated. The Food and Drug Administration has issued a boxed warning regarding this concern. However, specific recommendations on genetic testing and alternative therapeutic strategies are not currently available. Genetic testing is commercially available to test patients for variability in the CYP2C19 isozyme, but altering antiplatelet therapy based on the results of this testing has not been adequately studied, and it is therefore not clear how to adjust therapy based on the results of this genetic testing. In addition, there are many other factors that may contribute to the variability in antiplatelet effect seen with clopidogrel besides CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. Ongoing trials dealing with adjusting antiplatelet therapy based on genetic testing will hopefully provide more useful information on how to appropriately integrate pharmacogenomics with the care of patients with atherothrombotic disease.

Dabigatran etexilate: the first oral anticoagulant available in the United States since warfarin.

For more than 5 decades, warfarin has been the mainstay of therapy when oral anticoagulation is required. It has been shown to be effective in the prevention as well as treatment of various thromboembolic disorders. However, drawbacks of warfarin, such as time-consuming requirements for frequent international normalized ratio monitoring, as well as drug and food interactions, have encouraged the development of alternative oral agents. One such agent, dabigatran, has risen up to the challenge. Due to its predictable anticoagulation response, dabigatran does not require routine anticoagulation monitoring. Another advantage dabigatran has over warfarin is its more favorable drug and food interaction profiles. Dabigatran was shown to be noninferior to warfarin in studies evaluating the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, thus leading to the US Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication. Dabigatran has also demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery as well as the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, although these are not current Food and Drug Administration-approved indications. The safety profile appears to be similar to warfarin with regards to overall bleeding risk, though the risk for gastrointestinal bleeds was higher in patients on dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. Disadvantages of dabigatran may include a higher frequency of dyspepsia compared with warfarin, lack of dosing information in severe renal impairment, possible missed opportunities for periodic health examinations and interventions due to elimination of regular physician's visit for international normalized ratio monitoring, and drug costs. This article provides an overview of the clinical studies, pharmacokinetic profile, adverse effects, drug interactions as well as advantages and disadvantages associated with dabigatran.

Pitavastatin: a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

Because of their good tolerability and their positive effect on lipid parameters and clinical outcomes, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have become the drugs of first choice for the management of dyslipidemia. Pitavastatin is the newest member in the statin family and received Food and Drug Administration approval for oral use in August 2009. Compared to other statins such as atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin at specific doses, pitavastatin dosed at 1 to 4 mg daily showed similar efficacy in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and altering other lipid parameters according to a number of studies. In addition, pitavastatin demonstrated cholesterol-lowering efficacy in special populations such as the elderly, patients with diabetes, and patients with higher cardiovascular risk. Because pitavastatin is minimally metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes, it is associated with a lower frequency of drug-drug interactions, and this may be a desirable characteristic of pitavastatin. Beneficial effects, such as reductions of coronary plaque volume and fibrofatty composition, have also been observed with pitavastatin. Thus far, the safety profile of pitavastatin is favorable and appears to be similar to those of other statins. Given its encouraging pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, pitavastatin is likely to be a good alternative to other more established statins. The pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of pitavastatin are reviewed in this article.

Clevidipine: a novel ultra-short-acting calcium antagonist.

Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular condition in the United States. It can lead to end organ damage and increased mortality risk if it is not properly controlled. In most situations where blood pressure has to be brought down quickly, an intravenous agent with a quick onset of action is often used. Clevidipine is the first third-generation IV dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that has a high degree of vascular selectivity and an ultra-fast onset and offset of blood pressure lowering effect. In various clinical trials, clevidipine has shown to be safe and effective in controlling acute blood pressure elevations in patients with hypertensive emergencies, preoperative hypertension, and postoperative hypertension. The most common adverse events noted are atrial fibrillation, nausea, headache, and acute renal failure. Overall, clevidipine is a useful addition to available intravenous agents in reducing blood pressure during acute situations. The acceptance of this agent to hospital formularies may ultimately depend on its perceived ease of administration, clinically relevant benefits over other available agents, and acquisition costs.