Clinical Validation of the Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Scoring System and Substratification Model Proposed by the International Bladder Cancer Group: A Multicenter Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Working Group Collaboration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) encompasses a broad spectrum of disease, with heterogeneous outcomes in terms of disease recurrence and progression. The International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) recently proposed an updated scoring model for IR substratification that is based on five key risk factors. Our aim was to provide a clinical validation of the IBCG scoring system and substratification model for IR NMIBC. METHODS: This was an international multicenter retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with IR NMIBC between 2012 and 2022 and treated with transurethral resection of the bladder and adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy were included. According to the presence or absence of risk factors, patients with IR NMIBC were further categorized in IR-low (no risk factors), IR-intermediate (1-2 risk factors), and IR-high (≥3 risk factors) groups. The 1-yr and 3-yr rates for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for each subgroup. Cox regression analyses were used to compare oncological outcomes between the groups. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 677 patients with IR NMIBC included in the study, 231 (34%), 364 (54%), and 82 (12%) were categorized in the IR-low, IR-intermediate, and IR-high groups, respectively. There were significant differences in RFS and PFS rates between these groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We provide the first clinical validation of the IBCG scoring system and model for substratification of IR NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study demonstrates that patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be correctly classified into three distinct subgroups according to their risk of both disease recurrence and progression. Our results support use of this scoring system in clinical practice.

Advanced Age Impacts Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is rare but has a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors have been extensively studied in order to provide the best possible management for patients. We have aimed to investigate commonly available factors predictive of recurrence and survival in this patient population at high risk of death and recurrence, with an emphasis on the effects of age (using a cutoff of 70 years) on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1387 patients with clinically nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy at 21 academic hospital centers between 2005 and 2021, 776 patients were eligible and included in the study. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were built to evaluate the independent prognosticators for intravesical and extravesical recurrence, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival according to age groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We did not find an association between groups aged <70 and >70 years old and preoperatively clinical or histopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was found no statistical significance between the 2 age groups in terms of intravesical or extravesical recurrence (P = .09 and P = .57). Overall survival (P = .0001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .0001) have been found to be statistically significantly associated with age as independent predictors (confounding factors: gender, tumor size, tumor side, clinical T stage, localization, preoperative hydronephrosis, tumor localization, type of surgery, multifocality of the tumor, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant CIS, lymph node status, necrosis, or history of previous bladder cancer). CONCLUSION: This research confirms that patients aged 70 and above who undergo radical nephroureterectomy may have worse outcomes compared to younger patients, older patients needing an improved care and management of UTUC to improve their outcomes in the setting of an increase in this aged population group.

Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.

Trans - Perineal laser ablation of the prostate in high surgical risk patients affected by severe lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic obstruction.

BACKGROUND: In our study, we aimed to test the efficacy and safety of Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of the prostate (TPLA®) in the surgical treatment of high-risk Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) patients. METHODS: We defined a high-risk BPO patient as an elderly man affected by severe comorbidities, among which coagulation issues due to pre-existent medications or diseases. From October 2020 to June 2022, we prospectively enrolled high-risk patients affected by a moderate to severe and/or complicated BPO condition. The analysis of the efficacy of the Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation was defined as the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints were post-operative surgical complications and patient-reported quality of life. RESULTS: Globally, 40 consecutive patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) age was 80 (72.5-84) years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (5-7). Median prostate volume was 38 (30.5-73) cc. In all cases, a TPLA® procedure was performed under local anesthesia, and patients being discharged within the same day of the procedure. A progressive reduction of median prostate volumes was reported at 3 and 6 months post-operatively, compared to baseline [38 (30.5-73) vs 35 (26-49) vs 34 (28-49) cc, p < 0.001]. Median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improved accordingly [25 (19-30) vs 10.5 (7.5-13) vs 8 (6-11.5), p < 0.001]. A permanent bladder catheter was successfully removed in 13 out of 23 (56.5%) cases. Within 90 days from surgery, 19 (47.5%) patients experienced at least one surgical complication. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, complications were classified as grade I in 16 (40%) cases, grade II in 9 (22.5%), and grade III in 1 (2.5%). We did not observe any grade IV or V complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate is a feasible, safe, and effective Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, when offered to elderly, high-risk patients affected by severe Benign Prostatic Obstruction.