ABSTRACT
This article is a clinical guide which discusses the "state-of-the-art" usage of the classic monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, and isocarboxazid) in modern psychiatric practice. The guide is for all clinicians, including those who may not be experienced MAOI prescribers. It discusses indications, drug-drug interactions, side-effect management, and the safety of various augmentation strategies. There is a clear and broad consensus (more than 70 international expert endorsers), based on 6 decades of experience, for the recommendations herein exposited. They are based on empirical evidence and expert opinion-this guide is presented as a new specialist-consensus standard. The guide provides practical clinical advice, and is the basis for the rational use of these drugs, particularly because it improves and updates knowledge, and corrects the various misconceptions that have hitherto been prominent in the literature, partly due to insufficient knowledge of pharmacology. The guide suggests that MAOIs should always be considered in cases of treatment-resistant depression (including those melancholic in nature), and prior to electroconvulsive therapy-while taking into account of patient preference. In selected cases, they may be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm than has previously been customary, and should not be regarded as drugs of last resort; they may prove decisively effective when many other treatments have failed. The guide clarifies key points on the concomitant use of incorrectly proscribed drugs such as methylphenidate and some tricyclic antidepressants. It also illustrates the straightforward "bridging" methods that may be used to transition simply and safely from other antidepressants to MAOIs.
ABSTRACT
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are pervasive in the United States, with 20.1 million cases in 2016, of which only 19% receive treatment. SUDs permeate all medical specialties and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of every chief complaint. Acknowledging the salience of SUDs provides a unique opportunity for early identification and intervention. Thus, SUDs should be reflected prominently in the history of the present illness rather than in the social history. To this effect, we propose the inclusion of Use (U) in the history of present illness and incorporating "U" into the pedagogical mnemonic of OPQRST that is commonly used in medical training. Obtaining this history will help determine if and which abused substances may be contributing to the chief complaint. We also suggest the incorporation of an additional acronym, SORTED, to account for the various domains of Use, including Street (illicit drugs), OTCs (over-the-counter medications), Rx (prescriptions, including nonmedicinal use of pharmaceutical drugs), Tobacco (including e-cigarettes), EtOH (alcohol), and Dietary (caffeine, vitamins, and herbal supplements) agents. We discuss how utilizing OPQRSTU will help reshape the way medical students think about SUDs and will facilitate detection and diagnosis of all domains of SUDs.
Subject(s)
Medical History Taking/methods , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , HumansSubject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Bipolar Disorder , Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Psychomotor Agitation , Administration, Sublingual , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Psychomotor Agitation/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, medical students on clinical rotations receive instruction on principles of mental health only during the psychiatry clerkship. We used emails to insert teaching of psychiatric concepts beyond the psychiatry clerkship into other rotations using the method of spaced learning, the delivery of brief morsels of information repeated over time intervals. We predicted that the intervention would improve attitudes and confidence towards the integration of psychiatry and knowledge retention. METHODS: We developed and distributed a series of emails relating key psychiatric concepts targeted to the other core clerkships. RESULTS: In a cluster-randomized trial over one academic year (intervention group n = 71, control group n = 61), scores on the Attitudes and Confidence in the Integration of Psychiatry scale and on the knowledge quiz did not differ significantly. Students who actively engaged with the emails demonstrated significantly higher scores on the knowledge test. Email users valued the timing, format of delivery and application of psychiatric principles outside the psychiatric setting. Participants recommended simplifying the format and previewing the benefits of spaced learning to increase utilization. CONCLUSION: Delivering spaced learning through emails, within a curriculum designed to foster engagement, may provide an efficient means of addressing the widely-recognized but elusive goal of integrating teaching across medical disciplines.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Electronic Mail , Psychiatry/education , Students, Medical/psychology , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Clinical Clerkship , Educational Measurement/methods , Electronic Mail/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Learning , Male , Michigan , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to measure attitudes and confidence in the integration of psychiatry into other fields of medicine. METHODS: The Attitudes and Confidence in Integration of Psychiatry in Medicine (ACIP) scale was developed through discussion with content experts across disciplines and pilot testing of items and administered to third- and fourth-year medical students at University of Iowa, University of Michigan, Rush University for validation, focused on assessment of variability, internal consistency, factor structure, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: A total of 310 medical students completed the survey (35% participation rate). The scale had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and was without ceiling or floor effects. Students rated the integration of psychiatry into the practice of surgery and its subspecialties as less relevant than its integration into other specialties; however, scores were not biased by students' interest in procedural vs. non-procedural specialties. Test-retest reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The ACIP may serve a useful role in determining the outcome of educational efforts toward integrated care.