ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended starting age for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk adults from 50 to 45 years. We aimed to estimate the global burden and trends of colorectal cancer in adults aged 20-49 years (early-onset CRC). METHODS: This is an analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 (GBD 2019). The GBD 2019 estimation methods were used to describe the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of early CRC from 1990 to 2019. Data from 204 countries and geographic areas were available. RESULTS: The global incidence rate of early-onset CRC increased from 4.2/100 000 to 6.7/100 000 from 1990 to 2019. Mortality and DALYs of early-onset CRC also increased. The CRC incidence rate increased faster in younger adults (1.6%) than in adults aged 50-74 years (0.6%) as measured by the annual percentage change. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was consistently observed in all five socio-demographic index (SDI) regions and 190 out of 204 countries and territories. Middle and high-middle SDI regions had faster annual increases in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention. CONCLUSIONS: The global incidence, mortality, and DALYs of early-onset CRC increased from 1990 to 2019. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was prevalent worldwide. Several countries were found to have higher incidence rates than the United States or fast increase in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention.
Subject(s)
Global Burden of Disease , Neoplasms , Humans , Young Adult , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Incidence , Global HealthABSTRACT
Background: There is an increased trend of e-cigarette but the toxic effects of e-cigarette metabolites are not widely studied especially in liver disease. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of recent e-cigarette use in a nationally representative sample of US adults and adolescents and its association amongst respondents with liver disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2015 to 2018. The self-reported NHANES questionnaire was used to assess liver disease (MCQ160L, MCQ170L and MCQ 510 (a-e)), e-cigarette use (SMQ900) and traditional smoking status (SMQ020 or SMQ040). We conducted univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models to predict the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking and dual smoking amongst the population with liver disease. Results: Out of total 178,300 respondents, 7,756 (4.35%) were e-cigarette users, 48,625 (27.27%) traditional smoking, 23,444 (13.15%) dual smoking and 98,475 (55.23%) non-smokers. Females had a higher frequency of e-cigarette use (49.3%) compared to dual (43%) and traditional smoking (40.8%) (P < 0.0001). Respondents with a past history of any liver disease have lower frequency of e-cigarette use compared to dual and traditional smoking, respectively (2.4% vs. 6.4% vs. 7.2%; P < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression models, we found that e-cigarette users (odds ratio (OR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 - 1.06; P < 0.0001) and dual smoking (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.50 - 1.51; P < 0.0001) were associated with higher odds of having history of liver disease compared to non-smokers. Conclusion: Our study found that despite the low frequency of e-cigarette use in respondents with liver disease, there was higher odds of e-cigarette use amongst patients with liver disease. This warrants the need for more future prospective studies to evaluate the long-term effects and precise mechanisms of e-cigarette toxicants on the liver.