ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum have both been noted to complicate cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospital admission. We report the largest case series yet described of patients with both these pathologies (including nonventilated patients). METHODS: Cases were collected retrospectively from UK hospitals with inclusion criteria limited to a diagnosis of COVID-19 and the presence of either pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum. Patients included in the study presented between March and June 2020. Details obtained from the medical record included demographics, radiology, laboratory investigations, clinical management and survival. RESULTS: 71 patients from 16 centres were included in the study, of whom 60 had pneumothoraces (six with pneumomediastinum in addition) and 11 had pneumomediastinum alone. Two of these patients had two distinct episodes of pneumothorax, occurring bilaterally in sequential fashion, bringing the total number of pneumothoraces included to 62. Clinical scenarios included patients who had presented to hospital with pneumothorax, patients who had developed pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum during their inpatient admission with COVID-19 and patients who developed their complication while intubated and ventilated, either with or without concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival at 28â days was not significantly different following pneumothorax (63.1±6.5%) or isolated pneumomediastinum (53.0±18.7%; p=0.854). The incidence of pneumothorax was higher in males. 28-day survival was not different between the sexes (males 62.5±7.7% versus females 68.4±10.7%; p=0.619). Patients aged ≥70 years had a significantly lower 28-day survival than younger individuals (≥70â years 41.7±13.5% survival versus <70â years 70.9±6.8% survival; p=0.018 log-rank). CONCLUSION: These cases suggest that pneumothorax is a complication of COVID-19. Pneumothorax does not seem to be an independent marker of poor prognosis and we encourage continuation of active treatment where clinically possible.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/virology , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/therapy , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Survival Rate , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition of the psychosocial burden of caregiving on relative caregivers of the mentally ill in low-and middle-income countries. Yet there remains limited formal research examining the challenges and psychosocial support needs of these relative caregivers, particularly with sensitivity to understanding caregiver experiences across diverse cultures and contexts. The purpose of this study was to study caregiver burden to inform potential intervention approaches among relative caregivers of treatment-engaged mentally ill patients in Cambodia. METHODS: Participants were all relative caregivers identified through their connection to a non-governmental organization providing psychiatric care. Five focus group discussions were held with 37 participants to explore challenges experienced by relative caregivers. A total of 115 caregivers then completed a mental health assessment consisting of the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 item scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7-item scale, and 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale. Internal consistencies ranged from α = .81 to .87 across scales. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from the focus group discussions: financial burden, erratic behavior of patients, social alienation, somatic and emotional symptoms, and barriers to help-seeking. Assessment data indicated the sample was highly symptomatic. Women and those with no employment appeared to be at higher risk of distress, as were those caregivers with a biological relationship to the patient (parents, children, and siblings; relative to spouses or other relationships). DISCUSSION: Findings suggest a need for regular screening and greater psychosocial support for relative caregivers. It is notable that the needs identified within the current study remain prominent even as this is a treatment-engaged sample.
Subject(s)
Mentally Ill Persons , Child , Humans , Female , Social Support , Cambodia , Anxiety , Parents , Caregivers/psychology , Cost of IllnessABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of prolonged air leak due to secondary spontaneous pneumothorax is challenging. Autologous blood patch pleurodesis (ABPP) is a treatment option. Previous evidence is reliant on single-centre series and underpowered trials and is mostly described in air leaks post cardiothoracic intervention. There are no United Kingdom (UK) wide data. METHODS: Members of the UK Pleural Society were surveyed for their practice and for patients who underwent blood patch. There were 16 respondents from 333 members. Twelve had performed the procedure, and six had kept records and could submit data. Basic demographics, intervention and clinical details of patients were then collected. The study was sponsored by the Audit Department of Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (reference 8124), and Caldicott Clearance for data sharing was provided by the Trust's Information Goverance Board (reference C4221). There was no requirement for informed consent. RESULTS: Data for 12 patients that received ABPP between 2014 and 2022 in six respiratory centres were assessed. The aetiology of the secondary pneumothoraces was mostly due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and end-stage interstitial lung disease. The patients had a median age of 75 years. The median air leak time before ABPP was 17 days. A total of 50-100 ml of blood was used for ABPP. Five patients had two attempts at ABPP. Air leak resolved in six patients (50%). Four patients had pleural apposition prior to ABPP. Four patients were diagnosed with hospital-acquired pneumonia following ABPP. CONCLUSION: This is the only UK-wide retrospective case series of ABPP of 'medical' patients with secondary pneumothorax. There is widespread variation in care. No formal conclusions can be drawn, and much larger robust datasets are required. An application has been made to the European Respiratory Society to incorporate ABPP within the International Collaborative Effusion database.
ABSTRACT
A 72-year-old female patient underwent endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspirate sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes to investigate a middle lobe abnormality following an urgent referral. CT imaging completed the following day demonstrated a pneumomediastinum. At clinical review, the patient remained clinically stable and no intervention was required.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Mediastinal Emphysema , Aged , Bronchoscopy , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinum/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinum/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Can you diagnose this eosinophilic patient with a pleural effusion? http://ow.ly/8G1530dJdbZ.
ABSTRACT
Infection and malignancy are common causes of consolidation but are not always the answer! http://ow.ly/p5LK301PziB.
ABSTRACT
A 28-year old woman presented with a progressive cough and breathlessness. She had a family history of early onset COPD. Spirometry demonstrated airflow obstruction with no reversibility. An HRCT showed extensive centrolobular emphysema with an upper lobe predominance. Blood tests including an Alpha - 1 Antitrypsin level were normal.