Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 188(6): 786-91, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15619500

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Five percent of patients who undergo fundoplication will require reoperation. The cause of this high failure rate and the best management for these patients remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify patterns and causes of failure of primary antireflux procedures. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent revisional antireflux surgery at 2 tertiary referral centers. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, 39 patients underwent laparoscopic revisional antireflux surgery. The time between primary and revisional surgery was 5.9 +/- 0.4 years. Primary operations included 26 laparoscopic and 13 open fundoplications. All of the 39 revisional operations were attempted laparoscopically, and there was 1 open conversion. Revisional procedures included 31 Nissen and 8 partial fundoplications. The duration of surgery was 138 +/- 10 minutes. Length of hospital stay was 2.1 +/- 0.3 days. At a mean follow-up of 6 months, reflux resolved in 94% of patients. Morbidity occurred in 23% of patients. Four types of failure were identified: type 1 = herniation of the gastroesophageal junction through the hiatus with or without the wrap (n = 21); type 2 = paraesophageal hernia (n = 9); type 3 = malformation of the wrap (n = 2). Six patients had primary wrap failure, and 1 had esophageal dysmotility. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic revisional antireflux surgery is effective treatment for patients with failed primary fundoplications. Successful revisional surgery depends on identification and correction of the reason for primary fundoplication failure.


Subject(s)
Fundoplication/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparotomy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Probability , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Failure
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 103(5): 709-12, 2009 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19231338

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of patients are living with ventricular assist devices (VADs). Many of these patients will require noncardiac surgery for conditions not directly related to their VADs. The aim of this study was to assess the risks and outcomes of noncardiac surgery in these patients. Perioperative and follow-up data from patients with VADs who underwent noncardiac surgery from 1993 to 2006 were analyzed. In that period, 184 VADs were implanted in 155 patients. Thirty-seven patients (24%) subsequently underwent 59 noncardiac surgeries. The mean duration of VAD support before surgery was 229 days. Bleeding was the most common postsurgical complication (10%), necessitating reexploration in 20% of abdominal surgeries. Thirty-day mortality was 12%. No deaths were caused by direct complications of surgery. Successful transplantation occurred in 72% of bridge to transplantation patients who required noncardiac surgery, compared with 71% of these patients who did not require noncardiac surgery (relative risk 1.0, p = 0.9). The average duration of VAD support after noncardiac surgery for destination therapy patients was 324 days, most of which time was spent at home. In conclusion, outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with VADs are favorable, and most patients continue to benefit from the intended purpose of mechanical circulatory support after recovering from noncardiac surgery.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Female , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Preoperative Care , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL