Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(49): 31278-31289, 2020 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33229591

ABSTRACT

Presbycusis, or age-related hearing loss (ARHL), is a major public health issue. About half the phenotypic variance has been attributed to genetic factors. Here, we assessed the contribution to presbycusis of ultrarare pathogenic variants, considered indicative of Mendelian forms. We focused on severe presbycusis without environmental or comorbidity risk factors and studied multiplex family age-related hearing loss (mARHL) and simplex/sporadic age-related hearing loss (sARHL) cases and controls with normal hearing by whole-exome sequencing. Ultrarare variants (allele frequency [AF] < 0.0001) of 35 genes responsible for autosomal dominant early-onset forms of deafness, predicted to be pathogenic, were detected in 25.7% of mARHL and 22.7% of sARHL cases vs. 7.5% of controls (P = 0.001); half were previously unknown (AF < 0.000002). MYO6, MYO7A, PTPRQ, and TECTA variants were present in 8.9% of ARHL cases but less than 1% of controls. Evidence for a causal role of variants in presbycusis was provided by pathogenicity prediction programs, documented haploinsufficiency, three-dimensional structure/function analyses, cell biology experiments, and reported early effects. We also established Tmc1N321I/+ mice, carrying the TMC1:p.(Asn327Ile) variant detected in an mARHL case, as a mouse model for a monogenic form of presbycusis. Deafness gene variants can thus result in a continuum of auditory phenotypes. Our findings demonstrate that the genetics of presbycusis is shaped by not only well-studied polygenic risk factors of small effect size revealed by common variants but also, ultrarare variants likely resulting in monogenic forms, thereby paving the way for treatment with emerging inner ear gene therapy.


Subject(s)
Deafness/genetics , Genes, Dominant , Mutation/genetics , Presbycusis/genetics , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Heterozygote , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mice , MicroRNAs/genetics , Mitochondria/genetics , Exome Sequencing
2.
BMC Neurosci ; 10: 23, 2009 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19309511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In normal-hearing subjects, monaural stimulation produces a normal pattern of asynchrony and asymmetry over the auditory cortices in favour of the contralateral temporal lobe. While late onset unilateral deafness has been reported to change this pattern, the exact influence of the side of deafness on central auditory plasticity still remains unclear. The present study aimed at assessing whether left-sided and right-sided deafness had differential effects on the characteristics of neurophysiological responses over auditory areas. Eighteen unilaterally deaf and 16 normal hearing right-handed subjects participated. All unilaterally deaf subjects had post-lingual deafness. Long latency auditory evoked potentials (late-AEPs) were elicited by two types of stimuli, non-speech (1 kHz tone-burst) and speech-sounds (voiceless syllable/pa/) delivered to the intact ear at 50 dB SL. The latencies and amplitudes of the early exogenous components (N100 and P150) were measured using temporal scalp electrodes. RESULTS: Subjects with left-sided deafness showed major neurophysiological changes, in the form of a more symmetrical activation pattern over auditory areas in response to non-speech sound and even a significant reversal of the activation pattern in favour of the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulation in response to speech sound. This was observed not only for AEP amplitudes but also for AEP time course. In contrast, no significant changes were reported for late-AEP responses in subjects with right-sided deafness. CONCLUSION: The results show that cortical reorganization induced by unilateral deafness mainly occurs in subjects with left-sided deafness. This suggests that anatomical and functional plastic changes are more likely to occur in the right than in the left auditory cortex. The possible perceptual correlates of such neurophysiological changes are discussed.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Auditory Perception , Deafness/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Functional Laterality , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Electroencephalography , Female , France , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged
3.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 52(4): 827-38, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18971288

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study investigates the ability to understand degraded speech signals and explores the correlation between this capacity and the functional characteristics of the peripheral auditory system. METHOD: The authors evaluated the capability of 50 normal-hearing native French speakers to restore time-reversed speech. The task required them to transcribe two-syllable items containing temporal reversions of variable sizes, ranging from no reversion to complete reversion, increasing by half-syllable steps. In parallel, the functionality of each participant's auditory efferent system was evaluated using contralateral suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. RESULTS: Perceptual accuracy for time-reversed speech diminished when the size of the applied temporal distortion increased. A lexical benefit was evident, and an important interindividual variability in performance was observed. Functional exploration of the auditory system revealed that speech restoration performances correlated with the suppression strength of the participant's auditory efferent system. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a clear relation between the functional asymmetry of the auditory efferent pathway (the right-side activity is greater than the left-side activity in right-handed participants) and the comprehension of acoustically distorted speech in normal-hearing participants. Further experiments are needed to better specify how the functionality of the medial olivocochlear bundle can cause phonological activation to be more efficient.


Subject(s)
Comprehension/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Phonetics , Psychoacoustics , Time Factors , Vocabulary , Young Adult
4.
Front Psychol ; 10: 1990, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31572253

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant (CI) users can only access limited pitch information through their device, which hinders music appreciation. Poor music perception may not only be due to CI technical limitations; lack of training or negative attitudes toward the electric sound might also contribute to it. Our study investigated with an implicit (indirect) investigation method whether poorly transmitted pitch information, presented as musical chords, can activate listeners' knowledge about musical structures acquired prior to deafness. Seven postlingually deafened adult CI users participated in a musical priming paradigm investigating pitch processing without explicit judgments. Sequences made of eight sung-chords that ended on either a musically related (expected) target chord or a less-related (less-expected) target chord were presented. The use of a priming task based on linguistic features allowed CI patients to perform fast judgments on target chords in the sung music. If listeners' musical knowledge is activated and allows for tonal expectations (as in normal-hearing listeners), faster response times were expected for related targets than less-related targets. However, if the pitch percept is too different and does not activate musical knowledge acquired prior to deafness, storing pitch information in a short-term memory buffer predicts the opposite pattern. If transmitted pitch information is too poor, no difference in response times should be observed. Results showed that CI patients were able to perform the linguistic task on the sung chords, but correct response times indicated sensory priming, with faster response times observed for the less-related targets: CI patients processed at least some of the pitch information of the musical sequences, which was stored in an auditory short-term memory and influenced chord processing. This finding suggests that the signal transmitted via electric hearing led to a pitch percept that was too different from that based on acoustic hearing, so that it did not automatically activate listeners' previously acquired musical structure knowledge. However, the transmitted signal seems sufficiently informative to lead to sensory priming. These findings are encouraging for the development of pitch-related training programs for CI patients, despite the current technological limitations of the CI coding.

5.
J Neurosci ; 27(29): 7838-46, 2007 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17634377

ABSTRACT

Deprivation from normal sensory input has been shown to alter tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. In this context, cochlear implant subjects provide an interesting model in that profound deafness is made partially reversible by the cochlear implant. In restoring afferent activity, cochlear implantation may also reverse some of the central changes related to deafness. The purpose of the present study was to address whether the auditory cortex of cochlear implant subjects is tonotopically organized. The subjects were thirteen adults with at least 3 months of cochlear implant experience. Auditory event-related potentials were recorded in response to electrical stimulation delivered at different intracochlear electrodes. Topographic analysis of the auditory N1 component (approximately 85 ms latency) showed that the locations on the scalp and the relative amplitudes of the positive/negative extrema differ according to the stimulated electrode, suggesting that distinct sets of neural sources are activated. Dipole modeling confirmed electrode-dependent orientations of these sources in temporal areas, which can be explained by nearby, but distinct sites of activation in the auditory cortex. Although the cortical organization in cochlear implant users is similar to the tonotopy found in normal-hearing subjects, some differences exist. Nevertheless, a correlation was found between the N1 peak amplitude indexing cortical tonotopy and the values given by the subjects for a pitch scaling task. Hence, the pattern of N1 variation likely reflects how frequencies are coded in the brain.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Mapping , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Auditory Cortex/radiation effects , Deafness/pathology , Deafness/surgery , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electrodes , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/radiation effects , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reaction Time/physiology
6.
J Neurosci Methods ; 175(2): 196-205, 2008 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18789971

ABSTRACT

Speech elicited auditory brainstem responses (Speech ABR) have been shown to be an objective measurement of speech processing in the brainstem. Given the simultaneous stimulation and recording, and the similarities between the recording and the speech stimulus envelope, there is a great risk of artefactual recordings. This study sought to systematically investigate the source of artefactual contamination in Speech ABR response. In a first part, we measured the sound level thresholds over which artefactual responses were obtained, for different types of transducers and experimental setup parameters. A watermelon model was used to model the human head susceptibility to electromagnetic artefact. It was found that impedances between the electrodes had a great effect on electromagnetic susceptibility and that the most prominent artefact is due to the transducer's electromagnetic leakage. The only artefact-free condition was obtained with insert-earphones shielded in a Faraday cage linked to common ground. In a second part of the study, using the previously defined artefact-free condition, we recorded speech ABR in unilateral deaf subjects and bilateral normal hearing subjects. In an additional control condition, Speech ABR was recorded with the insert-earphones used to deliver the stimulation, unplugged from the ears, so that the subjects did not perceive the stimulus. No responses were obtained from the deaf ear of unilaterally hearing impaired subjects, nor in the insert-out-of-the-ear condition in all the subjects, showing that Speech ABR reflects the functioning of the auditory pathways.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychoacoustics , Reaction Time/physiology , Young Adult
7.
Brain ; 130(Pt 11): 2915-28, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17921181

ABSTRACT

Reading disability is associated with phonological problems which might originate in auditory processing disorders. The aim of the present study was 2-fold: first, the perceptual skills of average-reading children and children with dyslexia were compared in a categorical perception task assessing the processing of a phonemic contrast based on voice onset time (VOT). The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system, an inhibitory pathway functioning under central control, was also explored. Secondly, we investigated whether audiovisual training focusing on voicing contrast could modify VOT sensitivity and, in parallel, induce MOC system plasticity. The results showed an altered voicing sensitivity in some children with dyslexia, and that the most severely impaired children presented the most severe reading difficulties. These deficits in VOT perception were sometimes accompanied by MOC function abnormalities, in particular a reduction in or even absence of the asymmetry in favour of the right ear found in average-reading children. Audiovisual training significantly improved reading and shifted the categorical perception curve of certain children with dyslexia towards the average-reading children's pattern of voicing sensitivity. Likewise, in certain children MOC functioning showed increased asymmetry in favour of the right ear following audiovisual training. The training-related improvements in reading score were greatest in children presenting the greatest changes in MOC lateralization. Taken together, these results confirm the notion that some auditory system processing mechanisms are impaired in children with dyslexia and that audiovisual training can diminish these deficits.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/complications , Dyslexia/psychology , Psychotherapy/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Articulation Disorders/complications , Articulation Disorders/psychology , Articulation Disorders/therapy , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/psychology , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Child , Dyslexia/therapy , Female , Functional Laterality , Hearing Tests , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Psychological Tests , Psychophysics
8.
Hear Res ; 235(1-2): 105-13, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18093768

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates the relationship between auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) and loudness growth function. ASSR amplitudes were compared to the perceived loudness level at frequencies of 500 and 2000Hz in 11 normal-hearing subjects. As a first step, loudness growth function was estimated for the two test frequencies. Then ASSR amplitude was recorded for each of the two frequencies at different stimulus intensities, each corresponding to a loudness level as given by the first part of the study. Normalized results show that the ASSR amplitude correlates well with the loudness function (R(2)=0.81). A stepwise multiple linear regression confirmed these results with loudness explaining almost all the ASSR amplitude (loudness R(2)=0.81, p<0.001, f=562 and for intensity f=1.1, p=0.29). The non-linearity of the ASSR amplitude for low loudness levels can be explained by both the active amplification in the cochlea and the noise in the recording. The results suggest that ASSRs can be used for "objective" loudness measurement.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Hearing/physiology , Loudness Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Audiometry, Evoked Response , Auditory Threshold , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Models, Biological , Psychoacoustics , Reference Values
9.
Radiat Res ; 168(5): 608-13, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17973552

ABSTRACT

The European multicenter project named GUARD involved nine centers and aimed to assess potential changes in auditory function as a consequence of exposure to low-intensity electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produced by GSM cellular phones. Participants were healthy young adults without any evidence of hearing or ear disorders. Auditory function was assessed immediately before and after exposure to EMFs, and only the exposed ear was tested. The procedure was conducted twice in a double blinded design, once with a genuine EMF exposure and once with a sham exposure (at least 24 h apart). Tests for assessment of auditory function were hearing threshold level (HTL), transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), and auditory brainstem response (ABR). The exposure consisted of speech at a typical conversational level delivered via an earphone to one ear, plus genuine or sham EMF exposure. The EMF exposure used the output of a software-controlled consumer cellular phone at full power for 10 min. A system of phone positioning that allowed participants to freely move their heads without affecting exposure was used. Analysis of the data showed there were no effects of exposure to GSM mobile phone signals on the main measures of the status of the auditory system.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Auditory Perception/radiation effects , Cell Phone , Hearing Tests , Microwaves , Adolescent , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage
10.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 118(3): 676-89, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17223382

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Maturation of acoustically evoked brainstem responses (ABR) in hearing children is not complete at birth but rather continues over the first two years of life. In particular, it has been established that the decrease in ABR wave V latency can be modeled as the sum of two decaying exponential functions with respective time-constants of 4 and 50 weeks [Eggermont, J.J., Salamy, A., 1988a. Maturational time-course for the ABR in preterm and full term infants. Hear Res 33, 35-47; Eggermont, J.J., Salamy, A., 1988b. Development of ABR parameters in a preterm and a term born population. Ear Hear 9, 283-9]. Here, we investigated the maturation of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in 55 deaf children who recovered hearing after cochlear implantation, and proposed a predictive model of EABR maturation depending on the onset of deafness. The pattern of EABR maturation over the first 2 years of cochlear implant use was compared with the normal pattern of ABR maturation in hearing children. METHODS: Changes in EABR wave V latency over the 2 years following cochlear implant connection were analyzed in two groups of children. The first group (n=41) consisted of children with early-onset of deafness (mostly congenital), and the second (n=14) of children who had become profoundly deaf after 1 year of age. The modeling of changes in EABR wave V latency with time was based on the mean values from each of the two groups, allowing comparison of the rates of EABR maturation between groups. Differences between EABRs elicited at the basal and apical ends of the implant electrode array were also tested. RESULTS: There was no influence of age at implantation on the rate of wave V latency change. The main factor for EABR changes was the time in sound. Indeed, significant maturation was observed over the first 2 years of implant use only in the group with early-onset deafness. In this group maturation of wave V progressed as in the ABR model of [Eggermont, J.J., Salamy, A., 1988a. Maturational time-course for the ABR in preterm and full term infants. Hear Res 33, 35-47; Eggermont, J.J., Salamy, A., 1988b. Development of ABR parameters in a preterm and a term born population. Ear Hear 9, 283-9] of normal hearing children: a sum of two decaying exponential functions, one showing an early rapid decrease in latency and the other a slower decrease. Remarkably, the time-constants fell well within the ranges described by Eggermont and Salamy (i.e., 3.9 and 68 weeks), consistent with the time-course of the neurophysiological mechanisms presumably involved in auditory pathway maturation during the first 2 years of life: i.e., myelination and increased synaptic efficacy. In contrast, relatively little change in wave V was evident in children with late-onset deafness. In agreement with the notion that EABR maturation follows an apex-to-base gradient as described for ABR, we observed that wave V latencies were longer for the basal than the apical end of the implant electrode array and remained so throughout the study period, whatever the time of onset of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in the early-onset of deafness group support the theory that auditory pathways remain "frozen" during the period of sensory deprivation until cochlear implant rehabilitation restores the normal chronology of maturational processes. In children with late-onset deafness, however, some maturational processes may occur before the onset of deafness, and thus less additional maturation is required during the first two years of implant use resulting in no significant EABR latency changes being observed in this period. The results suggest that the rehabilitation-induced plasticity of the auditory pathways is, in case of late auditory deprivation, unlikely to result in neurophysiological outcomes similar to those observed in children with early auditory deprivation. SIGNIFICANCE: Changes in EABR wave V latency over the first 2 years of cochlear implant use were found to be well fitted by the sum of two decaying exponential functions in children with early-onset deafness. This is in line with the maturation of ABR wave V latency in normal-hearing children over the first two years of life. Further studies are needed to assess whether the differences observed in terms of auditory pathways maturation are associated with consistent differences in terms of language development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Models, Statistical , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mathematics , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Time Factors
11.
Hear Res ; 228(1-2): 44-57, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17350776

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave N1, wave P2, and inter-peak interval N1-P2 of electrical late auditory responses (ELARs). ELARs were recorded from four intra-cochlear electrodes in fourteen adult HiRes90K cochlear implant users who had at least three months of experience. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess the influence of the auditory pathway anatomy on ELARs, i.e., whether the speed of neural propagation varies according to the place that is activated in the cochlea. Audiograms before implantation, duration of deafness, and psychophysics at first fitting were used to describe the influence of deafness characteristics on latencies. The stimulation sites were found to have no effect on ELAR latency and, while there was no influence of psychophysics on latency, a strong relationship was shown with duration of deafness and the pre-implantation audiogram. Thus, ELAR latency was longer for poorer audiograms and longer durations of deafness and this relationship appeared to be independent of stimulation parameters such as stimulation site. Comparison between these findings and those from the equivalent study on EABR waves IIIe and Ve latency [Guiraud, J., Gallego, S., Arnold, L., Boyle, P., Truy, E., Collet, L., 2007. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear. Res. 223 (1-2), 48-60] shows that, while ELAR and EABR latencies are related with parameters that reflect the integrity of the auditory pathway, ELAR latency is less dependent on stimulation parameters than EABR latency.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/surgery , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Audiometry , Auditory Pathways/pathology , Deafness/pathology , Deafness/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychoacoustics , Reaction Time , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
12.
Hear Res ; 223(1-2): 48-60, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17157463

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave IIIe, wave Ve, and interpeak interval IIIe-Ve of electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). EABRs were recorded from all the intra-cochlear electrodes in eight adult HiRes90K((R)) cochlear implant users. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess activity along the auditory pathway. Audiograms before implantation, psychophysics at first fitting and duration of deafness were used to describe the influence of deafness on latencies. A decreasing baso-apical latency gradient was found for waves IIIe and Ve, while the interpeak interval IIIe-Ve remained the same along the electrode array. Electrical stimulation enabling to stimulate various parts of the cochlea at the same time, this could indicate an anatomical way of compensating for the delay the acoustic wave takes to reach the cochlea apex in a non-implanted ear. However, psychophysical levels were also found to increase at the cochlear base showing that the latency gradient could result from an increasing gradient of neural degeneration toward the base. Correlations of EABR latencies with psychophysics, audiometric data and duration of deafness show that factors linked to deafness have indeed an influence on EABR latencies. The possible explanations for the latency shift observed, whether they are anatomical and/or pathological, are exposed.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/pathology , Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Deafness/pathology , Deafness/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
13.
Hear Res ; 233(1-2): 14-22, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17658232

ABSTRACT

Cochlear damages have been shown to induce changes in tonotopic maps in the central auditory system of animals; neurons deprived from peripheral inputs start to respond to stimuli with frequencies close to the cutoff frequency (Fc) or "edge" of the hearing loss, which then become over-represented at the neural level. Here, we review findings, which reveal a possible psychophysical correlate of such central over-representation in human listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. These findings concur to demonstrate a local improvement in difference limens for frequency (DLFs) at or near Fc. This effect has now been observed in several studies and subjects with varied audiometric characteristics, including high- and low-frequency, and symmetric and asymmetric hearing losses. The presence of cochlear dead region or a steeply sloping hearing loss appear as a necessary condition for its occurrence. The effect cannot be explained simply by more prominent loudness cues or spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) near the audiogram edge. Overall, the data are consistent with local changes in pitch discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cutoff frequency being a result of the neural over-representation of that frequency region in the central auditory system. Further work is needed to confirm this hypothesis, and investigate other possible perceptual correlates of injury-related cortical plasticity in both humans and animals.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Cochlea/pathology , Discrimination, Psychological , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/psychology , Neuronal Plasticity , Speech Acoustics , Auditory Perception , Hearing Disorders/pathology , Humans
14.
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil ; 5(2): 121-5, 2007 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17556218

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's disease has major social and family consequences. However, therapeutic strategies are still limited. Non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches are known to be useful to protect the intellectual abilities of the patients, or at least, to slow down their decline. Therefore, it is important to pay attention to the consequences of sensory impairment in these old patients. Indeed, sensory troubles, mainly concerning hearing, may have an impact on the cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Several studies showed that the management of hearing impairment could afford cognitive and behavioral benefits in demented subjects as well as for the non-demented people. These results are encouraging, and suggest that hearing management should be applied to all hearing impaired patients with Alzheimer's disease.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Hearing Aids , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Hearing Disorders/therapy , Aged , Humans
15.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 58(1): 123-137, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387664

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cognitive benefit of hearing aids (HA) in older patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and hearing loss (HL) after a 6- and 12-month period of utilization. METHODS: A multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients aged more than 65 years. A group was equipped with active HA for 6 months (active group) and a second group had placebo HA for 6 months (placebo group) followed by a secondary activation phase for a further 6 months (semi crossover procedure). Both groups were retested after a 12-month period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS Cog) after a 6-month period in both groups and after 6 months of secondary HA activation in the placebo group. A smaller cognitive decline should be obtained with HA use; an increase in ADAS Cog score of less than 6 points was defined a success. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients aged 68 to 99 years were included; 38 attended the 6-month visit: 18 in the active group and 20 in the placebo group. At 6 months, 14 (82.4%) successes were noticed in the active group, and 15 (88.2%) in the placebo group (p = 1.0); delta ADAS Cog in the active group was 1.8±5.3 and 1.3±5.3 in the placebo group (p = 0.8). In the placebo group, after the secondary HA activation, no significant improvement was observed. CONCLUSION: No significant effect of HA use was observed after 6 months of follow-up in patients with AD and HL.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/complications , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/rehabilitation , Audiometry , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests
16.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 58(1): 109-121, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28269769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that age-related hearing loss (ARHL) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are commonly associated. OBJECTIVE: The Alzheimer Disease, Presbycusis and Hearing Aids (ADPHA) clinical trial assessed the influence of hearing aids (HAs) on patients affected by ARHL and AD, as judged by behavioral symptoms and functional abilities, as well as patient and caregiver quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a semi-crossover procedure over 12 months, was conducted from 2006 to 2012. For the first 6 months, the active group was treated with active HAs and the placebo group with inactive HAs. For the last 6 months, HAs in the placebo group were activated. Assessment was conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. We performed intergroup and intragroup comparisons. Behavioral symptoms were assessed by neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI), functional abilities by instrumental activities of daily living, and QoL by Zarit, Alzheimer's disease related quality of life, and simplified Duke scales. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included and randomized: 22 in active group (mean NPI 17.6; mean age 83±6.2) and 26 in placebo group (mean NPI 25.8; mean age 82.3±7.2) were fitted with HAs. At 6-month follow-up, all scores worsened without significant difference between the two groups. In placebo group, activation of HAs had no effect on the change of these scores. CONCLUSION: These findings do not provide evidence of improvement in behavioral symptoms, functional status, or QoL of hearing impaired AD patients and their caregivers after 6 months of HA use. However, we cannot exclude that HAs may have a positive effect in patients aged less than 75 years.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Quality of Life/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Dementia/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Aids/psychology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Compliance , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
18.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 114(7): 1307-15, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12842730

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: One of the main difficulties in electrical compound action potential (ECAP) recordings is to reduce the stimulus artifact due to electrical stimulation. The neural response telemetry (NRT) system of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant extracts the ECAP response using a forward-masking (standard) subtraction technique. However, it has been shown that this subtraction technique may distort the ECAP responses in certain situations. In order to improve ECAP recordings, a modified forward-masking subtraction technique was recently proposed (Ear Hear. 21 (2000) 280). This modified subtraction technique can be applied to recovery function measurement. The objective of this study is to compare results obtained with the modified method to those obtained using the standard method. METHODS: ECAP responses were recorded in 4 adult patients using a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Data were collected for the 20 active electrodes. For each electrode, measurements consisted of the recovery function recording using 16 different Masker-Probe intervals. The modified method was then applied and the results compared with the standard method. RESULTS: Comparison between the two methods revealed that results were different when using the standard or modified method. Using the modified method, more ECAP responses were obtained (61.8 vs. 44.2%), but the P1 peak was sometimes attenuated; when using the standard method, N1 peak was missing in many cases. A mathematical model has been established and the mathematical simulation confirms the results obtained in patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both methods have limitations and advantages. The modified subtraction method seems to be better for analyzing ECAP recordings in recovery function measurement because of the higher number of responses obtained compared to the standard method.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Microphonic Potentials/physiology , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Models, Theoretical , Recovery of Function/physiology , Adult , Artifacts , Cochlear Implantation , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perceptual Masking , Reaction Time , Sensitivity and Specificity
19.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 115(12): 2811-24, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15546789

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In cochlear implant recipients, the threshold of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) has been shown to correlate with the perceptual detection threshold and maximum comfortable loudness levels (respectively, T- and C-levels) used for implant programming. Our general objective was to model the relationship between ECAP threshold and T/C-levels by taking into account their relative changes within each subject. In particular, we were interested in investigating further the validity of ECAP threshold as a predictor of psychophysical levels, depending on intra-cochlear electrode location and time of testing (from 1 to 18 months post-implantation). METHODS: A total of 370 ECAP thresholds, measured in 49 children, using a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant, were compared with the corresponding T- and C-levels obtained at the same visit, for the same electrode. Response profiles for the whole group of patients were modeled across four test electrodes spaced equally along the electrode array from base towards apex. A linear regression model was constructed and the quality of the ECAP threshold-based predictions was assessed by testing for correlation between measured and predicted psychophysics. Comparison was made with a more simplistic model (described here as the 'parallel profiles method') stipulating, within each subject, a 1 microA increase in psychophysical levels for every 1 microA increase in ECAP threshold. RESULTS: Offset between ECAP threshold and psychophysics profiles was found to vary significantly along the electrode array for the T-, but not for the C-level. In contrast with the parallel profiles method, our regression model predicted, within each subject, an average increase of 0.23 microA (95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.28) in T-level for every 1 microA increase in ECAP threshold. This correction improved the quality of T-level prediction when our model was run using measured T-level and ECAP threshold from a reference electrode (r=0.77 vs. r=0.62). The shorter the distance between the electrode for which T-level was predicted and the one used as reference, the stronger the correlation between measured and predicted T-levels. In addition, poorer T-level predictions were obtained at the basal end of the array during the first 3 months post-implantation. In contrast to T-level, individual changes in C-level with ECAP threshold exhibited heterogeneous patterns across subjects so that no common coefficient could account for these changes. However, applying the parallel profiles method led to high-quality C-level prediction. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that covariation between ECAP thresholds and psychophysics plays a decisive role in the relationship of ECAP threshold with T-, but not with C-level. Therefore, our regression model and the parallel profiles method should both be used for predicting, respectively, the T- and the C-levels. Although the predictability of our regression model seems to be better for middle and apical electrodes, its utilization should be extended to basal electrodes after 6 months' implant use.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Models, Theoretical , Psychophysics , Action Potentials , Auditory Threshold , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Regression Analysis
20.
Hear Res ; 184(1-2): 41-50, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14553902

ABSTRACT

Fifteen initially inexperienced subjects were trained for 4 weeks (12 2-h sessions) in frequency discrimination with pure tones around 88, 250, or 1605 Hz, or amplitude modulation rate discrimination of noise bands, using modulation rates around 88 or 250 Hz. Before, in the middle of, and after this training period, pure-tone frequency discrimination thresholds (DLFs), harmonic complex tone fundamental frequency discrimination thresholds (DLF0s), and amplitude modulation rate discrimination thresholds (DLFMs) were measured in several conditions including the trained one. Training in pure-tone frequency discrimination resulted in significantly larger improvements in DLF0s when the test complexes contained resolved harmonics than when they were composed of unresolved harmonics. This result supports the hypothesis that the discrimination of the F0 of resolved harmonics shares common underlying mechanisms with the frequency discrimination of pure tones. Training in rate discrimination did not result in larger DLF0 improvements for unresolved than for resolved harmonics.


Subject(s)
Generalization, Psychological , Learning/physiology , Pitch Discrimination/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Humans , Noise , Teaching
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL