Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Radiographics ; 43(2): e220093, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563094

ABSTRACT

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), similar to other radiologic modalities, requires specific technical considerations and is subject to image artifacts. These artifacts may affect examination quality, negatively impact diagnostic accuracy, and decrease user comfort when using this emerging technique. Some artifacts are related to commonly known gray-scale US artifacts that can also appear on the contrast-only image (tissue-subtracted image obtained with the linear responses from background tissues nulled). These may include acoustic shadowing and enhancement; reverberation, refraction, and reflection; and poor penetration. Other artifacts are exclusive to CEUS owing to the techniques used for contrast mode image generation and the unique properties of the microbubbles that constitute ultrasound-specific contrast agents (UCAs). UCA-related artifacts may appear on the contrast-only image, the gray-scale image, or various Doppler mode images. Artifacts related to CEUS may include nonlinear artifacts and unintentional microbubble destruction resulting in pseudowashout. The microbubbles themselves may result in specific artifacts such as pseudoenhancement, signal saturation, and attenuation and shadowing and can confound the use of color and spectral Doppler US. Identifying and understanding these artifacts and knowing how to mitigate them may improve the quality of the imaging study, increase user confidence, and improve patient care. The authors review the principles of UCAs and the sound-microbubble interaction, as well as the technical aspects of image generation. Technical considerations, including patient positioning, depth, acoustic window, and contrast agent dose, also are discussed. Specific artifacts are described, with tips on how to identify and, if necessary, apply corrective measures, with the goal of improving examination quality. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Contrast Media , Humans , Ultrasonography/methods , Microbubbles
2.
J Ultrasound Med ; 42(2): 409-415, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of ACR TI-RADS when points for lobulated margins are applied only when the margins meet a quantified measure of margin microlobulation and not applied when nodules only demonstrate macrolobulation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound and pathology records (May 01, 2018 to July 31, 2020) to find all thyroid nodules at one institution characterized as having lobulated margins using the ACR TI-RADS lexicon and subsequently undergoing fine needle aspiration (FNA). Nodule margins were evaluated to note the presence or absence of microlobulation, quantitatively defined as a protrusion with a base <2.5 mm in length. The impact to detection of malignant nodules and avoidance of benign FNA when margin points for lobulation were added only when microlobulated was analyzed. RESULTS: 58 of 516 thyroid nodules undergoing US-guided FNA were classified as lobulated, comprising the study population. 21 (36.2%) had microlobulated margins, with 12 of the 21 (57.1%) being malignant. Comparatively, of the 37 nodules showing only macrolobulated margins without microlobulation, only 2 (5.4%) were malignant (P < .0001). For 53 nodules ≥10 mm, 15 (28.3%) benign nodules would not have met size criteria for FNA had points for margins not been applied when only showing macrolobulation, whereas all 10 malignant nodules would still have been sampled. CONCLUSION: Adding two points to the ACR TI-RADS score for lobulated thyroid nodules should only apply when microlobulations are present.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Nodule , Humans , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Ultrasonography
3.
Radiology ; 304(1): 18-30, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35412355

ABSTRACT

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a panel of specialists from radiology, orthopedic surgery, and pathology to arrive at a consensus regarding the management of superficial soft-tissue masses imaged with US. The recommendations in this statement are based on analysis of current literature and common practice strategies. This statement reviews and illustrates the US features of common superficial soft-tissue lesions that may manifest as a soft-tissue mass and suggests guidelines for subsequent management.


Subject(s)
Radiologists , Radiology , Humans , Ultrasonography/methods
4.
Radiology ; 305(2): 277-289, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787200

ABSTRACT

Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.


Subject(s)
Gallbladder Diseases , Gallbladder Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Polyps , Humans , Gallbladder Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Polyps/pathology , Gallbladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Gallbladder Neoplasms/pathology , Radiologists
5.
J Ultrasound Med ; 41(12): 3145-3158, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35984099

ABSTRACT

Peripheral arterial and venous examinations are performed regularly in vascular labs and interpreted by physicians of different specialities. Many vascular examinations have nonvascular pathology that is either inadvertently imaged by the sonographer or imaged with intent as it relates to patient's symptoms. It is prudent for every reader of vascular studies to be acquainted with the sonographic appearance of these non-vascular lesions to enable appropriate and optimal interpretation that has a direct bearing on patient's clinical care. Our review includes a discussion of the nonvascular pathologies like lymph nodes, soft tissue edema, soft tissue fluid collections, musculotendinous injuries, soft tissue masses, and joint and bursal pathologies that may be encountered during interpretation of vascular exams. The pictorial essay includes a discussion of their sonographic appearances and pitfalls in interpretation. Multiple illustrative examples and sonographic images of the non-vascular pathologies found during interpretation of vascular studies have been utilized to highlight their appearances.


Subject(s)
Arteries , Veins , Humans , Veins/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Lower Extremity/blood supply
6.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 216(2): 428-435, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325737

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the timing of major bleeding complications after renal transplant biopsy in the context of a standardized 1-hour postprocedure observation protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records for consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, and were observed according to a newly implemented 1-hour postprocedure observation protocol. The development of a major bleeding complication (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events class 3 or higher) was recorded along with all available details regarding the time course of patient symptoms and presentation. Complications were grouped into one of four categories according to onset time after biopsy: 2 hours or less (timing category 1), more than 2 hours but 4 hours or less (timing category 2), more than 4 hours but 8 hours or less (timing category 3), and more than 8 hours (timing category 4). RESULTS. In 1824 patients (769 women, 1055 men) who underwent 4519 consecutive ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies during the study period, 11 class 3 complications were found (11/4519 [0.2%]). Four of the 11 patients (36.4%) had symptoms during the 1-hour observation period. Of these four patients, three (3/11 [27.3%]) had substantial symptoms related to major bleeding and were classified as timing category 1, and one (1/11 [9.1%]) had initially minor symptoms that increased in severity more than 2 hours but within 4 hours and was classified as timing category 2. Seven of the 11 patients (63.6%) did not have any symptoms at 1 hour of observation and were discharged; three (27.3%) were classified as timing category 3, and four (36.4%) were classified as category 4. CONCLUSION. Major bleeding complications following ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy are rare (0.2% of patients in this study). In our study, more than half were not clinically apparent within 4 hours of biopsy. A 1-hour postprocedure recovery period can be safely used after renal transplant biopsy.


Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Transplants/pathology
7.
Vasc Med ; 26(5): 515-525, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009060

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic criteria to classify severity of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis vary across vascular laboratories. Consensus-based criteria, proposed by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound in 2003 (SRUCC), have been broadly implemented but have not been adequately validated. We conducted a multicentered, retrospective correlative imaging study of duplex ultrasound versus catheter angiography for evaluation of severity of ICA stenosis. Velocity data were abstracted from bilateral duplex studies performed between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2015 and studies were interpreted using SRUCC. Percentage ICA stenosis was determined using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) methodology. Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated the performance of SRUCC parameters compared with angiography. Of 448 ICA sides (from 224 patients), 299 ICA sides (from 167 patients) were included. Agreement between duplex ultrasound and angiography was moderate (κ = 0.42), with overestimation of degree of stenosis for both moderate (50-69%) and severe (⩾ 70%) ICA lesions. The primary SRUCC parameter for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis of peak-systolic velocity (PSV) of ⩾ 125 cm/sec did not meet prespecified thresholds for adequate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (sensitivity 97.8%, specificity 64.2%, accuracy 74.5%). Test performance was improved by raising the PSV threshold to ⩾ 180 cm/sec (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 81.6%, accuracy 85.2%) or by adding the additional parameter of ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 84.3%, accuracy 87.4%). For ⩾ 70% ICA stenosis, analysis was limited by a low number of cases with angiographically severe disease. Interpretation of carotid duplex examinations using SRUCC resulted in significant overestimation of severity of ICA stenosis when compared with angiography; raising the PSV threshold for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis to ⩾ 180 cm/sec as a single parameter or requiring the ICA/CCA PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 in addition to PSV of ⩾ 125 cm/sec for laboratories using the SRUCC is recommended to improve the accuracy of carotid duplex examinations.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, Internal , Carotid Stenosis , Accreditation , Blood Flow Velocity , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Constriction, Pathologic , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex
8.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(10): 2123-2130, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33320368

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed growth rates of benign ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas to understand what percentage would show a volume doubling time (DT) of less than 3 years, between 3 and 5 years, or greater than 5 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pathology records (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019) to find all surgically excised ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas. Imaging records were then reviewed to identify those that had been confidently identified with ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography at least twice before surgical removal, with at least a 60-day interval between studies. Three orthogonal measurements were recorded on the first and last imaging studies on which the mass was detected, with volume calculations by the prolate formula (product of 3 measurements multiplied by 0.52). The volume DT was calculated and grouped into 1 of 5 categories: (1) DT of less than 1 year; (2) DT of 1 to 3 years; (3) DT of 3 to 5 years; (4) DT of 5 to 10 years; and (5) no growth (any mass with a DT >10 years or showing a decrease in volume). RESULTS: A total of 102 of 536 cystadenomas and 44 of 227 cystadenofibromas met inclusion criteria. Of the 146 tumors, 40 (27.4%) had a DT of less than 1 year; 38 (26.0%) had a DT of 1 to 3 years; 22 (15.1%) had a DT of 3 to 5 years; 10 (6.8%) had a DT of 5 to 10 years; and 36 (24.7%) showed no growth. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 53.4% of ovarian serous cystadenomas/cystadenofibromas have a DT of less than 3 years; 15.1% have a DT between 3 and 5 years; and 31.5% have a DT of greater than 5 years or show no growth.


Subject(s)
Cystadenofibroma , Cystadenoma, Serous , Ovarian Neoplasms , Cystadenofibroma/diagnostic imaging , Cystadenoma, Serous/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography
9.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(6): 1091-1096, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894615

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the uterine sliding sign in predicting deeply infiltrating endometriosis in the setting of non-physician sonographers performing but not interpreting the maneuver. The impact of uterine sliding sign has not been previously demonstrated in this practice setting. METHODS: Physicians' remote interpretations of transvaginal ultrasound examinations in 2016, before uterine sliding sign, were compared to examinations in 2019 after addition of uterine sliding sign to determine the diagnostic rates. Surgical and histopathological results were reviewed to determine sensitivity and specificity of the respective exam techniques. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five transvaginal ultrasounds were performed in 2016 and 390 sliding sign ultrasounds in 2019. The number of deeply infiltrating endometriosis cases identified increased significantly from 2% to 6% during the study period (chi-square, Fisher's exact test p = .012). The sensitivity and specificity of routine pelvic sonography for detecting deeply infiltrating endometriosis improved from 36%/94% to 68%/98%. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine sliding sign videos should be included in the standard sonographic protocol for patients presenting with chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis history, or sonographic evidence of endometriosis in the setting of physicians interpreting sonographic images obtained by non-physicians.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Pelvic Pain , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography
10.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(8): 1603-1611, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33103276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether renal transplant diagnoses substantially change when 2 biopsy sites are chosen and whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has value for targeting the second site. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsy within 2 years of transplant: 20, surveillance; and 20, for cause. A CEUS examination was performed to identify cortical regions with subjectively altered flow. One biopsy was performed at the operator-preferred (primary) site regardless of CEUS findings. Another biopsy was done at a second location, either targeted to an area in which CEUS perfusion findings differed from the primary site (targeted) or at a random location (secondary) if no other area differed. Specimens were randomly labeled A or B; pathologists were blinded to the CEUS result and biopsy location. Location-specific CEUS assessments were recorded. Pathologic results were compared, including acute and chronic Banff scores and any new findings from the targeted or secondary biopsy. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2018. No location-specific pathologic differences correlated with differences in CEUS assessments. The second biopsy provided additional information that changed management in 4 of 40 patients (10.0% [95% confidence interval, 2.8%-23.7%]). Major bleeding complications occurred in 3 of 40 (7.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeting was not useful. Major bleeding complications were higher than expected, possibly due to the additional biopsy away from the operator-preferred location. Obtaining a second renal transplant biopsy from a substantially different area than the initial operator-preferred location provided additional clinically useful information in 10% of patients.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Contrast Media , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
11.
J Hand Surg Am ; 46(3): 247.e1-247.e7, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33277100

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution static and dynamic ultrasound (US) for diagnosing intact repairs and small, clinically relevant gaps (≥4 mm) in repaired flexor digitorum profundus tendons within zone 2 and, secondarily, to evaluate the effect of suture artifact from 3 commonly used suture types. METHODS: Eighty-eight fresh-frozen cadaveric digits (thumbs excluded) were randomized to either an intact repair (0-mm gap) or repairs using a locked 4-strand suture repair with either 4-0 Prolene, Ethibond, or FiberWire and gaps of 2, 4, or 6 mm and no suture in which 2-, 4-, or 6-mm gaps were created without a suture crossing the repair site. Gap widths were estimated by a blinded musculoskeletal ultrasonographer in static and dynamic modes. RESULTS: Both static and dynamic modalities tended to overestimate actual gap sizes. For the suture gaps, both modalities had poor sensitivity (29% static; 42% dynamic) for accurately diagnosing a clinically intact repair (<4 mm), but better specificity (83% static; 75% dynamic) for diagnosing a clinically failed repair (≥4-mm gap). Although suture presence decreased the sensitivity of gap width measurement for both modalities, no differences were seen between suture types. CONCLUSIONS: Static and dynamic US have poor sensitivity for diagnosing clinically intact repairs (gaps < 4 mm) because they typically overestimate gap size. The ability to diagnose failed repairs (gap ≥ 4 mm), based on greater specificity, is much better, but still suboptimal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on a receiver operating characteristic analysis cutoff of 5 mm, if a gap of 5 mm or larger is identified with US when evaluating a zone 2 flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair, a failed repair is likely in about 80% of cases. A gap measurement of less than 5 mm may miss a high percentage of repairs that are clinically failed.


Subject(s)
Tendon Injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Humans , Suture Techniques , Sutures , Tendon Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Tendons/diagnostic imaging , Tendons/surgery , Tensile Strength
12.
J Hand Surg Am ; 46(4): 287-294, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33451904

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would more accurately diagnose small gaps (<6 mm) after flexor tendon repair than static ultrasound (US) and that suture artifact would negatively impair accuracy. METHODS: A laceration of the flexor digitorum profundus was created in 160 fresh-frozen cadaveric digits and randomized to either an intact repair (0-mm gap) or repairs using a locked 4-strand suture repair with either 4-0 Prolene, Ethibond, or and gaps of 2, 4,or 6 mm; or no suture in which 2-, 4-, or 6-mm gaps were created without a suture crossing the repair site. We performed 1.5T and 3T MRI and static US studies; gap widths were estimated by radiologists blinded to suture presence and true gap widths. RESULTS: The 1.5 and 3.0T MRI had a lower mean error than US for gap sizes 0 and 2 mm. All 3 modalities performed similarly for 4- and 6-mm gaps. Documentation of imaging artifact worsened error, and odds of seeing artifacts were 1.72 higher with MRI than with US. Suture did not worsen artifact nor impair accuracy for any of the 3 modalities. When no suture was used, all 3 modalities significantly overestimated the true gap. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is most accurate for small gaps less than 4 mm. Although all modalities overestimated gap sizes in specimens with a 0-mm gap (intact tendon repair), mean overestimation (<2 mm) was not clinically relevant. Ultrasound overestimated 2-mm gaps (clinically intact repairs), whereas MRIs did not. We recommend MRI for evaluation of gaps after flexor tendon repair. The 1.5T has slightly better sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing clinically intact (gap < 3 mm) from clinically impaired (gap > 3 mm) repairs than the 3T. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate diagnosis of intact repairs or small gaps (<3 mm) might prevent unnecessary exploration or allow modification of rehabilitation protocols. Diagnosis of clinically relevant gaps (3-6 mm) may allow for earlier revision surgery before significant tendon retraction and adhesions develop, possibly necessitating a staged reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Tendon Injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Suture Techniques , Sutures , Tendon Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Tendons/diagnostic imaging , Tendons/surgery , Tensile Strength
13.
Radiographics ; 39(5): 1327-1355, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498742

ABSTRACT

The kidney is the most commonly transplanted solid organ. Advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression regimens, surveillance imaging, and histopathologic diagnosis of rejection have allowed prolonged graft survival times. However, the demand for kidneys continues to outgrow the available supply, and there are efforts to increase use of donor kidneys with moderate- or high-risk profiles. This highlights the importance of evaluating the renal transplant patient in the context of both donor and recipient risk factors. Radiologists play an integral role within the multidisciplinary team in care of the transplant patient at every stage of the transplant process. In the immediate postoperative period, duplex US is the modality of choice for evaluating the renal allograft. It is useful for establishing a baseline examination for comparison at future surveillance imaging. In the setting of allograft dysfunction, advanced imaging techniques including MRI or contrast-enhanced US may be useful for providing a more specific diagnosis and excluding nonrejection causes of renal dysfunction. When a pathologic diagnosis is deemed necessary to guide therapy, US-guided biopsy is a relatively low-risk, safe procedure. The range of complications of renal transplantation can be organized temporally in relation to the time since surgery and/or according to disease categories, including immunologic (rejection), surgical or iatrogenic, vascular, urinary, infectious, and neoplastic complications. The unique heterotopic location of the renal allograft in the iliac fossa predisposes it to a specific set of complications. As imaging features of infection or malignancy may be nonspecific, awareness of the patient's risk profile and time since transplantation can be used to assign the probability of a certain diagnosis and thus guide more specific diagnostic workup. It is critical to understand variations in vascular anatomy, surgical technique, and independent donor and recipient risk factors to make an accurate diagnosis and initiate appropriate treatment.©RSNA, 2019.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Multimodal Imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Donor Selection , Humans
14.
Radiographics ; 39(3): 690-708, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31059393

ABSTRACT

The US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was released in 2017 and is the newest of the four American College of Radiology (ACR) LI-RADS algorithms. US LI-RADS provides standardized terminology, technical recommendations, and a reporting framework for US examinations performed for screening or surveillance in patients at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The appropriate patient population for screening and surveillance includes individuals who are at risk for developing HCC but do not have known or suspected cancer. This includes patients with cirrhosis from any cause and subsets of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the absence of cirrhosis. In an HCC screening or surveillance study, US LI-RADS recommends assigning two scores that apply to the entire study: the US category, which determines follow-up, and a visualization score, which communicates the expected level of sensitivity of the examination but does not affect management. Three US categories are possible: US-1 negative, a study with no evidence of HCC; US-2 subthreshold, a study in which an observation less than 10 mm is depicted that is not definitely benign; and US-3 positive, a study in which an observation greater than or equal to 10 mm or a new thrombus in vein is identified, for which diagnostic contrast material-enhanced imaging is recommended. Three visualization scores are possible: A (no or minimal limitations), B (moderate limitations), and C (severe limitations). ©RSNA, 2019.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Data Systems , Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Liver Diseases/classification , Liver Diseases/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Ultrasonography/methods
15.
Radiology ; 287(1): 185-193, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29498593

ABSTRACT

Purpose To compare the biopsy rate and diagnostic accuracy before and after applying the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) criteria for thyroid nodule evaluation. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, eight radiologists with 3-32 years experience in thyroid ultrasonography (US) reviewed US features of 100 thyroid nodules that were cytologically proven, pathologically proven, or both in December 2016. The radiologists evaluated nodule features in five US categories and provided biopsy recommendations based on their own practice patterns without knowledge of ACR TI-RADS criteria. Another three expert radiologists served as the reference standard readers for the imaging findings. ACR TI-RADS criteria were retrospectively applied to the features assigned by the eight radiologists to produce biopsy recommendations. Comparison was made for biopsy rate, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results Fifteen of the 100 nodules (15%) were malignant. The mean number of nodules recommended for biopsy by the eight radiologists was 80 ± 16 (standard deviation) (range, 38-95 nodules) based on their own practice patterns and 57 ± 11 (range, 37-73 nodules) with retrospective application of ACR TI-RADS criteria. Without ACR TI-RADS criteria, readers had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83%, 99%), 20% (95% CI: 16%, 25%), and 28% (95% CI: 21%, 37%), respectively. After applying ACR TI-RADS criteria, overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92% (95% CI: 68%, 98%), 44% (95% CI: 33%, 56%), and 52% (95% CI: 40%, 63%), respectively. Although fewer malignancies were recommended for biopsy with ACR TI-RADS criteria, the majority met the criteria for follow-up US, with only three of 120 (2.5%) malignancy encounters requiring no follow-up or biopsy. Expert consensus recommended biopsy in 55 of 100 nodules with ACR TI-RADS criteria. Their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87% (95% CI: 48%, 98%), 51% (95% CI: 40%, 62%), and 56% (95% CI: 46%, 66%), respectively. Conclusion ACR TI-RADS criteria offer a meaningful reduction in the number of thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy and significantly improve the accuracy of recommendations for nodule management. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Radiology Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Gland/pathology , United States , Young Adult
16.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 211(1): 162-167, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29702015

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver variability in assigning features in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) lexicon and in making recommendations for thyroid nodule biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 100 nodules in 92 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration with definitive cytologic results (Bethesda category II or VI) or diagnostic lobectomy between April 2009 and May 2010. Eight board-certified radiologists evaluated the nodules according to the five feature categories that constitute ACR TI-RADS and gave a biopsy recommendation based on their own practice. Variability in feature assignment and biopsy recommendation was assessed with the Fleiss kappa statistic. RESULTS: Agreement in interpretation was fair to moderate for all features except shape (κ = 0.61) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.73), which had substantial agreement. The features with the poorest agreement were margin and other types of echogenic foci, which had kappa values ranging from 0.25 to 0.39, indicating fair agreement. Interobserver agreement regarding biopsy recommendation was fair (κ = 0.22) based on radiologists' current practice. Applying ACR TI-RADS resulted in moderate agreement (κ = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Variability in interpreting thyroid nodule sonographic features was highest for margin and all types of echogenic foci, except for macrocalcifications. Because radiologists' interpretations of these features change the level of suspicion of thyroid malignancy, the results of this study suggest a need for further education. Despite the variability in assigning features, adoption of ACR TI-RADS improves agreement for recommending biopsy.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , United States
17.
Radiographics ; 38(3): 766-793, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757718

ABSTRACT

Acute cholecystitis is the most common diagnosable cause for right upper quadrant abdominal (RUQ) pain in patients who present to the emergency department (ED). However, over one-third of patients initially thought to have acute cholecystitis actually have RUQ pain attributable to other causes. Ultrasonography (US) is the primary imaging modality of choice for initial imaging assessment and serves as a fast, cost-effective, and dynamic modality to provide a definitive diagnosis or a considerably narrowed list of differential possibilities. Multiple organ systems are included at standard RUQ US, and a variety of ultrasonographically diagnosable disease processes can be identified, including conditions of hepatic, pancreatic, adrenal, renal, gastrointestinal, vascular, and thoracic origin, all of which may result in RUQ pain. In certain cases, subsequent computed tomography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR cholangiopancreatography, or cholescintigraphy may be considered, depending on the clinical situation and US findings. Familiarity with the spectrum of disease processes outside of the gallbladder and biliary tree that may manifest with RUQ pain and recognition at US of these alternative conditions is pivotal for early diagnosis and appropriate management. Diagnosis at the time of initial US can reduce unnecessary imaging and its consequences, including excess cost, radiation exposure, nephrotoxic contrast medium use, and time to diagnosis, thereby translating into improved patient care and outcome. This article (a) reviews the causes of RUQ pain identifiable at US using an organ-system approach, (b) illustrates the US appearance of select conditions from each organ system with multimodality imaging correlates, and (c) discusses the relevant pathophysiology and treatment of these entities to aid in efficient direction of management. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Ultrasonography/methods , Contrast Media , Diagnosis, Differential , Digestive System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Thoracic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Urologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging
18.
Radiographics ; 37(3): 901-923, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493801

ABSTRACT

Hydatid disease (HD) is a parasitic infection caused by the larvae of a tapeworm that is endemic to many regions around the world-South America, Africa, and Asia, in particular. Humans are infected as intermediate hosts in the parasite's life cycle; thus, HD can be seen in persons living in areas where animal husbandry is practiced. However, owing to the varied patterns of migration and immigration during the past several decades, HD can be diagnosed in individuals living anywhere. The liver is the most common organ involved, with hepatic HD accounting for the majority of published cases. However, HD can affect multiple organs and tissues other than the liver, including the spleen, kidneys, lungs, heart, peritoneum, muscles, and brain. Knowledge of the route of spread, clinical findings at presentation, and possible complications involving each extrahepatic location can be useful for the radiologist when evaluating imaging findings in patients suspected of having HD. The ultrasonographic, computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of extrahepatic hydatid lesions frequently simulate those of hepatic HD, as long as rupture, bleeding, and/or superimposed bacterial infection has not occurred. Specific features of HD seen at different extrahepatic sites can help tailor the diagnosis. The differential diagnoses that can mimic HD at every nonhepatic location should be considered, as many of these entities are common, especially in nonendemic areas. ©RSNA, 2017.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Echinococcosis/diagnostic imaging , Animals , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
19.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(7): 1170-1176, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28694166

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and learning curve of a sonographic mapping protocol for deep endometriosis (DE). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Tertiary referral center in the United States. PATIENTS: 117 consecutive patients who presented to our gynecology clinic with complaints of significant noncyclic pelvic pain of at least 6 months' duration, and/or clinical findings concerning for deep endometriosis and who were referred for transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound with bowel-preparation (TVUS-BP) performed by a single radiologist. Findings suspicious for DE were reported and correlated with surgical and histopathological findings. The duration of the examination and number of cases required to achieve proficiency were calculated for positive, equivocal, and negative findings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 117 patients (median age, 35 years; range, 19-54 years) referred for TVUS-BP, 113 had complete examinations. Fifty-seven of these 113 patients underwent surgical exploration within 1 year, and DE was identified surgically in 23 of them. DE of the rectosigmoid colon and/or rectovaginal septum was detected with a sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%). DE of the retrocervical region and/or uterosacral ligaments was detected with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 65%-97%) and specificity of 94% (95% CI, 81%-99%). Proficiency, defined by a flattening of the learning curve, was achieved after 70 to 75 scans. The mean duration of the examination was 42 ± 4 minutes initially, but declined to 15 ± 4 minutes once proficiency was achieved. Cases of equivocal or minimal disease demonstrated the greatest decline in examination duration. CONCLUSION: A newly applied TVUS-BP protocol for detection of pelvic DE is highly accurate and required only a modest learning curve to achieve procedural proficiency in a US tertiary referral center where physicians interpret but typically do not perform TVUS exams. Overcoming diagnostic uncertainty regarding minimal or equivocal disease appeared to be an important factor in the initial learning curve. With adequate training, TVUS-BP may be adapted as a primary diagnostic tool for detecting pelvic DE.


Subject(s)
Cathartics/therapeutic use , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/surgery , Endosonography/methods , Learning Curve , Peritoneal Diseases/diagnosis , Preoperative Care/education , Vagina/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Colon, Sigmoid/diagnostic imaging , Colon, Sigmoid/drug effects , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Education, Medical/methods , Endometriosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Pelvis/pathology , Peritoneal Diseases/pathology , Peritoneal Diseases/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/methods , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Rectum/drug effects , Rectum/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tertiary Care Centers , United States , Vagina/pathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL