Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dis ; 221(6): 910-918, 2020 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31784749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Highly effective human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are used in many national programs in 3- or 2-dose schedules. We examined HPV vaccine effectiveness against HPV prevalence by number of doses. METHODS: We collected residual liquid-based cytology samples from US women aged 20-29 years who were screened for cervical cancer. Women continuously enrolled from 2006 through the specimen collection date were analyzed. Specimens were tested using the Linear Array assay. We analyzed prevalence of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV) types (HPV 6,11,16,18) and other HPV-type categories and determined prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 1, 2, and 3 compared with no vaccine doses. RESULTS: Among 4269 women, 1052 (24.6%) were unvaccinated, 2610 (61.1%) received 3 doses, 304 (7.1%) received 2 doses, and 303 (7.1%) received 1 dose. The 4vHPV-type prevalence was 7.4% among unvaccinated women compared with 1.7%, 1.0%, and 1.0% among 1-, 2-, and 3-dose recipients. Among women vaccinated at ≤18 years, adjusted PRs for 1, 2, and 3 doses were 0.06 (95% CI, 0.01-0.42), 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.39), and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Among women who received their first dose at age ≤18, estimated HPV vaccine effectiveness was high regardless of number of doses.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Female , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Papillomaviridae/classification , Young Adult
2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(2): 182-188, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31797475

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective was to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify vaccine-related anaphylaxis from plain-text clinical notes, and to implement the algorithm at five health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. METHODS: The NLP algorithm was developed using an internal NLP tool and training dataset of 311 potential anaphylaxis cases from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). We applied the algorithm to the notes of another 731 potential cases (423 from KPSC; 308 from other sites) with relevant codes (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for anaphylaxis, vaccine adverse reactions, and allergic reactions; Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes for epinephrine administration). NLP results were compared against a reference standard of chart reviewed and adjudicated cases. The algorithm was then separately applied to the notes of 6 427 359 KPSC vaccination visits (9 402 194 vaccine doses) without relevant codes. RESULTS: At KPSC, NLP identified 12 of 16 true vaccine-related cases and achieved a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 98.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.7%, and negative predictive value of 99.0% when applied to notes of patients with relevant diagnosis codes. NLP did not identify the five true cases at other sites. When NLP was applied to the notes of KPSC patients without relevant codes, it captured eight additional true cases confirmed by chart review and adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated the potential to apply rule-based NLP algorithms to clinical notes to identify anaphylaxis cases. Increasing the size of training data, including clinical notes from all participating study sites in the training data, and preprocessing the clinical notes to handle special characters could improve the performance of the NLP algorithms. We recommend adding an NLP process followed by manual chart review in future vaccine safety studies to improve sensitivity and efficiency.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Natural Language Processing , Vaccines/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , California/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Vaccines/administration & dosage
3.
Hosp Pharm ; 51(11): 894-900, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057948

ABSTRACT

Background: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for pneumococcal vaccinations were updated in 2014. Given the complexity of the guidelines and the fact that hospitals are no longer required to keep records for pneumococcal vaccinations, many hospitals are determining whether to continue this service. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact on compliance with the revised pneumococcal vaccination guidelines from the CDC after involving pharmacy in the screening and selection processes. Secondary objectives were to determine the impact of the new process on inappropriate vaccination duplications, the time spent by pharmacy on assessments, and financial outcomes. Methods: This institutional review board (IRB)-approved, retrospective, cohort study examined all patients who received a pneumococcal vaccination from January to February 2016 after implementing a new process whereby pharmacy performed pneumococcal vaccination screening and selection (intervention group). These patients were compared to patients who received a pneumococcal vaccination from January to February 2015 (control group). Results: Of 274 patients who received a pneumococcal vaccine, 273 were included in the study. Compliance to CDC guidelines increased from 42% to 97%. Noncompliant duplications decreased from 16% to 2%. In the intervention group, labor cost for assessments and expenditure for vaccines increased. For Medicare patients, the increased reimbursement balanced the increased expenditure in the intervention group. Conclusions: Involving pharmacy in the pneumococcal vaccine screening and selection process improves compliance to CDC guidelines, but further clinical and financial analysis is needed to determine financial sustainability of the new process.

4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 41(8): 496-500, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25013978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most studies of anogenital wart (AGW) epidemiology have used large clinical or administrative databases and unconfirmed case definitions based on combinations of diagnosis and procedure codes. METHODS: We developed and validated an AGW case definition using a combination of diagnosis codes and other information available in the electronic medical record (provider type, laboratory testing). We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of this case definition compared with manual medical record review in a random sample of 250 cases. Using this case definition, we calculated the annual age- and sex-stratified prevalence of AGW among individuals 11 through 30 years of age from 2000 through 2005. RESULTS: We identified 2730 individuals who met the case definition. The PPV of the case definition was 82%, and the average annual prevalence was 4.16 per 1000. Prevalence of AGW was higher in females compared with males in every age group, with the exception of the 27- to 30-year-olds. Among females, prevalence peaked in the 19- to 22-year-olds, and among males, the peak was observed in 23- to 26-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: The case definition developed in this study is the first to be validated with medical record review and has a good PPV for the detection of AGW. The prevalence rates observed in this study were higher than other published rates, but the age- and sex-specific patterns observed were consistent with previous reports.


Subject(s)
Condylomata Acuminata/epidemiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Clinical Protocols , Condylomata Acuminata/prevention & control , Databases, Factual , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Oregon/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Sentinel Surveillance
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(6): 688-693, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504376

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of adjusting antibiotic use (AU) by prevalence of bacterial isolates as an alternative method for risk adjustment beyond hospital characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Hospitals in the southeastern United States. METHODS: AU in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days and microbiologic data from 2015 and 2016 were collected from 26 hospitals. The prevalences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were calculated and compared to the average prevalence of all hospitals in the network. This proportion was used to calculate the adjusted AU (a-AU) for various categories of antimicrobials. For example, a-AU of antipseudomonal ß-lactams (APBL) was the AU of APBL divided by (prevalence of P. aeruginosa at that hospital divided by the average prevalence of P. aeruginosa). Hospitals were categorized by bed size and ranked by AU and a-AU, and the rankings were compared. RESULTS: Most hospitals in 2015 and 2016, respectively, moved ≥2 positions in the ranking using a-AU of APBL (15 of 24, 63%; 22 of 26, 85%), carbapenems (14 of 23, 61%; 22 of 25; 88%), anti-MRSA agents (13 of 23, 57%; 18 of 26, 69%), and anti-VRE agents (18 of 24, 75%; 15 of 26, 58%). Use of a-AU resulted in a shift in quartile of hospital ranking for 50% of APBL agents, 57% of carbapenems, 35% of anti-MRSA agents, and 75% of anti-VRE agents in 2015 and 50% of APBL agents, 28% of carbapenems, 50% of anti-MRSA agents, and 58% of anti-VRE agents in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The a-AU considerably changes how hospitals compare among each other within a network. Adjusting AU by microbiological burden allows for a more balanced comparison among hospitals with variable baseline rates of resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
6.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 9(5)2020 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There is debate on whether the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) increases the risk of clinical failure in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by chromosomally-mediated AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (CAE). This study evaluates the impact of definitive 3GC therapy versus other antibiotics on clinical outcomes in BSIs due to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult hospitalized patients with BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species from 1 January 2006 to 1 September 2014. Definitive 3GC therapy was compared to definitive therapy with other non-3GC antibiotics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the impact of definitive 3GC on overall treatment failure (OTF) as a composite of in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, or 90-day reinfection. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients from 18 institutions in the southeastern United States were enrolled. Common sources of BSIs were the urinary tract and central venous catheters (78 (20.5%) patients each). Definitive 3GC therapy was utilized in 65 (17.1%) patients. OTF occurred in 22/65 patients (33.9%) in the definitive 3GC group vs. 94/316 (29.8%) in the non-3GC group (p = 0.51). Individual components of OTF were comparable between groups. Risk of OTF was comparable with definitive 3GC therapy vs. definitive non-3GC therapy (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.51-1.72) in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes suggest definitive 3GC therapy does not significantly alter the risk of poor clinical outcomes in the treatment of BSIs secondary to Enterobacter, Serratia, or Citrobacter species compared to other antimicrobial agents.

7.
Int J Med Inform ; 127: 27-34, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128829

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Local reactions are the most common vaccine-related adverse event. There is no specific diagnosis code for local reaction due to vaccination. Previous vaccine safety studies used non-specific diagnosis codes to identify potential local reaction cases and confirmed the cases through manual chart review. In this study, a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was developed to identify local reaction associated with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. METHODS: Presumptive cases of local reactions were identified among members ≥ 11 years of age using ICD-9-CM codes in all care settings in the 1-6 days following a Tdap vaccination between 2012 and 2014. The clinical notes were searched for signs and symptoms consistent with local reaction. Information on the timing and the location of a sign or symptom was also extracted to help determine whether or not the sign or symptom was vaccine related. Reactions triggered by causes other than Tdap vaccination were excluded. The NLP algorithm was developed at the lead study site and validated on a stratified random sample of 500 patients from five institutions. RESULTS: The NLP algorithm achieved an overall weighted sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 92.8%, positive predictive value of 82.7%, and negative predictive value of 95.1%. In addition, using data at one site, the NLP algorithm identified 3326 potential Tdap-related local reactions that were not identified through diagnosis codes. CONCLUSION: The NLP algorithm achieved high accuracy, and demonstrated the potential of NLP to reduce the efforts of manual chart review in vaccine safety studies.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Natural Language Processing , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Vaccination , Whooping Cough
8.
Vaccine ; 34(1): 167-71, 2016 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26549361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate concerns about a potential association between quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV4) and venous thromboembolism (VTE), we conducted a self-controlled case series study in adolescents and young adults 9-26 years of age in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. METHODS: We identified potential VTE cases diagnosed in 2008 through 2011 who had also received at least one HPV4 dose during that period. We confirmed each presumptive diagnosis by medical record review. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to estimate the risk in the 1-60 day period following HPV4 exposure and in subsets of that period. IRRs were stratified by age, gender, hormonal contraceptive use, and recent surgery or trauma. RESULTS: We identified 313 potential cases of VTE among HPV4 vaccinees, and 291 (93%) had sufficient medical records for review. Of these, we confirmed 156 (54%) cases. VTE was uncommon among males (n=3) and 9-12 year olds (n=4). Nearly all confirmed cases (97%) had at least one known risk factor for VTE, including hormonal contraceptive use, obesity, and hypercoagulability. Sixteen (10%) confirmed cases occurred in the 1-60 days following HPV4 exposure. The risk of VTE varied from 1.47 (95% CI: 0.47-4.64) in the 1-7 days following HPV4 exposure to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.54-1.57) in the 1-60 days following vaccination. It was not possible to calculate a stratified IRR for males due to small sample size; the other risk factors evaluated did not significantly affect the risk of VTE after HPV4 exposure. CONCLUSION: The risk of developing VTE among 9- to 26-year-olds was not elevated following HPV4 exposure. Sample size limited our ability to rigorously evaluate potential effect modifiers, such as gender, through stratified analysis.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/administration & dosage , Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
9.
Vaccine ; 28(49): 7713-5, 2010 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20875495

ABSTRACT

In 2008, potential temperature compromise of one lot of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) led to the revaccination of 13,210 Kaiser Permanente Northwest members within 28 days of receipt of their initial TIV dose. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine if these individuals experienced a higher rate of medically attended events (MAE) than those receiving only one TIV dose. We found no increase in MAE among those rapidly revaccinated (odds ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.80, 1.45), which may reassure individuals of the safety of revaccination with TIV should it be necessary, thereby leading to increased compliance with influenza vaccination recommendations.


Subject(s)
Immunization, Secondary , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Young Adult
10.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; : 306-10, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16779051

ABSTRACT

The Vaccine Safety Datalink is a collaboration between the CDC and eight large HMO's to investigate adverse events following immunization through analysis of medical care databases and patients' medical charts. We modified an existing system called MediClass that uses natural language processing (NLP) and knowledge-based methods to classify clinical encounters recorded in electronic medical records (EMRs). We developed the knowledge necessary for MediClass to detect possible vaccine reactions in the outpatient, ED, and telephone encounters recorded in the EMR of a large HMO. We first trained the system using a manually coded gold standard training set, and achieved high sensitivity and specificity. We then ran a large set of post-immunization encounter records through MediClass to see if our method would generalize. Compared to methods that use administrative and clinical codes assigned to the EMR by clinicians, the system significantly improves the positive predictive value for detecting possible vaccine reactions.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Natural Language Processing , Vaccines/adverse effects , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Databases, Factual , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Knowledge Bases , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/classification , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Systems Integration , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL