ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (before 37 completed weeks of gestation) is associated with an increased risk of adverse health and developmental outcomes relative to birth at term. Existing guidelines for data collection in cohort studies of individuals born preterm are either limited in scope, have not been developed using formal consensus methodology, or did not involve a range of stakeholders in their development. Recommendations meeting these criteria would facilitate data pooling and harmonisation across studies. OBJECTIVES: To develop a Core Dataset for use in longitudinal cohort studies of individuals born preterm. METHODS: This work was carried out as part of the RECAP Preterm project. A systematic review of variables included in existing core outcome sets was combined with a scoping exercise conducted with experts on preterm birth. The results were used to generate a draft core dataset. A modified Delphi process was implemented using two stages with three rounds each. Three stakeholder groups participated: RECAP Preterm project partners; external experts in the field; people with lived experience of preterm birth. The Delphi used a 9-point Likert scale. Higher values indicated greater importance for inclusion. Participants also suggested additional variables they considered important for inclusion which were voted on in later rounds. RESULTS: An initial list of 140 data items was generated. Ninety-six participants across 22 countries participated in the Delphi, of which 29% were individuals with lived experience of preterm birth. Consensus was reached on 160 data items covering Antenatal and Birth Information, Neonatal Care, Mortality, Administrative Information, Organisational Level Information, Socio-economic and Demographic information, Physical Health, Education and Learning, Neurodevelopmental Outcomes, Social, Lifestyle and Leisure, Healthcare Utilisation and Quality of Life. CONCLUSIONS: This core dataset includes 160 data items covering antenatal care through outcomes in adulthood. Its use will guide data collection in new studies and facilitate pooling and harmonisation of existing data internationally.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children born very preterm (<32 weeks of gestation) face high risks of neurodevelopmental and health difficulties compared with children born at term. Follow-up after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit is essential to ensure early detection and intervention, but data on policy approaches are sparse. METHODS: We investigated the characteristics of follow-up policy and programmes in 11 European countries from 2011 to 2022 using healthcare informant questionnaires and the published/grey literature. We further explored how one aspect of follow-up, its recommended duration, may be reflected in the percent of parents reporting that their children are receiving follow-up services at 5 years of age in these countries using data from an area-based cohort of very preterm births in 2011/12 (N = 3635). RESULTS: Between 2011/12 and 22, the number of countries with follow-up policies or programmes increased from 6 to 11. The policies and programmes were heterogeneous in eligibility criteria, duration and content. In countries that recommended longer follow-up, parent-reported follow-up rates at 5 years of age were higher, especially among the highest risk children, born <28 weeks' gestation or with birthweight <1000 g: between 42.1% and 70.1%, vs. <20% in most countries without recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Large variations exist in follow-up policies and programmes for children born very preterm in Europe; differences in recommended duration translate into cross-country disparities in reported follow-up at 5 years of age.
Subject(s)
Infant, Extremely Premature , Premature Birth , Infant, Newborn , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Follow-Up Studies , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Europe/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIM: We examined the outcomes of using inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) to treat very preterm born (VPT) infants across Europe. METHODS: This was a sub-study of the Screening to Improve Health in Very Preterm Infants in Europe research. It focused on all infants born between 22 + 0 and 31 + 6 weeks/days of gestation from 2011 to 2012, in 19 regions in 11 European countries. We studied 7268 infants admitted to neonatal care and 5 years later, we followed up the outcomes of 103 who had received iNO treatment. They were compared with 3502 propensity score-matched controls of the same age who did not receive treatment. RESULTS: All countries used iNO and 292/7268 (4.0%) infants received this treatment, ranging from 1.2% in the UK to 10.5% in France. There were also large regional variations within some countries. Infants treated with iNO faced higher in-hospital mortality than matched controls (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.33-3.09). The 5-year follow-up analysis of 103 survivors showed no increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment after iNO treatment. CONCLUSION: iNO was used for VPT patients in all 11 countries. In-hospital mortality was increased in infants treated with iNO, but long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes were not affected in 103 5-year-old survivors.
Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases , Respiratory Insufficiency , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Nitric Oxide , Hospital Mortality , Infant, Extremely Premature , Administration, Inhalation , Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Motor impairment is common after extremely preterm (EPT, <28 weeks' gestational age (GA)) birth, with cerebral palsy (CP) affecting about 10% of children and non-CP movement difficulties (MD) up to 50%. This study investigated the sociodemographic, perinatal and neonatal risk factors for CP and non-CP MD. METHODS: Data come from a European population-based cohort of children born EPT in 2011-2012 in 11 countries. We used multinomial logistic regression to assess risk factors for CP and non-CP MD (Movement Assessment Battery for Children - 2nd edition ≤5th percentile) compared to no MD (>15th percentile) among 5-year-old children. RESULTS: Compared to children without MD (n = 366), young maternal age, male sex and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were similarly associated with CP (n = 100) and non-CP MD (n = 224) with relative risk ratios (RRR) ranging from 2.3 to 3.6. CP was strongly related to severe brain lesions (RRR >10), other neonatal morbidities, congenital anomalies and low Apgar score (RRR: 2.4-3.3), while non-CP MD was associated with primiparity, maternal education, small for GA (RRR: 1.6-2.6) and severe brain lesions, but at a much lower order of magnitude. CONCLUSION: CP and non-CP MD have different risk factor profiles, with fewer clinical but more sociodemographic risk factors for non-CP MD. IMPACT: Young maternal age, male sex and bronchopulmonary dysplasia similarly increased risks of both cerebral palsy and non-cerebral palsy movement difficulties. Cerebral palsy was strongly related to clinical risk factors including severe brain lesions and other neonatal morbidities, while non-cerebral palsy movement difficulties were more associated with sociodemographic risk factors. These results on the similarities and differences in risk profiles of children with cerebral palsy and non-cerebral palsy movement difficulties raise questions for etiological research and provide a basis for improving the identification of children who may benefit from follow-up and early intervention.
Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia , Cerebral Palsy , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Infant, Extremely Premature , Cerebral Palsy/diagnosis , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Risk Factors , ParalysisABSTRACT
AIM: To measure the association between cerebral palsy (CP) and non-CP-related movement difficulties and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among 5-year-old children born extremely preterm (<28 weeks gestational age). METHOD: We included 5-year-old children from a multi-country, population-based cohort of children born extremely preterm in 2011 to 2012 in 11 European countries (n = 1021). Children without CP were classified using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition as having significant movement difficulties (≤5th centile of standardized norms) or being at risk of movement difficulties (6th-15th centile). Parents reported on a clinical CP diagnosis and HRQoL using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Associations were assessed using linear and quantile regressions. RESULTS: Compared to children without movement difficulties, children at risk of movement difficulties, with significant movement difficulties, and CP had lower adjusted HRQoL total scores (ß [95% confidence interval] = -5.0 [-7.7 to -2.3], -9.1 [-12.0 to -6.1], and - 26.1 [-31.0 to -21.2]). Quantile regression analyses showed similar decreases in HRQoL for all children with CP, whereas for children with non-CP-related movement difficulties, reductions in HRQoL were more pronounced at lower centiles. INTERPRETATION: CP and non-CP-related movement difficulties were associated with lower HRQoL, even for children with less severe difficulties. Heterogeneous associations for non-CP-related movement difficulties raise questions for research about mitigating and protective factors.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Quality of Life , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Infant, Extremely Premature , Gestational Age , Cerebral Palsy/diagnosisABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the predictive validity of parent-reported gross motor impairment (GMI) at age 2 years to detect significant movement difficulties at age 5 years in children born extremely preterm. METHOD: Data were from 556 children (270 males, 286 females) born at less than 28 weeks' gestation in 2011 to 2012 in 10 European countries. Parent report of moderate/severe GMI was defined as walking unsteadily or unable to walk unassisted at 2 years corrected age. Examiners assessed significant movement difficulties (score ≤ 5th centile on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition) and diagnoses of cerebral palsy (CP) were collected by parent report at 5 years chronological age. RESULTS: At 2 years, 66 (11.9%) children had moderate/severe GMI. At 5 years, 212 (38.1%) had significant movement difficulties. Parent reports of GMI at age 2 years accurately classified CP at age 5 years in 91.0% to 93.2% of children. Classification of moderate/severe GMI at age 2 years had high specificity (96.2%; 95% confidence interval 93.6-98.0) and positive predictive value (80.3%; 68.7-89.1) for significant movement difficulties at age 5 years. However, 74.5% of children with significant movement difficulties at 5 years were not identified with moderate/severe GMI at age 2 years, resulting in low sensitivity (25.1%; 19.4-31.5). INTERPRETATION: This questionnaire may be used to identify children born extremely preterm who at age 2 years have a diagnosis of CP or movement difficulties that are likely to have a significant impact on their functional outcomes at age 5 years.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Movement Disorders , Male , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant, Extremely Premature , Cerebral Palsy/diagnosis , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Movement Disorders/diagnosis , Movement Disorders/epidemiology , Movement Disorders/etiology , Movement , Gestational AgeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe parent-reported healthcare service use at age 5 years in children born very preterm and investigate whether perinatal and social factors and the use of very preterm follow-up services are associated with high service use. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from an area-based cohort of births at <32 weeks of gestation from 11 European countries, collected from birth records and parental questionnaires at 5 years of age. Using the published literature, we defined high use of outpatient/inpatient care (≥4 sick visits to general practitioners, pediatricians, or nurses, ≥3 emergency room visits, or ≥1 overnight hospitalization) and specialist care (≥2 different specialists or ≥3 visits). We also categorized countries as having either a high or a low rate of children using very preterm follow-up services at age 5 years. RESULTS: Overall, 43% of children had high outpatient/inpatient care use and 48% had high specialist care use during the previous year. Perinatal factors were associated with high outpatient/inpatient and specialist care use, with a more significant association with specialist services. Associations with intermediate parental educational level and unemployment were stronger for outpatient/inpatient services. Living in a country with higher rates of very preterm follow-up service use was associated with lower use of outpatient/inpatient services. CONCLUSIONS: Children born very preterm had high healthcare service use at age 5 years, with different patterns for outpatient/inpatient and specialist care by perinatal and social factors. Longer follow-up of children born very preterm may improve care coordination and help avoid undesirable health service use.
Subject(s)
Infant, Extremely Premature , Parents , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a motor disorder of unknown aetiology that may have long-term consequences on daily activities, and psychological and physical health. Studies investigating risk factors for DCD have so far provided inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES: To assess, using a parent-report screening tool, risk of DCD in school-age very preterm children born in Italy, and investigate the associated early biomedical and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: A prospective area-based cohort (804 children, response rate 73.4%) was assessed at 8-11 years of age in three Italian regions. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records. DCD risk was measured using the Italian-validated version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-IT). For this study, children with cognitive deficit (i.e. intelligence quotient <70), cerebral palsy, severe vision and hearing disabilities, and other impairments affecting movement were excluded. A total of 629 children were analysed. We used inverse probability weighting to account for loss to follow-up, and multilevel, multivariable modified Poisson models to obtain adjusted risk ratio (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Missing values in the covariates were imputed. RESULTS: 195 children (weighted proportion 31.8%, 95% CI 28.2, 35.6) scored positive on the DCDQ-IT, corresponding to the 15th centile of the reference Movement-ABC test. Factors associated with overall DCD risk were male sex (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05, 1.73), intrauterine growth restriction (aRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14, 1.85), retinopathy of prematurity (aRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07, 2.45), and older maternal age at delivery (aRR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09, 1.77). Complete maternal milk feeding at discharge from the neonatal unit and higher parental socio-economic status were associated with decreased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Both biomedical and sociodemographic factors increase DCD risk. These findings can contribute to elucidating the origins of this disorder, and assist in the identification of children at risk for early referral and intervention.
Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases , Motor Skills Disorders , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Male , Motor Skills Disorders/complications , Motor Skills Disorders/etiology , Pregnancy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIM: To (1) determine the proportion of 5-year-old children born extremely preterm (EPT) with movement difficulties including cerebral palsy (CP) and the proportion of these children receiving motor-related health care (MRHC), and (2) describe factors associated with receiving MRHC. METHOD: Children born before 28 weeks' gestation in 2011 to 2012 in 11 European countries were assessed with the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (MABC-2) at 5 years of age. Information on family characteristics, child health including CP diagnosis, and health care use were collected using parent-report questionnaires. MRHC was defined as visits in the previous year with health care providers (physical and occupational therapists) specialized in assessing/treating motor problems. We analysed receipt of MRHC and associated factors among children at risk of movement difficulties (MABC-2 score 6th-15th centiles), with significant movement difficulties (SMD; ≤5th centile) or with CP. RESULTS: Of 807 children assessed at 5 years 7 months (SD 4 months; 4 years 7 months-7 years 1 month), 412 were males (51.1%), 170 (21.1%) were at risk of movement difficulties, 201 (24.9%) had SMD, and 92 (11.4%) had CP. Those who received MRHC comprised 89.1% of children with CP, 42.8% with SMD, and 25.9% at risk of movement difficulties. MRHC for children with SMD varied from 23.3% to 66.7% between countries. Children were more likely to receive MRHC if they had other developmental problems or socioemotional, conduct, or attention difficulties. INTERPRETATION: Efforts are needed to increase MRHC for 5-year-old children born EPT with movement difficulties. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Children born extremely preterm without cerebral palsy frequently experienced motor difficulties. Most of these children were not receiving motor-related health care (MRHC). Large geographical differences throughout Europe were observed in receipt of MRHC. Socioemotional problems were related to MRHC use.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Developmental Disabilities , Cerebral Palsy/epidemiology , Cerebral Palsy/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Male , MovementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: End-of-life decision-making for terminally ill neonates raises important legal and ethical issues. In Greece, no recent data on nurses' attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions are available. RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM: To investigate neonatal nurses' attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions and the relation to their socio-demographic and work-related background data. RESEARCH DESIGN: A survey was carried out in 28 neonatal intensive care units between September 2018 and January 2019. A structured questionnaire was distributed by post. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: The questionnaire was answered anonymously by 312 nurses (response rate, 71.1%) and returned to the investigators. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the Bioethics and Research Committee of Aretaieio Hospital in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. FINDINGS: Nurses more often reported involvement in various end-of-life decisions, such as continuation of treatment without adding further therapeutic interventions for terminally ill neonates, while less reported were mechanical ventilation withdrawal and drug administration to end life. Nurses with a high attitude score, reflecting a more quality-of-life approach, were more likely to be involved in setting limits to intensive care. α low score was consistent with life preservation. Nurses' religiousness (p = 0.097), parenthood (p = 0.093), involvement in daily practice (p = 0.03), and position on the existing legal framework (p < 0.002) influenced their attitude score. DISCUSSION: The likelihood of nurses to support interventions in neonates with poor prognosis in neonatal intensive care units was related to their attitudes. After adjusting for potential confounders, the most important predictors for nurses' attitudes were parenthood, involvement in daily practice, and position supporting current legislation reform. CONCLUSION: Variability in involvement in end-of-life decisions among nurses exists on a national level.
Subject(s)
Nurses, Neonatal , Terminal Care , Attitude of Health Personnel , Death , Decision Making , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Follow-up of very preterm infants is essential for reducing risks of health and developmental problems and relies on parental engagement. We investigated parents' perceptions of post-discharge healthcare for their children born very preterm in a European multi-country cohort study. METHODS: Data come from a 5-year follow-up of an area-based cohort of births <32 weeks' gestation in 19 regions from 11 European countries. Perinatal data were collected from medical records and 5-year data from parent-report questionnaires. Parents rated post-discharge care related to their children's preterm birth (poor/fair/good/excellent) and provided free-text suggestions for improvements. We analyzed sociodemographic and medical factors associated with poor/fair ratings, using inverse probability weights to adjust for attrition bias, and assessed free-text responses using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned for 3635 children (53.8% response rate). Care was rated as poor/fair for 14.2% [from 6.1% (France) to 31.6% (Denmark)]; rates were higher when children had health or developmental problems (e.g. cerebral palsy (34.4%) or epilepsy (36.9%)). From 971 responses, 4 themes and 25 subthemes concerning care improvement were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Parents' experiences provide guidance for improving very preterm children's post-discharge care; this is a priority for children with health and developmental problems as parental dissatisfaction was high. IMPACT: In a European population-based very preterm birth cohort, parents rated post-discharge healthcare as poor or fair for 14.2% of children, with a wide variation (6.1-31.6%) between countries. Dissatisfaction was reported in over one-third of cases when children had health or developmental difficulties, such as epilepsy or cerebral palsy. Parents' free-text suggestions for improving preterm-related post-discharge healthcare were similar across countries; these focused primarily on better communication with parents and better coordination of care. Parents' lived experiences are a valuable resource for understanding where care improvements are needed and should be included in future research.
Subject(s)
Parents , Cerebral Palsy/therapy , Child, Preschool , Epilepsy/therapy , Europe , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Neonatology/organization & administration , Patient Discharge , Patient Satisfaction , Risk , Sociodemographic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants' and researcher's perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings. METHODS: This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages. RESULTS: Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Parents , Child , Cohort Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Portugal , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Innovation is important to improve patient care, but few studies have explored the factors that initiate change in healthcare organizations. METHODS: As part of the European project EPICE on evidence-based perinatal care, we carried out semi-structured interviews (N = 44) with medical and nursing staff from 11 randomly selected neonatal intensive care units in 6 countries. The interviews focused on the most recent clinical or organizational change in the unit relevant to the care of very preterm infants. Thematic analysis was performed using verbatim transcripts of recorded interviews. RESULTS: Reported changes concerned ventilation, feeding and nutrition, neonatal sepsis, infant care, pain management and care of parents. Six categories of drivers to change were identified: availability of new knowledge or technology; guidelines or regulations from outside the unit; need to standardize practices; participation in research; occurrence of adverse events; and wish to improve care. Innovations originating within the unit, linked to the availability of new technology and seen to provide clear benefit for patients were more likely to achieve consensus and rapid implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation can be initiated by several drivers that can impact on the success and sustainability of change.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intensive Care, Neonatal/organization & administration , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Denmark , Diffusion of Innovation , Female , France , Germany , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Neonatal Nursing , Nurses , Physicians , Portugal , Qualitative Research , Treatment Outcome , United KingdomABSTRACT
AIM: To estimate healthcare use and related costs for 2-year-old very preterm (VP) children after discharge from the neonatal unit. METHODS: As part of a European project, we recruited an area-based cohort including all VP infants born in three Italian regions (Lazio, Emilia-Romagna and Marche) in 2011-2012. At 2 years corrected age, parents completed a questionnaire on their child health and healthcare use (N = 732, response rate 75.6%). Cost values were assigned based on national reimbursement tariffs. We used multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with any rehospitalisation and overall healthcare costs. RESULTS: The most frequently consulted physicians were the paediatrician (85% of children), the ophthalmologist (36%) and the neurologist/neuropsychiatrist (26%); 38% of children were hospitalised at least once after the initial discharge, for a total of 513 admissions and over one million euros cost, corresponding to 75% of total healthcare costs. Low maternal education and parental occupation index, congenital anomalies and postnatal prematurity-related morbidities significantly increased the risk of rehospitalisation and total healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: Rehospitalisation and outpatient care are frequent in VP children, confirming a substantial health and economic burden. These findings should inform the allocation of resources to preventive and rehabilitation services for these children.
Subject(s)
Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy , Italy/epidemiology , MorbidityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in attitudes of neonatologists regarding the care of extremely preterm infants and parental involvement over the last 20 years. STUDY DESIGN: Internet-based survey (2016) involving 170 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany using the European Project on Parents' Information and Ethical Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Units questionnaire (German edition) with minor modifications to the original survey from 1996 to 1997. RESULTS: The 2016 survey included 104 respondents (52.5% response rate). In 2016, significantly more neonatologists reported having ever withheld intensive care treatment (99% vs 69%) and withdrawn mechanical ventilation (96% vs 61%) or life-saving drugs (99% vs 79%), compared with neonatologists surveyed in 1996-1997. Fewer considered limiting intensive care as a slippery slope possibly leading to abuse (18% vs 48%). In the situation of a deteriorating clinical condition despite all treatment, significantly more neonatologists would ask parental opinion about continuation of intensive care (49% vs 18%). In 2016, 21% of German neonatologists would resuscitate a hypothetical infant at the limits of viability, even against parental wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Withholding or withdrawing intensive care for extremely preterm infants at the limits of viability with parental involvement has become more acceptable than it was 20 years ago. However, resuscitating extremely preterm infants against parental wishes remains an option for up to one-fifth of the responding neonatologists in this survey.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Decision Making , Infant, Extremely Premature , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Neonatologists/psychology , Self Report , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Austria , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Germany , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Parents/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland , Withholding TreatmentABSTRACT
AIM: Children born very preterm require additional specialist care because of the health and developmental risks associated with preterm birth, but information on their health service use is sparse. We sought to describe the use of specialist services by children born very preterm in Europe. METHOD: We analysed data from the multi-regional, population-based Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort of births before 32 weeks' gestation in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records and parents completed a questionnaire at 2 years corrected age (4322 children; 2026 females, 2296 males; median gestational age 29wks, interquartile range [IQR] 27-31wks; median birthweight 1230g, IQR 970-1511g). We compared parent-reported use of specialist services by country, perinatal risk (based on gestational age, small for gestational age, and neonatal morbidities), maternal education, and birthplace. RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of the children had consulted at least one specialist, ranging across countries from 53.7% to 100%. Ophthalmologists (53.4%) and physiotherapists (48.0%) were most frequently consulted, but individual specialists varied greatly by country. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist use, but the gradient differed across countries. Children with more educated mothers had higher proportions of specialist use in three countries. INTERPRETATION: Large variations in the use of specialist services across Europe were not explained by perinatal risk and raise questions about the strengths and limits of existing models of care. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Use of specialist services by children born very preterm varied across Europe. This variation was observed for types and number of specialists consulted. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist care, but did not explain country-level differences. In some countries, mothers' educational level affected use of specialist services.
UTILIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS DE SALUD ESPECIALIZADOS EN UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE EUROPEO DE NIÑOS NACIDOS MUY PREMATUROS: OBJETIVO: Niños nacidos muy prematuramente requieren cuidados especializados adicionales debido a su salud y a los riesgos asociados con la prematuros, sin embargo la información sobre el uso de servicios de salud es escasa. Buscamos describir la utilización de servicios especializados por niños nacidos muy prematuramente, en Europa. MÉTODO: Analizamos datos de una cohorte de nacimientos ocurridos antes de las 32 semanas de gestación tomados del Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE), basado en la población y multirregional, en 11 países europeos. Los datos perinatales fueron extraídos de las historias clínicas y los padres completaron un cuestionario a los 2 años de edad corregida (4.322 niños; 2026 sexo femenino, 2.296 masculino; edad gestacional mediana 29 semanas, rango intercuartílico (IQR) 27-31 semanas; mediana de peso de nacimiento 1.230 gr, IQR 970-1.511 gr). Comparamos el uso de servicios especializados (según informe de los padres) por país, riesgo perinatal (basado en edad gestacional, bajo peso para edad gestacional y morbilidades neonatales), educación materna y lugar de nacimiento. RESULTADOS: En total 65% de los niños habían consultado por lo menos a un especialista, con un rango entre países de 53,7% a 100%. Los especialistas más frecuentemente consultados fueron Oftalmólogos (53,4%) y Fisioterapeutas (48%) pero los especialistas consultados por cada individuo variaron mucho según el país. El riesgo perinatal se asoció al uso de especialista, pero el gradiente varió entre los países. Niños de madres con mayor nivel educativo tuvieron mayor proporción de uso de especialistas en tres países. INTERPRETACIÓN: Las grandes variaciones en el uso de servicios especializados en Europa no fueron explicadas por el riesgo perinatal y arrojan cuestionamientos sobre las fortalezas y limitaciones de los modelos de cuidados existentes.
USO DE SERVIÇOS DE SAÚDE ESPECIALIZADOS EM UMA COORTE EUROPÉIA DE LACTENTES NASCIDOS MUITO PREMATUROS: OBJETIVO: Crianças nascidas muito prematuras requerem cuidado especializado adicional por causa dos riscos à saúde e ao desenvolvimento associados ao nascimento premature, mas informações sobreo uso de serviços de saúde são escassas. Procuramos descrever o uso de serviços especializados por crianças nascidas muito prematuras na Europa. MÉTODO: Analisamos dados de uma coorte populacional multi-regional, do Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal Efetivo na Europa (EPICE), com lactentes nascidos antes de 32 semanas de gestação em 11 países europeus. Dados perinatais foram extraídos dos registros médicos, e os pais completaram um questionário com 2 anos de idade corrigida (4.322 crianças; 2.026 do sexo feminino, 2.296 do sexo masculino; idade gestacional mediana 29semanas, intervalo interquartile [IIQ] 27-31sem; peso ao nascimento mediano 1,230g, IIQ 970-1511g). Comparamos o uso de serviços especializados reportados pelos pais por país, risco perinatal (com base na idade gestacional, pequeno para a idade gestacional e morbidades neonatais), educação materna e local de nascimento. RESULTADOS: Setenta e seis por cento das crianças consultou pelo menos um especialista, variando entre países de 53,7 a 100%. Oftalmologistas (53,4%) e fisioterapeutas (48,0%) foram os mais frequentemente consultados, mas os especialistas individuais variaram bastante por país. O risco perinatal se associou com uso de serviços especializados, mas o gradient diferiu entre países. Crianças com mães mais educadas tinham maior proporção de uso de especialistas em três países. INTERPRETAÇÃO: Grandes variações no uso de serviços especializados na Europa não foram explicadas pelo risco perinatal, e levantam questões sobre as forças e limitações dos modelos de cuidado existentes.
Subject(s)
Infant, Extremely Premature , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Specialization , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Geography, Medical , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Male , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Breastfeeding confers multiple benefits for the health and development of very preterm infants, but there is scarce information on the duration of breastfeeding after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We used data from the Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe population-based cohort of births below 32 weeks of gestation in 11 European countries in 2011-2012 to investigate breastfeeding continuation until 6 months. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected from obstetric and neonatal medical records as well as parental questionnaires at 2 years of corrected age. Among 3,217 ever-breastfed infants, 34% were breastfeeding at 6 months of age (range across countries from 25% to 56%); younger and less educated mothers were more likely to stop before 6 months (adjusted relative risk [aRR] <25 years: 0.68, 95% CI [0.53, 0.88], vs. 25-34 years; lower secondary: 0.58, 95% CI [0.45, 0.76] vs. postgraduate education). Multiple birth, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and several neonatal transfers reduced the probability of continuation but not low gestational age, fetal growth restriction, congenital anomalies, or severe neonatal morbidities. Among infants breastfeeding at discharge, mixed versus exclusive breast milk feeding at discharge was associated with stopping before 6 months: aRR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.48, 0.74]. Low breastfeeding continuation rates in this high-risk population call for more support to breastfeeding mothers during and after the neonatal hospitalization, especially for families with low socio-economic status, multiples, and infants with BPD. Promotion of exclusive breastfeeding in the NICU may constitute a lever for improving breastfeeding continuation after discharge.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Premature/physiology , Adult , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia , Cohort Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Birth Offspring , Socioeconomic Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Breast milk feeding (BMF) is associated with lower neonatal morbidity in the very preterm infant (<32 weeks gestation) and breastfeeding is beneficial for maternal health. Previous studies show large variations in BMF after very preterm birth and recognize the need for targeted breastfeeding support in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU). In a European collaboration project about evidence-based practices after very preterm birth, we examined the association between maternal, obstetric, and infant clinical factors; neonatal and maternal care unit policies; and BMF at discharge from the NICU. In multivariable analyses, covariates associated with feeding at discharge were first investigated as predictors of any BMF and in further analysis as predictors of exclusive or partial BMF. Overall, 58% (3,826/6,592) of the infants received any BMF at discharge, but there were large variations between regions (range 36-80%). Primiparity, administration of antenatal corticosteroids, first enteral feed <24 hr after birth, and mother's own milk at first enteral feed were predictors positively associated with any BMF at discharge. Vaginal delivery, singleton birth, and receiving mother's own milk at first enteral feed were associated with exclusive BMF at discharge. Units with a Baby Friendly Hospital accreditation improved any BMF at discharge; units with protocols for BMF and units using donor milk had higher rates of exclusive BMF at discharge. This study suggests that there is a high potential for improving BMF through policies and support in the NICU.
Subject(s)
Bottle Feeding , Breast Feeding , Milk Banks , Milk, Human , Patient Compliance , Premature Birth/diet therapy , Social Support , Adult , Bottle Feeding/ethnology , Breast Feeding/ethnology , Cohort Studies , Europe , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Needs Assessment , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Patient Education as Topic , Premature Birth/ethnology , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between maternal education and breastfeeding in very preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, population-based cohort study analyzed the data of all very preterm infants admitted to neonatal care during 1 year in 3 regions in Italy (Lazio, Emilia-Romagna, and Marche). The use of mothers' own milk was recorded at initial enteral feedings and at hospital discharge. We used multilevel logistic analysis to model the association between maternal education and breastfeeding outcomes, adjusting for maternal age and country of birth. Region was included as random effect. RESULTS: There were 1047 very preterm infants who received enteral feeding, and 975 were discharged alive. At discharge, the use of mother's own milk, exclusively or not, and feeding directly at the breast were significantly more likely for mothers with an upper secondary education or higher. We found no relationship between maternal education and type of milk at initial enteral feedings. However, the exclusive early use of the mother's own milk at initial feedings was related significantly with receiving any maternal milk and feeding directly at the breast at discharge from hospital, and the association with feeding at the breast was stronger for the least educated mothers. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort of very preterm infants, we found a significant and positive association between maternal education and the likelihood of receiving their mother's own milk at the time of discharge. In light of the proven benefits of maternal milk, strategies to support breastfeeding should be targeted to mothers with less education.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Enteral Nutrition/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Italy , Male , Mothers , Patient Discharge , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In this study we sought to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of selective muscle involvement and disease progression in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 3b (SMA3b). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with genetically confirmed SMA3b underwent MRI on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner. RESULTS: MRI showed significantly more severe involvement of the iliopsoas than of the gluteus maximus muscles, and more severe involvement of the triceps brachii than of the biceps brachii muscles. The quadriceps femoris muscles were severely involved. The deltoid, adductor longus, portions of the hamstrings, gracilis, sartorius, and rectus abdominis muscles were well preserved. We found a significant positive correlation between MRI changes and disease duration for gluteus maximus and triceps brachii. Follow-up MRIs of 4 patients showed disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the pattern of selective muscle involvement suggested by previous studies and further refines muscle MRI changes in SMA3b. Progressive muscle involvement is implicated. Muscle Nerve 55: 651-656, 2017.