The ROARI project - Road Accident Acute Rehabilitation Initiative: a randomised clinical trial of two targeted early interventions for road-related trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of an Early Rehabilitation Intervention (ERI ) versus a Brief Education Intervention (BEI) following road trauma. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: return to work or usual activities at 12 weeks (for minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks for major injury. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Reduction in pain, anxiety, depression, disability and incidence of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and improved quality of life. DESIGN: A multi-site single-blinded stratified randomized clinical trial (RCT). METHODS: 184 patients (92 in each arm) were recruited over 18 months and followed for 12 weeks (minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks (major injury). Screening questionnaires at 2-4 weeks and follow-up interviews by phone for all outcome measures were undertaken. For those in the ERI group with a positive screen for high risk of persistent symptoms, an early assessment and intervention by a Rehabilitation Physician was offered. Those in the BEI group were sent written information and advised to see their GP. RESULTS: 89.4% of injuries were mild in this cohort. At 12 weeks 73.8% and 69.1% of patients in the ERI and the BEI groups respectively had returned to work or usual activities. There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups with respect to the primary or any secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This is the first RCT of an ERI following road trauma in Australia. A targeted ERI is as effective as a BEI in assisting those with mild/moderate trauma to return to work or usual activities.

Evaluation of resuscitation with angiography, percutaneous techniques and operative repair (RAPTOR): hybrid suite introduction and initial use at a level I urban trauma centre.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the utilization of the RAPTOR suite (hybrid theatre) for trauma patients. Ideally, this is used to achieve haemorrhage control in time-critical patients that may require damage control surgery (DCS) and/or interventional radiological (IR) procedures concurrently. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study identifying all trauma patients that were treated at the level I trauma centre during 2011-2016 was performed. Patients that underwent treatment in the RAPTOR suite were described. Subgroup analyses were performed for trauma patients that underwent interventions within 60 min and patients who underwent a combination of DCS + angioembolization in the RAPTOR suite or in other locations (OR, radiology). RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2011, 1% of all procedures performed in the RAPTOR suite were trauma related. From 2011 until 2016, 43 trauma patients underwent treatment in the RAPTOR suite. The majority of patients (81%) suffered blunt injury. Most patients were male (70%), with a mean age of 43 years. The mean ISS was 38. In 56% (n = 24) the MTP was activated and in 40% (n = 17) a CT scan was performed prior to treatment. Damage control surgery alone, angioembolization alone and a combination of DCS and angioembolization were performed in 37% (n = 16), 23% (n = 10) and 40% (n = 17) of patients, respectively. Median time to the hybrid suite, procedure time and total time were 56 min (15-704), 160 min (42-404), and 251 min (93-788), respectively. CONCLUSION: In the first 5 years following introduction of a hybrid theatre in an urban level I trauma centre, only 1% of patients using the resource has injury-related pathology. Earlier identification of patients requiring this facility may improve timely access and management for this select group of patients needing urgent control of bleeding.

Introduction of the Abbreviated Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia Scale and Impact on Length of Stay.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mild traumatic brain injury is a common presentation to Emergency Departments. Early identification of patients with cognitive deficits and provision of discharge advice are important. The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale provides an early and efficient assessment of post-traumatic amnesia for patients with mild traumatic brain injuries, compared with the previously used assessment, the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 270 patients with mild traumatic brain injury assessed for post-traumatic amnesia over a 2-year period between February 2011 and February 2013. It identified those assessed with Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale versus Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale, the outcomes of these post-traumatic amnesia assessments, the hospital length of stay for patients, and their readmission rates. RESULTS: The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale was used in 91% of patient cases (and the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale in 7%), and of those assessed with the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale, 94% cleared post-traumatic amnesia testing within 4 h. Of those assessed with the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale, 56% had a shorter length of stay than had they been assessed with the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale, resulting in 295 bed-days saved. Verbal and written discharge advice was provided to those assessed for post-traumatic amnesia to assist their recovery. In all, 1% of patients were readmitted for monitoring of mild post-concussion symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale provides an effective and timely assessment of post-traumatic amnesia for patients presenting to the Emergency Department with mild traumatic brain injury compared with the previously used assessment tool. It helps identify patients with cognitive impairment and the need for admission and further investigation, resulting in appropriate access to care. It also results in a decreased length of stay and decreased hospital admissions, with subsequent cost savings to the hospital.

Initial management of the poly-trauma patient: a practical approach in an Australian major trauma service.

The initial management of the poly-trauma patient is of vital importance to minimizing both patient morbidity and mortality. We present a practical approach to the early management of a severely injured patient as practiced at Liverpool Hospital in Sydney, Australia. Specific attention is paid to innovations in care and specific controversies in early management as well as local solutions to challenging problems.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Prospective study to evaluate the influence of FAST on trauma patient management.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have concentrated on the accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), but evaluation of whether FAST changes subsequent management has not been fully assessed. METHODS: This prospective study compared 419 trauma admissions in two groups, FAST and no-FAST, for demographics, time of resuscitation, and action after resuscitation. The 194 patients undergoing FAST had their management plan specified before, and confirmed after, FAST was performed to assess for change in management. To ensure scan consistency and to minimize bias, criteria were established to define an adequate FAST. RESULTS: FAST was performed in 194 patients (46%), assessing for free fluid. Management was changed in 59 cases (32.8%) after FAST. Laparotomy was prevented in 1 patient, computed tomography was prevented in 23 patients, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage was prevented in 15 patients. Computed tomography rates were reduced from 47% to 34% and diagnostic peritoneal lavage rates were reduced from 9% to 1%. CONCLUSIONS: FAST plays a key role in trauma, changing subsequent management in an appreciable number of patients.

Damage control surgery and the abdomen.

There is a complex interplay between primary injury, particularly major abdominal injury in the multi-system trauma patient, and secondary injury, which relate to patient physiology, decision making and surgical technique. Analysis of outcomes is further confounded by the variety of surgical techniques used. The challenge is to match the correct operation, for a critically injured patient, with the patient's physiology. Excellence in general surgery does not equate with excellence in trauma surgery, and a clear understanding of damage control is essential.

Major intrahepatic bile duct injuries detected after laparotomy: selective nonoperative management.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma causing major intrahepatic bile duct injury is a relatively uncommon occurrence. Most authorities recommend operative, usually resectional, management of these injuries when recognized, citing increased risks of complications and mortality with nonoperative management. However, very few data have been published to document the optimal management of these challenging injuries. METHODS: We present a series of five patients with significant hepatic injury and documented major bile duct injury managed at a single provincial trauma center. All of these patients had first- or second-order bile duct injuries diagnosed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and had developed complications caused by the ductal injury. RESULTS: In all patients, the bile duct injury and resulting complication were successfully managed by a combination of endoscopic drainage procedures and interventional radiology techniques. Average length of hospital stay for these patients was 45 days. All patients eventually attained preinjury functional status. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative techniques can be used to successfully manage selected patients and represent a reasonable alternative to operative intervention and resectional therapy, especially in the compromised patient. Extended length of stay is to be expected, but good outcomes can be achieved.