Individualized busulfan dosing improves outcomes compared to fixed-dose administration in pre-transplant minimal residual disease-positive acute myeloid leukemia patients with intermediate-risk undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CR.

Pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) impacts negatively on post-transplant relapse risk in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therapeutic drug monitoring by calculating area under the curve (AUC) was developed to optimize busulfan (Bu) exposure. Here, we compared post-transplant outcomes after individualized versus fixed busulfan dosage in intermediate-risk AML who achieved CR prior to allograft focusing on pre-transplant flow-MRD. Eighty-seven patients (median, 56 years) with intermediate-risk AML and pre-transplant flow-MRD ("different from normal") were included. Thirty-two patients received individualized busulfan; 54 fixed dosages. Individualized dosage was adjusted in 25/32 patients: increased, n = 18/25 (72%); decreased: n = 7/25 (28%). After median follow-up of 27 months, we observed lower 3-year relapses (6%, 2%-19% vs. 35%, 23%-49% p = 0.02), improved 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) (78%, 54%-91% vs. 55%, 40%-70% p = 0.009) and - overall survival (OS) (82%, 60%-93% vs. 69%, 54%-81% p = 0.05) after individualized compared to fixed Bu. Non-relapsed mortality (NRM) and acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) were not different. In multivariate analysis, fixed Bu showed unfavorable impact on OS (hazard ratio [HR] 4.6, p = 0.044), LFS (HR 3.6, p = 0.018) and relapses (HR 3.6, p = 0.033). Fixed Bu also had unfavorable impact on LFS (3.6, 1.1-12.6, p = 0.041) in pre-transplant MRD-positive patients. Individualized, AUC-based, busulfan is associated with lower relapses in intermediate-risk AML patients allografted in CR and may overcome pre-transplant MRD-positivity.

Evaluation of the Robustness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Coupled with Bayesian Forecasting of Busulfan with Regard to Inaccurate Documentation.

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion times is a potential source of error in personalizing busulfan doses using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Planned times rather than the actual times for sampling and infusion time are often documented. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of a limited sampling TDM of busulfan with regard to inaccurate documentation. METHODS: A pharmacometric analysis was conducted in NONMEM® 7.4.3 and "R" by performing stochastic simulation and estimation with four, two and one sample(s) per patient on the basis of a one-compartment- (1CMT) and two-compartment (2CMT) population pharmacokinetic model. The dosing regimens consisted of i.v. busulfan (0.8 mg/kg) every 6 h (Q6H) or 3.2 mg/kg every 24 h (Q24H) with a 2 h- and 3 h infusion time, respectively. The relative prediction error (rPE) and relative root-mean-square error (rRmse) were calculated in order to determine the accuracy and precision of the individual AUC estimation. RESULTS: A noticeable impact on the estimated AUC based on a 1CMT-model was only observed if uncertain documentation reached ± 30 min (1.60% for Q24H and 2.19% for Q6H). Calculated rPEs and rRmse for Q6H indicate a slightly lower level of accuracy and precision when compared to Q24H. Spread of rPE's and rRmse for the 2CMT-model were wider and higher compared to estimations based on a 1CMT-model. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated AUC was not affected substantially by inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion time. The calculated rPEs and rRmses of estimated AUC indicate robustness and reliability for TDM of busulfan, even in presence of erroneous records.

A practical guide to therapeutic drug monitoring in busulfan: recommendations from the Pharmacist Committee of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

Busulfan (Bu) is an important component of many conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The therapeutic window of Bu is well characterized, with strong associations between Bu exposure and the clinical outcome in adults (strongest evidence in myelo-ablative setting) and children (all settings). We provide an overview of the literature on Bu as well as a step-by-step guide to the implementation of Bu therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The guide covers the clinical, pharmacological, laboratory and administrative aspects of the procedure. Through this document, we aim to support centers in implementing TDM for Bu to further enhance the success rates of HCT and improve patient outcomes. The Pharmacist Committee of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) encourages all centers to perform TDM for Bu in the aforementioned indications.

Case Report: Lymphodepletion followed by CAR-T cell therapy with Idecabtagen vicleucel in a patient with severe renal impairment.

Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease is common in multiple myeloma. Fludarabine which is part of lymphodepletion before CAR-T cell therapy is renally eliminated and its use is not recommended for patients with severe renal impairment defined as a glomerular filtration rate below 30ml/min/1.73m2. We administered fludarabine to a 58-year-old female patient with myeloma-associated severe renal impairment as part of lymphodepletion before Idecabtagen vicleucel infusion. Fludarabine was administered in reduced dose (15mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide with a dose of 300mg/m2 followed by hemodialysis over six hours using a larger filter (FX-100). The therapy was well tolerated with excellent CAR-T cell expansion and complete remission which is ongoing now beyond 12 months.

A Unified Data Architecture for Assessing Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease depend on the assessment of motor symptoms. Wearables and machine learning algorithms have emerged to collect large amounts of data and potentially support clinicians in clinical and ambulant settings. STATE OF THE ART: However, a systematical and reusable data architecture for storage, processing, and analysis of inertial sensor data is not available. Consequently, datasets vary significantly between studies and prevent comparability. CONCEPT: To simplify research on the neurodegenerative disorder, we propose an efficient and real-time-optimized architecture compatible with HL7 FHIR backed by a relational database schema. LESSONS LEARNED: We can verify the adequate performance of the system on an experimental benchmark and in a clinical experiment. However, existing standards need to be further optimized to be fully sufficient for data with high temporal resolution.

Development of an immediate release excipient composition for 3D printing via direct powder extrusion in a hospital.

3D printing offers the possibility to prepare personalized tablets on demand, making it an intriguing technology for hospital pharmacies. For the implementation of 3D-printed tablets into the digital Closed Loop Medication Management system, the required tablet formulation and development of the manufacturing process as well as the pharmaceutical validation were conducted. The goal of the formulation development was to enable an optimal printing process and rapid dissolution of the printed tablets for the selected model drugs Levodopa/Carbidopa. The 3D printed tablets were prepared by direct powder extrusion. Printability, thermal properties, disintegration, dissolution, physical properties and storage stability were investigated by employing analytical methods such as HPLC-UV, DSC and TGA. The developed formulation shows a high dose accuracy and an immediate drug release for Levodopa. In addition, the tablets exhibit high crushing strength and very low friability. Unfortunately, Carbidopa did not tolerate the printing process. This is the first study to develop an immediate release excipient composition via direct powder extrusion in a hospital pharmacy setting. The developed process is suitable for the implementation in Closed-Loop Medication Management systems in hospital pharmacies and could therefore contribute to medication safety.

Iron Chelation with Deferasirox Suppresses the Appearance of Labile Plasma Iron During Conditioning Chemotherapy Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

During conditioning chemotherapy prior to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), non-transferrin-bound iron and its chelatable form, labile plasma iron (LPI), regularly appear in the blood of patients at high levels of transferrin saturation (TfS). As these free iron species potentially favor infection and mediate transplantation-associated toxicities, chelation therapy could be an approach to improve outcome after transplantation. However, data addressing iron chelation in the immediate peritransplantation period are sparse. In this study, we investigated the influence of iron chelation with deferasirox during conditioning chemotherapy on the appearance of LPI, the incidence of infection and toxicities, and the tolerability of this treatment in the peritransplantation period. We conducted this single-center prospective observational study in 25 adults with iron overload (serum ferritin >1000 µg/L) undergoing allogeneic HSCT after myeloablative busulfan-based conditioning chemotherapy. Patients received iron chelation with deferasirox (14 mg/kg) from the start of conditioning until day 3 post-transplantation. Iron parameters, including LPI, were obtained at the chelator's trough level daily until day 0 and then on days 4, 7, and 14. Data on infection (bacteremia or invasive fungal disease) and toxicity, as well as the tolerability of deferasirox, were collected until the end of the follow-up period on day 28. Data were analyzed descriptively. TfS levels exceeded 70% in median on 6 days (range, 4 to 10 days) and in 63.6% (range, 36.4% to 90.9%) of the samples per patient, although in 19 of 25 patients (76%), no elevated LPI values were detected during the intake of deferasirox despite high TfS levels. Only 6 patients (24%) showed mildly increased LPI values (≤0.5 units) during the intake of deferasirox, 3 of whom had presented with elevated LPI values before the start of conditioning. Deferasirox was well tolerated, and no aggravation of toxicities was observed. Infection occurred in 5 patients (20%), including 3 of the 6 patients with elevated LPI values despite chelation therapy. In the present study, we demonstrate that iron chelation with deferasirox safely suppresses the appearance of LPI and might decrease the incidence of infection, whereas the impact on transplantation-associated toxicities remains to be elucidated.

Iron Chelation With Deferasirox Increases Busulfan AUC During Conditioning Chemotherapy Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The negative effects of iron overload caused by repetitive blood transfusions and iron release during cytotoxic chemotherapy might be ameliorated by early treatment with an iron chelator. However, in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), chelation therapy is often postponed until the late post-transplantation period because of potential drug interactions. Therefore we systematically investigated the influence of iron chelation with deferasirox on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in adult patients in the context of routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) before HSCT. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study in 25 adult patients with planned allogeneic HSCT after myeloablative, busulfan-based, TDM-guided conditioning chemotherapy. Busulfan was administered intravenously over 3 hours with an initial dose of 3.2 mg/kg once daily (based on adjusted ideal body weight [AIBW] in overweight patients). Four consecutive dosages were planned to achieve a cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of 80 mg · h/L. Patients received deferasirox for transfusional iron overload as per approval from the start of conditioning until day 3 after transplantation. Model-based calculation of the busulfan AUC was carried out by means of Bayesian prediction based on a population pharmacokinetic model after the first or second dose of busulfan, and dose adjustments were performed accordingly. Calculated median cumulative AUC before dose adjustment was 93.7 mg · h/L (65.1-151.4 mg · h/L), which was considerably above the target AUC of 80 mg · h/L ± 10%. Median dose adjustment was -17.1% (-50.0% to 18.2%), and patients ultimately received busulfan with a median cumulative dose of 10.60 mg/kg (6.38 - 15.62) mg/kg. A busulfan dose reduction was necessary in 19 patients (76%) whereas a dose increase was only needed in 1 patient. After dose adjustment the median AUC was 79.7 mg/L · h (62.5 - 84.2 mg/L · h). Median busulfan clearance was 0.134 L/h/kg (0.084 - 0.203 L/h/kg), which is significantly lower than the average clearance of 0.2 L/h/kg reported in the literature, whereas volume of distribution was not altered. We were able to demonstrate, that TDM is the key point to facilitate a safe co-administration of both medications, because the intake of deferasirox leads to a considerable increase in the busulfan AUC of about 35% to 40%. The reason for the increase in busulfan AUC is a reduction in busulfan clearance by about one third; therefore a lower initial dose of busulfan followed by TDM could be considered in patients with comedication with deferasirox.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Busulfan and Its Metabolite Sulfolane in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

For patients with myelofibrosis, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment to date. Busulfan-based conditioning regimens are commonly used, although high inter-individual variability (IIV) in busulfan drug exposure makes individual dose selection challenging. Since data regarding the IIV in patients with myelofibrosis are sparse, this study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of busulfan and its metabolite sulfolane in patients with myelofibrosis. The influence of patient-specific covariates on the pharmacokinetics of drug and metabolite was assessed using non-linear mixed effects modeling in NONMEM®. We obtained 523 plasma concentrations of busulfan and its metabolite sulfolane from 37 patients with myelofibrosis. The final model showed a population clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.217 L/h/kg and 0.82 L/kg for busulfan and 0.021 L/h/kg and 0.65 L/kg for its metabolite. Total body weight (TBW) and a single-nucleotide polymorphism of glutathione-S-transferase A1 (GSTA1 SNP) displayed a significant impact on volume of distribution and metabolite clearance, respectively. This is the first PopPK-model developed to describe busulfan's pharmacokinetics in patients with myelofibrosis. Incorporating its metabolite sulfolane into the model not only allowed the characterization of the covariate relationship between GSTA1 and the clearance of the metabolite but also improved the understanding of busulfan's metabolic pathway.