ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since March, Chile experienced an exponential increase in SARS-CoV2 cases, which led to an almost full occupancy of the intensive care units (ICU). AIM: To characterize patients with SARS-CoV2 disease who required hospitalization in the ICU and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed, which included the first 50 patients, aged 54 ± 13 years (58% men), with SARS-CoV2 disease, with ICU and IMV requirements between March 23 and June 2, 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory and imaging, therapies performed and IMV characteristics were registered. The most relevant outcomes observed were lethality, number of days in the ICU and connection to an IMV. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients were overweight or obese, 46% had hypertension and many had diabetes mellitus. They had elevated inflammatory parameters and typical patterns of COVID-19 in computed tomography. Most of the patients got protective lung ventilation with a high rate of use of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and prone position. Antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir were administered according to the protocol of the institution. Lethality was 16% (8 cases) at the end of this study. CONCLUSIONS: The information obtained in this study provides characteristics and early outcomes of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 and IMV, admitted to the ICU of our center.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , RNA, Viral , Adult , Aged , Chile/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A portfolio is a compilation of academic work that demonstrates student's knowledge, reflection and critical thinking. AIM: To describe the development and implementation of an undergraduate portfolio in the School of Medicine at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, its temporal evolution and its educational impact after 10 years of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The development and implementation of a portfolio for 4th-year undergraduate medical student was analyzed. Its design, teaching and learning methodologies, results and perceptions of students and teachers were assessed. The educational impact was measured using Kirkpatrick's levels. RESULTS: A total of 1,320 students participated between 2007 and 2017, supported by six teachers and 190 assistant-students. The portfolio included clinical cases, narrative medicine, palliative care and evidence-based medicine (EBM). The overall student's perception was positive, highlighting the development of critical analysis, clinical reasoning and professionalism. The delivery of feedback and learning assessment, allowed students to obtain excellent grades. There were only two cases of plagiarism reported. Fifteen EBM articles and two books with 52 narrative medicine essays were published. The greatest organizational impact of this teaching innovation, was that it evolved to become an established and continuous assessment instrument in 10 consecutive years. CONCLUSIONS: This portfolio is a project with a high educational impact, with a favorable perception by students and tutors, excellent results related to grades, stimulating both scientific writing and reflective practice.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Educational Measurement/methods , Chile , Humans , Learning , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Cirrhotic patients who have had an episode of bleeding from gastroesophageal varices are at high risk of rebleeding, despite treatment with endoscopic variceal ligation. Adding beta-blockers could reduce this risk, but it is associated with adverse effects. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening multiple databases, we identified seven systematic reviews including 21 randomized controlled trials addressing the question of this article. We extracted data, combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings following the GRADE approach. We concluded the addition of beta-blockers to endoscopic variceal ligation as secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding reduces the risk of rebleeding, but probably does not lead to any difference in terms of mortality. Even though it is associated to frequent adverse effects, these would be mild and generally do not lead to discontinuation of treatment.
Los pacientes cirróticos que han tenido un episodio de hemorragia por várices gastroesofágicas tienen un alto riesgo de resangrado, a pesar del tratamiento con ligadura variceal endoscópica. La adición de betabloqueadores podría disminuir este riesgo, pero se asocia a efectos adversos. Utilizando la base de datos Epistemonikos, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples bases de datos, identificamos siete revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen tres estudios aleatorizados que responden la pregunta. Extrajimos los datos, realizamos un metanálisis y confeccionamos tablas de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Concluimos que la adición de betabloquedores a la ligadura variceal endoscópica como profilaxis secundaria de hemorragia variceal disminuye el riesgo de resangrado, sin embargo, parece no disminuir la mortalidad, aunque la certeza de la evidencia para esto es baja. Si bien se asociaría a efectos adversos frecuentes estos serían leves y en general no llevan a suspender la terapia.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/mortality , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Ligation/methods , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Secondary Prevention/methodsABSTRACT
Knee osteoarthritis is a chronic disabling condition that is both progressive and irreversible. Intraarticular steroids are commonly used to reduce osteoarthritis symptoms and to minimize the need for surgery. Nevertheless, debate still exists regarding the efficacy and safety of steroids. To address this point, we searched Epistemonikos database which is maintained by screening 30 separate databases and identified 12 systematic reviews including 41 studies addressing steroids use in knee osteoarthritis. Of these, 40 were randomized trials. The evidence from these studies was combined using meta-analysis, and a summary of findings table was constructed following the GRADE approach. We concluded intraarticular steroid use slightly decreases short-term pain, makes little or no difference in the mid-term, and may have no effects in the long-term.
Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis, Knee/pathology , Pain/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Since March, Chile experienced an exponential increase in SARS-CoV2 cases, which led to an almost full occupancy of the intensive care units (ICU). Aim: To characterize patients with SARS-CoV2 disease who required hospitalization in the ICU and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in our hospital. Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was performed, which included the first 50 patients, aged 54 ± 13 years (58% men), with SARS-CoV2 disease, with ICU and IMV requirements between March 23 and June 2, 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory and imaging, therapies performed and IMV characteristics were registered. The most relevant outcomes observed were lethality, number of days in the ICU and connection to an IMV. Results: Ninety percent of patients were overweight or obese, 46% had hypertension and many had diabetes mellitus. They had elevated inflammatory parameters and typical patterns of COVID-19 in computed tomography. Most of the patients got protective lung ventilation with a high rate of use of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and prone position. Antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir were administered according to the protocol of the institution. Lethality was 16% (8 cases) at the end of this study. Conclusions: The information obtained in this study provides characteristics and early outcomes of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 and IMV, admitted to the ICU of our center.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral , COVID-19 , Respiration, Artificial , Chile/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalization , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Background: A portfolio is a compilation of academic work that demonstrates student's knowledge, reflection and critical thinking. Aim: To describe the development and implementation of an undergraduate portfolio in the School of Medicine at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, its temporal evolution and its educational impact after 10 years of experience. Material and Methods: The development and implementation of a portfolio for 4th-year undergraduate medical student was analyzed. Its design, teaching and learning methodologies, results and perceptions of students and teachers were assessed. The educational impact was measured using Kirkpatrick's levels. Results: A total of 1,320 students participated between 2007 and 2017, supported by six teachers and 190 assistant-students. The portfolio included clinical cases, narrative medicine, palliative care and evidence-based medicine (EBM). The overall student's perception was positive, highlighting the development of critical analysis, clinical reasoning and professionalism. The delivery of feedback and learning assessment, allowed students to obtain excellent grades. There were only two cases of plagiarism reported. Fifteen EBM articles and two books with 52 narrative medicine essays were published. The greatest organizational impact of this teaching innovation, was that it evolved to become an established and continuous assessment instrument in 10 consecutive years. Conclusions: This portfolio is a project with a high educational impact, with a favorable perception by students and tutors, excellent results related to grades, stimulating both scientific writing and reflective practice.
Subject(s)
Humans , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Educational Measurement/methods , Students, Medical , Time Factors , Chile , Surveys and Questionnaires , LearningABSTRACT
Introducción: La sobrecarga laboral horaria es un importante problema en los programas de especialización médica. Se asocia a mayor prevalencia de depresión, burnout, deserción, e impacta en la calidad de vida de los residentes. Nuestro objetivo fue cuantificar las horas semanales de carga laboral horaria en residentes de especialidad y subespecialidad de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC). Métodos: Se realizó una encuesta electrónica a los residentes de especialidad y subespecialidad de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (2013). Esta incluyó autorreporte de horas semanales trabajadas (jornada habitual, turnos presenciales y turnos de llamada). Para el análisis se consideraron solo las horas presenciales (jornada habitual y turnos presenciales Resultados: se obtuvieron 415 respuestas (tasa de respuesta 86%). Los residentes de especialidad reportaron una jornada de 52,8 ± 20,3 horas semanales más un promedio de 22,6 ± 22,5 horas de turnos presenciales semanales. Los residentes de programas de subespecialidad reportaron una jornada de 55,9 ± 22,2 horas semanales más un promedio de 23 ± 3,9 horas de turnos presenciales semanales. De los 53 programas evaluados, el 22,6 por ciento sobrepasó el límite recomendado por la Dirección de Postgrado PUC (80 horas semanales). Cinco programas reportaron 90-100 horas semanales (todas especialidades o subespecialidades quirúrgicas) y 7 programas reportaron 80-90 horas semanales (3 subespecialidades médicas, 1 subespecialidad quirúrgica, 2 especialidades médicas y 1 especialidad quirúrgica). Conclusión: los residentes de especialidades y subespecialidades médicas en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile están sometidos a una carga horaria significativa. Los programas quirúrgicos presentaron la mayor sobrecarga horaria presencial, con un promedio mayor al recomendado a nivel internacional. (AU)
Introduction: Residents work hours' overload constitutes an important problem in medical postgraduate residency programs. It has been associated to an increased prevalence of depression, burnout, attrition and affects quality of life of residents. The aim of our study was to quantify the duty hours in residents of specialty and subspecialty at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC). Methods: An electronic survey was performed to residents of specialty and subspecialty at PUC (2013). It included an auto report of the duty hours worked in a week (regular working day, night shifts and on call shifts). We only included for analysis the face hours (regular working day and night shifts). Results: 415 surveys were answered (response rate 86percent). Specialty residents reported 52.8 ± 20.3 regular working hours per week plus an average of 22.6 ± 22.5 hours of night shifts. Subspecialty residents reported 55.9 ± 22.2 regular working hours per week plus an average of 23 ± 3.9 hours of night shifts. From the 53 evaluated programs, 22.6 percent exceeded the limit recommended in the PUC Postgraduate Office (80 hours per week). Five programs reported 90-100 hours per week (all were surgical specialties and subspecialties) and 7 programs reported 80-90 hours per week (3 medical subspecialties, 1 surgical subspecialty, 2 medical specialties and 1 surgical specialty). Conclusion: The residents of specialty and subspecialty from medical postgraduate programs at PUC are subject to a significant workload. The surgical programs present the highest time workload, with a greater average than the internationally recommended.(AU)