Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Urol Nurs ; 34(6): 303-11, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26298926

ABSTRACT

In this study from Rwanda, voluntary adult male circumcision costs 33% less with trained nurses using the PrePex device compared with physician-nurse teams performing dorsal-slit surgery. These cost savings and the documented safety, speed, and efficacy of the PrePex procedure, serve Rwanda's HIV prevention program.


Subject(s)
Circumcision, Male/economics , Circumcision, Male/instrumentation , Circumcision, Male/nursing , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Adult , Cost Savings , Equipment Design , Humans , Male , Nurse's Role , Rwanda , Treatment Outcome
2.
Antivir Ther ; 19 Suppl 3: 79-89, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25310145

ABSTRACT

Procurement, the country-level process of ordering antiretrovirals (ARVs), and supply chain management, the mechanism by which they are delivered to health-care facilities, are critical processes required to move ARVs from manufacturers to patients. To provide a glimpse into the ARV procurement and supply chain, the following pages provide an overview of the primary stakeholders, principal operating models, and policies and regulations involved in ARV procurement. Also presented are key challenges that need to be addressed to ensure that the supply chain is not a barrier to the goal of universal coverage. This article will cover the steps necessary to order and distribute ARVs, including different models of delivery, key stakeholders involved, strategic considerations that vary depending on context and policies affecting them. The single drug examples given illustrate the complications inherent in fragmented supply and demand-driven models of procurement and supply chain management, and suggest tools for navigating these hurdles that will ultimately result in more secure and reliable ARV provision. Understanding the dynamics of ARV supply chain is important for the global health community, both to ensure full and efficient treatment of persons living with HIV as well as to inform the supply chain decisions for other public health products.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/supply & distribution , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/economics , Government Programs/economics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Public Health/economics , Anti-HIV Agents/economics , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Guidelines as Topic , HIV Infections/economics , Humans , International Cooperation , Organizational Policy , Public-Private Sector Partnerships/economics , Workforce , World Health Organization
3.
PLoS One ; 9(11): e108304, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25389777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Today's uncertain HIV funding landscape threatens to slow progress towards treatment goals. Understanding the costs of antiretroviral therapy (ART) will be essential for governments to make informed policy decisions about the pace of scale-up under the 2013 WHO HIV Treatment Guidelines, which increase the number of people eligible for treatment from 17.6 million to 28.6 million. The study presented here is one of the largest of its kind and the first to describe the facility-level cost of ART in a random sample of facilities in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia. METHODS & FINDINGS: In 2010-2011, comprehensive data on one year of facility-level ART costs and patient outcomes were collected from 161 facilities, selected using stratified random sampling. Overall, facility-level ART costs were significantly lower than expected in four of the five countries, with a simple average of $208 per patient-year (ppy) across Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda and Zambia. Costs were higher in South Africa, at $682 ppy. This included medications, laboratory services, direct and indirect personnel, patient support, equipment and administrative services. Facilities demonstrated the ability to retain patients alive and on treatment at these costs, although outcomes for established patients (2-8% annual loss to follow-up or death) were better than outcomes for new patients in their first year of ART (77-95% alive and on treatment). CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that the facility-level costs of ART are lower than previously understood in these five countries. While limitations must be considered, and costs will vary across countries, this suggests that expanded treatment coverage may be affordable. Further research is needed to understand investment costs of treatment scale-up, non-facility costs and opportunities for more efficient resource allocation.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/economics , Anti-Retroviral Agents/economics , HIV Infections/economics , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Communicable Disease Control , Communicable Diseases/economics , Developing Countries/economics , Ethiopia , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Humans , Malawi , Models, Economic , Rwanda , South Africa , Treatment Outcome , Zambia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL