Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Birth ; 51(1): 176-185, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37800376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared low-risk cesarean birth rates for Black and White women across hospitals serving increasing proportions of Black women and identified hospitals where Black women had low-risk cesarean rates less than or equal to White women. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of secondary data from four states, we categorized hospitals by their proportion of Black women giving birth from "low" to "high". We analyzed the odds of low-risk cesarean for Black and White women across hospital categories. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 493 hospitals and the 65,524 Black and 251,426 White women at low risk for cesarean who birthed in them. The mean low-risk cesarean rate was significantly higher for Black, compared with White, women in the low (20.1% vs. 15.9%) and medium (18.1% vs. 16.9%) hospital categories. In regression models, no hospital structural characteristics were significantly associated with the odds of a Black woman having a low-risk cesarean. For White women, birthing in a hospital serving the highest proportion of Black women was associated with a 21% (95% CI: 1.01-1.44) increase in the odds of having a low-risk cesarean. DISCUSSION: Black women had higher odds of a low-risk cesarean than White women and were more likely to access care in hospitals with higher low-risk cesarean rates. The existence of hospitals where low-risk cesarean rates for Black women were less than or equal to those of White women was notable, given a predominant focus on hospitals where Black women have poorer outcomes. Efforts to decrease the low-risk cesarean rate should focus on (1) improving intrapartum care for Black women and (2) identifying differentiating organizational factors in hospitals where cesarean birth rates are optimally low and equivalent among racial groups as a basis for system-level policy efforts to improve equity and reduce cesarean birth rates.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cesarean Section , Healthcare Disparities , White People , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Birth Rate , Cross-Sectional Studies , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups , White People/statistics & numerical data , Cesarean Section/methods , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Risk , United States/epidemiology
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 2024 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301721

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: While there are known racial disparities in cesarean delivery (CD) rates, the exact etiologies for these disparities are multifaceted. We aimed to determine if differences in induction of labor (IOL) management contribute to these disparities. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all nulliparous patients with an unfavorable cervix and intact membranes who underwent IOL of a term, singleton gestation at a single institution from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2020. IOL management was at clinician discretion. Patients were classified as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) or White based on self-report. Overall rates of CD were compared for BIPOC versus White race. Chart review then evaluated various IOL management strategies as possible contributors to differences in CD by race. RESULTS: Of 1,261 eligible patients, 915 (72.6%) identified as BIPOC and 346 (27.4%) as White. BIPOC patients were more likely to be younger (26 years interquartile range (IQR) [22-30] vs. 32 years IQR [30-35], p < 0.001) and publicly insured (59.1 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001). Indication for IOL and modified Bishop score also differed by race (p < 0.001; p = 0.006). There was 40% increased risk of CD for BIPOC patients, even when controlling for confounders (30.7 vs. 21.7%, p = 0.001; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.06-1.86]). Despite this difference in CD, there were no identifiable differences in IOL management prior to decision for CD by race. Specifically, there were no differences in choice of cervical ripening agent, cervical dilation at or time to amniotomy, use and maximum dose of oxytocin, or dilation at CD. However, BIPOC patients were more likely to undergo CD for fetal indications and failed IOL. CONCLUSION: BIPOC nulliparas are 40% more likely to undergo CD during IOL than White patients within our institution. These data suggest that the disparity is not explained by differences in IOL management prior to cesarean, indicating that biases outside of induction management may be important to target to reduce CD disparities. KEY POINTS: · The etiologies for racial disparities in cesarean are likely multifaceted.. · In this work, there were no differences by race in measures of labor induction management.. · Biases outside of induction management during labor may be targeted to reduce CD disparities..

3.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 38(2): 158-166, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758272

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of nurse staffing in varying work environments on missed breastfeeding teaching and support in inpatient maternity units in the United States. BACKGROUND: Breast milk is the optimal food for newborns. Teaching and supporting women in breastfeeding are primarily a nurse's responsibility. Better maternity nurse staffing (fewer patients per nurse) is associated with less missed breastfeeding teaching and support and increased rates of breastfeeding. We examined the extent to which the nursing work environment, staffing, and nurse education were associated with missed breastfeeding care and how the work environment and staffing interacted to impact missed breastfeeding care. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study using the 2015 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicator survey, maternity nurses in hospitals in 48 states and the District of Columbia responded about their workplace and breastfeeding care. Clustered logistic regression models with interactions were used to estimate the effects of the nursing work environment and staffing on missed breastfeeding care. RESULTS: There were 19 486 registered nurses in 444 hospitals. Nearly 3 in 10 (28.2%) nurses reported missing breastfeeding care. In adjusted models, an additional patient per nurse was associated with a 39% increased odds of missed breastfeeding care. Furthermore, 1 standard deviation decrease in the work environment was associated with a 65% increased odds of missed breastfeeding care. In an interaction model, staffing only had a significant impact on missed breastfeeding care in poor work environments. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the work environment is more fundamental than staffing for ensuring that not only breastfeeding care is not missed but also breastfeeding care is sensitive to nurse staffing. Improvements to the work environment support the provision of breastfeeding care. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: Both nurse staffing and the work environment are important for improving breastfeeding rates, but the work environment is foundational.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Workplace , Humans , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/statistics & numerical data , United States , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Working Conditions
4.
J Emerg Nurs ; 50(1): 153-160, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37498276

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the well-being outcomes and quality of work environment among emergency nurses compared with inpatient nurses working in Magnet hospitals and identify recommendations in emergency department work environments that hold promise for enhancing emergency nurses' well-being. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of multicenter survey data collected in 2021 from 11,743 nurses practicing in 60 United States Magnet hospitals. Nurses report on burnout, job dissatisfaction, intent to leave, work environment, and recommendations to improve well-being. RESULTS: Emergency nurses are significantly more likely to report high burnout (P = .04), job dissatisfaction (P < .001), and intent to leave (P < .001) than inpatient nurses working in the same Magnet hospitals. Emergency nurses are significantly more likely to report insufficient staffing (P = .001), an unfavorable work environment (P < .001), and lack confidence that management will act to resolve problems in patient care (P < .001) but did report significantly better working relationships with physicians (P < .001) than their inpatient counterparts. The 2 greatest recommendations to improve well-being included improving nurse staffing (91.4%) and the ability to take uninterrupted breaks (86.7%); the lowest-ranked recommendations were employing more advanced practice providers (25.9%) and appointing a wellness champion (21.2%). DISCUSSION: High burnout and other adverse nurse outcomes are common among emergency nurses in Magnet hospitals. Modifiable features of ED work environments including inadequate nurse staffing, inability of nurses to take uninterrupted breaks, and lack of responsiveness of management to persistent problems in patient care warrant high priority attention by Magnet hospital leaders.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Nurses , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , United States , Cross-Sectional Studies , Job Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Hospitals , Working Conditions
5.
J Adv Nurs ; 78(3): 799-809, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34402538

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To explore factors associated with nurses' moral distress during the first COVID-19 surge and their longer-term mental health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, correlational survey study. METHODS: Registered nurses were surveyed in September 2020 about their experiences during the first peak month of COVID-19 using the new, validated, COVID-19 Moral Distress Scale for Nurses. Nurses' mental health was measured by recently experienced symptoms. Analyses included descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Outcome variables were moral distress and mental health. Explanatory variables were frequency of COVID-19 patients, leadership communication and personal protective equipment/cleaning supplies access. The sample comprised 307 nurses (43% response rate) from two academic medical centres. RESULTS: Many respondents had difficulty accessing personal protective equipment. Most nurses reported that hospital leadership communication was transparent, effective and timely. The most distressing situations were the transmission risk to nurses' family members, caring for patients without family members present, and caring for patients dying without family or clergy present. These occurred occasionally with moderate distress. Nurses reported 2.5 days each in the past week of feeling anxiety, withdrawn and having difficulty sleeping. Moral distress decreased with effective communication and access to personal protective equipment. Moral distress was associated with longer-term mental health. CONCLUSION: Pandemic patient care situations are the greatest sources of nurses' moral distress. Effective leadership communication, fewer COVID-19 patients, and access to protective equipment decrease moral distress, which influences longer-term mental health. IMPACT: Little was known about the impact of COVID-19 on nurses' moral distress. We found that nurses' moral distress was associated with the volume of care for infected patients, access to personal protective equipment, and communication from leaders. We found that moral distress was associated with longer-term mental health. Leaders should communicate transparently to decrease nurses' moral distress and the negative effects of global crises on nurses' longer-term mental health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nurses , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Mental Health , Morals , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Birth ; 48(1): 44-51, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Birth is the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States. Hospital variation in maternal outcomes is an important indicator of health care quality. Spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) is the most optimal birth outcome for the majority of mothers and newborns. The purpose of this study was to examine hospital-level variation in SVB overall and among low-risk women in a four-state sample representing 25% of births in the United States in 2016. METHODS: Women giving birth in California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Florida were identified in 2016 state discharge abstracts. Patient data were merged with hospital data from the American Hospital Association's (AHA) 2016 Annual Survey. Overall and low-risk SVB rates were calculated for each hospital in the sample and stratified by bed size, teaching status, rurality, birth volume, and state. RESULTS: Our final sample included 869 681 women who gave birth in 494 hospitals. The mean overall SVB rate in the sample was 61.1%, ranging from 16.8% to 79.9%. The mean low-risk SVB rate was 78% and ranged from 34.6% to 93.3%. Variation in SVB rates cut across all the hospital structural characteristic strata. DISCUSSION: The wide variation in SVB rates indicates significant room for improvement in this maternal quality metric. Our finding, that hospitals of all types and locations had both low and high SVB rates, suggests that excellent maternal outcomes are possible in all hospital settings. The variation in SVB rates across hospitals warrants research into modifiable hospital factors that may be influencing SVB rates.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric , Hospitals , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pennsylvania , Pregnancy , Quality of Health Care , United States/epidemiology
7.
Res Nurs Health ; 44(3): 559-570, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651381

ABSTRACT

Machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, is increasingly used in health research, including nursing and maternal outcomes research. Machine learning algorithms are complex and involve statistics and terminology that are not common in health research. The purpose of this methods paper is to describe three machine learning algorithms in detail and provide an example of their use in maternal outcomes research. The three algorithms, classification and regression trees, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest, may be used to understand risk groups, select variables for a model, and rank variables' contribution to an outcome, respectively. While machine learning has plenty to contribute to health research, it also has some drawbacks, and these are discussed as well. To provide an example of the different algorithms' function, they were used on a completed cross-sectional study examining the association of oxytocin total dose exposure with primary cesarean section. The results of the algorithms are compared to what was done or found using more traditional methods.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Machine Learning , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Obesity , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Young Adult
8.
J Clin Nurs ; 30(1-2): 200-206, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33090594

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in hospitals' proportion of specialty certified nurses and to determine whether and to what extent individual nurse characteristics and organisational hospital characteristics are associated with a nurse's likelihood of having specialty certification. BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown that patients in hospitals with high proportions of specialty certified nurses have better outcomes including lower mortality and fewer adverse events, yet less is known about what motivates nurses to obtain specialty certification. METHODS AND DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of paediatric nurses in 119 acute care hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between individual nurse characteristics, organisational hospital characteristics and an individual nurses' likelihood of holding a specialty certification. STROBE was followed. RESULTS: The proportion of certified nurses varies substantially among hospitals, with Magnet® hospitals being significantly more likely, on average, to have higher proportions of certified nurses. Nurses in children's hospitals were no more likely than paediatric nurses in general hospitals to be certified. A nurse's years of experience and bachelors-preparation were significantly associated with higher odds of having certification. The strongest predictors of certification were favourable nurse work environments and Magnet® -designation of the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: While individual attributes of the nurse were associated with a nurse's likelihood of having a specialty certification, the strongest predictors of certification were modifiable attributes of the hospital-a favourable nurse work environment and Magnet® -designation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospital administrators seeking to increase the proportion of specialty certified nurses in their organisation should look to improvements in the organisation's nurse work environment as a possible mechanism.


Subject(s)
Nurses, Pediatric , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Certification , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Workplace
9.
J Nurs Manag ; 28(8): 2001-2006, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335967

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study examined the prevalence of job dissatisfaction and burnout among maternity nurses and the association of job dissatisfaction and burnout with missed care. BACKGROUND: Nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction affect the quality and safety of care and are amenable to intervention. Little is known about job dissatisfaction and burnout among maternity nurses or how these factors are associated with missed care in maternity units. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of the 2015 RN4CAST survey data and the American Hospital Association's 2015 Annual Survey. Robust logistic regression models at the nurse level examined the association of job dissatisfaction and burnout with missed care. RESULTS: One-quarter of nurses screened positive for burnout, and almost one-fifth reported job dissatisfaction. While 56.4% of nurses in the total sample reported any missed care, 72.6% of nurses with job dissatisfaction and 84.5% of nurses with burnout reported any missed care (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The association of job dissatisfaction and burnout, which are modifiable states, with increased rates of missed maternity care suggests that addressing job dissatisfaction and burnout may improve care quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Job dissatisfaction, burnout and missed care may decrease with an improved work environment.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Maternal Health Services , Nurses , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Burnout, Professional/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Am J Nurs ; 124(2): 48-54, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38270423

ABSTRACT

LOCAL PROBLEM: Variations in nursing practice were observed across our hospital, a 520-bed acute care teaching facility in the northeast United States, regarding the timing and frequency of insulin administration in adult patients with diabetes. Chart audits noted that RNs administered insulin more than one hour after blood glucose results were obtained 97% of the time. In addition, insulin was given at bedtime only 37% of the time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to improve the care of inpatients requiring insulin by implementing protocols and adjusting practice to align with best practice recommendations. METHODS: The clinical nurse education specialist met with a team of staff nurses, providers, nurse leaders, and patient care technicians (PCTs) to formulate protocols and design interventions to ensure improvements in the quality of care for inpatients with diabetes. A sequence of education sessions and an online learning module were developed and assigned to nurses and PCTs to address knowledge gaps, specifically in the pharmacodynamics and safe administration of insulin, as well as how best to provide care to patients with diabetes. Monthly adherence data were disseminated to nurse leaders and educators and reviewed with clinical staff at daily safety huddles and staff meetings. Additional interventions to enhance nursing practice in caring for patients with diabetes included ensuring both bedtime insulin administration and timely insulin delivery. This project began in May 2017 and ended five years later. RESULTS: Two weeks after initial education sessions began in May and June 2017, the frequency of giving bedtime insulin based on the order set and according to the patient's blood glucose levels rose from 37% to 82%, and adherence to best practice protocols continued until final chart audits were performed in May 2022. The frequency of giving insulin less than one hour after obtaining blood glucose results improved from 3% to 64% between October and December 2019, and increased to a sustained level above the project's 92% goal two years later. CONCLUSION: Protocol development, targeted education, and audits with feedback led to improved care delivery for patients requiring insulin and increased nursing confidence.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Insulin , Adult , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Insulin/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose , Critical Care , Perinatal Care
11.
Learn Health Syst ; 8(Suppl 1): e10425, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883872

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Poor communication is a leading root cause of preventable maternal mortality in the United States. Communication challenges are compounded with the presence of biases, including racism. Hospital administrators and clinicians are often aware that communication is a problem, but understanding where to intervene can be difficult to determine. While clinical leadership routinely reviews incident reports and acts on them to improve care, we hypothesized that reviewing incident reports in a systematic way might reveal thematic patterns, providing targeted opportunities to improve communication in direct interaction with patients and within the healthcare team itself. Methods: We abstracted incident reports from the Women's Health service and linked them with patient charts to join patient's race/ethnicity, birth outcome, and presence of maternal morbidity and mortality to the incident report. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of incident reports using an inductive and deductive approach to categorizing communication challenges. We then described the intersection of different types of communication challenges with patient race/ethnicity and morbidity outcomes. Results: The use of incident reports to conduct research on communication was new for the health system. Conversations with health system-level stakeholders were important to determine the best way to manage data. We developed a thematic codebook based on prior research in healthcare communication. We found that we needed to add codes that were equity focused, as this was missing from the existing codebook. We also found that clinical and contextual expertise was necessary for conducting the analysis-requiring more resources to conduct coding than initially estimated. We shared our findings back with leadership iteratively during the work. Conclusions: Incident reports represent a promising source of health system data for rapid improvement to transform organizational practice around communication. There are barriers to conducting this work in a rapid manner, however, that require further iteration and innovation.

12.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 51(3): 290-301, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278349

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine variation in nursing resources across three different types of maternity units in five regions of the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive. SETTING: Maternity units in hospitals in 48 states and the District of Columbia that participated in the 2016 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicator survey. PARTICIPANTS: Staff nurses (N = 19,486) who worked in 707 maternity units. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of survey data examining nursing resources (work environment, staffing, education, specialty certification) by type of maternity unit, including labor and delivery, labor/delivery/recovery/postpartum, and postpartum. We used descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Participants worked in 707 units (269 labor and delivery units, 164 labor/delivery/recovery/postpartum units, and 274 postpartum units) in 444 hospitals. The work environment was not significantly different across unit types (mean = 2.89-2.94, p = .27). Staffing, education, and specialty certification varied significantly across the unit types (p ≤ .001). In terms of staffing, postpartum units had, on average, almost twice the number of patients per nurse as labor and delivery units (7.51 patients/nurse vs. 4.01 patients/nurse, p ≤ .001) and 1.5 times more patients than labor/delivery/recovery/postpartum units (5.04 patients/nurse vs. 4.01 patients/nurse, p ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Nursing resources varied significantly across types of maternity units and regions of the United States. This variation suggests that improving nursing resources may be a system-level target for improving maternity care in the United States.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Workforce , Workplace
13.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(4): 342-349, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33737332

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) are concentrated in some hospitals as compared with newborns without NAS and whether care quality and safety differed among these hospitals. We hypothesized that newborns with NAS would be cared for in poorer-quality hospitals. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 3 2016 data sets: (1) the panel study of effects of changes in nursing on patient outcomes-US survey of hospital registered nurses regarding work conditions and safety, (2) inpatient discharge abstracts, and (3) the American Hospital Association annual survey. Newborns in 266 hospitals from the 4 states where the panel study of effects of changes in nursing on patient outcomes was conducted were included. We used Lorenz curves to determine if newborns with NAS were concentrated in different hospitals than newborns without NAS and whether care quality and safety differed among those hospitals. Quality and safety were assessed by staff nurses by using standard survey questions. RESULTS: Of the 659 403 newborns in this study, 3130 were diagnosed with noniatrogenic NAS. We found that newborns with NAS were cared for in different hospitals compared with newborns without NAS (Gini coefficient 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.68) and that the hospitals in which they received care were rated as having poorer quality and safety (Gini coefficient 0.12, 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Newborns with NAS are cared for in poorer-quality hospitals than other newborns. Our findings are of concern because poorer-quality care is linked to patient outcomes. As stakeholders seek to address the opioid epidemic and improve outcomes of newborns with NAS, our findings suggest the importance of examining hospital factors.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome , Analgesics, Opioid , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
14.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 66(1): 54-61, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930507

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To examine whether there is a threshold of oxytocin exposure at which the risk for primary cesarean increases among women who are nulliparous with a term, singleton, vertex fetus (NTSV) and how oxytocin interacts with other risk factors to contribute to this outcome. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor data set that used a retrospective cohort study design. Women who met the criteria for NTSV who were not admitted for a prelabor cesarean and for whom oxytocin data were available, were included in the sample. Robust logistic regression was used to examine the association of oxytocin exposure with primary cesarean birth, while controlling for demographic and clinical risk factors and clustering by provider. RESULTS: The sample comprised 17,331 women who were exposed to oxytocin during labor. The women were predominantly white non-Hispanic (59.2%) with an average (SD) gestational age of 39.4 (1.1) weeks and an 18.5% primary cesarean rate. Exposure to greater than 11,400-milliunits (mU) of oxytocin resulted in 1.6 times increased odds of primary cesarean birth compared with less than 11,400 mU (95% CI 1.01-2.6). DISCUSSION: Exposure to greater than 11,400 mU of oxytocin in labor was associated with an increased odds of primary cesarean birth in NTSV women.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Labor, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Labor, Obstetric , Logistic Models , Obstetric Labor Complications/surgery , Obstetrics/methods , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Oxytocin/adverse effects , Parity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
15.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(8): 825-833, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34230061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We measured within-hospital concordance of mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD) and newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) or opioid exposure (OE). Secondarily, we described the demographics of mothers and newborns with and without opioid-related diagnoses. METHODS: We used hospital discharge abstracts from California, Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania in 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to compare newborns and mothers with and without opioid-related diagnoses. Within-hospital frequencies of mothers with OUD and newborns with NAS and OE were compared. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: In 474 hospitals, we found 896 702 mothers (0.6% with OUD) and 910 867 newborns (0.47% with NAS, 0.85% with OE, and 0.07% with both). Although the frequency of mothers and newborns with opioid-related diagnoses in a hospital was strongly correlated (r = 0.81), more infants were identified than mothers in most hospitals (68.3%). Mothers with OUD were more likely to be white (79% vs 40.9%), on Medicaid (75.4% vs 44.0%), and receive care in rural hospitals (20.6% vs 17.6%), compared with mothers without OUD. Newborns with NAS had demographics similar to women with OUD. Newborns with OE were disproportionately Black (22% vs 7%) or Hispanic (22% vs 9%). CONCLUSIONS: More newborns are diagnosed with opioid-related disorders than mothers are. Although infants diagnosed with NAS had demographics similar to mothers with OUD, infants with OE were more likely to be Black or Hispanic. The lack of diagnostic coding of maternal OUD and the racial differences in diagnoses warrant attention.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome , Opioid-Related Disorders , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/diagnosis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States
16.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs ; 45(5): 265-270, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520729

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Maternal outcomes in the United States are the poorest of any high-income country. Efforts to improve the quality and safety of maternity care are frequently reported by individual hospitals, limiting generalizability. The purpose of this study is to describe maternity care quality and safety in hospitals in four states. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study is a secondary analysis of the Panel Study of Effects of Changes in Nursing on Patient Outcomes data. Registered nurses reported on maternity unit quality, safety, and work environment. Descriptive statistics and clustered linear regressions were used. RESULTS: The sample included 1,165 nurses reporting on 166 units in California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Florida in 2015. One-third of nurses, on average, gave their units an overall safety grade of "excellent," but this decreased to less than one-sixth of nurses in units with poor work environments. Overall, 65% of nurses reported that their mistakes were held against them. A good work environment, compared with poor, was significantly associated with fewer nurses grading safety as poor (ß -35.6, 95% CI -42.9 - -28.3). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our research found that the nurses in the majority of hospitals with maternity units in four states representing a quarter of the nation's annual births felt their units do not provide excellent quality care and have a less than optimal safety climate.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Workplace/standards , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Florida , Humans , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , New Jersey , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/standards , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
17.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 64(5): 545-558, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31294522

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use is epidemic in the United States. Opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy, as well as neonatal abstinence syndrome, has quadrupled in the last decade, and opioid maintenance therapy is recommended for pregnant women with OUD. Breastfeeding is an important means of improving outcomes for these vulnerable women and newborns. The purpose of this study was to review current policy on breastfeeding and opioid maintenance therapy, the rates of breastfeeding among women in this population, and facilitators and barriers to implementing policy recommendations. METHODS: CINAHL, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria included publication between 2013 and 2018, English language, human only, and original data (except for policy statements). Studies were excluded if they did not report original data and did not examine breastfeeding for women on opioid maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Eight policy statements and 17 original research studies were identified that met the search criteria. All the policy statements support breastfeeding for women who are stable on opioid maintenance therapy and do not have HIV. Despite this, rates of breastfeeding among women receiving opioid maintenance therapy remain low compared with women in the general population. Results of qualitative research indicates that women on opioid maintenance therapy face numerous barriers to breastfeeding, including misinformation from health care professionals. Quantitative research has only begun to identify interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes in this population. Research was conducted primarily with white women receiving care at urban health care centers. DISCUSSION: Practice lags behind policy in terms of supporting breastfeeding in women receiving opioid maintenance therapy. There is a need for more research that includes African American and rural women on opioid maintenance therapy, as well as quantitative research that uses findings from qualitative research to identify the best possible interventions for improving breastfeeding outcomes for women on opioid maintenance therapy and their newborns. One significant need is for health care provider education regarding these policies as well as best practices for providing breastfeeding education and support to this population.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/etiology , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Organizational Policy , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL