Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(10): 2494-2501, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31186182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knee arthroplasty (KA) is a common and effective surgical procedure that allows patients with knee osteoarthritis to restore functional ability and relieve pain. Sit-to-stand is a common demanding task during activities of daily living and is performed more than 50 times per day. The purpose of this systematic review is to obtain a comprehensive understanding of biomechanical changes during sit-to-stand transfers following KA. METHODS: Relevant articles were selected through MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embrace, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) underwent KA without restriction on the arthroplasty design, (2) involve kinematic, kinetic, or muscle activity variables as the primary outcome measure, (3) evaluated sit-to-stand, and (4) were written in English. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included in the current systematic review. The KA group exhibited altered movement patterns as compared to healthy controls. Considering the time course of recovery, improvement in knee joint kinematics was found up to 2 years but kinetic changes indicate intensified contralateral limb loading. For comparisons for limbs, limb differences were apparent, but those differences were resolved by 1 year. CONCLUSION: Despite the inevitable changes in kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity in sit-to-stand since KA, it appears to be important to restore quadriceps strength for the operative limb in order to minimize risk for subsequent joint problems.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Joint/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Quadriceps Muscle/surgery , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Kinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Movement , Muscle Strength , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Sitting Position , Standing Position
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 18(9)2018 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30213036

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the effect of paravertebral spinal injection (PSI), utilizing both subjective and objective assessments in chronic low back pain (LBP) associated with facet joint arthrosis over a one-month duration. Subjective questionnaires included the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Health Survey SF-12, and the short Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). Objective assessments included in-clinic gait and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests using wearable sensors, as well as 48 h daily physical activity (DPA) monitored using a chest-worn triaxial accelerometer. Subjective and objective measures were performed prior to treatment, immediately after the treatment, and one month after the treatment. Eight LBP patients were recruited for this study (mean age = 54 ± 13 years, body mass index = 31.41 ± 6.52 kg/m², 50% males). Results show significant decrease in pain (~55%, p < 0.05) and disability (Oswestry scores, ~21%, p < 0.05). In-clinic gait and TUG were also significantly improved (~16% and ~18% faster walking and shorter TUG, p < 0.05); however, DPA, including the percentage of physical activities (walking and standing) and the number of steps, showed no significant change after PSI (p > 0.25; effect size ≤ 0.44). We hypothesize that DPA may continue to be truncated to an extent by conditioned fear-avoidance, a psychological state that may prevent increase in daily physical activity to avoid pain.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Disability Evaluation , Exercise/physiology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Nerve Block , Pain Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 18(1): 45, 2017 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are no core outcome domain or measurement sets for Total Joint Replacement (TJR) clinical trials. Our objective was to achieve an International consensus by orthopaedic surgeons on the OMERACT core domain/area set for TJR clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted surveys of two orthopaedic surgeon cohorts, which included (1) the leadership of international orthopaedic societies and surgeons (IOS; cohort 1), and (2) the members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Outcome Special Interest Group (AAOS-Outcome SIG), and/or the Outcome Research Interest Group of the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS; cohort 2). Participants rated OMERACT-endorsed preliminary core area set for TJR clinical trials on a 1 to 9 scale, indicating 1-3 as domain of limited importance, 4-6 being important, but not critical, and 7-9 being critical. RESULTS: Eighteen survey participants from the IOS group and 69 participants from the AAOS-Outcome SIG/ORS groups completed the survey questionnaire. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) scores were seven or higher for all six proposed preliminary core areas/domains across both groups, IOS and AAOS-Outcome SIG/ORS, respectively: pain, 8 [8, 9] and 8 [7, 9]; function, 8 [8, 8] and 8 [7, 9]; patient satisfaction, 8 [7, 9] and 8 [7, 8]; revision surgery, 7 [6, 9] and 8 [6, 8]; adverse events, 7 [5, 8] and 7 [6, 9]; and death, 7 [7, 9] and 8 [5, 9]. Respective median scores were lower for two additional optional domains: patient participation, 6.5 [5, 7] and 6 [5, 8]; and cost, 6 [5, 7] and 6 [5, 7]. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that two independent surveys dervied from three groups of orthopaedic surgeons with international representation endorsed a preliminary/draft OMERACT core domain/area set for Joint Replacement clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement/mortality , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedic Surgeons/standards , Range of Motion, Articular , Reoperation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(2): 386-389, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advantages of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty include rapid recovery and shorter lengths of stay following surgery. Patients requiring extended postoperative care fail to recognize these benefits. Patient-reported outcome measures have proved useful in predicting outcomes following joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify and report preoperative patient-reported outcome measures and clinical variables that predict discharge to skilled nursing facilities following UKA. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 174 patients was used to collect 36-Item Short Form scores and objective clinical data. Univariate and multivariate analysis with backward elimination were conducted to find a predictive risk model. RESULTS: The predictive model reported (78.7% concordance, receiver operating characteristic curve c-statistic 0.719, P = .0016) demonstrates that risk factors for discharge to skilled nursing facilities are: older age (odds ratio 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.256-13.911, P = .019), bilateral UKA procedures (odds ratio 1.887; 95% CI 1.054-3.378, P = .0326) and lower patient-reported preoperative 36-Item Short Form physical function scores (odds ratio 0.968; CI 0.938-1, P = .0488). CONCLUSION: The information presented here regarding possible patient disposition following UKA could aid informed decision-making regarding patients' short-term needs following surgery and help streamline preoperative planning.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Period , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Appl Biomech ; 32(3): 316-23, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26695763

ABSTRACT

Balance assessments could render useful objective performance measures to evaluate the efficacy of low back surgeries, yet these assessments have not been collectively examined to determine longitudinal sensitivity across surgical interventions. The purpose of this review was to determine sensitivity of balance measurements for disparate spinal disorders after surgical intervention. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Articles were selected based on: (1) sample consisted of low back disorder individuals and (2) balance measurements were obtained both pre- and postsurgery. Most of the articles addressed 2 specific low back disorders: (1) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis/spinal fusion and (2) disc herniation/decompression surgery. For scoliosis patients, body sway increased (14-97%) immediately following surgery but gradually reduced (1-33%) approaching the 1-year post spinal fusion assessment. For patients with disc herniation, sway range, sway velocity, sway area, and sway variability all decreased (19-42%) immediately postsurgery. Balance assessments for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent surgical intervention should be performed with visual occlusion, focus on time domain parameters, and evaluated with longer follow-up times. Patients with disc herniation who underwent decompression surgery should have balance assessments with visual deprivation, test conditions specifically addressing hip strategy, and correlation with pain.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Low Back Pain/surgery , Postural Balance/physiology , Scoliosis/surgery , Decompression, Surgical , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Scoliosis/physiopathology , Spinal Fusion
6.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 469(6): 1692-700, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A combination mechanical-pharmacologic regimen is an accepted prophylactic treatment against symptomatic venous thromboembolism for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties. Foot pumps have been recognized as effective mechanical devices. Research suggests pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is associated with complications and foot pumps offer an adjunct or alternative approach. Presumably the effectiveness of foot pumps relate to enhancement of venous flow. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared an established foot pump system with a new mobile foot pump for their ability to influence mean peak venous velocity in the common femoral, popliteal, and posterior tibial veins. METHODS: We evaluated 60 healthy subjects with the established and the novel foot-pump systems. Ultrasonography was used to measure baseline and peak venous velocity with mechanical compression. We constructed 95% confidence intervals (CI) on the mean differences between the two devices to establish equivalence limits. We compared ratios of peak velocity to resting velocity. Subjects subjectively rated the two foot pumps with respect to size, fit, and comfort. RESULTS: The 95% CI test for equivalence of the mean differences between the two devices was inconclusive. The novel device augmented the venous velocity 11 times greater than the resting velocity in the posterior tibial vein and three times greater than the resting velocity in the popliteal vein. The established foot pump augmented the venous velocity 15 times greater than the resting velocity in the posterior tibial vein and four times greater than the resting velocity in the popliteal vein. The novel device rated better for size, fit, and comfort when compared with the established device. CONCLUSIONS: The established foot pump tended to be associated with greater peak velocities; the novel device produced more consistent mean peak venous velocities and may be more acceptable to patients and caregivers.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bandages , Foot/blood supply , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure , Reference Values , Young Adult
7.
Arthroplast Today ; 7: 148-156, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33553542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and effective surgical procedure that allows patients with hip osteoarthritis to restore functional ability and relieve pain. Sit-to-stand transfers are common demanding tasks during activities of daily living and are performed more than 50 times per day. The purpose of this systematic review is to obtain a comprehensive understanding of biomechanical changes during sit-to-stand transfers after THA. METHODS: Relevant articles were selected through MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: 1) participants underwent total hip arthroplasty without restriction on the arthroplasty design, 2) involved either kinematic or kinetic variables as the primary outcome measure, 3) evaluated sit-to-stand, and 4) were written in English. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles were included in the current systematic review. The THA group exhibited altered movement patterns as compared to healthy controls. Improvement in loading asymmetry was found up to 1 year after THA, but other kinetic changes indicate intensified contralateral limb loading. Limb differences were apparent, but whether these differences persist over 10 months after THA is still unknown. CONCLUSION: Despite the inevitable changes in kinematics and kinetics in sit-to-stand transfers after THA, it appears to be important to resolve asymmetrical loading between the operative and nonoperative limbs to minimize risk for subsequent joint problems.

8.
J Orthop Res ; 39(10): 2093-2102, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33300119

ABSTRACT

Traditional methods of collecting functional outcome measures are widely used for lower extremity arthroplasty outcome assessment. Wearable sensors are emerging as viable tools for functional outcome measures in monitoring of postarthroplasty recovery. The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy of wearable sensors with traditional methods for monitoring postarthroplasty functional recovery. Articles were searched for inclusion in this review that used both traditional and wearable sensor functional outcome measures to assess lower extremity function before and after lower extremity arthroplasty. Two independent screeners reviewed all articles, and resolved differences through consensus and consultation with the senior author. Studies that met inclusion criteria were evaluated for methodologic quality using performed risk of bias assessments. Results from several traditional and wearable sensor functional outcome measures from baseline through follow-up were normalized across studies. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Six studies used statistical methods to directly compare functional outcome measures and eight studies used qualitative description of comparisons. This review found evidence that wearable sensors detected nuanced functional outcome information on the specific biomechanics and timing of recovery, which were unaccounted for using traditional methods. Wearable sensors have shown promising utility in providing additional recovery information from lower extremity arthroplasty compared with traditional functional outcome measures, but future research is needed to assess the clinical significance of this additional information. Wearable sensor technology is an emerging clinical tool providing advanced and determinative data with the potential for advancing the assessment of lower extremity arthroplasty outcomes.


Subject(s)
Gait , Wearable Electronic Devices , Lower Extremity , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Recovery of Function
9.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 27(5): 1209-16, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419187

ABSTRACT

Ozone (O3), a reactive component of air pollution, depresses feeding and voluntary locomotor behavior in laboratory rodents, but the effects of O3 on amphibian behavior are not known. We evaluated the effects of 4 h of exposure to air or ozone (0.6 microl/L), on two ecologically relevant behaviors of the toad Bufo marinus. Toads were offered five mealworms at 1, 24, and 48 h after exposure. One hour after exposure, O3-exposed toads ate fewer mealworms than did air-exposed toads (Fisher exact test, p=0.005). Within 24 h after exposure, all toads ate four or five mealworms. Because movement is a key component of toad feeding behavior, we tested additional toads (n=25) for voluntary locomotor behavior during three 1-h trials in a 2.9-m2 open-field arena. Mean (+/-standard deviation) total distance moved was: pre-exposure, 29+/-19.5 m; 1-h postexposure, 13+/-15.6 m; and 24-h postexposure, 17+/-17.4 m. The means were not statistically different by repeated measures analysis of covariance. Therefore, our results suggest that a single 4-h exposure to O3 depresses toad feeding behavior after exposure but had little effect on voluntary locomotor behavior.


Subject(s)
Bufo marinus/physiology , Feeding Behavior/drug effects , Locomotion/drug effects , Ozone/toxicity , Animals , Female , Male
10.
Injury ; 49(2): 261-271, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150315

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This paper describes surgical options for Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) with acute flexible or chronic rigid kyphosis, and pseudarthrosis complicated with pain and neurologic deficit. METHODS: This study has two components. a) A prospective clinical study of surgical treatment of 31 patients (age: 69±11 years) with either acute flexible or progressive pseudarthrotic kyphosis manifested with severe pain or neurological deficit between 2010 and 2014. Eleven patients exhibited neurocompression (Frankel B, C, D). Surgery consisted in indirect reduction, kyphoplasty, and short posterior instrumentation in 28 patients and multilevel instrumentation in three. b) The second component involved a literature search of OVCF complicated with acute or painful chronic deformities and neurologic deficit, managed with open surgical approach. RESULTS: Indirect reduction, kyphoplasty and short posterior stabilization can restore satisfactory anatomic alignment and neurological deficit. Multilevel instrumentation was used for rigid long kyphosis. Complications were related to a) screw pull out and junctional kyphosis (4 patients) one of the patients also developed anterior migration of cement, b) cement leakage (4 patients). L5 radiculopathy occurred in one patient. The others remained asymptomatic. The literature review concluded that corpectomy with anterior, posterior or combined instrumentations is indicated for burst fractures, or rigid kyphosis with neurocompression. Prompt decompression with anatomical alignment may restore paraplegia. Complications were germane to osteoporotic bone predisposing to hardware loosening or cut out and dislodgement of instrumentation. DISCUSSION: Neurologic deficit associated with fractures or progressive pseudarthrotic kyphosis effectively may respond to indirect postural reduction, kyphoplasty and posterior percutaneous short segment transpedicle instrumentation. For burst fractures and rigid chronic kyphosis corpectomy reconstructed with cages and anterior, or posterior or combined instrumentations can restore and maintain normal anatomy. The following guidelines for optimal surgical instrumentation have been established: To prevent screw loosening and junctional kyphosis the instrumentation should not end within the kyphotic segment. Screws for anterior instrumentation should penetrate the contralateral cortex. Multiple site of fixation or combined anterior and posterior instrumentations dissipate stresses at any one site. Augmentation of transpedicle screw fixation with cement is a sound technical principle. Cement should inserted in a doughy state with minimal pressure to prevent cement complications.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Diseases/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Kyphosis/surgery , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Aged , Bone Cements , Bone Screws , Central Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Female , Fractures, Compression/complications , Fractures, Compression/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging
11.
Injury ; 49(12): 2111-2120, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526920

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A variety of biodegradable implants (screws, rods, plates and cages) are available which are composed of many different biodegradable polymers with varying characteristics. The present review of animal and clinical studies examines the efficacy and safety of biodegradable implants in spinal fracture intervention. METHODS: A review of the literature through March 2018 was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. Success rates were calculated according to sufficient tissue biocompatibility, solid clinical fusion and propensity for osseointegration. RESULTS: 49 articles (24 animal and 25 human studies) were included. In animal experiments, the overall success rate for spinal fusion was 60.3%, while the mean success rate regarding the cervical spine was 51.8% compared to 68.1% for the lumbar spine (p = 0.002). In studies involving control group(s): the mean bioabsorbable implant success rate for spinal fusion was 42% compared to 57% for conventional implants (p = 0.0016). In the lumbar spine pL-lactide acid (PLLA) had 75.2% success rate compared to poly (L-lactide-co-DL-lactide) (PLDLLA) at 53.4% (p = 0.003). In clinical studies, the overall mean success rate was 89%, while the mean success rate regarding the cervical spine was 92%, as compared to 83.6% for the lumbar spine (p = 0.001). In studies involving control group(s): the mean bioabsorbable implant success rate was 75% compared to a conventional implant mean success rate of 97% (p<0.0001). In the cervical spine PLLA had a 98.7% success rate compared to 90% with PLDLLA (p = 0.015). In the lumbar spine PLDLLA had 84.7% success rate compared to 63.6% for poly-glycolic acid (PGA) (p = 0.085). DISCUSSION: Studies combined biodegradable and conventional implants. Polymers were used in various combinations and surface modification of the implants also varied. Comparison studies were of small sample size. Animal and clinical studies diverged. The current data are not encouraging. The end-point of assessing osseointegration varies in the studies and is indeterminate. In early stages the structure comparison of osseous restoration using biodegradable implants appears inferior to utilization of conventional cages and instrumentation. There is no statistically significant evidence supporting the efficacy of biodegradable implants replacing traditional instrumentation. There is a lack of prospective clinical trials with long-term follow-up regarding utilization of biodegradable implants and the available data does not support their routine use in spinal fracture intervention.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Osseointegration/physiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fusion , Animals , Biomechanical Phenomena , Equipment Design , Humans , Polyesters , Polymers , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Rheumatol ; 44(11): 1723-1726, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089984

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Discussion and endorsement of the OMERACT total joint replacement (TJR) core domain set for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) for endstage arthritis; and next steps for selection of instruments. METHODS: The OMERACT TJR working group met at the 2016 meeting at Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. We summarized the previous systematic reviews, the preliminary OMERACT TJR core domain set and results from previous surveys. We discussed preliminary core domains for TJR clinical trials, made modifications, and identified challenges with domain measurement. RESULTS: Working group participants (n = 26) reviewed, clarified, and endorsed each of the inner and middle circle domains and added a range of motion domain to the research agenda. TJR were limited to THR and TKR but included all endstage hip and knee arthritis refractory to medical treatment. Participants overwhelmingly endorsed identification and evaluation of top instruments mapping to the core domains (100%) and use of subscales of validated multidimensional instruments to measure core domains for the TJR clinical trial core measurement set (92%). CONCLUSION: An OMERACT core domain set for hip/knee TJR trials has been defined and we are selecting instruments to develop the TJR clinical trial core measurement set to serve as a common foundation for harmonizing measures in TJR clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Consensus , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Treatment Outcome
13.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 39: 100-108, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27744005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined short- and long-term improvements in motor performance, quantified using wearable sensors, in response to facet spine injection in degenerative facet osteoarthropathy patients. METHODS: Adults with confirmed degenerative facet osteoarthropathy were recruited and were treated with medial or intermediate branch block injection. Self-report pain, health condition, and disability (Oswestry), as well as objective motor performance measures (gait, balance, and timed-up-and-go) were obtained in five sessions: pre-surgery (baseline), immediately after the injection, one-month, three-month, and 12-month follow-ups. Baseline motor performance parameters were compared with 10 healthy controls. FINDINGS: Thirty patients (age=50 (14) years) and 10 controls (age=46 (15) years) were recruited. All motor performance parameters were significantly different between groups. Results showed that average pain and Oswestry scores improved by 51% and 24%, respectively among patients, only one month after injection. Similarly, improvement in motor performance was most noticeable in one-month post-injection measurements; most improvements were observed in gait speed (14% normal walking, P<0.02), hip sway within balance tests (63% eyes-open P<0.01), and turning velocity within the timed-up-and-go test (28%, P<0.02). Better baseline motor performance led to better outcomes in terms of pain relief; baseline turning velocity was 18% faster among the responsive compared to the non-responsive patients. INTERPRETATIONS: Spinal injection can temporarily (one to three months) improve motor performance in degenerative facet osteoarthropathy patients. Successful pain relief in response to treatment is independent of demographic characteristics and initial pain but dependent on baseline motor performance. Immediate self-reported pain relief is unrelated to magnitude of gradual improvement in motor performance.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Motor Activity/physiology , Osteoarthritis, Spine/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Spine/physiopathology , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Female , Gait/physiology , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Low Back Pain/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postural Balance/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Triamcinolone/administration & dosage
14.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 24(1): 205-10, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15683185

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary macrophages are an important component of immune defense against inhaled foreign particles and microorganisms. In humans and other mammals, exposure to moderate amounts of ozone (O3) can inhibit functional capacities of alveolar macrophages. In many wilderness areas downwind of urban centers, ozone levels frequently exceed national standards. We report results of 4-h inhalation exposures to 0.8 parts per million O3 on pulmonary macrophage viability and phagocytosis capacity in marine toads, Bufo marinus. At 1 and 24 h after ozone exposure, macrophages had reduced in vitro capacity to phagocytize fluorescent polystyrene microspheres. By 48 h postexposure, there were no differences in these macrophage functions between ozone- and air-exposed toads. Macrophage yield did not differ among exposure groups nor did exposure to elevated temperatures (30 degrees C) for up to 48 h affect recovery of macrophages. However, compared with the millions of macrophages per milliliter recovered in mammals by similar procedures, pulmonary macrophage yield was typically in the range of 50 to 200 x 10(3) per milliliter extracted fluid. These results are the first to report effects of an air pollutant on amphibian immune system function and suggest a possible role of oxidant air pollutants in regional declines of amphibian populations.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/toxicity , Bufo marinus/immunology , Macrophages, Alveolar/drug effects , Ozone/toxicity , Phagocytosis/drug effects , Animals , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Temperature , Time Factors
15.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 30(6): 528-36, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Objective motor performance measures, especially gait assessment, could improve evaluation of low back disorder surgeries. However, no study has compared the relative effectiveness of gait parameters for assessing motor performance in low back disorders after surgery. The purpose of the current review was to determine the sensitive gait parameters that address physical improvements in each specific spinal disorder after surgical intervention. METHODS: Articles were searched with the following inclusion criteria: 1) population studied consisted of individuals with low back disorders requiring surgery; 2) low back disorder was measured objectively using gait assessment tests pre- and post-surgery. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using Delphi consensus, and meta-analysis was performed to compare pre- and post-surgical changes. FINDINGS: Thirteen articles met inclusion criteria, which, almost exclusively, addressed two types of spinal disorders/interventions: 1) scoliosis/spinal fusion; and 2) stenosis/decompression. For patients with scoliosis, improvements in hip and shoulder motion (effect size=0.32-1.58), energy expenditure (effect size=0.59-1.18), and activity symmetry of upper-body muscles during gait were present after spinal fusion. For patients with spinal stenosis, increases in gait speed, stride length, cadence, symmetry, walking smoothness, and walking endurance (effect size=0.60-2.50), and decrease in gait variability (effect size=1.45) were observed after decompression surgery. INTERPRETATION: For patients with scoliosis, gait improvements can be better assessed by measuring upper-body motion and EMG rather than the lower extremities. For patients with spinal stenosis, motor performance improvements can be captured by measuring walking spatio-temporal parameters, gait patterns, and walking endurance.


Subject(s)
Gait/physiology , Scoliosis/physiopathology , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/physiopathology , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Decompression, Surgical , Electromyography , Hip/physiology , Humans , Lower Extremity/physiology , Movement , Shoulder/physiology , Spinal Fusion , Treatment Outcome , Walking/physiology
16.
J Rheumatol ; 42(12): 2496-502, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25834208

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a plan for harmonizing outcomes for people undergoing total joint replacement (TJR), to achieve consensus regarding TJR outcome research. METHODS: The TJR working group met during the 2014 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 12 meeting in Budapest, Hungary. Multiple conference calls preceded the face-to-face meeting. Brief presentations were made during a 1.5-h meeting, which included an overview of published systematic reviews of TJR trials and the results of a recent systematic review of TJR clinical trial outcome domains and measures. This was followed by discussion of potential core set areas/domains for TJR clinical trials (as per OMERACT Filter 2.0) as well as the challenges associated with the measurement of these domains. RESULTS: Working group participants discussed which TJR clinical trial outcome domains/areas map to the inner versus outer core for core domain set. Several challenges were identified with TJR outcomes including how to best measure function after TJR, elucidating the source of the pre- and post-TJR joint pain being measured, joint-specific versus generic quality of life instruments and the importance of patient satisfaction and revision surgery as outcomes. A preliminary core domain set for TJR clinical trials was proposed and included pain, function, patient satisfaction, revision, adverse events, and death. This core domain set will be further vetted with a broader audience. CONCLUSION: An international effort with active collaboration with the orthopedic community to standardize key outcome domains and measures is under way with the TJR working group. This effort will be further developed with new collaborations.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Cooperative Behavior , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/standards , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Innovation , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Qualitative Research
17.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 90(1): 34-42, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18171955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although more than 1200 hip fracture repairs are performed in United States Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals annually, little is known about the relationship between perioperative care and short-term outcomes for veterans with hip fracture. The purpose of the present study was to test whether perioperative care impacts thirty-day outcomes, with patient characteristics being taken into account. METHODS: A national sample of 5683 community-dwelling male veterans with an age of sixty-five years or older who had been hospitalized for the operative treatment of a hip fracture at one of 108 Veterans Administration hospitals between 1998 and 2003 was identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. Operative care characteristics were assessed in relation to thirty-day outcomes (mortality, complications, and readmission to a Veterans Administration facility for inpatient care). RESULTS: A surgical delay of four days or more after admission was associated with a higher adjusted mortality risk (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.61) but a reduced risk of readmission (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.91). Compared with spinal or epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia was related to a significantly higher risk of both mortality (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.55) and complications (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.53). The type of procedure was not significantly associated with outcome after controlling for other variables in the model. However, a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA class) was associated with worse thirty-day outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to recognizing the importance of patient-related factors, we identified operative factors that were related to thirty-day surgical outcomes. It will be important to investigate whether modifying operative factors, such as reducing surgical delays to less than four days, can directly improve the outcomes of hip fracture repair.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/mortality , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Quality of Life , Veterans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Chi-Square Distribution , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/mortality , Fracture Healing/physiology , Geriatric Assessment , Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Logistic Models , Male , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Probability , Recovery of Function , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15556394

ABSTRACT

Ozone at concentrations found in urban air pollution is known to have significant physiological effects on humans and other mammals. Exposure of the lizard, Sceloporus occidentalis, to 0.6 ppm ozone for 4 h at 25 degrees C induced 1.6 degrees C of behavioral hypothermia immediately following exposure, but selected body temperature recovered to control 35.3 degrees C the next day. Lizards exposed at 35 degrees C to 0.6 ppm ozone for 4 h selected body temperatures 1.9 degrees C below controls after exposure, and the behavioral hypothermic response persisted and increased to 3.3 degrees C the following day. Four-hour exposures of the frog, Pseudacris cadaverina, to 0.2 to 0.8 ppm ozone resulted in concentration-dependent alterations of respiration including depression of lung ventilation and oxygen consumption and the adoption of a low profile posture that reduced the exposed body surface. Ozone levels in wilderness habitats downwind of urban sources can potentially have stressful physiological effects on wildlife. Defensive physiological and behavioral reactions to ozone exposure may interfere with routine activities, and oxidant air pollution may be in part responsible for observed wildlife population declines.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Lizards/physiology , Ozone/pharmacology , Ranidae/physiology , Respiration/drug effects , Animals
19.
Evolution ; 50(4): 1688-1701, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28565702

ABSTRACT

We tested the hypothesis that locomotor speed and endurance show a negative genetic correlation using a genetically variable laboratory strain of house mice (Hsd:ICR: Mus domesticus). A negative genetic correlation would qualify as an evolutionary "constraint," because both aspects of locomotor performance are generally expected to be under positive directional selection in wild populations. We also tested whether speed or endurance showed any genetic correlation with body mass. For all traits, residuals from multiple regression equations were computed to remove effects of possible confounding variables such as age at testing, measurement block, observer, and sex. Estimates of quantitative genetic parameters were then obtained using Shaw's (1987) restricted maximum-likelihood programs, modified to account for our breeding design, which incorporated cross-fostering. Both speed and endurance were measured on two consecutive trial days, and both were repeatable. We initially analyzed performances on each trial day and the maximal value. For endurance, the three estimates of narrow-sense heritabilities ranged from 0.17 to 0.33 (full ADCE model), and some were statistically significantly different from zero using likelihood ratio tests. The heritability estimate for sprint speed measured on trial day 1 was 0.17, but negative for all other measures. Moreover, the additive genetic covariance between speeds measured on the two days was near zero, indicating that the two measures are to some extent different traits. The additive genetic covariance between speed on trial day 1 and any of the four measures of endurance was negative, large, and always statistically significant. None of the measures of speed or endurance was significantly genetically correlated with body mass. Thus, we predict that artificial selection for increased locomotor speed in these mice would result in a decrease in endurance, but no change in body mass. Such experiments could lead to a better understanding of the physiological mechanisms leading to trade-offs in aspects of locomotor abilities.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL