ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter transformation (DLBCL-RT) is typically chemoresistant with poor prognosis. Aiming to explore a chemotherapy-free treatment combination that triggers anti-tumour immune responses, we conducted a phase 2 study of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with DLBCL-RT. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase 2 study in 15 hospitals in Italy and Switzerland. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma as per the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria with biopsy-proven transformation to DLBCL; had not previously received treatment for DLBCL-RT, although they could have received chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapies; were aged 18 years or older; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. No previous treatment with any of the drugs in the triplet combination was allowed. Patients received 35 cycles of 21 days of intravenous obinutuzumab (100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, 1000 mg on day 8 and day 15 of cycle 1; 1000 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-8) and intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg on day 2 of cycle 1 and 1200 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-18), and continuous oral venetoclax (ramp-up from 20 mg/day on day 15 of cycle 1 according to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia schedule, then 400 mg/day from day 1 of cycle 3 to day 21 of cycle 35). The primary endpoint was overall response rate at day 21 of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. We considered an overall response rate of 67% or more to be clinically active, rejecting the null hypothesis of a response of 40% or less. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04082897, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between Oct 9, 2019, and Oct 19, 2022, 28 patients were enrolled (12 [43%] male patients and 16 [57%] female patients). Median follow-up was 16·8 months (IQR 7·8-32·0). At cycle 6, 19 of 28 patients showed a response, yielding an overall response rate of 67·9% (95% CI 47·6-84·1). Treatment-emergent adverse events that were grade 3 or worse were reported in 17 (61%; 95% CI 40·6-78·5) of 28 patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent (11 [39%; 21·5-59·4] of 28 patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (29%; 14·2-48·7) patients, which were most commonly infections (five [18%; 6·1-36·9] of 28 patients). There were two (7%) deaths attributable to adverse events during the study: one from sepsis and one from fungal pneumonia, which were not considered as directly treatment-related by the investigators. Six (21·4%) patients had immune-related adverse events, none of which led to discontinuation. No tumour lysis syndrome was observed. INTERPRETATION: The atezolizumab, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab triplet combination was shown to be active and safe, suggesting that this chemotherapy-free regimen could become a new first-line treatment approach in patients with DLBCL-RT. FUNDING: Roche.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Sulfonamides , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/mortality , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortalityABSTRACT
Undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) is achievable in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax alone or combined with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. This phase 2, multicenter, MRD-driven study was designed to discontinue treatment upon reaching uMRD4 (<10-4) in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL receiving venetoclax monotherapy or after the addition of ibrutinib. Primary end point of the study was proportion of uMRD4 with venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Secondary end points were overall response rate, partial response, complete response, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety of venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Patients with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. MRD+ patients added ibrutinib and continued both drugs up to Cycle 24 Day 28/uMRD4/progression/toxicity. After Cycle 24 Day 28, MRD+ patients continued ibrutinib. Thirty-eight patients (29% with TP53 aberrations; 79% with unmutated IGHV) started venetoclax. Overall response rate with venetoclax was 36 (95%) of 38 patients (20 complete; 16 partial response). Seventeen patients (45%) with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. Nineteen (55%) MRD+ subjects added ibrutinib. After a median of 7 months (range, 3-10 months) of combined treatment, 16 (84%) of 19 achieved uMRD4, thus stopping both drugs. Two MRD+ patients at Cycle 24 Day 28 continued ibrutinib until progression/toxicity. After a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was not reached; 10 patients progressed (4 restarted venetoclax, 3 without treatment need, 2 developed Richter transformation, and 1 dropped out). Seven (22%) of 32 patients remain uMRD4 after 3 years of follow-up. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event; no grade 5 events occurred on study. This sequential MRD-guided approach led to uMRD4 in 33 (87%) of 38 patients, with venetoclax monotherapy or combined with ibrutinib, delivering treatment combination only in a fraction, and ultimately identifying the few patients benefiting from continuous therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT04754035.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Humans , Neoplasm, Residual/drug therapy , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicABSTRACT
The GIMEMA phase II LLC1518 VERITAS trial investigated the efficacy and safety of front-line, fixed-duration venetoclax and rituximab (VenR) in combination in young (≤65 years), fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unmutated IGHV and/or TP53 disruption. Treatment consisted of the venetoclax ramp-up, six monthly courses of the VenR combination, followed by six monthly courses of venetoclax as a single agent. A centralized assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) was performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction assay on the peripheral blood and bone marrow at the end of treatment (EOT) and during the follow-up. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate at the EOT. Seventy-five patients were enrolled; the median age was 54 years (range, 38-65), 96% had unmutated IGHV, 12% had TP53 disruption, and 4% had mutated IGHV with TP53 disruption. The overall response rate at the EOT was 94.7%, with a complete remission rate of 76%. MRD was undetectable in the peripheral blood of 69.3% of patients and in the bone marrow of 58.7% of patients. The 12-month MRD-free survival in the 52 patients with undetectable MRD in the peripheral blood at the EOT was 73.1%. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, no cases of disease progression were observed. Three patients had died, two due to COVID-19 and one due to tumor lysis syndrome. The first report of the VERITAS study shows that front-line VenR was associated with a high rate of complete remissions and durable response with undetectable MRD in young patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unfavorable genetic characteristics. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03455517.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Humans , Middle Aged , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Rituximab/adverse effects , Neoplasm, Residual/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are indolent nonfollicular B-cell lymphomas (INFLs) and have heterogeneous clinical behavior. Recently, time to progression of disease at 24 months (POD24) was identified to stratify overall survival (OS) in follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in INFL. Here, we examined the ability of POD24 to predict subsequent OS in a large, international cohort of MZL as part of the NF10 prospective international registry headed by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). POD24 was only calculated for MZL patients requiring immediate therapy and was defined as experiencing lymphoma progression within 24 months from diagnosis. Among the 1325 patients enrolled in the NF10 study, we identified 321 patients with MZL for whom immediate therapy was planned right after lymphoma diagnosis. Overall, POD24 was confirmed in 59 patients (18%). Three-year OS for patients with POD24 was 53% with a hazard ratio of 19.5 (95% confidence interval, 8.4-45) compared with patients without POD24 (3-year OS, 95%). Association of POD24 with OS was confirmed for the subgroup of splenic and extranodal MZLs. Assessment of POD24 stratifies subsequent outcome in MZL and identifies a high-risk population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02904577.
Subject(s)
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/diagnosis , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/mortality , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
We analyzed 160 young Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) patients with a median age of 49 years (range 23-55 years), diagnosed between January 2000 and January 2019 in 14 Italian centers. At diagnosis, 70% of patients were asymptomatic. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 57% have been treated. As initial therapy 79% of patients received chemo-immunotherapy, 13% a chemo-free induction and 8% chemotherapy only. At relapse or progression, 6% underwent an autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall, 19% of patients received ibrutinib during the course of the disease. According to IPSSWM, 63% were classified as low risk, 27% as intermediate risk and 10% as high risk. Five-year OS was shorter in high-risk as compared with low or intermediate risk patients (92.9% vs 100% P = .002). According to revised IPSSWM, 92% were classified as very low or low risk and 8% as intermediate risk, with a shorter 5-year OS in the latter group (87.5% vs 100%, P = .028). The OS of young WM patients was not significantly reduced as compared with age-matched, sex-matched and calendar year-matched general population. Early diagnosis, absence of high-risk features in symptomatic patients and high efficacy of modern treatments are the main determinants of the excellent outcome of young WM patients.
Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Stem Cell Transplantation , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Age Factors , Autografts , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Piperidines , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/mortality , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/therapyABSTRACT
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is usually associated with a serum IgM paraprotein, corresponding to Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Cases presenting with IgG or IgA, or without a monoclonal protein are extremely rare. We analyzed clinical characteristics, frontline treatment, and the outcome of 45 patients with non-IgM LPL, and compared them with a control group of WM patients. The median age was similar, with significantly higher prevalence of females in non-IgM LPL, than in WM patients (60% vs 39%, P = .016). Patients with non-IgM LPL more frequently presented with lymphadenopathies (53% vs 15%, P < .001), splenomegaly (22% vs 8%, P = .015) or extranodal involvement (20% vs 8%, P = .05). In non-IgM LPL a serum monoclonal protein and bone marrow infiltration were less common than in WM patients (69% and 84% of cases respectively, P < .001 for both comparisons). The MYD88 (L265P) mutation was found in 8/19 patients using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. A CXCR4 mutation was found in 4/17 cases using Sanger. In 16 patients we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of genes MYD88, CXCR4, ARID1-A, KMT2D, NOTCH2, TP53, PRDM1, CD79B, TRAF3, MYBBP1A, TNFAIP3. Seven patients (44%) had a MYD88 mutation (S219C in one), four (25%) a CXCR4 mutation, three (19%) a KMT2D mutation, one (6%) a TP53 mutation and one (6%) a TRAF3 mutation. With a median follow-up of 55.7 months, 36 non-IgM LPL patients (80%) were treated. Non-IgM LPL patients received more frequently anthracycline-containing regimens, as compared with WM patients, who mainly received alkylating-based therapies. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 84%, similar to that of WM patients.
Subject(s)
Paraproteins/analysis , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anthracyclines/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Progression-Free Survival , Receptors, CXCR4/genetics , Sex Distribution , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/blood , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/drug therapy , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/geneticsSubject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Sulfonamides , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effectsABSTRACT
P110-γ and -δ act in lymphocytes chemotaxis, presenting distinct, nonredundant roles in B- and T-cell migration and adhesion to stromal cells. Moreover, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-γ inhibition contributes to regulate macrophage polarization inhibiting cancer growth. Duvelisib (IPI-145) is an oral first-in-class, dual phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor targeting p110-δ/γ exerting its activity in preclinical studies across different prognostic groups. In a large Phase III study, duvelisib showed superior progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with ofatumumab, thus leading to its approval for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Immune-related effects are the main reason for treatment suspension, thus affecting survival benefit. Nevertheless, the correct management of adverse events, eventually including dose modification, allows patients to remain on treatment. In conclusion, duvelisib represents a promising treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and a salvage therapy after ibrutinib.
Subject(s)
Isoquinolines/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Purines/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Drug Evaluation , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/classification , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Isoquinolines/adverse effects , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Piperidines , Prognosis , Purines/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Ibrutinib represents a revolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment scenario providing results never seen before and offering an effective therapy even in high-risk patients with really poor outcome after chemoimmunotherapy. Thanks to longer updates, on one hand, ibrutinib has confirmed its efficacy continuing to show clinical benefits over time; on the other hand, resistance mechanisms are slowly emerging. Moreover, clinicians should be aware of ibrutinib-related side effects, paying attention to screen patients that could benefit more from the drug and try to prevent adverse events. While ibrutinib approval indication is expanding, high treatment costs will shortly require a selection of those who can really draw advantage from Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition and those who could continue to be treated with chemoimmunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Piperidines , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/geneticsSubject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Hepatitis B virus/physiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Piperidines , Retrospective Studies , Virus ActivationSubject(s)
Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Quality of Life , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/therapy , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/immunology , Prognosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/immunologySubject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/physiopathology , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Richter's transformation (RT) is defined as the evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This complication is rare and aggressive, with poor prognosis and dismal survival. Clonal relationship with the underlying CLL/SLL, observed in â¼80% of cases, represents one of the main factors affecting prognosis. Treatment has been historically based on chemoimmunotherapy, but frequent mutations in genes involved in cell survival and proliferation-such as TP53, NOTCH1, MYC, CDKN2A-confer resistance to standard treatments. During the last years, advances in the knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying RT allowed to identify genetic and molecular lesions that can potentially be targeted by novel selective agents. Pathway and checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapy are currently under investigation and represent promising treatment options. This review summarizes current biological evidence and available data on novel therapeutic agents.
ABSTRACT
Concern has emerged about the prevalence of second cancers among patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL) treated with purine analogs. We investigated 513 patients with HCL treated with cladribine over the last 30 years at 18 Italian centers and calculated their standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). We identified 24 patients with a second cancer diagnosed at a median time from treatment with cladribine of 59.9 months (range: 9.2-169.7 months). All patients with solid neoplasms presented with a limited-stage disease, except four cases of locally advanced cancer; multiple myeloma patients had a smoldering disease, while lymphoma patients had stage Ie and stage IV diseases. Response to therapy was complete in 19 cases; 1 patient is still receiving treatment for a relapsing bladder disease, while 2 patients progressed during treatment and died. These two patients died from unrelated causes: one from infection and one due to surgery complications. The median OS from HCL was 98.5 months (range: 38.4-409.2 months), while the median OS from second cancer was 27.6 months (range: 1-117.8 months). The SIR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.54-1.30) for males and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.36-2.73) for females: no statistically significant differences were highlighted. We were not able to demonstrate an excess of second cancer or a significant association with the specific studied neoplasm.
ABSTRACT
Background: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Methods: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami. Findings: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109/L, platelets <100 × 109/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets. Interpretation: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment. Funding: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.
ABSTRACT
Ibrutinib revolutionized the CLL treatment approach and prognosis demonstrating its efficacy and safety even at extended follow-up. During the last few years, several next-generation inhibitors have been developed to overcome the occurrence of toxicity or resistance in patients on continuous treatment. In a head-to-head comparison of two phase III trials, both acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib demonstrated a lower incidence of adverse events in respect to ibrutinib. Nevertheless, resistance mutations remain a concern with continuous therapy and were demonstrated with both first- and next-generation covalent inhibitors. Reversible inhibitors showed efficacy independently of previous treatment and the presence of BTK mutations. Other strategies are currently under development in CLL, especially for high-risk patients, and include BTK inhibitor combinations with BCl2 inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Finally, new mechanisms for BTK inhibition are under investigations in patients progressing with both covalent and non-covalent BTK and BCl2 inhibitors. Here we summarize and discuss results from main experiences on irreversible and reversable BTK inhibitors in CLL.