Continuous irrigation with thrombolytics for intraventricular hemorrhage: case-control study.

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a complication of a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Standard treatment is with external ventricular drain (EVD). Intraventricular thrombolysis may improve mortality but does not improve functional outcomes. We present our initial experience with a novel irrigating EVD (IRRAflow) that automates continuous irrigation with thrombolysis.Single-center case-control study including patients with IVH treated with EVD compared to IRRAflow. We compared standard demographics, treatment, and outcome parameters between groups. We developed a brain phantom injected with a human clot and assessed clot clearance using EVD/IRRAflow approaches with CT imaging.Twenty-one patients were treated with standard EVD and 9 patients with IRRAflow. Demographics were similar between groups. Thirty-three percent of patients with EVD also had at least one dose of t-PA and 89% of patients with IRRAflow received irrigation with t-PA (p = 0.01). Mean drain days were 8.8 for EVD versus 4.1 for IRRAflow (p = 0.02). Days-to-clearance of ventricular outflow was 5.8 for EVD versus 2.5 for IRRAflow (p = 0.02). Overall clearance was not different. Thirty-seven percent of EVD patients achieved good outcome (mRS ≥ 3) at 90 days versus 86% of IRRAflow patients (p = 0.03). Assessing only t-PA, reduction in mean days-to-clearance (p = 0.0004) and ICU days (p = 0.04) was observed. In the benchtop model, the clot treated with IRRAflow and t-PA showed a significant reduction of volume compared to control.Irrigation with IRRAflow and t-PA is feasible and safe for patients with IVH. Improving clot clearance with IRRAflow may result in improved clinical outcomes and should be incorporated into randomized trials.

Preoperative meningioma embolization reduces perioperative blood loss: a multi-center retrospective matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The utility of preoperative embolization remains controversial within the literature. Here, we evaluate whether preoperative meningioma embolization is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss, safe to perform, and cost-effective when compared with surgical resection without preoperative embolization. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with meningiomas were matched by tumor size and location to 29 control patients with meningiomas at another institution where preoperative embolization was not practiced. The variables evaluated were pre- and post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels as a measure of operative blood loss and postoperative morbidity. The additional cost of undergoing angiography and embolization was calculated from hospital charges obtained from the billing department. RESULTS: The mean decrease in perioperative hemoglobin and hematocrit was 0.9 and 2.7, respectively, in the embolization group and 2.8 and 10.0, respectively, in the control group for a significant decrease in operative blood loss as measured by change in hematocrit and hemoglobin levels after surgery. There was no significant difference in operative blood loss when subdividing patients based on tumor location. There were no angiogram-related complications. Twenty-two of 29 patients (76%) underwent embolization of a feeding artery, whereas 7 patients underwent only a diagnostic angiogram. The mean additional charge per patient in the embolization group was $88,767. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative embolization was safe and effective in reducing the overall perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing meningioma resection, as measured by the change in postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. However, the cost of embolization was significant.

Rapid exponential increase in neurosurgery departmental scholarly output following an intensive research initiative.

There has been extensive research into methods of increasing academic departmental scholarly activity (DSA) through targeted interventions. Residency programmes are responsible for ensuring sufficient scholarly opportunities for residents. We sought to discover the outcomes of an intensive research initiative (IRI) on DSA in our department in a short-time interval. IRI was implemented, consisting of multiple interventions, to rapidly produce an increase in DSA through resident/medical student faculty engagement. We compare pre-IRI (8 years) and post-IRI (2 years) research products (RP), defined as the sum of oral presentations and publications, to evaluate the IRI. The study was performed in 2020. The IRI resulted in an exponential increase in DSA with an annual RP increase of 350% from 2017 (3 RP) to 2018 (14 RP), with another 92% from 2018 (14 RP) to 2019 (27 RP). RP/year exponentially increased from 2.1/year to 10.5/year for residents and 0.5/year to 10/year for medical students, resulting in a 400% and 1900% increase in RP/year, respectively. The common methods in literature to increase DSA included instituting protected research time (23.8%) and research curriculum (21.5%). We share our department's increase in DSA over a short 2-year period after implementing our IRI. Our goal in reporting our experience is to provide an example for departments that need to rapidly increase their DSA. By reporting the shortest time interval to achieve exponential DSA growth, we hope this example can support programmes in petitioning hospitals and medical colleges for academic support resources.

Chameleons, red herrings, and false localizing signs in neurocritical care.

False localizing signs (FLS) and other misleading neurological signs have long been an intractable aspect of neurocritical care. Because they suggest an incorrect location or etiology of the pathological lesion, they have often led to misdiagnosis and mismanagement of the patient. Here, we reviewed the existing literature to provide an updated, comprehensive descriptive review of these difficult to diagnose signs in neurocritical care. For each sign presented, we discuss the non-false localizing presentation of symptoms, the common FLS or misleading presentation, etiology/pathogenesis of the sign, and diagnosis, as well as any other clinically relevant considerations. Within cranial neuropathies, we cover cranial nerves III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, as well as multiple cranial nerve involvement of IX, X, and XII. FLS ophthalmologic symptoms indicate diagnostically challenging neurological deficits, and here we discuss downbeat nystagmus, ping-pong-gaze, one-and-a-half syndrome, and wall-eyed bilateral nuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO). Cranial herniation syndromes are integral to any discussion of FLS and here we cover Kernohan's notch phenomenon, pseudo-Dandy Walker malformation, and uncal herniation. FLS in the spinal cord have also been relatively well documented, but in addition to compressive lesions, we also discuss newer findings in radiculopathy and disc herniation. Finally, pulmonary syndromes may sometimes be overlooked in discussions of neurological signs but are critically important to recognize and manage in neurocritical care, and here we discuss Cheyne-Stokes respiration, cluster breathing, central neurogenic hyperventilation, ataxic breathing, Ondine's curse, and hypercapnia. Though some of these signs may be rare, the framework for diagnosing and treating them must continue to evolve with our growing understanding of their etiology and varied presentations.

Association of baseline frailty status with clinical outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is an emergent neurosurgical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. The prognostic significance of baseline frailty status in aSAH patients has not been previously evaluated in a large, nationally representative sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2010-2018 were compared among sub-cohorts stratifying admissions by increasing frailty thresholds [(assessed using the 11-point modified frailty index (mFI-11)]. The previously validated NIS-SAH Severity Score (NIS-SSS) and NIS-SAH Outcome Measure (NIS-SOM) were utilized. Complex samples multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess adjusted associations and discrimination of frailty for endpoints. RESULTS: Among 64,102 aSAH hospitalizations (mean age 55.4 years), 20.4% of admissions were classified as robust (mFI=0), 43.4% as pre-frail (mFI = 1), 24.9% as frail (mFI = 2), and 11.2% as severely frail (mFI ≥ 3). Following multivariable analysis adjusting for age and aSAH severity, increasing frailty was independently associated with NIS-SOM (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.21; p < 0.001), extended length of hospital stay (eLOS) (OR = 1.08, 1.02-1.13; p = 0.008), neurological complications (OR = 1.08, 1.03-1.13; p < 0.001), and medical complications (OR = 1.14, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.001). Based on ROC curve analysis, frailty achieved an AUC of 0.59 (0.58-0.60) and 0.54 (0.53-0.55) for NIS-SOM and eLOS, respectively. Age and NIS-SSS demonstrated significantly greater discrimination for NIS-SOM [AUC 0.69 (0.68-0.70) and 0.79 (0.78-0.80), respectively), while NIS-SSS achieved significantly greater discrimination for eLOS [(AUC 0.74 (0.73-0.75)] in comparison to both age and frailty. CONCLUSIONS: This national database evaluation of frailty in aSAH patients demonstrates an independent association between increasing frailty and poor functional outcome. Age and aSAH severity, however, may be more robust prognostic factors.

The immense heterogeneity of frailty in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review.

The aim of this study was to review and analyze the neurosurgery body of literature to document the current knowledge of frailty within neurosurgery, standardizing terminology and how frailty is defined, including the different levels of frailty, while determining what conclusions can be drawn about frailty's impact on neurosurgical outcomes. While multiple studies on frailty in neurosurgery exist, no literature reviews have been conducted. Therefore, we performed a literature review in order to organize, tabulate, and present findings from the data to broaden the understanding about what we know from frailty and neurosurgery. We performed a PubMed search to identify studies that evaluated frailty and neurosurgery. The terms "frail," "frailty," "neurosurgery," "spine surgery," "craniotomy," and "neurological surgery" were all used in the query. We then organized, analyzed, and summarized the comprehensive frailty and neurosurgical literature. The literature contained 25 published studies analyzing frailty in neurosurgery between December 2015 and December 2018. Five of these studies were cranial neurosurgical studies, the remaining studies focused on spinal neurosurgery. Over 100,000 surgical cases were analyzed among the 25 studies. Of these, 18 studies demonstrated that increasing frailty was associated with increased rate of complications, 10 studies showed that frailty was associated with higher mortality rates, 11 studies demonstrated an association between frailty and increased hospital length of stay, and 5 studies noted that higher frailty was associated with discharge to a higher level of care. The current body of literature repeatedly demonstrates that frailty is associated with worse outcomes across the neurosurgical subspecialties.

A comparison of frailty indices in predicting length of inpatient stay and discharge destination following angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While patients with angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhages (ANSAH) have better prognoses than those with aneurysmal SAH, frailty's impact on outcomes in ANSAH is unclear. We previously showed that the modified frailty index (mFI-11) is associated with poor outcomes following ANSAH. Here, we compared the mFI-5, mFI-11, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and temporalis thickness (TMT) to determine which index was the best predictor of ANSAH outcomes and mortality rates. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis between 2014 and 2018, patients with non-traumatic, angiogram negative SAH (ANSAH) were identified. The admission mFI-5, mFI-11, CCI, and TMT were calculated for each patient. Primary outcomes were mortality rate, discharge location, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS; LOS >85th percentile). Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate frailty as predictors of primary endpoints. RESULTS: We included 75 patients with a mean age of 55.4 ± 1.5 years. There were 4 patient deaths (5.3%), 53 patients (70.7%) discharged home, and 11 patients (14.7%) with PLOS. On ROC analysis, the mFI-5 had the highest discriminatory value for mortality (AUC = 0.97) while the mFI-11 was most discriminatory for discharge home (AUC = 0.85) and PLOS (AUC = 0.78). On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of mortality was the mFI-11 (OR = 0.46; 95%CI: 1.45-14.23; p = 0.009) while the mFI-5 was the best predictor of discharge home (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.61; p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of PLOS was the Hunt and Hess score (OR = 2.63; 95%CI: 1.38-5.00; p = 0.003). The CCI and TMT were inferior to either mFI for predicting primary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing frailty is associated with poorer outcomes and higher mortality following ANSAH. The mFI-5 and mFI-11 were found to be superior predictors of discharge home and mortality rate. While larger prospective study is needed, frailty, as measured by mFI-11 and -5, should be considered when evaluating ANSAH prognosis.

Frailty predicts worse outcomes after intracranial meningioma surgery irrespective of existing prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty has been recognized as a predictor of adverse surgical outcomes across multiple surgical disciplines, but until now the relationship between frailty and intracranial meningioma surgery has not been studied. The goal of the present study was to determine the relationship between increasing frailty (determined using the modified Frailty Index [mFI]) and intracranial meningioma resection outcomes (including hospital length of stay [LOS], discharge location, and reoperation and readmission rates). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent intracranial meningioma resection between August 2012 and May 2018. Seventy-six patients met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Frailty was associated with increased hospital LOS (p = 0.0218), increased reoperation rate (p = 0.029), and discharge to a higher level of care: an inpatient rehabilitation facility or a skilled nursing facility (p = 0.0002). After multivariable analysis, frailty was determined to be an independent risk factor for increased LOS, worse discharge disposition, and subsequent readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is an independent risk factor for worse outcomes following intracranial meningioma resection, including increased LOS, reoperations, and worse discharge disposition. Frailty may help stratify preoperative surgical risk, and thus may provide important clinical information to help neurosurgeons and elderly patients weigh the risks and benefits of resection.

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Neurocritical Care: a Specialty-Wide Disruptive Transformation or a Strategy for Success.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurocritical care combines the complexity of both medical and surgical disease states with the inherent limitations of assessing patients with neurologic injury. Artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered interest in the basic management of these complicated patients as data collection becomes increasingly automated. RECENT FINDINGS: In this opinion article, we highlight the potential AI has in aiding the clinician in several aspects of neurocritical care, particularly in monitoring and managing intracranial pressure, seizures, hemodynamics, and ventilation. The model-based method and data-driven method are currently the two major AI methods for analyzing critical care data. Both are able to analyze the vast quantities of patient data that are accumulated in the neurocritical care unit. AI has the potential to reduce healthcare costs, minimize delays in patient management, and reduce medical errors. However, these systems are an aid to, not a replacement for, the clinician's judgment.

AlloDerm for duraplasty in Chiari malformation: superior outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Autologous pericranium, fascia lata (either as autograft or allograft), bovine pericardium (DuraGuard), fetal bovine tissue (Durepair), processed collagen matrix (DuraGen), and synthetic fabrics (e.g., synthetic Goretex graft) have all been used for duraplasty in Chiari decompression surgery, and no consensus exists as to the optimal material. We reviewed our experience to compare the incidence of graft-related complications associated with using acellular human dermis allograft (AlloDerm) with those of DuraGuard, DuraGen, and Durepair. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort chart review, our cohort included 119 patients who underwent 128 Chiari decompression procedures by a single surgeon from January 1, 1997, through July 31, 2012. Age, sex, smoking status, weight, and the type of dural graft used were analyzed with univariate statistical tests. Dural grafts were selected based on the commercial products available at the time of surgery during this 15-year period. RESULTS: The reoperation rate for cerebrospinal fluid leak causing pseudomeningocele was 2.2 % (1/46 cases) with the AlloDerm graft and 17.1 % (14/82 cases) with other materials (p = 0.01). Each of the non-AlloDerm grafts had a higher reoperation rate than AlloDerm when analyzed separately. Not using AlloDerm was the only statistically significant factor for the need for reoperation (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the AlloDerm dural graft for duraplasty in Chiari decompressions resulted in a significantly lower pseudomeningocele formation than the use of any other type of dural graft. There was no association between patient age, sex, extra weight, or smoking status and the need for reoperation.

Cerebral autoregulation, spreading depolarization, and implications for targeted therapy in brain injury and ischemia.

Cerebral autoregulation is an intrinsic myogenic response of cerebral vasculature that allows for preservation of stable cerebral blood flow levels in response to changing systemic blood pressure. It is effective across a broad range of blood pressure levels through precapillary vasoconstriction and dilation. Autoregulation is difficult to directly measure and methods to indirectly ascertain cerebral autoregulation status inherently require certain assumptions. Patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation may be at risk of brain ischemia. One of the central mechanisms of ischemia in patients with metabolically compromised states is likely the triggering of spreading depolarization (SD) events and ultimately, terminal (or anoxic) depolarization. Cerebral autoregulation and SD are therefore linked when considering the risk of ischemia. In this scoping review, we will discuss the range of methods to measure cerebral autoregulation, their theoretical strengths and weaknesses, and the available clinical evidence to support their utility. We will then discuss the emerging link between impaired cerebral autoregulation and the occurrence of SD events. Such an approach offers the opportunity to better understand an individual patient's physiology and provide targeted treatments.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of 2542 Patients with Spinal Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to systematically analyze the data on the clinical features, surgical treatment, and outcomes of spinal schwannomas. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search of bibliographic databases from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2021, yielded 4489 studies. Twenty-six articles were included in our final qualitative systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of 2542 adult patients' data from 26 included studies showed that 53.5% were male, and the mean age ranged from 35.8 to 57.1 years. The most common tumor location was the cervical spine (34.2%), followed by the thoracic spine (26.2%) and the lumbar spine (18.5%). Symptom severity was the most common indicator for surgical treatment, with the most common symptoms being segmental back pain, sensory/motor deficits, and urinary dysfunction. Among all patients analyzed, 93.8% were treated with gross total resection, which was associated with better prognosis and less chance of recurrence than subtotal resection. The posterior approach was the most common (87.4% of patients). The average operative time was 4.53 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.18-6.48); the average intraoperative blood loss was 451.88 mL (95% CI, 169.60-1203.95). The pooled follow-up duration was 40.6 months (95% CI, 31.04-53.07). The schwannoma recurrence rate was 5.3%. Complications were particularly low and included cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, and the sensory-motor deficits. Most of the patients experienced complete recovery or significant improvement of preoperative neurological deficits and pain symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that segmental back pain, sensory/motor deficits, and urinary dysfunction are the most common symptoms of spinal schwannomas. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice with overall good reported outcomes and particularly low complication rates. gross total resection offers the best prognosis with the slightest chance of tumor recurrence and minimal risk of complications.

Surgical technique affects outcomes in acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Optimal treatment for acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation is unknown. Numerous surgical procedures for AC injuries have been described with little comparison. This study sought to compare the clinical and radiographic results of various surgical techniques in order to identify the optimal surgical technique. Ninety patients met inclusion criteria of AC reconstruction at this institution. A retrospective review of outcomes was performed using the electronic records system. Radiographs were measured for pre- and postoperative grade and percent elevation versus the contralateral side. Overall revision rate was 9%. Suture button fixation had a revision rate of 0% compared to 14% (p = .01). Reconstruction procedures performed with distal clavicle excision showed a higher revision rate, 17% compared to 0% (p = .003). There were no statistically significant clinical differences. AC reconstructions performed with suture button construct were superior to other surgical techniques. Procedures performed with distal clavicle excision were inferior to those without.

HummingFlow: novel single twist-drill access for ventricular drainage, irrigation, monitoring, and automated local drug delivery in subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: The management of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains one of the most important targets for neurocritical care. Advances in monitoring technology have facilitated a more thorough understanding of the pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches, but interventions are generally limited to either systemic therapies or passive CSF drainage. The authors present a novel approach that combines a multimodal monitoring bolt-based system with an irrigating ventricular drain capable of delivering intrathecal medications and describe their early experience in patients with aSAH. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of cases treated with the combined Hummingbird multimodal bolt system and the IRRAflow irrigating ventriculostomy. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated with the combined multimodal bolt system with irrigating ventriculostomy approach. The median number of days to clearance of the third and fourth ventricles was 3 days in patients with obstructive intraventricular hemorrhage. Two patients received intrathecal alteplase for intraventricular hemorrhage clearance, and 2 patients received intrathecal nicardipine as rescue therapy for severe symptomatic angiographic vasospasm. CONCLUSIONS: Combined CSF drainage, irrigation, multimodality monitoring, and automated local drug delivery are feasible using a single twist-drill hole device. Further investigation of irrigation settings and treatment approaches in high-risk cases is warranted.

Production of heterologous IgG antibody against Heymann nephritis antigen by injections of immune complexes.

Heterologous IgG antibody (ab) can be produced against Heymann nephritis (HN) antigen (ag) in rabbits by administering it in Freund's complete adjuvant. The developing abs reacted at high titre with rat kidney brush border (BB) regions of the renal proximal tubules in an indirect fluorescence ab test. A single IV injection of the heterologous ab into a susceptible strain of rat resulted in the localization of IgG ab to glomerular fixed ags, producing immune complex glomerular nephritis. The injected ab also reacted with the BB region of the renal proximal tubules. The aim of this experiment was to find out whether heterologous IgG ab against the HN ag can also be produced in recipient rabbits by injecting immune complexes (ICs) composed of a rat kidney tubular preparation [rat kidney fraction 3 (rKF3)] and donor rabbit-derived rabbit anti-rKF3 IgG ab. We found that anti-rKF3 IgG ab--against the BB region of the renal proximal tubules--could be induced in rabbits injected with ICs, and the resulting ab was able to initiate passive HN in rats. This was the first time a pathogenic IgG ab was produced against HN ag in rabbits without the use of adjuvant. Ab responses in recipient rabbits were achieved by ab information transfer. Recipient rabbits injected with the IC produced the same class of immunoglobulin with the same specificity against the target ag rKF3, as was present in the innoculum, namely rabbit anti-rKF3 IgG ab.

Intramedullary bone pedestal formation contributing to femoral shaft fracture nonunion: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Femoral shaft fracture is a commonly encountered orthopedic injury that can be treated operatively with a low overall delayed/nonunion rate. In the case of delayed union after antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nail fixation, fracture dynamization is often attempted first. Nonunion after dynamization has been shown to occur due to infection and other aseptic etiologies. We present a unique case of diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture nonunion after dynamization due to intramedullary cortical bone pedestal formation at the distal tip of the nail. CASE SUMMARY: A 37-year-old male experienced a high-energy trauma to his left thigh after coming down hard during a motocross jump. Evaluation was consistent with an isolated, closed, left mid-shaft femur fracture. He was initially managed with reamed antegrade intramedullary nail fixation but had continued thigh pain. Radiographs at four months demonstrated no evidence of fracture union and failure of the distal locking screw, and dynamization by distal locking screw removal was performed. The patient continued to have pain eight months after the initial procedure and 4 mo after dynamization with serial radiographs continuing to demonstrate no evidence of fracture healing. The decision was made to proceed with exchange nailing for aseptic fracture nonunion. During the exchange procedure, an obstruction was encountered at the distal tip of the failed nail and was confirmed on magnified fluoroscopy to be a pedestal of cortical bone in the canal. The obstruction required further distal reaming. A longer and larger diameter exchange nail was placed without difficulty and without a distal locking screw to allow for dynamization at the fracture site. Post-operative radiographs showed proper fracture and hardware alignment. There was subsequently radiographic evidence of callus formation at one year with subsequent fracture consolidation and resolution of thigh pain at eighteen months. CONCLUSION: The risk of fracture nonunion caused by intramedullary bone pedestal formation can be mitigated with the use of maximum length and diameter nails and close follow up.

Intraoperative navigation in surgical management of traumatic spine injury: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) can lead to severe morbidity and significant health care resource utilization. Intraoperative navigation (ION) systems have been shown to improve outcomes in some populations. However, controversy about the benefit of ION remains. To our knowledge, there is no large database analysis studying the outcomes of ION on TSI patients. Here we hope to compare complications and outcomes in patients with TSI undergoing spinal fusion of 3 or more levels with or without the use of ION. METHODS: The 2015-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for cases of posterior spinal instrumentation of 3 or more levels. This population was then selected for postoperative diagnosis consistent with TSI. The effect of prolonged operative time was analyzed for all patients. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to create ION case and non-ION control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics, complications, and outcome data were collected and compared between ION and non-ION groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,034 patients were included in the propensity matched analysis. Among comorbidities, only obesity was significantly more likely in the non-ION group. There was no difference in case complexity between the two groups. ION was associated with higher incidence of prolonged operative time but was a negative independent predictor for sepsis. Prolonged operative time was a significant independent predictor for pulmonary embolism and requirement of transfusion in all patients. Discharge to home, readmission, and reoperation rates did not differ between TSI patients with or without ION. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ION during posterior spinal fusion of 3 or more levels in TSI patients is not associated with worse outcomes. Prolonged operative time, rather than ION, appears to have a higher influence on the rate of complications in this population. Evaluation of ION in the context of specific populations and pathology is warranted to optimize its use.

Association of baseline frailty status and age with outcomes in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma surgery: Results of a nationwide analysis of 5818 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2015-2019.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of frailty, as measured by the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5), with that of age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for intracranial meningiomas, using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2015-2019) was queried to analyze data from patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection (N = 5,818). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and mFI-5 score were performed for 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, extended hospital length of stay (eLOS), and discharge to a non-home destination. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for sex, body mass index, transfer status, smoking, and operative time) demonstrated that mFI-5 and age were significant predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients with intracranial meningioma. However, based on odds ratios (OR) and effect sizes, increasing frailty tiers were better predictors than age of adverse outcomes. Severely frail patients showed highest effects sizes for all postoperative outcome variables [OR 11.17 (95% CI 3.45-36.19), p<0.001 for mortality; OR 4.15 (95% CI 2.46-6.99), p<0.001 for major complications; OR 4.37 (95% CI 2.68-7.12), p<0.001 for unplanned readmission; OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.17-4.55), p<0.001 for unplanned reoperation; OR 4.28 (95% CI 2.74-6.68), p<0.001 for eLOS; and OR 9.34 (95% CI 6.03-14.47, p<0.001) for discharge other than home. CONCLUSION: In this national database study, baseline frailty status was a better independent predictor for worse postoperative outcomes than age in patients with intracranial meningioma.

Worse Pituitary Adenoma Surgical Outcomes Predicted by Increasing Frailty, Not Age.

PURPOSE: Increasing patient age has been associated with worse outcomes after pituitary adenoma resection in previous studies, but the prognostic value of frailty compared with advancing age on pituitary adenoma resection outcomes has not been clearly evaluated. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2019 was queried for data for patients aged >18 years who underwent pituitary adenoma resection (n = 1454 identified patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses of age and frailty (5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5]) were performed on 30-day mortality, major complications, extended length of stay (eLOS), discharge destination, and readmission and reoperation. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare effect of age and mFI-5. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, increasing frailty was significantly associated with greater risk of unplanned readmission (frail: odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.2; severely frail: OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.4-19.8) and a major complication (frail: OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.1-6.1). Severe frailty was also associated with nonhome discharge (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 3.2-35.8) and eLOS (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5-13.4). Increasing age was not associated with any of these outcome measures. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated similar trends. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the mFI-5 score showed higher discrimination for major complications compared with age (area under the curve: 0.624 vs. 0.503; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, and not advancing age, was an independent predictor for major complications, unplanned readmissions, eLOS, and nonhome discharge after pituitary adenoma resection, suggesting frailty to be superior to age in preoperative risk stratification in this patient population.

Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline frailty status (as measured by modified frailty index-5 [mFI-5]) versus age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for spinal tumors using data from a large national registry. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect spinal tumor resection patients' data from 2015 to 2019 (n = 4,662). Univariate and multivariate analyses for age and mFI-5 were performed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, major complications, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge to a nonhome destination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of age versus mFI-5. RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that mFI-5 was a more robust predictor of worse postoperative outcomes as compared to age. Furthermore, based on categorical analysis of frailty tiers, increasing frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. 'Severely frail' patients were found to have the highest risk, with odds ratio 16.4 (95% confidence interval [CI],11.21-35.44) for 30-day mortality, 3.02 (95% CI, 1.97-4.56) for major complications, and 2.94 (95% CI, 2.32-4.21) for LOS. In ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 score (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.743) achieved superior discrimination compared to age (AUC = 0.594) for mortality. CONCLUSION: Increasing frailty, as measured by mFI-5, is a more robust predictor as compared to age, for poor postoperative outcomes in spinal tumor surgery patients. The mFI-5 may be clinically used for preoperative risk stratification of spinal tumor patients.