Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(4): e13584, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33594745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the common gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events after solid organ transplantation. Diarrhea may be caused by infectious or non-infectious etiology. The infectious etiology of diarrhea varies according to the location and duration of diarrhea. Non-infectious etiologies include drugs, inflammatory bowel disease, neoplasia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the etiological profile of diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients presenting to a tertiary care center in Southern India. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all solid organ transplantation recipients referred to the Department of Medical Gastroenterology for evaluation of diarrhea from April 2012 till May 2014. All patients had stool evaluated by wet mount examination, modified acid fast (AFB) stain, trichrome stain, culture, and Clostridium difficile toxin assay. EDTA plasma was collected for quantitative Cytomegalovirus (CMV) detection by real-time PCR. If the diarrhea was acute (<2 wk), and no etiological agent was identified, empirical antibiotic therapy was instituted and followed up. If persistent or chronic diarrhea (>2-4 wk), endoscopic evaluation (upper GI endoscopy and/or colonoscopy with biopsies), depending on the clinical type of diarrhea was done. If no specific etiological diagnosis was established after endoscopic evaluation, breath test for SIBO and celiac serology were done. If no specific etiology was identified after the above investigations, dose of immunosuppressive drugs was reduced. If diarrhea responded to dose reduction, it was considered to be drug related. RESULTS: Fifty-eight episodes of diarrhea occurred in 55 solid organ transplant recipients during the study period. Renal transplant recipients constituted the majority (70%). Most (79%) of patients included in the study had their transplant > 6 mo ago. Infective diarrhea was the etiology in 46%, drug-related diarrhea in 29.3%. No specific etiology was identified in 22.4% of patients. Parasites accounted for 69% of all infective diarrhea. Stool evaluation was the main investigation in establishing diagnosis in acute diarrhea. Endoscopic evaluation was required in two thirds of patients to establish diagnosis in chronic diarrhea. CONCLUSION: GI infections and drug-related diarrhea were the common causes of diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients. Parasites were the most common infectious etiology of diarrhea. Step-wise evaluation was able to identify the etiology in ~ 77% of patients. Overall, 98% of diarrheal episodes resolved.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea , Organ Transplantation , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Transplant Recipients
2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 43(3): 660-667, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is being reported in developing countries, including India. Most Indian studies on CRC are retrospective and single-centered. The present study is an attempt to understand the current clinical profile and stage of newly diagnosed CRCs across multiple centers in Tamil Nadu, India. METHODS: A multi-centric observational survey was conducted between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, under the aegis of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology - Tamil Nadu chapter. Patients 18 years of age and older with a recent diagnosis of CRC fulfilling the inclusion criteria were prospectively recruited at the participating centers. Their demographic, clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, histopathologic, radiologic and risk factor details were systematically collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Across 23 centers in Tamil Nadu, 1208 patients were recruited. The male:female ratio was 1.49:1, while mean (SD) age was 57.7 (13.5) years. A majority (81.9%) were Tamils and 78.5% belonged to lower socioeconomic classes. The predominant symptoms were hematochezia (30.2%) and a change in bowel habits (27.5%). The most common locations were the rectum (34.3%) and rectosigmoid (15.1%). Synchronous CRCs were seen in 3.3% and synchronous colorectal polyps in 12.8%. Predisposing factors for CRC were seen in 2%. A past history of any cancer among CRC patients was obtained in 3.1% and a family history of any cancer was found in 7.6%. Patients who were either overweight or obese constituted 46.4% of the study population. At presentation, the predominant stages were stage III (44.7%) and stage IV (20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients with newly diagnosed CRC in Tamil Nadu belonged to the lower socioeconomic classes. About 60% had CRCs located within the reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope. Two-thirds of the patients exceeded stage II disease at presentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Humans , Male , Female , India/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Risk Factors , Adult , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Incidence , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Lung India ; 34(1): 76-78, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28144066

ABSTRACT

Covered or uncovered self-expanding metal stents are currently used for the palliative treatment of neoplastic esophageal strictures or compressions and esophageal leaks or fistulas due to malignancies. Erosion of esophageal stents into the respiratory tract is a rare complication and that too has been reported mostly as an early complication within few days or weeks. Here, we present the case of a 31-year-old female, who presented with a late complication of an esophageal stent eroding into the left main bronchus causing respiratory distress. She was stented for a benign corrosive esophageal stricture following caustic soda ingestion 3 years ago. She underwent a thoracotomy and closure of esophagobronchial fistula along with laparoscopic esophagectomy and gastric pull through. Postoperatively, patient developed an anastomotic leak which was corrected by placing a temporary stent.

5.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 35(2): 139-42, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27033844

ABSTRACT

Drug-related injury has been noted in virtually all organ systems, and recognition of the patterns of injury associated with medication enables modification of treatment and reduces the morbidity associated with the side effects of drugs. With the large number of new drugs being developed, documentation of the morphology of the changes seen as an adverse effect becomes important to characterize the pattern of injury. The pathologist is often the first to identify these abnormalities and correlate them with a particular drug. Kayexalate or sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), a linear polymer derived from polystyrene containing sulfonic acid and sulfonate functional groups is used to treat hyperkalemia. It is usually administered with an osmotic laxative sorbitol orally or as retention enema. This combination has been implicated in causing damage to different parts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract especially the colon and causes an established pattern of injury, recognizable by the presence of characteristic crystals, is presented to create a greater awareness of the Kayexalate colitis. This entity should be included in the differential diagnosis of lower GI mucosal injury in a setting of uremia and hyperkalemia.


Subject(s)
Colitis/chemically induced , Laxatives/adverse effects , Polystyrenes/adverse effects , Sorbitol/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Aged , Colitis/diagnosis , Colitis/pathology , Colon/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Combinations , Enema , Female , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Laxatives/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Polystyrenes/administration & dosage , Sorbitol/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL