ABSTRACT
Differential diagnosis between constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is crucial as treatment and surveillance differ. We report the case of a girl with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic NF1 who developed a glioblastoma. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins identified PMS2 loss in tumour and normal cells and WES showed the tumour had an ultra-hypermutated phenotype, supporting the diagnosis of CMMRD. Germline analyses identified two variants (one pathogenic variant and one classified as variant(s) of unknown significance) in the PMS2 gene and subsequent functional assays on blood lymphocytes confirmed the diagnosis of CMMRD. The large plexiform neurofibroma of the thigh and the freckling were however more compatible with NF1. Indeed, a NF1 PV (variant allele frequencies of 20%, 3% and 9% and in blood, skin and saliva samples, respectively) was identified confirming a mosaicism for NF1. Retrospective analysis of a French cohort identified NF1 mosaicism in blood DNA in 2 out of 22 patients with CMMRD, underlining the existence of early postzygotic PV of NF1 gene in patients with CMMRD whose tumours have been frequently reported to exhibit somatic NF1 mutations. It highlights the potential role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of CMMRD-associated gliomas and argues in favour of testing MEK inhibitors in this context.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Neurofibromatosis 1 , Female , Humans , Neurofibromatosis 1/diagnosis , Neurofibromatosis 1/genetics , Mosaicism , Retrospective Studies , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Mosaic BRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1meth) increases the risk of early-onset breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer and ovarian cancer. As mosaic BRCA1meth are believed to occur de novo, their role in family breast/ovarian cancer has not been assessed. PATIENTS: Blood-derived DNA from 20 unrelated affected cases from families with aggregation of breast/ovarian cancer, but with no germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, PALB2 or RAD51C/D, were screened by methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting. CpG analysis was performed by pyrosequencing on blood and buccal swab. Two probands carried a pathogenic variant in a moderate-penetrance gene (ATM and BARD1), and 8 of 18 others (44%) carried BRCA1meth (vs none of the 20 age-matched controls). Involvement of BRCA1 in tumourigenesis in methylated probands was demonstrated in most tested cases by detection of a loss of heterozygosity and a homologous recombination deficiency signature. Among the eight methylated probands, two had relatives with breast cancer with detectable BRCA1meth in blood, including one with high methylation levels in two non-tumour tissues. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of mosaic BRCA1meth in patients with breast/ovarian cancer with affected relatives, as well as this first description of a family aggregation of mosaic BRCA1meth, shows how this de novo event can contribute to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer pedigrees.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Pedigree , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Methylation , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , DNA Methylation/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare recessive childhood cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mismatch repair variants. Constitutional microsatellite instability (cMSI) is a CMMRD diagnostic hallmark and may associate with cancer risk. We quantified cMSI in a large CMMRD patient cohort to explore genotype-phenotype correlations using novel MSI markers selected for instability in blood. METHODS: Three CMMRD, 1 Lynch syndrome, and 2 control blood samples were genome sequenced to >120× depth. A pilot cohort of 8 CMMRD and 38 control blood samples and a blinded cohort of 56 CMMRD, 8 suspected CMMRD, 40 Lynch syndrome, and 43 control blood samples were amplicon sequenced to 5000× depth. Sample cMSI score was calculated using a published method comparing microsatellite reference allele frequencies with 80 controls. RESULTS: Thirty-two mononucleotide repeats were selected from blood genome and pilot amplicon sequencing data. cMSI scoring using these MSI markers achieved 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 93.6%-100.0%) and specificity (95% CI 97.9%-100.0%), was reproducible, and was superior to an established tumor MSI marker panel. Lower cMSI scores were found in patients with CMMRD with MSH6 deficiency and patients with at least 1 mismatch repair missense variant, and patients with biallelic truncating/copy number variants had higher scores. cMSI score did not correlate with age at first tumor. CONCLUSIONS: We present an inexpensive and scalable cMSI assay that enhances CMMRD detection relative to existing methods. cMSI score is associated with mismatch repair genotype but not phenotype, suggesting it is not a useful predictor of cancer risk.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Microsatellite Instability , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genotype , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/geneticsABSTRACT
Central nervous system (CNS) dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVF) have been reported in PTEN-related hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS). However, PHTS-associated DAVF remain an underexplored field of the PHTS clinical landscape. Here, we studied cases with a PTEN pathogenic variant identified between 2007 and 2020 in our laboratory (n = 58), and for whom brain imaging was available. Two patients had DAVF (2/58, 3.4%), both presenting at advanced stages: a 34-year-old man with a left lateral sinus DAVF at immediate risk of hemorrhage, and a 21-year-old woman with acute intracranial hypertension due to a torcular DAVF. Interestingly, not all patients had 3D TOF/MRA, the optimal sequences to detect DAVF. Early diagnosis of DAVF can be lifesaving, and is easier to treat compared to developed, proliferative, or complex lesions. As a result, one should consider brain MRI with 3D TOF/MRA in PHTS patients at genetic diagnosis, with subsequent surveillance on a case-by-case basis.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations , Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple , PTEN Phosphohydrolase , Humans , Adult , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Female , Male , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/genetics , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/complications , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/diagnosis , Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple/genetics , Hamartoma Syndrome, Multiple/complications , Young Adult , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , MutationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome have an increased risk of high-grade gliomas (HGG), and brain imaging abnormalities. This study analyzes brain imaging features in CMMRD syndrome children versus those with HGG without CMMRD. METHODS: Retrospective comparative analysis of brain imaging in 30 CMMRD children (20 boys, median age eight years, 22 with HGG), seven with Lynch syndrome (7 HGG), 39 with type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) (four with HGG) and 50 with HGG without MMR or NF1 pathogenic variant ("no-predisposition" patients). RESULTS: HGG in CMMRD and Lynch patients were predominantly hemispheric (versus midline) compared to NF1 and no-predisposition patients (91% and 86%, vs 25% and 54%, p = 0.004). CMMRD-associated tumors often had ill-defined boundaries (p = 0.008). All CMMRD patients exhibited at least one developmental venous anomaly (DVA), versus 14%, 10%, and 6% of Lynch, NF1, and no-predisposition patients (p < 0.0001). Multiple DVAs were observed in 83% of CMMRD patients, one NF1 patient (3%), and never in other groups (p < 0.0001). Cavernomas were discovered in 21% of CMMRD patients, never in other groups (p = 0.01). NF1-like focal areas of high T2-FLAIR signal intensity (FASI) were more prevalent in CMMRD patients than in Lynch or no-predisposition patients (50%, vs 20% and 0%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Subcortical and ill-limited FASI, possibly involving the cortex, were specific to CMMRD (p < 0.0001) and did not evolve in 93% of patients (13/14). CONCLUSION: Diffuse hemispherically located HGG associated with multiple DVAs, cavernomas, and NF1-like or subcortical FASI strongly suggests CMMRD syndrome compared to children with HGG in other contexts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiologic suggestion of CMMRD syndrome when confronted with HGGs in children may prompt genetic testing. This can influence therapeutic plans. Therefore, imaging features could potentially be incorporated into CMMRD testing recommendations. KEY POINTS: Using imaging to detect CMMRD syndrome early may improve patient care. CMMRD features include: hemispheric HGG with multiple developmental venous anomalies and NF1-like or subcortical areas with high T2-FLAIR intensity. We propose novel imaging features to improve the identification of potential CMMRD patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare autosomal recessively inherited syndrome that is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants of the mismatch repair genes. It is characterised by the development of multiple tumours in the first and second decade of life including brain, gastrointestinal and haematological tumours often resulting in early death. In order to improve the prognosis of these patients, the European collaborative group 'care for CMMRD' developed a surveillance programme in 2014 and established a registry of patients with CMMRD in Paris. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of this programme. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with a definitive diagnosis of CMMRD and with at least one follow-up study were selected from the registry. Medical data on the outcome of surveillance were collected from these patients. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 4 years, the programme detected eight malignant tumours including three brain tumours, three upper gastrointestinal cancers and two colorectal cancers. Most tumours could successfully be treated. In addition, many adenomas were detected in the duodenum, and colorectum and subsequently removed. Seven patients developed a symptomatic malignancy, including two brain tumours, one small bowel cancer and four haematological malignancies. At the end of the follow-up, 16 out of 22 patients (73%) who participated in the surveillance programme were still alive. CONCLUSION: The study suggests a beneficial effect of surveillance of the digestive tract and brains.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/epidemiology , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/geneticsABSTRACT
APC germline pathogenic variants result in predisposition to familial adenomatous polyposis and extraintestinal tumours such as desmoid fibromatosis, medulloblastomas and thyroid cancers. They have also been recently involved in ovarian microcystic stromal tumours. APC inactivation has been described at the tumour level in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Here, we report the identification of APC germline pathogenic variants in two patients diagnosed with premenopausal EOC in early 30s, with no other pathogenic variant detected in the known ovarian cancer predisposing genes. Subsequent tumour analysis showed neither a second hit of APC inactivation nor ß-catenin activation. Both tumours did not have a homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, pointing towards the implication of other genes than those involved in HR. APC may contribute to the carcinogenesis of EOC in a multifactorial context. Further studies are required to clarify the role of APC in predisposition to EOC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Genes, APC , Ovarian Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Germ Cells/pathology , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Premenopause , beta Catenin/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The MSH3 gene is part of the DNA mismatch repair system, but has never been shown to be involved in Lynch syndrome. A first report of four patients from two families, bearing biallelic MSH3 germline variants, with a phenotype of attenuated colorectal adenomatous polyposis raised the question of its involvement in hereditary cancer predisposition. The patients' tumours exhibited elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST), a hallmark of MSH3 deficiency. METHODS: We report five new unrelated patients with MSH3-associated polyposis. We describe their personal and familial history and study the EMAST phenotype in various normal and tumour samples, which are relevant findings based on the rarity of this polyposis subtype so far. RESULTS: All patients had attenuated colorectal adenomatous polyposis, with duodenal polyposis in two cases. Both women had breast carcinomas. EMAST phenotype was present at various levels in different samples of the five patients, confirming the MSH3 deficiency, with a gradient of instability in polyps depending on their degree of dysplasia. The negative EMAST phenotype ruled out the diagnosis of germline MSH3 deficiency for two patients: one homozygous for a benign variant and one with a monoallelic large deletion. CONCLUSION: This report lends further credence to biallelic MSH3 germline pathogenic variants being involved in colorectal and duodenal adenomatous polyposis. Large-scale studies may help clarify the tumour spectrum and associated risks. Ascertainment of EMAST may help with the interpretation of variants of unknown significance. We recommend adding MSH3 to dedicated diagnostic gene panels.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , MutS Homolog 3 Protein/genetics , MutS Homolog 3 Protein/metabolismABSTRACT
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumour suppressor genes that have been characterised as predisposition genes for the development of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers among other malignancies. The molecular diagnosis of this predisposition syndrome is based on the detection of inactivating variants of any type in those genes. But in the case of structural variants, functional consequences can be difficult to assess using standard molecular methods, as the precise resolution of their sequence is often impossible with short-read next generation sequencing techniques. It has been recently demonstrated that Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing technology can accurately and rapidly provide genetic diagnoses of Mendelian diseases, including those linked to pathogenic structural variants. Here, we report the accurate resolution of a germline duplication event of exons 18-20 of BRCA1 using Nanopore sequencing with adaptive sampling target enrichment. This allowed us to classify this variant as pathogenic within a short timeframe of 10 days. This study provides a proof-of-concept that nanopore adaptive sampling is a highly efficient technique for the investigation of structural variants of tumour suppressor genes in a clinical context.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Nanopore Sequencing , Female , Humans , Virulence , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Genes, BRCA2 , Exons , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action. METHODS: National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country. RESULTS: Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.
Subject(s)
European Union , Genetic Counseling , Neoplasms , Humans , Genetic Counseling/legislation & jurisprudence , Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Testing/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Only a few patients with germline AXIN2 variants and colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer have been described, raising questions about the actual contribution of this gene to colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. To assess the clinical relevance for AXIN2 testing in patients suspected of genetic predisposition to CRC, we collected clinical and molecular data from the French Oncogenetics laboratories analyzing AXIN2 in this context. Between 2004 and June 2020, 10 different pathogenic/likely pathogenic AXIN2 variants were identified in 11 unrelated individuals. Eight variants were from a consecutive series of 3322 patients, which represents a frequency of 0.24%. However, loss-of-function AXIN2 variants were strongly associated with genetic predisposition to CRC as compared with controls (odds ratio: 11.89, 95% confidence interval: 5.103-28.93). Most of the variants were predicted to produce an AXIN2 protein devoid of the SMAD3-binding and DIX domains, but preserving the ß-catenin-binding domain. Ninety-one percent of the AXIN2 variant carriers who underwent colonoscopy had adenomatous polyposis. Forty percent of the variant carriers developed colorectal or/and other digestive cancer. Multiple tooth agenesis was present in at least 60% of them. Our report provides further evidence for a role of AXIN2 in CRC susceptibility, arguing for AXIN2 testing in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/genetics , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/pathology , Germ-Line Mutation , beta Catenin/metabolism , Germ Cells/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Axin Protein/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Truncating pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants of CDH1 cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), a tumour risk syndrome that predisposes carrier individuals to diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer. Rare CDH1 missense variants are often classified as variants of unknown significance. We conducted a genotype-phenotype analysis in families carrying rare CDH1 variants, comparing cancer spectrum in carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV; analysed jointly) or missense variants of unknown significance, assessing the frequency of families with lobular breast cancer among PV/LPV carrier families, and testing the performance of lobular breast cancer-expanded criteria for CDH1 testing. METHODS: This genotype-first study used retrospective diagnostic and clinical data from 854 carriers of 398 rare CDH1 variants and 1021 relatives, irrespective of HDGC clinical criteria, from 29 institutions in ten member-countries of the European Reference Network on Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS). Data were collected from Oct 1, 2018, to Sept 20, 2022. Variants were classified by molecular type and clinical actionability with the American College of Medical Genetics and Association for Molecular Pathology CDH1 guidelines (version 2). Families were categorised by whether they fulfilled the 2015 and 2020 HDGC clinical criteria. Genotype-phenotype associations were analysed by Student's t test, Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, and multivariable logistic regression models. Performance of HDGC clinical criteria sets were assessed with an equivalence test and Youden index, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were compared by Z test. FINDINGS: From 1971 phenotypes (contributed by 854 probands and 1021 relatives aged 1-93 years), 460 had gastric and breast cancer histology available. CDH1 truncating PV/LPVs occurred in 176 (21%) of 854 families and missense variants of unknown significance in 169 (20%) families. Multivariable logistic regression comparing phenotypes occurring in families carrying PV/LPVs or missense variants of unknown significance showed that lobular breast cancer had the greatest positive association with the presence of PV/LPVs (odds ratio 12·39 [95% CI 2·66-57·74], p=0·0014), followed by diffuse gastric cancer (8·00 [2·18-29·39], p=0·0017) and gastric cancer (7·81 [2·03-29·96], p=0·0027). 136 (77%) of 176 families carrying PV/LPVs fulfilled the 2015 HDGC criteria. Of the remaining 40 (23%) families, who did not fulfil the 2015 criteria, 11 fulfilled the 2020 HDGC criteria, and 18 had lobular breast cancer only or lobular breast cancer and gastric cancer, but did not meet the 2020 criteria. No specific CDH1 variant was found to predispose individuals specifically to lobular breast cancer, although 12 (7%) of 176 PV/LPV carrier families had lobular breast cancer only. Addition of three new lobular breast cancer-centred criteria improved testing sensitivity while retaining high specificity. The probability of finding CDH1 PV/LPVs in patients fulfilling the lobular breast cancer-expanded criteria, compared with the 2020 criteria, increased significantly (AUC 0·92 vs 0·88; Z score 3·54; p=0·0004). INTERPRETATION: CDH1 PV/LPVs were positively associated with HDGC-related phenotypes (lobular breast cancer, diffuse gastric cancer, and gastric cancer), and no evidence for a positive association with these phenotypes was found for CDH1 missense variants of unknown significance. CDH1 PV/LPVs occurred often in families with lobular breast cancer who did not fulfil the 2020 HDGC criteria, supporting the expansion of lobular breast cancer-centred criteria. FUNDING: European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes, European Regional Development Fund, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal), Cancer Research UK, and European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Lobular , Stomach Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Antigens, CD/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cadherins/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Germ Cells/pathology , Germ-Line Mutation , Pedigree , Phenotype , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation, MissenseABSTRACT
AIMS: The mutY DNA glycosylase encoded by the MUTYH gene prevents G:C â T:A transversions through the base excision repair DNA repair system. Germline biallelic pathogenic variants in MUTYH cause an adenomatous polyposis called MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), an autosomal recessive disease (OMIM: 608456), with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Digestive lesions in this context show an excess of G:C â T:A transversions, individualising a specific mutational signature associated with MUTYH deficiency called signature SBS36. Predisposition to other tumours in patients with germline biallelic pathogenic variants in MUTYH is suspected but remains unclear. We report the first case of medulloblastoma in a patient with MAP, carrying the homozygous pathogenic variant c.1227_1228dup, p.(Glu410Glyfs*43) in MUTYH. METHODS: Whole exome sequencing was performed on the medulloblastoma to enlighten single nucleotide variants of interest, microsatellite status and mutational signature. The objective was to determine the involvement of MUTYH deficiency in the oncogenesis of this medulloblastoma. RESULTS: The medulloblastoma has the mutational signature SBS36 and driver pathogenic variants in CTNNB1, PTCH1 and KDM6A corresponding to G:C â T:A transversions, suggesting a role of MUTYH deficiency in oncogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, medulloblastoma could be a rare manifestation associated with germline biallelic pathogenic variants in MUTYH.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli , Cerebellar Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Medulloblastoma , Humans , Medulloblastoma/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/genetics , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/pathology , Mutation , Cerebellar Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinogenesis , Colorectal Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
In breast or ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients with evocative personal and/or family history, multigene panel sequencing is performed on blood to diagnose hereditary predispositions. Additionally, BRCA1/BRCA2 testing can be performed on tumor sample for therapeutic purpose. The accuracy of multigene panel tumor analysis on BC/OC to detect predisposing germline pathogenic variants (gPV) has not been precisely assessed. By comparing sequencing data from blood and fresh-frozen tumor we show that tumor genomic instability causes pitfalls to consider when performing tumor testing to detect gPV. Even if loss of heterozygosity increases germline signal in most cases, somatic copy number variants (CNV) can mask germline CNV and collapse point gPV variant allele frequency (VAF). Moreover, VAF does not allow an accurate distinction between germline and somatic pathogenic variants.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Ovarian Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Genes, BRCA2 , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) is the most aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome associated with multiorgan cancers, often presenting in childhood. There is variability in age and presentation of cancers and benign manifestations mimicking neurofibromatosis type 1. Genetic testing may not be informative and is complicated by pseudogenes associated with the most commonly associated gene, PMS2. To date, no diagnostic criteria exist. Since surveillance and immune-based therapies are available, establishing a CMMRD diagnosis is key to improve survival. METHODS: In order to establish a robust diagnostic path, a multidisciplinary international working group, with representation from the two largest consortia (International Replication Repair Deficiency (IRRD) consortium and European Consortium Care for CMMRD (C4CMMRD)), was formed to establish diagnostic criteria based on expertise, literature review and consensus. RESULTS: The working group established seven diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of CMMRD, including four definitive criteria (strong evidence) and three likely diagnostic criteria (moderate evidence). All criteria warrant CMMRD surveillance. The criteria incorporate germline mismatch repair results, ancillary tests and clinical manifestation to determine a diagnosis. Hallmark cancers for CMMRD were defined by the working group after extensive literature review and consultation with the IRRD and C4CMMRD consortia. CONCLUSIONS: This position paper summarises the evidence and rationale to provide specific guidelines for CMMRD diagnosis, which necessitates appropriate surveillance and treatment.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Consensus , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Humans , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/diagnosis , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pathogenic variants (PV) of CTNNA1 are found in families fulfilling criteria for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) but no risk estimates were available until now. The aim of this study is to evaluate diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) risks for carriers of germline CTNNA1 PV. METHODS: Data from published CTNNA1 families were updated and new families were identified through international collaborations. The cumulative risk of DGC by age for PV carriers was estimated with the genotype restricted likelihood (GRL) method, taking into account non-genotyped individuals and conditioning on all observed phenotypes and genotypes of the index case to obtain unbiased estimates. A non-parametric (NP) and the Weibull functions were used to model the shape of penetrance function with the GRL. Kaplan-Meier incidence curve and standardised incidence ratios were also computed. A 'leave-one-out' strategy was used to evaluate estimate uncertainty. RESULTS: Thirteen families with 46 carriers of PV were included. The cumulative risks of DGC at 80 years for carriers of CTNNA1 PV are 49% and 57%, respectively with the Weibull GRL and NP GRL methods. Risk ratios to population incidence reach particularly high values at early ages and decrease with age. At 40 years, they are equal to 65 and 833, respectively with the Weibull GRL and NP GRL. CONCLUSION: This is the largest series of CTNNA1 families that provides the first risk estimates of GC. These data will help to improve management and surveillance for these patients and support inclusion of CTNNA1 in germline testing panels.
Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Cadherins/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Germ Cells/pathology , Germ-Line Mutation/genetics , alpha Catenin/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We report a very rare case of familial breast cancer and diffuse gastric cancer, with germline pathogenic variants in both BRCA1 and CDH1 genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such an association.Family description: The proband is a woman diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 52 years. She requested genetic counselling in 2012, at the age of 91 years, because of a history of breast cancer in her daughter, her sister, her niece and her paternal grandmother and was therefore concerned about her relatives. Her sister and maternal aunt also had gastric cancer. She was tested for several genes associated with hereditary breast cancer. RESULTS: A large deletion of BRCA1 from exons 1 to 7 and two CDH1 pathogenic cis variants were identified. CONCLUSION: This complex situation is challenging for genetic counselling and management of at-risk individuals.
Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cadherins/genetics , Genes, BRCA1 , Germ-Line Mutation , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Female , Humans , Medical History Taking , Pedigree , Stomach Neoplasms/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested for 113 DNA repair genes. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association with BC. RESULTS: Chest X-ray exposure doubled BC risk. A 3% increased BC risk per additional exposure was observed. Being 20 years old or younger at first exposure or being exposed before first full-term pregnancy did not seem to modify this risk. Birth after 1960 or carrying a rare likely deleterious coding variant in a DNA repair gene other than BRCA1/2 modified the effect of chest X-ray exposure. CONCLUSION: Ever/never chest X-ray exposure increases BC risk 2-fold regardless of age at first exposure and, by up to 5-fold when carrying 3 or more rare variants in a DNA repair gene. Further studies are needed to evaluate other DNA repair genes or variants to identify those which could modify radiation sensitivity. Identification of subpopulations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation is important and potentially clinically relevant.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Radiography/adverse effects , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Repair/genetics , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Risk , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately 75% of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome carry variants in MLH1 or MSH2, proteins encoded by these genes are required for DNA mismatch repair (MMR). However, 30% of these are variants of unknown significance (VUS). A assay that measures cell response to the cytotoxic effects of a methylating agent can determine the effects of VUS in MMR genes and identify patients with constitutional MMR-deficiency syndrome. We adapted this method to test the effects of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 genes found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome. METHODS: We transiently expressed MLH1 or MSH2 variants in MLH1- or MSH2-null human colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 or LoVo), respectively. The MMR process causes death of cells with methylation-damaged DNA bases, so we measured proportions of cells that undergo death following exposure to the methylating agent; cells that escaped its toxicity were considered to have variants that affect function of the gene product. Using this assay, we analyzed 88 variants (mainly missense variants), comprising a validation set of 40 previously classified variants (19 in MLH1 and 21 in MSH2) and a prospective set of 48 VUS (25 in MLH1 and 23 in MSH2). Prediction scores were calculated for all VUS according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, based on clinical, somatic, in silico, population, and functional data. RESULTS: The assay correctly classified 39 of 40 variants in the validation set. The assay identified 12 VUS that did alter function of the gene product and 28 VUS that did not; the remaining 8 VUS had intermediate effects on MMR capacity and could not be classified. Comparison of assay results with prediction scores confirmed the ability of the assay to discriminate VUS that affected the function of the gene products from those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Using an assay that measures the ability of the cells to undergo death following DNA damage induction by a methylating agent, we were able to assess whether variants in MLH1 and MSH2 cause defects in DNA MMR. This assay might be used to help assessing the pathogenicity of VUS in MLH1 and MSH2 found in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , DNA Methylation/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , Biological Assay/methods , Cell Line, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Computer Simulation , DNA Methylation/drug effects , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Germ-Line Mutation , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/pharmacology , Humans , Methylnitronitrosoguanidine/toxicityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis is a dominantly inherited colorectal cancer syndrome caused by exonuclease domain missense variants in the DNA polymerases POLE and POLD1. Manifestations may also include malignancies at extracolonic sites. Cancer risks in this syndrome are not yet accurately quantified. METHODS: We sequenced POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domains in 354 individuals with early/familial colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomatous polyposis. We assessed the pathogenicity of POLE variants with yeast fluctuation assays and structural modeling. We estimated the penetrance function for each cancer site in variant carriers with a previously published nonparametric method based on survival analysis approach, able to manage unknown genotypes. RESULTS: Pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain variants P286L, M294R, P324L, N363K, D368N, L424V, K425R, and P436S were found in ten families. The estimated cumulative risk of CRC at 30, 50, and 70 years was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2-17.5), 48.5% (33.2-60.3), and 74% (51.6-86.1). Cumulative risk of glioblastoma was 18.7% (3.2-25.8) at 70 years. Variants interfering with DNA binding (P286L and N363K) had a significantly higher mutagenic effect than variants disrupting ion metal coordination at the exonuclease site. CONCLUSION: The risk estimates derived from this study provide a rational basis on which to provide genetic counseling to POLE variant carriers.