Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Ann Fam Med ; 20(2): 137-144, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346929

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Because social conditions such as food insecurity and housing instability shape health outcomes, health systems are increasingly screening for and addressing patients' social risks. This study documented the prevalence of social risks and examined the desire for assistance in addressing those risks in a US-based integrated delivery system. METHODS: A survey was administered to Kaiser Permanente members on subsidized exchange health insurance plans (2018-2019). The survey included questions about 4 domains of social risks, desire for help, and attitudes. We conducted a descriptive analysis and estimated multivariate modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Of 438 participants, 212 (48%) reported at least 1 social risk factor. Housing instability was the most common (70%) factor reported. Members with social risks reported more discomfort being screened for social risks (14.2% vs 5.4%; P = .002) than those without risks, although 90% of participants believed that health systems should assist in addressing social risks. Among those with 1-2 social risks, however, only 27% desired assistance. Non-Hispanic Black participants who reported a social risk were more than twice as likely to desire assistance compared with non-Hispanic White participants (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Athough most survey participants believed health systems have a role in addressing social risks, a minority of those reporting a risk wanted assistance and reported more discomfort being screened for risk factors than those without risks. Health systems should work to increase the comfort of patients in reporting risks, explore how to successfully assist them when desired, and offer resources to address these risks outside the health care sector.VISUAL ABSTRACT.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Insurance, Health , Humans , Mass Screening , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 111(1): 54-61, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30129484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no standardized, well-accepted, quality metrics that guide care for adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the quality metrics that are in use at the Adult Sickle Cell Disease Program at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and the applicability of the metrics to Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS), an integrated healthcare system with a developing adult sickle cell disease program. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of 146 KPMAS and 308 JHH patients from January 1, 2014-December 31, 2015. Demographics, genotype and data on several key quality metrics (yearly screening labs, documented vaccinations and appropriate hydroxyurea prescriptions) were collected from electronic health records (EPIC Systems). We defined hydroxyurea adherence as having had at least 6 months of refills prescribed during the two years of study by either EHR or patient report. RESULTS: Patients at KPMAS were older than those at JHH (median age 44 and 33 respectively) and less likely to have hemoglobin SS disease (29% and 66% respectively). Among KPMAS patients, 85% had documentation of any pneumococcal vaccination compared to 87% at JHH. 21 of 54 eligible patients at KPMAS and 95 of 165 eligible patients at JHH were prescribed hydroxyurea. At both institutions, 62% of patients were adherent to hydroxyurea. There were limitations to diagnosis coding and availability of vaccination and refill documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve preventative care adherence are needed to improve outcomes in both academic medical centers and integrated health systems.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , District of Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland/epidemiology , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Virginia/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 136: 107403, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination rates among long-term care center (LTCC) workers are among the lowest of all frontline health care workers. Current efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake generally focus on strategies that have proven effective for increasing influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers including educational and communication strategies. Experimental evidence is lacking on the comparative advantage of educational strategies to improve vaccine acceptance and uptake, especially in the context of COVID-19. Despite the lack of evidence, education and communication strategies are recommended to improve COVID-19 vaccination rates and decrease vaccine hesitancy (VH), especially strategies using tailored messaging for disproportionately affected populations. METHODS: We describe a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial with 40 LTCCs and approximately 4000 LTCC workers in 2 geographically, culturally, and ethnically distinct states. We compare the effectiveness of two strategies for increasing COVID-19 booster vaccination rates and willingness to promote COVID-19 booster vaccination: co-design processes for tailoring educational messages vs. an enhanced usual care comparator. Our study focuses on the language and/or cultural groups that are most disproportionately affected by VH and low COVID-19 vaccine uptake in these LTCCs. CONCLUSION: Finding effective methods to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake and decrease VH among LTCC staff is critical. Beyond COVID-19, better approaches are needed to improve vaccine uptake and decrease VH for a variety of existing vaccines as well as vaccines created to address novel viruses as they emerge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Long-Term Care , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination
4.
BMJ Health Care Inform ; 30(1)2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37429673

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Death Index (NDI) is a gold standard for mortality data, yet matching patients to the database depends on accurate and available key identifiers. Our objective was to evaluate NDI data for future healthcare research studies with mortality outcomes. METHODS: We used a Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States' Virtual Data Warehouse (KPMAS-VDW) sourced from the Social Security Administration and electronic health records on members enrolled between 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2017. We submitted data to NDI on 1 036 449 members. We compared results from the NDI best match algorithm to the KPMAS-VDW for vital status and death date. We compared probabilistic scores by sex and race and ethnicity. RESULTS: NDI returned 372 865 (36%) unique possible matches, 663 061 (64%) records not matched to the NDI database and 522 (<1%) rejected records. The NDI algorithm resulted in 38 862 records, presumed dead, with a lower percentage of women, and Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic people than presumed alive. There were 27 306 presumed dead members whose death dates matched exactly between the NDI results and VDW, but 1539 did not have an exact match. There were 10 017 additional deaths from NDI results that were not present in the VDW death data. CONCLUSIONS: NDI data can substantially improve the overall capture of deaths. However, further quality control measures were needed to ensure the accuracy of the NDI best match algorithm.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Ethnicity , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Female , Databases, Factual , Electronic Health Records , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
5.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(5)2021 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34063228

ABSTRACT

Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) patients have been seeking medical care in higher numbers and have faced unique social, personal, and health issues that affect the quality of care they receive. The purpose of this study was to conduct a mixed-methods study to describe TGNC care at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, a large integrated health system. We used a transgender registry to describe a TGNC patient population and compared healthcare utilization between TGNC patients and non-TGNC patients. Four focus groups were also conducted among 28 patients. Atlas.ti software was used to code and analyze themes for the qualitative analysis. Among the 282 adults TGNC patients, the mean age was 32.6 years. Of the study sample, 59% were White, and 27% were Black. TGNC patients demonstrated an increased use of email/telephone visits and the online patient portal and more cancellations and no-shows compared to non-TGNC controls. Of the 28 TGNC patients who participated in the focus groups, 39% identified as female, 21% as a transman, and 18% as non-binary/genderqueer. Participants were predominantly White (68%), highly educated (74%), and reported use of hormones (89%). Themes that emerged from our qualitative analysis included: limited availability of TGNC information; positive and negative sentiments regarding patient-provider interactions; issues with case management; limited access to care; lack of coordination of care; negative staff experiences. We identified specific areas in a health system to improve the quality of care of TGNC patients, including specific TGNC training for providers and staff, a source of TGNC information/resources, and hiring and training TGNC-specific case managers.

6.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 9(9): 5026-5034, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33209839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research shows the profound impact of social factors on health, lead many healths systems to incorporate social risk screening. To help healthcare systems select among various screening tools we compared two tools, the Your Current Life Situation (YCLS) and the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Screening tools, on key psychometric properties. METHOD: Kaiser Permanente Southern California subsidized exchange members (n = 1008) were randomly invited to complete a survey containing either the YCLS or the AHC tool, as well as other measures related to care experience and health. Healthcare use was measured through the electronic health record. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS was assessed using adjusted kappas for six domains (food - worry, food - pay, insecure housing, housing quality, transportation, utilities). To assess predictive validity, items on the AHC and YCLS were compared to self-rated health and receipt of a flu shot. RESULTS: Responders (n = 450) and non-responders (n = 558) significantly differed on sex, language, and depression (P < 0.05) but not anxiety, race/ethnicity, or healthcare use. Agreement between the AHC and YCLS tools was substantial on all items (kappas > 0.60) except for housing quality (kappa 0.52). Four out of six screening questions on the AHC tool and four out of seven on the YCLS tool were associated with self-rated health (P < 0.03). No social needs were associated with flu shot receipt except utilities on the AHC tool (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: In this sample, the AHC and YCLS tools are similar in their ability to screen for social risks. Differences observed likely stem from the timeframe and wording of the questions, which can be used to guide selection in healthcare systems.

7.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0213972, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30943242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic disparities in rates of influenza vaccinations in the US remain an issue even among those with access, no out-of-pocket costs, and after adjusting for confounders. We used an approach called the Oaxaca-Blinder (OB) decomposition method to ascertain the contribution of covariates individually and in aggregate to the racial disparity in influenza vaccination. METHODS: We included members > = 18 years of age as of 05/01/2014 with continuous enrollment through 04/30/2015. Influenza vaccination was defined by diagnosis, procedure, or medication codes, or documentation in the immunization table. Characteristics were reported by race. Logistic regression models estimated the odds of vaccination associated with: (1) race; and (2) covariates stratified by race. The Oaxaca-Blinder (OB) method calculated the contribution of covariates to the difference or disparity in vaccination between Blacks and Whites. RESULTS: We found that among adults, 44% were vaccinated; 55% were Black; and 45% were White. Black members have 42% lower odds of vaccination than White members. The contribution of the differences in the average value of the study covariates between Black and White members (the OB covariate effect) accounted for 29% of the racial disparity. The contributions to the total White-Black disparity in vaccination included: age (16%), neighborhood median income (11%), and registration on the online patient portal (13%). The contribution of the differences in how the covariates impact vaccination (OB coefficient effect) accounted for 71% of the disparity in vaccination between Blacks and Whites. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, equalizing average covariate values in Blacks and Whites could reduce the racial disparity in influenza vaccination by 29%. For health system vaccine campaigns, improving registration on the patient portal may be a target component of an effective system-level strategy to reduce racial disparities in vaccination. Additional information on patient-centered factors could further improve the value of the OB approach.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Male , Metalloporphyrins , Middle Aged , Patient Portals/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
Psychiatry Res ; 226(1): 142-8, 2015 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25623021

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study is to determine the pre-existing lifetime and current prevalence of DSM-IV Axis I disorders within the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG). Data was analyzed from the clinical subsample of the Ohio Army National Guard Mental Health Initiative (OHARNG MHI). Five hundred participants were provided with an in-depth clinical assessment using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID). Logistic regression examined the relationship between Axis I disorders and the number of deployments and gender. Prevalence of at least one DSM-IV lifetime disorder was 66.2%; substance use disorders were 52.2%, followed by mood disorders (30.0%) and anxiety disorders (22.0%). Prevalence of at least one current disorder was 24.8%; anxiety disorders (13.2%), mood disorders (7.6%), and substance use disorders (7.0%) were most frequent. Number of deployments was associated with PTSD (OR=8.27, 95% CI 2.10-32.59, p=0.003), alcohol use disorder (OR=1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.92, p=0.025), and any substance use disorder (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.05, p=0.016). Gender (OR=2.02, 95% CI 1.10-3.73, p=0.024) was associated with any mood disorder. The results provide baseline information on the most prevalent mental disorders within the OHARNG.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Military Personnel/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Ohio , Prevalence , Young Adult
9.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 23(1): 109-19, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24615746

ABSTRACT

To report the reliability and validity of key mental health assessments in an ongoing study of the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG). The 2616 OHARNG soldiers received hour-long structured telephone surveys including the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist (PCV-C) and Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9). A subset (N = 500) participated in two hour clinical reappraisals, using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID). The telephone survey assessment for PTSD and for any depressive disorder were both highly specific [92% (standard error, SE 0.01), 83% (SE 0.02)] with moderate sensitivity [54% (SE 0.09), 51% (SE 0.05)]. Other psychopathologies assessed included alcohol abuse [sensitivity 40%, (SE 0.04) and specificity 80% (SE 0.02)] and alcohol dependence [sensitivity, 60% (SE 0.05) and specificity 81% (SE 0.02)].The baseline prevalence estimates from the telephone study suggest alcohol abuse and dependence may be higher in this sample than the general population. Validity and reliability statistics suggest specific, but moderately sensitive instruments.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Mental Health , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Military Personnel/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL