ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Positive urine sample is a frequent finding in post-chemotherapy febrile neutropenia (FN) and can lead to prolonged antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of bacteriuria episodes in FN patients receiving targeted antibiotic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-centric retrospective study was conducted over a four-year period (2014-2019) on systematic urinalysis. All consecutive first bacteriuria episodes (≤ 2 bacteria with at least ≥ 103 CFU/mL) during FN in hospitalized adult patients for hematological malignancies were included. Relapse and recurrence were defined by fever or urinary tract symptoms (UTS) with the same bacterial subspecies in urine occurring ≤ 7 days and ≤ 30 days, respectively, after antibiotic discontinuation. Mortality rate was determined at 30 days. Targeted antibiotic therapy ≤ 10 days for women and ≤ 14 for men was considered as short course. RESULTS: Among 97 patients, 105 bacteriuria episodes on systematic urinalysis were analyzed; 67.6% occurred in women, 41.9% in AML patients, 17.1% were bacteremic, 14.2% presented with UTS, and 61.9% were treated with short-course antibiotic treatment. One death was reported. In men, no relapse/recurrence was noted, even in the short-course antibiotic group. In women, 2.8% of episodes treated with short-course antibiotic led to relapse or recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Relapse, recurrence, and mortality were uncommon events in FN patients experiencing bacteriuria episode, whatever the antibiotic duration. To distinguish asymptomatic bacteriuria from infection remained challenging in women. In men, systematic urinalysis at onset of FN could be useful.
Subject(s)
Bacteriuria , Febrile Neutropenia , Hematology , Urinary Tract Infections , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Bacteriuria/etiology , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/etiology , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/etiologyABSTRACT
Screening is important to determine whether patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have pulmonary hypertension because earlier pulmonary hypertension treatment can improve survival in these patients. Although decreased transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TLCO) is currently considered the best pulmonary function test for screening for pulmonary hypertension in SSc, small series have suggested that partitioning TLCO into membrane conductance (diffusing capacity) for carbon monoxide (DMCO) and alveolar capillary blood volume (VC) through combined measurement of TLCO and transfer factor of the lung for nitric oxide (TLNO) is more effective to identify pulmonary hypertension in SSc patients compared with TLCO alone. Here, the objective was to determine whether combined TLCO-TLNO partitioned with recently refined equations could more accurately detect pulmonary hypertension than TLCO alone in SSc.For that purpose, 572 unselected consecutive SSc patients were retrospectively recruited in seven French centres.Pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed with right heart catheterisation in 58 patients. TLCO, TLNO and VC were all lower in SSc patients with pulmonary hypertension than in SSc patients without pulmonary hypertension. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the presence of pulmonary hypertension was equivalent for TLCO (0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.85) and TLNO (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.83), but lower for VC (0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78) and DMCO (0.66, 95% CI 0.62-0.70).Compared with TLCO alone, combined TLCO-TLNO does not add capability to detect pulmonary hypertension in unselected SSc patients.
Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide/metabolism , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity/methods , Scleroderma, Systemic , Adult , Blood-Air Barrier , Capillary Permeability , Early Diagnosis , Early Medical Intervention , Female , France , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pulmonary/metabolism , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Gas Exchange , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During this pandemic situation, some studies have led to hasty conclusions about Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment, due to a lack of methodology. This pedagogic study aimed to highlight potential biases in research on COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: We evaluate the effect of coffee's active part, 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (TMX) on patients with COVID-19. A cohort of 93 patients, with a diagnosis of COVID-19 is analyzed. RESULTS: TMX group and control group included, respectively, 26 and 67 patients. In the TMX group, patients had a median length of stay in hospital of 5.5 days shorter than in the control group (9.5 vs. 15 days, p < 0.05). Patients in the control group were more severe than patients in the TMX group with a significantly higher National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2 score) (8 vs. 6, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple biases prevents us from concluding to an effect of coffee on COVID-19. Despite an important social pressure during this crisis, methodology and conscientiousness are the best way to avoid hasty conclusions that can be deleterious for patients. Identifier: NCT04395742.