Phase 1 study of the pharmacokinetics and clinical proof-of-concept activity of a biofilm-disrupting human monoclonal antibody in patients with chronic prosthetic joint infection of the knee or hip.

We report the results of a first-in-human phase 1 clinical study to evaluate TRL1068, a native human monoclonal antibody that disrupts bacterial biofilms with broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. The study population consisted of patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the knee or hip, including both monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections, that are highly resistant to antibiotics due to biofilm formation. TRL1068 was administered via a single pre-surgical intravenous infusion in three sequentially ascending dose groups (6, 15, and 30 mg/kg). Concomitant perioperative antibiotics were pathogen-targeted as prescribed by the treating physician. In this double-blinded study, 4 patients were randomized to receive placebo and 11 patients to receive TRL1068 on day 1, as well as targeted antibiotics for 7 days prior to the scheduled removal of the infected implant and placement of an antibiotic-eluting spacer as the first stage of the standard of care two-stage exchange arthroplasty. No adverse events attributable to TRL1068 were reported. TRL1068 serum half-life was 15-18 days. At day 8, the concentration in synovial fluid was approximately 60% of the blood level and thus at least 15-fold above the threshold for biofilm-disrupting activity in vitro. Explanted prostheses were sonicated to release adherent bacteria for culture, with elimination of the implant bacteria observed in 3 of the 11 patients who received TRL1068, which compares favorably to prior PJI treatments. None of the patients who received TRL1068 had a relapse of the original infection by the end of the study (day 169). CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04763759.

Corticosteroid Injections within 2 weeks Following Knee Arthroscopy is Associated with Increased Infection Risk.

PURPOSE: We quantified the risk of 90-day postoperative infection following arthroscopy, stratified by specific time intervals of corticosteroid injection (CSI) postoperatively (0-2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, 4-6 weeks, and 6-8 weeks). METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried. In the primary and secondary analyses, the main outcome was infection at 90-days. Infection was defined by documentation of a septic knee or surgical-site infection according to International Classification of Disease (ICD) Ninth Revision (9) and Tenth Revision (10) codes, and Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes. RESULTS: In the multivariable regression, the odds ratio (OR) of postoperative infection at 90-days was greater in the CSI injections within 0-<2 weeks (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.85-5.92, P<0.001) and 2-<4 weeks (OR 2.72 95% CI 1.57-4.71, P=0.003) cohorts in comparison to the control group. When comparing CSI administered within 0-2 weeks to CSI administered within 2-4 weeks, there was a greater odds of postoperative infection (OR 2.50) at 90-days following arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: CSI given within 2 weeks following knee arthroscopy increases the risk of postoperative infection the greatest whereas CSI given with 4 weeks increases the risk but to a lesser degree.

The Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is projected to reach 268,200 cases annually by 2030 in the United States. The growing demand for revision TKA can be attributed to the successes of primary TKAs combined with an aging population, patient desires to remain active, as well as expanded indications for younger patients. Given the evolving nature of revision TKAs, an epidemiological analysis of: (1) etiologies; (2) demographics, including age and region; as well as (3) lengths of stay (LOS) offers a way to minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention. METHODS: From 2016 to 2022, a national, all-payer database was queried. Incidences and indications were analyzed for a total of 135,983 patients who had revision TKA procedures. RESULTS: The most common etiologies for revision TKA procedures were infection (19.3%) and aseptic loosening (12.8%), followed by mechanical complications (7.9%). The largest age group was 65 to 74 years (34.9%) followed by 55 to 64 years (32.2%), then age >75 years (20.5%). The South had the largest total procedure cohort (39.8%), followed by the Midwest (28.6%), then the Northeast (18.6%), and the West (13.0%). The mean length of stay was 3.86 days (range, 1.0 to 15.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our study details the current status of revision TKA through 2022. While infection and aseptic loosening remain leading causes, we found a low aseptic loosening rate of 12.8%.

Impact of Reporting Bias, Conflict of Interest, and Funding Sources on Quality of Orthopaedic Research.

BACKGROUND: Influence of factors like reporting outcomes, conflicts of interest, and funding sources on study outcomes, particularly positive outcomes in orthopedics, remains underexplored. As transparency of partnerships in orthopaedic surgery through conflicts of interest statements has increased over the years, there has been a lack of focus on the value of these partnerships in influencing study outcomes. We aimed to investigate the associations between reporting outcomes, conflicts of interest, and sources of funding on study outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed articles published in 1 year in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, and The Journal of Arthroplasty. The abstracts were examined for appropriate inclusion, while the authors' names, academic degrees, funding disclosures, and departmental and institutional affiliations were redacted. There were a total of 1,351 publications reviewed from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: A significant association was found between positive outcomes and reported conflicts of interest (75% versus 25%, P < .001). Likewise, conflicts of interest showed significant association with industry-sponsored studies (88% versus 12%, P < .001) and evidence level > II (72% versus 28%, P < .001). Industry-sponsored research accounted for the highest percentage of studies involving a conflict of interest (88%) and level I studies (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Conflicts of interest are significantly associated with positive outcomes in orthopaedics. Sponsored studies were more inclined to have conflicts of interest and accounted for the majority of level I studies.

Staged Approach to Tibial Nail Removal Poses Increased Risk for Infection in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While previous research has addressed conversion arthroplasty scenarios, there is limited data on outcomes of staged or concurrent removal of intramedullary (IM) nails during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to explore the association between the timing of IM nail removal and the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), surgical site infection (SSI), manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and aseptic revision at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years after TKA when IM nail removal is performed in either a (1) staged or (2) concurrent manner. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database of all patients who underwent a primary TKA and hardware removal of an IM tibial nail. The group was separated into mutually exclusive cohorts with removal performed either (1) in a staged manner (n = 287) or (2) on the same day of TKA (n = 2,958). Surgical complications included the following: PJIs, SSIs, MUAs, and aseptic revisions. Surgical complications were collected at 90-day, 1 year, and 2-year time points. RESULTS: Patients who had staged nail removal before TKA demonstrated the highest incidence of PJI at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years (13.9, 16.7, and 17.1%, respectively). Adjusted multivariate regression analyses demonstrated significantly higher odds of a PJI, SSI, and MUA at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years for all patients who had staged nail removal TKA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an observed association between concurrent IM nail removal and a decreased risk of PJI, SSI, and MUA when compared to patients who had nail removal in a staged fashion. However, this does not discount the utility of the staged approach, as it may be necessary for patients less tolerant to longer operative times.

Stroke History and Time Elapsed are Predictors of Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A consensus has not been reached regarding the optimal timing of elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following a stroke. The purpose of this study was to examine the optimal period between stroke and TKA to minimize complications. Specifically, we assessed: (1) medical and surgical complications; (2) timing of stroke and TKA; (3) associated risk factors. METHODS: A national database identified 69,815 TKA patients that were separated into 6 exclusive cohorts using a stratum likelihood ratio: no stroke (n = 20,000), stroke within 6 (n = 17,764), 12 (n = 10,338), 18 (n = 8,370), 24 (n = 7,121), and 30 months (n = 6,222) prior to TKA. We analyzed 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year complications in each subgroup. Multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). RESULTS: The multivariate regression model identified that patients with a stroke within 6 months of TKA had increased risk of PJI at all time points (P < .001). Also, stroke 12 to 18 months before TKA elevated PJI risk at 1 and 2 years (all P < .021), while those over 18 months did not show a significant risk compared to controls (P > .067). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke prior to TKA was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, specifically PJI. We recommend a minimum of 6 months between stroke and TKA, with 18 months offering the lowest risk.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design.

Systematic reviews are conducted through a consistent and reproducible method to search, appraise, and summarize information. Within the evidence-based pyramid, systematic reviews can be at the apex when incorporating high-quality studies, presenting the strongest form of evidence given their synthesis of results from multiple primary studies to level IV evidence, depending on the studies they incorporate. When combined and supplemented with a meta-analysis using statistical methods to pool the results of 3 or more studies, systematic reviews are powerful tools to help answer research questions. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) execute; and (3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review and meta-analysis. In Part I, we discuss how to develop an appropriate research question as well as source and screen databases. To date, commonly used databases to source studies include PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Although not all-encompassing, this paper serves as a starting point for those interested in performing and/or critically reviewing lower extremity arthroplasty systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 65 and Older.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures are common in individuals over 65, necessitating quick mobilization for the best outcomes. There's ongoing debate about the optimal femoral component fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these fractures. Recent U.S. data shows a preference for cementless techniques in over 93% of primary THAs. Nonetheless, cemented fixation might offer advantages like fewer revisions, reduced periprosthetic fractures, lesser thigh pain, and enhanced long-term implant survival for those above 65. This study compares cementless and cemented fixation methods in THA, focusing on postoperative complications in patients aged 65 and older. METHODS: We analyzed a national database to identify patients aged 65+ who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures between 2016 and 2021, using either cementless (n = 2,842) or cemented (n = 1,124) techniques. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was conducted to balance variables such as age, sex, and comorbidities, resulting in two equally sized groups (n = 1,124 each). We evaluated outcomes like infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE), wound issues, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, etc., at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years post-surgery. A P-value < 05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: The cemented group initially consisted of older individuals, more females, and higher comorbidity rates. Both groups had similar infection and wound complication rates, and aseptic loosening. The cemented group, however, had lower periprosthetic fracture rates (2.5 versus 4.4%, P = .02) and higher VTE rates (2.9 versus 1.2%, P = .01) at 90 days. After 1 and 2 years, the cementless group experienced more aseptic revision surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: This study, using a large, national database and propensity-matched cohorts, indicates that cemented femoral component fixation in THA leads to fewer periprosthetic fractures and aseptic revisions, but a higher VTE risk. Fixation type choice should consider various factors, including age, sex, comorbidities, bone quality, and surgical expertise. This data can inform surgeons in their decision-making process.

The Effect of Insurance Type on Length of Stay Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: With the expansion of the Affordable Care Act in 2014, there has been a growing interest in how the Medicaid population will affect postoperative outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Studies have shown that lower socioeconomic status, non-Caucasian race, women, cardiac and renal disorders, and younger age have been associated with increased lengths of stay (LOS) after TKA. The primary purpose of our study was to compare total complications and LOS among patients undergoing TKA who have cash, commercial, government, Medicaid, and Medicare insurances. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer administrative claims database from 2016 to 2022 among patients undergoing TKA who had cash (n = 3,923), commercial (n = 966,169), government (n = 25,644), Medicaid (n = 56,184), and Medicare (n = 524,034) insurances. We compared and analyzed various baseline demographics, total complications, and LOS (< 1 day, 1 to 2 days, 3 to 4 days, and > 4 days), between the insurance types. RESULTS: Medicaid and Medicaid insurance types had patients who had the most comorbidities at baseline, including a comorbidity index > 3 (P < 0.0001), women, alcohol abuse, diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart disease (all P < 0.0001). In accounting for comorbidities, Medicaid was the biggest risk factor for total complications (P < 0.001) as well as increased LOS after TKA at 4 to 6 days, 7 to 9 days, and > 9 days (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Medicaid insurance is a risk factor for increased total complications and LOS following TKA. Appropriate preoperative and perioperative management of these patients is essential in order to mitigate the risk and burden on the healthcare system in this population.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-step Guide Part II: Study Execution.

Systematic reviews are the apex of the evidence-based pyramid, representing the strongest form of evidence synthesizing results from multiple primary studies. In particular, a quantitative systematic review, or meta-analysis, pools results from multiple studies to help answer a respective research question. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design, (2) execute, and (3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review. In Part II, we focus on methods to assess data quality through the Cochrane Risk of Bias, Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria, or Newcastle-Ottawa scale; enumerate various methods for appropriate data interpretation and analysis; and summarize how to convert respective findings to a publishable manuscript (providing a previously published example). Use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines is recommended and standard in all scientific literature, including that of orthopedic surgery. Pooled analyses with forest plots and associated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are common ways to present data. When converting to a manuscript, it is important to consider and discuss the inherent limitations of systematic reviews, including their inclusion and/or exclusion criteria and overall quality, which can be limited based on the quality of individual studies (eg, publication bias, heterogeneity, search/selection bias). We hope our papers will serve as starting points for those interested in performing an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review.

The Utility of the Social Vulnerability Index as a Proxy for Social Disparities Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, alternative payment models accounted for 40% of traditional Medicare reimbursements. As such, we sought to examine health disparities through a standardized categorization of social disparity using the social vulnerability index (SVI). We examined (1) risk factors for SVI ≥ 0.50, (2) incidences of complications, and (3) risk factors for total complications between patients who have SVI < 0.50 and SVI ≥ 0.50 who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified in the state of Maryland. A total of 4,952 patients who had complete social determinants of health data were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts according to SVI: < 0.50 (n = 2,431) and ≥ 0.50 (n = 2,521) based on the national mean SVI of 0.50. The SVI identifies communities that may need support caused by external stresses on human health based on 4 themed scores: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing and transportation. The SVI theme of household composition and disability encompassed patients aged 65 years and more, patients aged 17 years and less, civilians who have a disability, single-parent households, and English language deficiencies. The higher the SVI, the more social vulnerability or resources are needed to thrive in a geographic area. RESULTS: When controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities, the theme of household composition and disability (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.0, P = .03) was the only independent risk factor for total complications. Patients who had an SVI ≥0.50 were more likely to be women (65.8% versus 61.0%, P < .001), Black (34.4% versus 12.9%, P < .001), and have a median household income < $87,999 (21.3% versus 10.2%, P < .001) in comparison to the patients who had an SVI < 0.50, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SVI theme of household composition and disability, encompassing patients aged 65 years and more, patients aged 17 years and less, civilians who have a disability, single-parent households, and English language deficiencies, were independent risk factors for total complications following TKA. Together, these findings offer opportunities for interventions with selected patients to address social disparities.

Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 2016 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons released a consensus recommending venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to examine (1) incidences of postoperative complications, including pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and transfusion rates; (2) trends from 2016 to 2021 in VTE prophylaxis; and (3) independent risk factors for 90-day total complications following TKA between aspirin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. METHODS: Using a national, all-payer database from 2016 to 2021, we identified all patients who underwent primary TKA. Exclusions included all patients who had prescribed anticoagulants within 1 year prior to TKA, hypercoagulable states, and cancer. Data were collected on baseline demographics, including age, sex, diabetes, and a comorbidity index, in each of the VTE prophylaxis cohorts. Postoperative outcomes included rates of PE, DVT, and transfusion. Multivariable regressions were performed to determine independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days following TKA. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, aspirin was the most used anticoagulant (n = 62,054), followed by rivaroxaban (n = 26,426), enoxaparin (n = 20,980), and warfarin (n = 13,305). The cohort using warfarin had the highest incidences of PE (1.8%) and DVT (5.7%), while the cohort using aspirin had the lowest incidences of PE (0.6%) and DVT (1.6%). The rates of aspirin use increased the most from 2016 to 2021 (32.1% to 70.8%), while the rates of warfarin decreased the most (19.3% to 3.0%). Enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin were independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: An epidemiological analysis of VTE prophylaxis use from 2016 to 2021 shows an increase in aspirin following TKA compared to other anticoagulant cohorts in a nationally representative population. This approach provides more insight and a better understanding of anticoagulation trends over this time period in a nationally representative sample.

Use and Application of Large Language Models for Patient Questions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A consumer-focused health care model not only allows unprecedented access to information, but equally warrants consideration of the appropriateness of providing accurate patient health information. Nurses play a large role in influencing patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but they come at a cost. A specific natural language artificial intelligence (AI) model, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), has accumulated over 100 million users within months of launching. As such, we aimed to compare: (1) orthopaedic surgeons' evaluation of the appropriateness of the answers to the most frequently asked patient questions after TKA; and (2) patients' comfort level in answering their postoperative questions by using answers provided by arthroplasty-trained nurses and ChatGPT. METHODS: We prospectively created 60 questions based on the most commonly asked patient questions following TKA. There were 3 fellowship-trained surgeons who assessed the answers provided by arthroplasty-trained nurses and ChatGPT-4 to each of the questions. The surgeons graded each set of responses based on clinical judgment as: (1) "appropriate," (2) "inappropriate" if the response contained inappropriate information, or (3) "unreliable," if the responses provided inconsistent content. Patients' comfort level and trust in AI were assessed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) hosted at our local hospital. RESULTS: The surgeons graded 44 out of 60 (73.3%) responses for the arthroplasty-trained nurses and 44 out of 60 (73.3%) for ChatGPT to be "appropriate." There were 4 responses graded "inappropriate" and one response graded "unreliable" provided by the nurses. For the ChatGPT response, there were 5 responses graded "inappropriate" and no responses graded "unreliable." There were 136 patients (53.8%) who were more comfortable with the answers provided by ChatGPT compared to 86 patients (34.0%) who preferred the answers from arthroplasty-trained nurses. Of the 253 patients, 233 (92.1%) were uncertain if they would trust AI to answer their postoperative questions. There were 127 patients (50.2%) who answered that if they knew the previous answer was provided by ChatGPT, their comfort level in trusting the answer would change. CONCLUSIONS: One potential use of ChatGPT can be found in providing appropriate answers to patient questions after TKA. At our institution, cost expenditures can potentially be minimized while maintaining patient satisfaction. Inevitably, successful implementation is dependent on the ability to provide information that is credible and in accordance with the objectives of both physicians and patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide. Part III: Executing a Meta-Analysis.

At the top of the evidence-based pyramid, systematic reviews stand out as the most powerful, synthesizing findings from numerous primary studies. Specifically, a quantitative systematic review, known as a meta-analysis, combines results from various studies to address a specific research question. This review serves as a guide on how to: (1) design; (2) perform; and (3) publish an orthopedic arthroplasty systematic review. In Part III, we focus on how to design and perform a meta-analysis. We delineate the advantages and disadvantages of meta-analyses compared to systematic reviews, acknowledging their potential challenges due to time constraints and the complexities posed by study heterogeneity and data availability. Despite these obstacles, a well-executed meta-analysis contributes precision and heightened statistical power, standing at the apex of the evidence-based pyramid. The design of a meta-analysis closely mirrors that of a systematic review, but necessitates the inclusion of effect sizes, variability measures, sample sizes, outcome measures, and overall study characteristics. Effective data presentation involves the use of forest plots, along with analyses for heterogeneities and subgroups. Widely-used software tools are common in this domain, and there is a growing trend toward incorporating artificial intelligence software. Ultimately, the intention is for these papers to act as foundational resources for individuals interested in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the context of orthopaedic arthroplasty, where applicable.

A Comparison Between Polyethylene Exchange and Full Revision for Arthrofibrosis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating postoperative complication and a major cause of patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness after TKA. For cases not amenable to manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), one component or full revision are both suitable options. In a value-based healthcare era, maximizing cost-effectiveness with optimized clinical outcomes for patients remains the ultimate goal. As such, we compared (1) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), (2) range of motion (ROM), as well as (3) complication rates, including MUA and lysis of adhesions (LOA), between polyethylene exchange and full component revision for TKA arthrofibrosis. METHODS: Patients were queried from an institutional database who underwent revision TKA for arthrofibrosis between January 1, 2015, and April 31, 2021. There were 33 patients who underwent full revision and 16 patients who underwent polyethylene exchange. Demographics and baseline characteristics between the cohorts were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes included MUA, LOA, and re-revision rates as well as KOOS, JR, and extension and flexion ROM at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. Baseline comorbidities, including age, body mass index, alcohol use, tobacco use, and diabetes, were comparable between the full revision and polyethylene exchange revision cohorts (P > .05). The one and full component revisions had similar preoperative KOOS, JR (43 versus 42, P = .85), and flexion (81 versus 82 degrees, P = .80) versus extension (11 versus 11 degrees, P = .87) ROM. RESULTS: The full component revision had higher KOOS, JR (65 versus 55, P = .04), and flexion (102 versus 92 degrees, P = .02), but similar extension (3 versus 3 degrees, P = .80) ROM at final follow-up compared to the polyethylene exchange revision, respectively. The MUA (18.2 versus 18.8%, P = .96) and LOA (2.0 versus 0.0%, P = .32) rates were similar between full component and polyethylene exchange revisions. There was one re-revision (3.0%) for the cohort of patients who initially underwent full revision. There were four full re-revisions (25.0%) and two polyethylene exchange re-revisions (12.5%) performed in the cohort of patients who initially underwent a polyethylene exchange revision. CONCLUSIONS: The full component revision for stiffness after TKA showed favorable KOOS, JR, ROM, and outcomes in comparison to the polyethylene exchange revision. While the optimal treatment for stiffness after TKA is without consensus, this study supports the use of the full component revision when applied to the institutional population at hand. It is imperative that homogeneity exists in preoperative definitions, preoperative baseline patient demographics, ROM and function levels, outcome measures, and preoperative indications, as well as the inclusion of clinical data that assesses complete exchange, single exchange, and tibial insert exchange.

Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The mode of femoral fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is undetermined, with reported outcomes favoring different fixation methods. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between cemented and cementless fixation at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years in patients aged 65 years of age and older undergoing THA for osteoarthritis. METHODS: Using an all-payer, national database, patients 65 years and older undergoing primary THA, either with cementless (n = 56,701) or cemented (n = 6,283) femoral fixation for osteoarthritis were identified. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis for age, sex, comorbidity index, alcohol abuse, tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes was performed, resulting in n = 6,283 patients in each cohort. Postoperative outcomes, including postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic revision, surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, wound complications, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and aseptic loosening were assessed. RESULTS: The cemented cohort had higher rates of infection (4.5 versus 0.8%, odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.33 to 7.93, P < .001), aseptic revision (2.9 versus 2.0%, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.85, P = .001), venous thromboembolism (1.8 versus 1.3%, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.87, P < .001), and aseptic loosening (1.5 versus 0.7%, OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.32, P < .001) at 90-days. At 1 and 2 years, the cemented cohort had higher rates of infection, aseptic revision, and aseptic loosening (all P < .001). Rates of periprosthetic fracture were similar at all time points (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cemented fixation had higher rates of infection, aseptic loosening, and aseptic revision. This finding supports the current use of cementless fixation, but the ultimate decision regarding fixation type should be based on the proper optimization of the patient's comorbidities and bone quality.

Methodological Assessment of the 100 Most-Cited Articles in Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Last Decade Compared to the All-Time List.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been driven by a growing focus on evidence-based medicine. This transition is reflected in the critical appraisal of both, the quality of work and the potential impact on the orthopedic community. The purpose of our study was to (1) identify the top 100 most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade and from all-time, and (2) compare methodological rigor of the most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade to articles all-time by level of evidence. METHODS: The top 100 cited articles were recorded for manuscripts from the last decade, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022, and manuscripts from all-time for TKA. We collected authors, year of publication, journal of the article, country of origin of authors, article type (basic science article, clinical research article), level of evidence, methodological index for non-randomized studies score, physiotherapy evidence database scale, and citation density (total citations/years published). RESULTS: The largest number of studies for all-time TKA (53.0%) and decade TKA (42.0%) were Level III. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score for comparative studies was 18.7 for all-time TKA and 20.7 for decade TKA (P < .001). The average physiotherapy evidence database score was 6.1 for all-time TKA and 8.1 for decade TKA (P > .05). The highest citation density for all-time TKA was 111 and for past decade was 63. The number of level II studies in TKA increased from 19.0% from all time to 38.0% from the last decade (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of improved methodologies over time reflect positive steps toward evidence-based practice in TKA. A continued focus on producing methodologically sound studies may guide evidence-based clinical decision-making.

Appropriateness of Frequently Asked Patient Questions Following Total Hip Arthroplasty From ChatGPT Compared to Arthroplasty-Trained Nurses.

BACKGROUND: The use of ChatGPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer), which is a natural language artificial intelligence model, has gained unparalleled attention with the accumulation of over 100 million users within months of launching. As such, we aimed to compare the following: 1) orthopaedic surgeons' evaluation of the appropriateness of the answers to the most frequently asked patient questions after total hip arthroplasty; and 2) patients' evaluation of ChatGPT and arthroplasty-trained nurses responses to answer their postoperative questions. METHODS: We prospectively created 60 questions to address the most commonly asked patient questions following total hip arthroplasty. We obtained answers from arthroplasty-trained nurses and from the ChatGPT-3.5 version for each of the questions. Surgeons graded each set of responses based on clinical judgment as 1) "appropriate," 2) "inappropriate" if the response contained inappropriate information, or 3) "unreliable" if the responses provided inconsistent content. Each patient was given a randomly selected question from the 60 aforementioned questions, with responses provided by ChatGPT and arthroplasty-trained nurses, using a Research Electronic Data Capture survey hosted at our local hospital. RESULTS: The 3 fellowship-trained surgeons graded 56 out of 60 (93.3%) responses for the arthroplasty-trained nurses and 57 out of 60 (95.0%) for ChatGPT to be "appropriate." There were 175 out of 252 (69.4%) patients who were more comfortable following the ChatGPT responses and 77 out of 252 (30.6%) who preferred arthroplasty-trained nurses' responses. However, 199 out of 252 patients (79.0%) responded that they were "uncertain" with regard to trusting AI to answer their postoperative questions. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT provided appropriate answers from a physician perspective. Patients were also more comfortable with the ChatGPT responses than those from arthroplasty-trained nurses. Inevitably, its successful implementation is dependent on its ability to provide credible information that is consistent with the goals of the physician and patient alike.

Risk Factors Portending a Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients Who Have Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

INTRODUCTION: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) poses a substantial burden to orthopaedic surgeons. However, the exact risk attributed by each specific patient factor for those who end up receiving a total hip arthroplasty (THA) are not well known. We assessed: (1) patient demographics (age and sex); (2) blood cell dyscrasias (sickle-cell disease and hypercoagulable states); and (3) substance use (oral corticosteroid use, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search examined all patients who had a primary THA (n=715,100) between January 1, 2010 and April 30, 2020 using a national, all-payer database. Risk factors studied included age, sex, sickle-cell, hypercoagulable state, oral corticosteroid use, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. RESULTS: Several risk factors were found to be significantly predictive for ONFH requiring THA: age <55 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.01 to 1.02, p<0.001), men (OR 1.07, 95% CI of 1.04 to 1.10, p<0.001), oral corticosteroid use (OR 1.21, 95% CI of 1.17 to 1.25, p<0.001), tobacco use (OR 1.15, 95% CI of 1.11 to 1.18, p<0.001), and alcohol abuse (OR 1.05, 95% CI of 1.01 to 1.08, p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, young age, men, oral corticosteroid use, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse are risk factors for patients who have ONFH and had a THA. The degree of risk from greatest to least were: oral corticosteroid use, tobacco use, men, alcohol abuse, and age <55 years old.

The use of preoperative continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea following total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sleep apnea, affecting up to 1 in 4 older men in the United States, may be at increased risk of postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including increased thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events, as well as respiratory, cardiac, and digestive complications. However, the extent to which the use of CPAP in patients with sleep apnea has been studied in TKA is limited. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify all patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2010 and 2021. Patients who had any history of sleep apnea were identified and then stratified based on the use of CPAP. A propensity score match analysis was conducted to limit the influence of confounders. Medical complications, such as cardiac arrest, stroke, pulmonary embolism, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, and wound complications, were collected at 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years. RESULTS: The bivariate analysis showed inferior outcomes for sleep apnea with CPAP use compared to sleep apnea with no CPAP use, in terms of length of stay (5.9 vs. 5.2, p < 0.001), PJI (1.31% vs. 1.14%, p < 0.001), stroke (0.97% vs. 0.82%, p < 0.001), VTE (1.04% vs. 0.82, p < 0.001), and all other complications at 90-days (p < 0.001) except cardiac arrest (0.14% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.052), and aseptic revision (0.40% vs. 0.39%, p = 0.832), PJI (1.81% vs. 1.55%, p < 0.001) and aseptic revision (1.25% vs. 1.06%, p < 0.001) at 1-year, and PJI (2.07 vs. 1.77, p < 0.001) and aseptic revision (1.98 vs. 1.17, p < 0.001) at 2-years. CONCLUSION: Patients with sleep apnea have increased postoperative complications after undergoing TKA in comparison to patients without sleep apnea. More severe sleep apnea, represented by CPAP usage in this study led to worse postoperative outcomes but further analysis is required signify the role of CPAP in this patient population. Patients with sleep apnea should be treated as a high-risk group.