ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many patients referred with a provisional diagnosis of cancer of unknown primary (pCUP) present with presumed metastatic disease to the liver. Due to the lack of definitive histological markers, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) may be overlooked. This study assessed the frequency of iCCA within a pCUP cohort. METHODS: A single UK cancer-center study of sequential patients referred with pCUP from January 2017 to April 2020. Baseline diagnostic imaging was reviewed independently by a radiologist and oncologist; those with radiological features of iCCA (dominant liver lesion, capsular retraction) were identified. RESULTS: Of 228 patients referred with pCUP, 72 (32%) had malignancy involving the liver. 24/72 patients had radiological features consistent with iCCA; they were predominantly female (75%) with an average age of 63 years and 63% had an ECOG PS ≤ 2. The median overall survival (OS) of the iCCA group and the remaining liver-involved CUP group were similar (OS 4.1 vs 4.4 months, p-value = 0.805). Patients, where a primary diagnosis was subsequently determined, had better OS (10.2 months, p-values: iCCA = 0.0279: cCUP = 0.0230). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 34% of patients with liver-involved pCUP, fulfilled the radiological criteria for an iCCA diagnosis. Consideration of an iCCA diagnosis in patients with CUP could improve timely diagnosis, molecular characterisation and treatment.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary , Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Cancers of Unknown Primary (CUP) comprise a heterogeneous clinical entity of confirmed metastatic cancer where the primary site of origin is undetectable. It has a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. CUP is historically under-researched; however, understanding its biology has the potential to not only improve treatment and survival by implementation of biomarkers for patient management, but also to greatly contribute to our understanding of carcinogenesis and metastasis across all cancer types. Here we review the current advances in CUP research and explore the debated hypotheses underlying its biology. The evolution of molecular profiling and tissue-of-origin classifiers have the potential to transform the diagnosis, classification and therapeutic management of patients with CUP but robust evidence to support widespread use is lacking. Precision medicine has transformed treatment strategy in known tumour types; in CUP, however, there remains a clinical need for a better understanding of molecular characteristics to establish the potential role of novel or existing therapeutics. The emergence of liquid biopsies as a source of predictive and prognostic biomarkers within known tumour types is gaining rapid ground and this review explores the potential utility of liquid biopsies in CUP.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Carcinoma/genetics , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/genetics , Prognosis , Carcinoma/blood , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/blood , Precision MedicineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation have been shown to predict outcomes in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). We sought to validate these findings in patients with confirmed CUP (cCUP) and explore their role alongside existing clinicopathological prognostic categories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CUP oncologist from across the United Kingdom were invited to include patients with cCUP referred to their local CUP multidisciplinary team. Patient demographics, clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Data were available for 548 patients from four CUP services. 23% (n = 124) of patients met clinicopathological criteria for favourable-risk cCUP. On multivariate analysis c-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS: combining albumin and neutrophil count) (p < 0.001) were independently predictive of survival. CRP and SIPS effectively stratified survival in patients with both favourable-risk and poor-risk cCUP based on clinicopathological features. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are reliable prognostic factors in patients with cCUP, regardless of clinicopathological subgroup. We recommend that CRP or SIPS are incorporated into routine clinical assessments of patients with cCUP as a tool to aid investigation and/or treatment decision-making across all groups. Established clinicopathological factors can then be used to inform management pathways and specific systemic anticancer therapy selection.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Unknown Primary , Humans , Prognosis , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/pathology , Biomarkers , Inflammation , C-Reactive Protein/metabolismABSTRACT
Cancers of Unknown Primary (CUP) remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to biological heterogeneity and poor responses to standard chemotherapy. Predicting tissue-of-origin (TOO) molecularly could help refine this diagnosis, with tissue acquisition barriers mitigated via liquid biopsies. However, TOO liquid biopsies are unexplored in CUP cohorts. Here we describe CUPiD, a machine learning classifier for accurate TOO predictions across 29 tumour classes using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation patterns. We tested CUPiD on 143 cfDNA samples from patients with 13 cancer types alongside 27 non-cancer controls, with overall sensitivity of 84.6% and TOO accuracy of 96.8%. In an additional cohort of 41 patients with CUP CUPiD predictions were made in 32/41 (78.0%) cases, with 88.5% of the predictions clinically consistent with a subsequent or suspected primary tumour diagnosis, when available (23/26 patients). Combining CUPiD with cfDNA mutation data demonstrated potential diagnosis re-classification and/or treatment change in this hard-to-treat cancer group.
Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary , Humans , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , DNA Methylation , Liquid BiopsyABSTRACT
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by morphologic, epigenetic and transcriptomic heterogeneity. Subtypes based upon predominant transcription factor expression have been defined that, in mouse models and cell lines, exhibit potential differential therapeutic vulnerabilities, with epigenetically distinct SCLC subtypes also described. The clinical relevance of these subtypes is unclear, due in part to challenges in obtaining tumor biopsies for reliable profiling. Here we describe a robust workflow for genome-wide DNA methylation profiling applied to both patient-derived models and to patients' circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Tumor-specific methylation patterns were readily detected in cfDNA samples from patients with SCLC and were correlated with survival outcomes. cfDNA methylation also discriminated between the transcription factor SCLC subtypes, a precedent for a liquid biopsy cfDNA-methylation approach to molecularly subtype SCLC. Our data reveal the potential clinical utility of cfDNA methylation profiling as a universally applicable liquid biopsy approach for the sensitive detection, monitoring and molecular subtyping of patients with SCLC.
Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Animals , Mice , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/diagnosis , Epigenome/genetics , DNA Methylation/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Transcription Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
The prognosis of patients with gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma depends mainly on the clinical staging, as described by the new AJCC8 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition). Evidence suggests that peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be of prognostic significance in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. We examined the prognostic significance of NLR in the era of the new AJCC8 staging system. In this single-centre cohort study, retrospective data on patients with operable GOJ adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative chemotherapy were analysed. The prognostic significance of baseline NLR in combination with AJCC8 clinical staging and other patient characteristics was examined for both time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Of 316 patients, 245 (77.5%) underwent radical surgery. Fifty-one patients (16.2%) developed unresectable disease due to early disease progression. NLR was the only baseline factor independently associated with the development of early disease progression. AJCC8 clinical staging was significantly associated with TTP and OS. In addition, NLR ≥ 3 was predictive of poorer TTP (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002), confirmed in multivariate Cox-regression analysis. NLR ≥ 3 was prognostic, especially in patients with clinical stage III for TTP (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.025) and in patients with clinical stage IVA for OS (p = 0.017). NLR significantly improved the prognostic classification of patients by different AJCC8 clinical stages, with a c-index improved from 0.554 to 0.592 (p < 0.001). NLR was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor in this cohort and could be used in combination with AJCC8 clinical staging to improve the baseline prognostic stratification of patients with newly diagnosed resectable GOJ adenocarcinoma.