Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(5): 1005-1011, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31034591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Exercise interventions improve anxiety and mood disturbances in patients with cancer. However, studies are limited in older adults with cancer. We assessed the effects of exercise on anxiety, mood, and social and emotional well-being in older patients with cancer during their first 6 weeks of chemotherapy. DESIGN: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Community oncology practices. PARTICIPANTS: Older patients (aged 60 years or older) undergoing chemotherapy (N = 252). INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to Exercise for Cancer Patients (EXCAP) or usual care (control) for the first 6 weeks of chemotherapy. EXCAP is a home-based, low- to moderate-intensity progressive walking and resistance training program. MEASUREMENTS: Analysis of covariance, with study arm as the factor, baseline value as the covariate, and study arm × baseline interaction, was used to evaluate arm effects on postintervention anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), mood (Profile of Mood States [POMS]), and social and emotional well-being (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General subscales) after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Median age was 67 years; 77% had breast cancer. Statistically significant group differences were observed in the STAI score (P = .001), POMS score (P = .022), social well-being (P = .002), and emotional well-being (P = .048). For each outcome, EXCAP patients with worse baseline scores had larger improvements at 6 weeks; these improvements were clinically significant for STAI score and social well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Among older cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, a 6-week structured exercise program improved anxiety and mood, especially among those participants with worse baseline symptoms. Additional RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the appropriate exercise prescription for managing anxiety, mood, and well-being in this patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1005-1011, 2019.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety/rehabilitation , Exercise/psychology , Mood Disorders/rehabilitation , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Resistance Training/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/etiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/psychology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(1): 58-64, 2015 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25422488

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). CONCLUSION: Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor-negative/HER2-negative tumors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms, Male/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms, Male/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL