Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Characterizes Silent Cardiovascular Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Pediatric Cancer Survivors.

Late-onset cardiovascular complications are serious concerns for pediatric cancer survivors (PCS) including those who are asymptomatic. We investigated whether cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) can delineate the underlying pathophysiology of preclinical cardiovascular abnormalities in PCS. We examined CPET data via cycle ergometer in asymptomatic PCS with normal echocardiogram and age-matched controls. Peak and submaximal parameters were analyzed. Fifty-three PCS and 60 controls were studied. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2), peak work rate (WR), and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) were significantly lower in PCS than controls (1.86 ± 0.53 vs. 2.23 ± 0.61 L/min, 125 ± 45 vs. 154 ± 46 W, and 1.20 ± 0.35 vs. 1.42 ± 0.43 L/min, respectively; all p < 0.01), whereas peak heart rate (HR) and ventilatory efficiency (a slope of minute ventilation over CO2 production or ∆VE/∆VCO2) were comparable. Peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was significantly higher in PCS (p = 0.0006). Stroke volume (SV) reserve was decreased in PCS, indicated by simultaneous higher dependency on HR (higher ∆HR/∆WR) and lower peak oxygen pulse (OP). Twelve PCS with high peak RER (≥ 1.3) revealed lower pVO2 and VAT than the rest of PCS despite higher ventilatory efficiency (lower ∆VE/∆VCO2), suggesting fundamental deficiency in oxygen utilization in some PCS. Poor exercise performance in PCS may be mainly attributed to limited stroke volume reserve, but the underlying pathophysiology is multifactorial. Combined assessment of peak and submaximal CPET parameters provided critical information in delineating underlying exercise physiology of PCS.

A Combined Analysis of Peak and Submaximal Exercise Parameters in Delineating Underlying Mechanisms of Sex Differences in Healthy Adolescents.

Peak exercise parameters are considered the gold standard to quantify cardiac reserve in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). We studied whether submaximal parameters would add additional values in analyzing sex differences in CPET. We reviewed CPET of age-matched healthy male and female adolescents by cycle ergometer. Besides peak parameters, submaximal CPET parameters, including ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), and submaximal slopes of Δoxygen consumption (ΔVO2)/Δwork rate (ΔWR), Δheart rate (ΔHR)/ΔWR, ΔVO2/ΔHR, and Δminute ventilation (ΔVE)/ΔCO2 production (ΔVCO2), were obtained. We studied 35 male and 40 female healthy adolescents. Peak VO2 (pVO2), peak oxygen pulse (pOP), and VAT were significantly lower in females than males (1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 L/min; 10 ± 2.0 vs. 13.2 ± 3.5 ml/beat; 1.23 ± 0.3 vs. 1.52 ± 0.5 L/min, respectively, all p < 0.005). Females showed significantly lower pVO2, VAT, and OUES with the same body weight than males, implying higher skeletal muscle mass in males. When simultaneously examining ΔHR/ΔWR and pOP, females showed higher dependency on increases in HR than in stroke volume. Females demonstrated significantly lower pOP with the same levels of ΔVO2/ΔHR, suggesting more limited exercise persistence than males under an anaerobic condition at peak exercise. Oxygen uptake efficiency in relation to peak VE was significantly higher in males. There was no sex difference in either ΔVO2/ΔWR or ΔVE/ΔVCO2. Combinational assessment of peak and submaximal CPET parameters delineates the multiple mechanisms that contribute to the sex differences in exercise performance.

Surveillance cardiopulmonary exercise testing can risk-stratify childhood cancer survivors: underlying pathophysiology of poor exercise performance and possible room for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors (CCS) frequently show decreased exercise performance. Poor exercise performance may indicate impaired future cardiovascular health. METHODS: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed in asymptomatic off-treatment CCS (age ≥ 10 years). Patients were divided into Normal and Poor performance groups by %predicted maximum VO2 at 80%. Both peak and submaximal CPET values were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight males (19 Normal, 19 Poor) and 40 females (18 Normal, 22 Poor) were studied. Total anthracycline dosage was comparable among 4 groups. The body mass index (BMI), although normal, and weight were significantly higher in Poor groups. Peak heart rate (HR) and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were comparable in all four groups. Peak work rate (pWR)/kg, peak oxygen consumption (pVO2)/kg, peak oxygen pulse (pOP)/kg, and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT)/kg were significantly lower, whereas heart rate (HR) increase by WR/kg (ΔHR/Δ[WR/kg] was significantly higher in Poor groups. Simultaneously plotting of weight & pVO2 and ΔHR/ΔWR & ΔVO2/ΔHR revealed a distinct difference between the Normal and Poor groups in both sexes, suggesting decreased skeletal muscle mass and decreased stroke volume reserve, respectively, in Poor CCS. The relationship between VAT and pVO2 was almost identical between the two groups in both sexes. Ventilatory efficiency was mildly diminished in the Poor groups. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased skeletal muscle mass, decreased stroke volume reserve, and slightly decreased ventilatory efficiency characterize Poor CCS in both sexes. This unique combined CPET analysis provides useful clinical biomarkers to screen subclinical cardiovascular abnormality in CCS and identifies an area for improvement.