Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 27(8): 2203-12, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24064305

ABSTRACT

Behentrimonium chloride (BTC) is a straight-chain alkyltrimonium chloride compound commonly used as an antistatic, hair conditioning, emulsifier, or preservative agent in personal care products. Although the European Union recently restricted the use of alkyltrimonium chlorides and bromides as preservatives to ≤0.1%, these compounds have been safely used for many years at ≤5% in hundreds of cosmetic products for other uses than as a preservative. In vitro, clinical, and controlled consumer usage tests in barrier-impaired individuals were conducted to determine if whole body, leave-on skin care products containing 1-5% BTC cause dermal irritation or any other skin reaction with use. BTC-containing formulations were predicted to be non-irritants by the EpiDerm® skin irritation test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP)/chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) ocular irritation test battery. No evidence of allergic contact dermatitis or cumulative dermal irritation was noted under the exaggerated conditions of human occlusive patch tests. No clinically assessed or self-reported adverse reactions were noted in adults or children with atopic, eczematous, and/or xerotic skin during two-week and four-week monitored home usage studies. These results were confirmed by post-marketing data for five body lotions, which showed only 0.69 undesirable effects (mostly skin irritation) reported per million shipped consumer units during 2006-2011; a value consistent with a non-irritating body lotion. No serious undesirable effects were reported during in-market use of the products. Therefore, if formulated in appropriate conditions at 1-5%, BTC will not cause dermal irritation or delayed contact sensitization when used in a whole-body, leave-on product.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/toxicity , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/toxicity , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cattle , Child , Consumer Product Safety , Cornea/drug effects , Cornea/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Permeability , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Skin/drug effects , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Young Adult
2.
Bone ; 44(2): 266-74, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19013265

ABSTRACT

Prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 4 agonists (EP4A) and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) stimulate bone formation, but their effects on bone resorption are controversial. To provide additional insight into the skeletal effects of EP4A and FGF2, their regulation of expression of genes associated with bone formation and resorption in aged ovariectomized (OVX) rats and in cultured mouse bone marrow cells was determined. RNA was isolated from lumbar vertebrae of OVX rats (16 months of age) treated daily for 3 weeks with FGF2 or EP4A and processed for quantitative real time-PCR analyses. mRNA expression for the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and cathepsin K (CTSK), but not osteoprotegerin (OPG), were upregulated by both FGF2 and EP4A. Addition of FGF2 and EP4A to the medium of cultured mouse bone marrow cells increased the formation of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) positive cells, upregulated the expression of RANKL and CTSK, and downregulated expression for OPG. EP4A also increased the formation of actin rings, an indicator of osteoclast activation, in a dose dependent manner in osteoclasts cultured on bone slices and triggered the formation of pits as revealed by a pitting assay. Gene expression for osterix (OSX) and IGF-2, genes associated with bone formation, was significantly greater in FGF2-treated OVX rats compared with EP4A-treated OVX rats. These findings at the molecular level are consistent with previous tissue-level histomorphometric findings, and at the doses tested, support the contention that FGF2 has a stronger bone anabolic effect than EP4A. The results of these in vivo and in vitro analyses clarify the effects of FGF2 and EP4A on bone formation and resorption, and provide insight into differences in the efficacy of two potential bone anabolic agents for restoration of lost bone mass in the osteopenic, estrogen-deplete skeleton.


Subject(s)
Anabolic Agents/pharmacology , Bone Resorption/drug therapy , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/pharmacology , Receptors, Prostaglandin E/agonists , Sulfhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Acid Phosphatase/metabolism , Animals , Biological Assay , Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Calcitriol/pharmacology , Cells, Cultured , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Isoenzymes/metabolism , Lumbar Vertebrae/cytology , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Mice , Osteoclasts/cytology , Osteoclasts/drug effects , Osteoclasts/enzymology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sulfhydryl Compounds/pharmacology , Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase , Thiophenes/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL