ABSTRACT
We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009-2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly between recipients and nonrecipients (33% vs. 21%). However, whereas only 8 (27%) of 30 patients at low risk for death (admission sequential organ failure assessment score of 0-5) received AIG-IV, 7 (54%) of the 13 patients at high risk for death (sequential organ failure assessment score of 6-11) received treatment. AIG-IV recipients had surgery more often and, among survivors, had longer hospital stays than did nonrecipients. AIG-IV recipients were sicker than nonrecipients. This difference and the small number of higher risk patients confound assessment of AIG-IV effectiveness in this outbreak.
Subject(s)
Anthrax/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antitoxins/therapeutic use , Disease Outbreaks , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/drug therapy , Adult , Anthrax/epidemiology , Anthrax/microbiology , Anthrax/mortality , Bacillus anthracis/pathogenicity , Bacillus anthracis/physiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drug Users , Female , Heroin/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Scotland/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/mortality , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/microbiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In Scotland, the 2009 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis infection among persons who inject drugs resulted in a 28% death rate. To compare nonsurvivors and survivors, we obtained data on 11 nonsurvivors and 16 survivors. Time from B. anthracis exposure to symptoms or hospitalization and skin and limb findings at presentation did not differ between nonsurvivors and survivors. Proportionately more nonsurvivors had histories of excessive alcohol use (p = 0.05) and required vasopressors and/or mechanical ventilation (p≤0.01 for each individually). Nonsurvivors also had higher sequential organ failure assessment scores (mean ± SEM) (7.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, p<0.0001). Antibacterial drug administration, surgery, and anthrax polyclonal immune globulin treatments did not differ between nonsurvivors and survivors. Of the 14 patients who required vasopressors during hospitalization, 11 died. Sequential organ failure assessment score or vasopressor requirement during hospitalization might identify patients with injectional anthrax for whom limited adjunctive therapies might be beneficial.
Subject(s)
Anthrax/epidemiology , Anthrax/transmission , Bacillus anthracis , Drug Users , Adult , Anthrax/diagnosis , Anthrax/drug therapy , Anthrax/history , Disease Outbreaks , History, 21st Century , Humans , Immune Sera/administration & dosage , Public Health Surveillance , Risk Factors , Scotland/epidemiology , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Context: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience significant challenges when they access primary care and community services.Design: A provincial summit was held to direct research, education, and innovation for primary and community care for SCI.Setting: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Participants: Key stakeholders (N = 95) including persons with SCI and caregivers, clinicians from primary care, rehabilitation, and specialized care, researchers, advocacy groups, and policy makers.Methods: A one-day facilitated meeting that included guest speakers, panel discussions and small group discussions was held to generate potential solutions to current issues related to SCI care and to foster collaborative relationships to advance care for SCI. Perspectives on SCI management were shared by primary care, neurosurgery, rehabilitation, and members of the SCI communityOutcome Measures: Discussions were focused on five domains: knowledge translation and dissemination, application of best practices, communication, research, and patient service accessibility.Results: Summit participants identified issues and prioritized solutions to improve primary and community care including the creation of a network of key stakeholders to enable knowledge creation and dissemination; an online repository of SCI resources, integrated health records, and a clinical network for SCI care; development and implementation of strategies to improve care transitions across sectors; implementation of effective care models and improved access to services; and utilization of empowerment frameworks to support self-management.Conclusions: This summit identified priorities for further collaborative efforts to advance SCI primary and community care and will inform the development of a provincial SCI strategy aimed at improving the system of care for SCI.