ABSTRACT
In a workshop sponsored by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, experts identified current knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the scientific, conceptual, and ethical understanding of organ donation after the circulatory determination of death and its technologies. To minimize organ injury from warm ischemia and produce better recipient outcomes, innovative techniques to perfuse and oxygenate organs postmortem in situ, such as thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, are being implemented in several medical centers in the US and elsewhere. These technologies have improved organ outcomes but have raised ethical and legal questions. Re-establishing donor circulation postmortem can be viewed as invalidating the condition of permanent cessation of circulation on which the earlier death determination was made and clamping arch vessels to exclude brain circulation can be viewed as inducing brain death. Alternatively, TA-NRP can be viewed as localized in-situ organ perfusion, not whole-body resuscitation, that does not invalidate death determination. Further scientific, conceptual, and ethical studies, such as those identified in this workshop, can inform and help resolve controversies raised by this practice.
Subject(s)
Death , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Humans , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , United States , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , Lung Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Organ Preservation/methods , Heart TransplantationABSTRACT
The identification of novel tumor-interactive chemokines and the associated insights into the molecular and cellular basis of tumor-microenvironment interactions have continued to stimulate the development of targeted cancer therapeutics. Recently, we have identified monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1; CCL2) as a prominent regulator of prostate cancer growth and metastasis. Using neutralizing antibodies to human CCL2 (CNTO888) and the mouse homologue CCL2/JE (C1142), we show that treatment with anti-CCL2/JE antibody (2 mg/kg, twice weekly i.p.) attenuated PC-3Luc-mediated overall tumor burden in our in vivo model of prostate cancer metastasis by 96% at 5 weeks postintracardiac injection. Anti-CCL2 inhibition was not as effective as docetaxel (40 mg/kg, every week for 3 weeks) as a single agent, but inhibition of CCL2 in combination with docetaxel significantly reduced overall tumor burden compared with docetaxel alone, and induced tumor regression relative to initial tumor burden. These data suggest an interaction between tumor-derived chemokines and host-derived chemokines acting in cooperation to promote tumor cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis.
Subject(s)
Antibodies/pharmacology , Chemokine CCL2/antagonists & inhibitors , Immunization, Passive/methods , Immunoglobulin G/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Antibodies/immunology , Cell Growth Processes , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Chemokine CCL2/immunology , Docetaxel , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Mice , Mice, SCID , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, CCR2 , Receptors, Chemokine/biosynthesis , Taxoids/pharmacology , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
The ability of CCL2 to influence prostate cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis may occur through two distinct mechanisms: 1) a direct effect on tumor cell growth and function, and 2) an indirect effect on the tumor microenvironment by the regulation of macrophage mobilization and infiltration into the tumor bed. We have previously demonstrated that CCL2 exerts a direct effect on prostate cancer epithelial cells by the regulation of their growth, invasion, and migration, resulting in enhanced tumorigenesis and metastasis. Here we describe an indirect effect of CCL2 on prostate cancer growth and metastasis by regulating monocyte/macrophage infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and by stimulating a phenotypic change within these immune cells to promote tumor growth (tumor-associated macrophages). VCaP prostate cancer cells were subcutaneously injected in male SCID mice and monitored for tumor volume, CD68(+) macrophage infiltration, and microvascular density. Systemic administration of anti-CCL2 neutralizing antibodies (CNTO888 and C1142) significantly retarded tumor growth and attenuated CD68(+) macrophage infiltration, which was accompanied by a significant decrease in microvascular density. These data suggest that CCL2 contributes to prostate cancer growth through the regulation of macrophage infiltration and enhanced angiogenesis within the tumor.
Subject(s)
Chemokine CCL2/physiology , Chemotaxis , Macrophages/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Chemokine CCL2/antagonists & inhibitors , Chemotaxis/drug effects , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, SCID , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
The paradigm of cancer development and metastasis is a comprehensive, complex series of events that ultimately reflects a coordinated interaction between the tumor cell and the microenvironment within which the tumor cell resides. Despite the realization that this relationship has changed the current paradigm of cancer research, the struggle continues to more completely understand the pathogenesis of the disease and the ability to appropriately identify and design novel targets for therapy. A particular area of research that has added a significant understanding to cancer metastasis is the role of chemokines and chemokine receptors. Here we review the current concepts of CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) and its role in tumor metastasis with particular interest to its role in the development of bone metastases.