Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Compared With Anti-TNF in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Limited data are available on the consequences of prenatal exposure to vedolizumab and ustekinumab. We aimed to compare the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab with that of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS: Using nationwide, comprehensive data of the EPI-MERES registry, we identified pregnancies in women with IBD in France, exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab between 2014 and 2021. We compared pregnancy outcomes and complications in the offspring according to treatment exposure during pregnancy. We applied a propensity score matching for maternal, IBD, and pregnancy characteristics. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight pregnancies exposed to vedolizumab were compared with 1592 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF; 464 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab were compared with 1856 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF. Overall, compared with anti-TNF, neither vedolizumab nor ustekinumab was associated with increased risks of abortion, caesarean section, stillbirth, preterm birth, serious infections, malignancies, or congenital abnormality in children. Women exposed to ustekinumab had an increased risk of small for gestational age births. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF use during pregnancy is reassuring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Use of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies during pregnancy in France: Nationwide study between 2010 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently affects women of childbearing age and pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of MS disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) during pregnancy in France over the last decade, marked by an increasing DMTs availability. METHODS: All pregnancies ended from April 2010 to December 2021 in women with MS were identified based on the nationwide Mother-Child Register EPI-MERES, built from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS)). RESULTS: Of a total of 20,567 pregnancies in women with MS, 7587 were exposed to DMT. The number of DMT-exposed pregnancies markedly increased from 1079 in 2010-2012 to 2413 in 2019-2021 (+124%), especially those exposed to glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, and anti-CD20. Among pregnancies of women on DMT 6 months before pregnancy, 78.0% underwent DMT discontinuation and 7.6% switched DMT, generally before (33.0% and 77.0%, respectively) or during the first trimester of pregnancy (58.3% and 17.8%, respectively). DMT discontinuation decreased from 84.0% in 2010-2012 to 72.4% in 2019-2021 and was less frequent among women aged ⩾35 years and those socioeconomically disadvantaged. CONCLUSION: Despite MS therapeutic management adaptations to pregnancy, exposure during pregnancy to treatments whose safety profile has not yet been clearly established has increased sharply over the last decade.

Prevalence and associated factors of antibiotic exposure during pregnancy in a large French population-based study during the 2010-19 period.

BACKGROUND: Although bacterial infections are frequent during pregnancy, the prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women represents a challenge for physicians, driven by the benefit-risk balance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of prenatal antibiotic exposure and its associated factors. METHODS: This study included pregnancies in the National Mother-Child EPI-MERES Register 2010-19 (built from the French Healthcare Data System) regardless of outcome. Antibiotic exposure was defined as having at least one antibiotic prescription filled during pregnancy. The prevalence of pregnancies exposed to antibiotics was estimated. Univariable Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used to compare the number of antibiotic prescriptions filled during pregnancy and the period after pregnancy with the period 1 year before pregnancy. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to investigate factors associated with antibiotic exposure during pregnancy. RESULTS: Among 9 769 764 pregnancies, 3 501 294 (35.8%) were exposed to antibiotics and amoxicillin was the most common. Compared with a similar period 1 year before pregnancy, the number of filled antibiotic prescriptions was lower during pregnancy [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.903 (95% CI 0.902-0.905)] and during the period 1 year after pregnancy [IRR 0.880 (95% CI 0.879-0.881)]. Region of residence, deprivation index, smoking-related conditions and chronic diseases (especially chronic respiratory diseases) were associated with antibiotic exposure during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prescriptions are filled less frequently during pregnancy than during the preceding year. This may be due to a more relevant benefit-risk assessment. Pregnant women living with social deprivation, those with smoking-related conditions and those with chronic diseases are more likely to fill antibiotic prescriptions.

Trends in anti-infective use during pregnancy in France between 2010 and 2019: a nationwide population-based study.

AIMS: To describe the trends in anti-infective use during pregnancy between 2010 and 2019 and determine whether they were prescribed according to drug foetal safety international classification systems. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, nationwide study using the French national health data system including all pregnancies ended between 2010 and 2019. Anti-infective agents were considered according to their pharmacological group and potential harmful risk using the Australian and Swedish classification systems. Prevalence rate was estimated annually and by trimester. Average annual percent change (AAPC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Among 7 571 035 pregnancies, 3 027 031 (40.0%) received ≥1 antibacterial. This proportion decreased significantly from 41.5% in 2010 to 36.1% in 2019 (AAPC = -1.7%, [95%CI, -2.5 to -1.0%]). Conversely, use of antiviral agents increased during the 10-year study period for anti-herpes simplex virus agents (AAPC = 4.4%, [3.7-5.2%]), influenza agents (AAPC = 25.4%, [6.2-48.1%]) and for HIV-antiretroviral agents (AAPC = 1.3%, [0.6-2.0%]). Use of influenza vaccine increased from 0.2% in 2010 to 4.2% in 2019 (AAPC = 49.7%, [39.3-60.9%]). Among all pregnancies, 0.9% had been exposed to a potentially harmful anti-infective agent increasing from 0.7% in 2010 to 1.2% in 2019 (AAPC = 6.4%, [4.4-8.5%]). CONCLUSION: Based on >7 million pregnancies identified from French nationwide data, this study showed that antibacterials are frequently prescribed during pregnancy although their use has decreased over the past 10 years. Our results suggest that anti-infective agents are generally prescribed in accordance with recommendations, although with a potential for improvement in influenza vaccination.

Benefits and Risks Associated With Continuation of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor After 24 Weeks of Pregnancy in Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease : A Nationwide Emulation Trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuation of biologics for inflammatory disorders during pregnancy is still a difficult decision. Many women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) stop anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment after 24 weeks. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of anti-TNF continuation after 24 weeks of pregnancy for mothers with IBD and their offspring. DESIGN: Target trial emulation between 2010 and 2020. SETTING: Nationwide population-based study using the Système National des Données de Santé. PATIENTS: All pregnancies with birth exposed to anti-TNF between conception and 24 weeks of pregnancy in women with IBD. INTERVENTION: Continuation of anti-TNF after 24 weeks of pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS: Occurrence of maternal IBD relapse up to 6 months after pregnancy, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and serious infections in the offspring during the first 5 years of life was compared according to anti-TNF continuation after 24 weeks of pregnancy using inverse probability-weighted marginal models. RESULTS: A total of 5293 pregnancies were included; among them, anti-TNF treatment was discontinued before 24 weeks for 2890 and continued beyond 24 weeks for 2403. Continuation of anti-TNF was associated with decreased frequencies of maternal IBD relapse (35.8% vs. 39.0%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99]) and prematurity (7.6% vs. 8.9%; aRR, 0.82 [CI, 0.68 to 0.99]). No difference according to anti-TNF continuation was found regarding stillbirths (0.4% vs. 0.2%; aRR, 2.16 [CI, 0.64 to 7.81]), small weight for gestational age births (13.1% vs. 12.9%; aRR, 1.01 [CI, 0.88 to 1.17]), and serious infections in the offspring (54.2 vs. 50.2 per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.08 [CI, 0.94 to 1.25]). LIMITATION: Algorithms rather than clinical data were used to identify patients with IBD, pregnancies, and serious infections. CONCLUSION: Continuation of anti-TNF after 24 weeks of pregnancy appears beneficial regarding IBD activity and prematurity, while not affecting neonatal outcomes and serious infections in the offspring. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Risk for Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Pulmonary Embolism Following COVID-19 Vaccines in Adults Younger Than 75 Years in France.

BACKGROUND: The BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine has been shown to be safe with regard to risk for severe cardiovascular events (such as myocardial infarction [MI], pulmonary embolism [PE], and stroke) in persons aged 75 years or older. Less is known about the safety of other COVID-19 vaccines or outcomes in younger populations. OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term risk for severe cardiovascular events (excluding myocarditis and pericarditis) after COVID-19 vaccination in France's 46.5 million adults younger than 75 years. DESIGN: Self-controlled case series method adapted to event-dependent exposure and high event-related mortality. SETTING: France, 27 December 2020 to 20 July 2021. PATIENTS: All adults younger than 75 years hospitalized for PE, acute MI, hemorrhagic stroke, or ischemic stroke (n = 73 325 total events). MEASUREMENTS: Linkage between the French National Health Data System and COVID-19 vaccine databases enabled identification of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events (MI, PE, or stroke) and receipt of a first or second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech, mRNA-1273 (Moderna), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen), or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine. The relative incidence (RI) of each cardiovascular event was estimated in the 3 weeks after vaccination compared with other periods, with adjustment for temporality (7-day periods). RESULTS: No association was found between the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine and severe cardiovascular events. The first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with acute MI and PE in the second week after vaccination (RI, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.51] and 1.41 [CI, 1.13 to 1.75], respectively). An association with MI in the second week after a single dose of the Janssen vaccine could not be ruled out (RI, 1.75 [CI, 1.16 to 2.62]). LIMITATIONS: It was not possible to ascertain the relative timing of injection and cardiovascular events on the day of vaccination. Outpatient deaths related to cardiovascular events were not included. CONCLUSION: In persons aged 18 to 74 years, adenoviral-based vaccines may be associated with increased incidence of MI and PE. No association between mRNA-based vaccines and the cardiovascular events studied was observed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Serious Infections in Children Born to Mothers With Inflammatory Bowel Disease With In Utero Exposure to Thiopurines and Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the risk of serious infections in children with in utero exposure to thiopurines and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) born to mothers with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Using the French national health database, which covers 99% of the French population (around 66,000,000 people), we identified live births among women with IBD in France between 2010 and 2018. The risks of serious infections in children during the first 5 years of life were compared according to treatment exposures during pregnancy using propensity score-weighted marginal Cox models. RESULTS: A total of 26,561 children were included: 3392 were exposed to thiopurine monotherapy, 3399 to anti-TNF monotherapy, 816 to combination therapy, and 18,954 were not exposed to any of these drugs. The risks of serious infections during the first year of life among children exposed to thiopurine monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.07) and anti-TNF monotherapy (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.95-1.27) were similar to those of unexposed children; a higher risk was observed in children exposed to combination therapy (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04-1.79). The highest increased risks were observed for nervous system infections and viral infections. The risk of serious infections during the second to fifth years of life was not associated with IBD treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In children born to mothers with IBD, in utero exposure to thiopurine and anti-TNF monotherapies do not increase the risk of serious infections during the first 5 years of life. Combination therapy is associated with an increased risk of serious infections during the first year of life.

The Economic Burden of Disease in France From the National Health Insurance Perspective: The Healthcare Expenditures and Conditions Mapping Used to Prepare the French Social Security Funding Act and the Public Health Act.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the most frequently treated and the costliest health conditions is essential for prioritizing actions to improve the resilience of health systems. OBJECTIVES: Healthcare Expenditures and Conditions Mapping describes the annual economic burden of 58 health conditions to prepare the French Social Security Funding Act and the Public Health Act. DESIGN: Annual cross-sectional study (2015-2019) based on the French national health database. SUBJECTS: National health insurance beneficiaries (97% of the French residents). MEASURES: All individual health care expenditures reimbursed by the national health insurance were attributed to 58 health conditions (treated diseases, chronic treatments, and episodes of care) identified by using algorithms based on available medical information (diagnosis coded during hospital stays, long-term diseases, and specific drugs). RESULTS: In 2019, €167.0 billion were reimbursed to 66.3 million people (52% women, median age: 42 y). The most prevalent treated diseases were diabetes (6.0%), chronic respiratory diseases (5.5%), and coronary diseases (3.2%). Coronary diseases accounted for 4.6% of expenditures, neurotic and mood disorders 3.7%, psychotic disorders 2.8%, and breast cancer 2.1%. Between 2015 and 2019, the expenditures increased primarily for diabetes (+€906 million) and neurotic and mood disorders (+€861 million) due to the growing number of patients. "Active lung cancer" (+€797 million) represented the highest relative increase (+54%) due to expenditures for the expensive drugs and medical devices delivered at hospital. CONCLUSIONS: These results have provided policy-makers, evaluators, and public health specialists with key insights into identifying health priorities and a better understanding of trends in health care expenditures in France.

A modified self-controlled case series method for event-dependent exposures and high event-related mortality, with application to COVID-19 vaccine safety.

We propose a modified self-controlled case series (SCCS) method to handle both event-dependent exposures and high event-related mortality. This development is motivated by an epidemiological study undertaken in France to quantify potential risks of cardiovascular events associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Event-dependence of vaccinations, and high event-related mortality, are likely to arise in other SCCS studies of COVID-19 vaccine safety. Using this case study and simulations to broaden its scope, we explore these features and the biases they may generate, implement the modified SCCS model, illustrate some of the properties of this model, and develop a new test for presence of a dose effect. The model we propose has wider application, notably when the event of interest is death.

Colonoscopy in France during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic may have modified dispensing of colonoscopy preparations, a proxy for the number of colonoscopies performed. We therefore studied changes in dispensing of colonoscopy preparations during the pandemic in France. METHODS: Using the French national health data system, we identified colonoscopy preparations dispensed from 2018 to 2020. The expected 2020 dispensations were estimated from 2018 to 2019 dispensations. RESULTS: Dispensing of colonoscopy preparations decreased markedly during the eight weeks of national lockdown: 83,045 colonoscopy preparations were dispensed, i.e., 181,826 (68.6%) fewer than expected. After lockdown, dispensing of colonoscopy preparations gradually returned to expected numbers. Overall, this represents an estimated decrease of roughly 250,000 colonoscopy preparations during the six-month period following onset of the pandemic. This shortfall in the dispensing of colonoscopy preparations was of the same order of magnitude in people under or over 50 years of age, in men and women, and in those in the highest and the lowest quintiles of the deprivation index. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, roughly 250,000 fewer colonoscopy preparations were dispensed during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Deleterious consequences on morbidity and mortality related to gastroenterological diseases, such as colorectal cancer, are to be feared.

Effectiveness and Safety of Reference Infliximab and Biosimilar in Crohn Disease: A French Equivalence Study.

Background: CT-P13 is a biosimilar of the reference product (RP) infliximab, with demonstrated efficacy and safety for some inflammatory arthritides. It was approved for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD) on that basis, without specific studies examining its effects in CD. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 and RP in infliximab-naive patients with CD. Design: Comparative equivalence cohort study. Setting: Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), a French nationwide health administrative database (1 March 2015 to 30 June 2017). Patients: 5050 infliximab-naive patients with CD who were older than 15 years, had started treatment with RP (n = 2551) or CT-P13 (n = 2499), and had no other indications for infliximab. Measurements: The primary outcome was a composite end point of death, CD-related surgery, all-cause hospitalization, and reimbursement of another biologic therapy. Equivalence was defined as a 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) of CT-P13 versus RP in a multivariable marginal Cox model situated within prespecified margins (0.80 to 1.25). Results: Overall, 1147 patients in the RP group and 952 patients in the CT-P13 group met the composite end point (including 838 and 719 hospitalizations, respectively). In multivariable analysis of the primary outcome, CT-P13 was equivalent to RP (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99]). No differences in safety outcomes were observed between the 2 groups: serious infections (HR, 0.82 [CI, 0.61 to 1.11]), tuberculosis (HR, 1.10 [CI, 0.36 to 3.34]), and solid or hematologic cancer (HR, 0.66 [CI, 0.33 to 1.32]). Limitation: The SNDS does not contain all relevant clinical data (for example, disease activity). Conclusion: This analysis of real-world data indicates that the effectiveness of CT-P13 is equivalent to that of RP for infliximab-naive patients with CD. No difference was observed for safety outcomes. Primary Funding Source: Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis: an 11-year French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can affect women of childbearing age. The management of patients with RA during pregnancy has evolved over the past decades, especially with the availability of new therapeutic molecules. OBJECTIVES: To describe pregnancy in women with RA, to compare pregnancy outcomes with those of women in the general population and to compare pregnancy outcomes in women with active and inactive RA. METHODS: Using the French National Health Data System, we identified all pregnancies ending between 2010 and 2020 in patients with and without RA. Characteristics were described. Active RA was defined by conventional synthetic/biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation, systemic or intra-articular corticosteroid administration and/or RA-related hospitalisation. Pregnancy outcomes were compared computing multivariable logistic marginal regression model using generalised estimating equation (GEE). RESULTS: We included 11 792 RA and 10 413 681 non-RA pregnancies. Among RA pregnancies, 74.5% ended in live births and 0.4% in stillbirths. RA pregnancies resulted more frequently in preterm births (adjusted OR (ORa) 1.84; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.00) and very preterm births (ORa 1.43; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.71), low birth weight (ORa 1.65; 95% CI: 1.52 to 1.90), caesarean section (ORa 1.46; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.55) and pregnancy-related hospitalisation (ORa 1.30; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.39). Disease activity decreased during pregnancy. Active RA had higher rates of prematurity (ORa 2.02; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.38), small for gestational age (ORa 1.53; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.83) and caesarean section (ORa 1.25; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.40) than non-active RA. CONCLUSION: Pregnancies in women with RA were associated with more adverse outcomes, especially if the disease was active. These findings should encourage physicians to closely monitor RA during this crucial period.

Risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalisation after booster vaccination during the Omicron period: A French nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In spite of major effectiveness, a residual risk after COVID-19 primary vaccination was identified, in particular, for vulnerable individuals of advanced age or with comorbidities. Less is known about the Omicron period in people protected by a booster dose. We aimed to identify the characteristics associated with severe COVID-19 during the Omicron period in a population that had received a booster dose in France and to compare differences with the previous periods of the pandemic. METHODS: This study was carried out using the French national COVID-19 vaccination database (VAC-SI) coupled with the National Health Data System (SNDS). Individuals aged 12 years or over who received at least one booster dose were identified. Associations between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation occurring at least 14 days after receiving a third dose of vaccine during the period of Omicron predominance, i.e., from 1 January 2022 to 10 November 2022, were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, time since booster dose and vaccination schedule. Analyses were performed overall and by sub-period of circulation of the strains BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/BA.5, defined as periods where the main sub-variant accounted for more than 80 % of genotyped samples. FINDINGS: In total, 35,640,387 individuals received a booster dose (mean follow-up of 291 days) and 73,989 were hospitalised for COVID-19 during the total period. Older age (aHR 20.5 95 % CI [19.6-21.5] for 90 years of age or older versus 45-54 years of age), being male (aHR 1.52 [1.50-1.55]), and social deprivation (aHR 1.33 [1.30-1.37] for the most deprived areas versus the least deprived) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation for COVID-19. Most of the chronic diseases considered were also positively associated with a residual risk, in particular, cystic fibrosis (aHR 9.83 [7.68-12.56]), active lung cancer (aHR 3.26 [3.06-3.47]), chronic dialysis (aHR 3.79 [3.49-4.11]), psychological and neurodegenerative diseases (more markedly than during the periods of circulation of the alpha and delta variants), and organ transplantation. The use of immunosuppressants was also associated with an increased risk (aHR 2.24 [2.14-2.35], including oral corticosteroids aHR (2.58 [2.50-2.67]). CONCLUSION: Despite an effective booster and a generally less virulent circulating variant, a residual risk of severe COVID-19 still exists in vulnerable populations, especially those with neurological disorders.

Prevalence, mortality, and treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cohort study of the French National Health Data System, 2010-2019.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease mostly affecting the joints. Data on the prevalence of RA differ widely, depending on the study and country. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of RA in France and the mortality rate, characterise the causes of death, and identify prescribed treatments. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study was based on data of the French National Health Data System (SNDS) which covers 99% of the French population. All patients identified with RA based on specific ICD-10 codes (M05 and M06, except M06.1) between 2010 and 2019 were included. RESULTS: We identified 385,919 RA cases between 2010 and 2019, 318,243 of which were followed in 2019 (65.8±16.8 years, 72% women). The overall crude prevalence rate in 2019 was 0.47%: 0.66% for women and 0.28% for men. The crude annual mortality rate was 3.1%. The overall standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of RA patients relative to the French general population decreased over time, reaching 1.21 in 2019. Cause-specific mortality was increased in RA patients for cardiovascular (SMR 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.36-1.43), respiratory system (1.80, 1.73-1.87), digestive system (1.73, 1.59-1.88), and urogenital system (1.73, 1.59-1.88) diseases and infections (1.91, 1.76-2.06). We found no excess mortality due to tumours. The prevalence of treatment with conventional synthetic and biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for RA in 2019 was 41.9% (n=133,477) and 18.7% (n=59,409), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results may provide a better understanding of RA and its care in France.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on contraception use in France.

To limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19), sanitary restrictions have been established since March 2020 in France. These restrictions and the waves of contamination may have had consequences on the use of health products in general, and on the use of contraceptives in particular. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID 19 pandemic from March 16th 2020 to April 30th 2021 in France on reimbursed contraceptives. We analyzed data from the French national health insurance database (SNDS) by extracting all oral contraception (OC), emergency contraception (EC), levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), copper-intrauterine device (C-IUD) and contraceptive implant dispensations in 2018, 2019, 2020 and to April 30th 2021. We computed the expected use of contraceptives in 2020 and 2021 without pandemic and its associated sanitary restrictions, by taking the annual trend into account. We assessed the evolution of dispensations by type of contraceptive and by age-groups (≤25 years old, between 25 and 35 and >35 years old) between observed and expected dispensations. After 15 months of pandemic, a decrease of all reimbursed contraceptives dispensations had been estimated, compared with what was expected: -2.0% for OC, -5.0% for EC, -9.5% for LNG-IUS, -8.6% for C-IUD, -16.4% for implant. Women under 25 years old were the most impacted by the decrease. This national study showed that the impact of the COVID 19 crisis was global on all reimbursed contraceptives, with different levels of impact depending on the type of contraceptive, the age-group and the severity of the restriction. OC dispensing decreased marginally compared with expectations. The decrease in long-acting contraceptives dispensing was more pronounced, especially for the implant. These results call for continued monitoring of contraceptive use over the long term and for prioritizing access to sexual health services during crises, especially among the youngest women who were most affected in this study.

Risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following COVID-19 Vaccines: A Nationwide Self-Controlled Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has been inconsistently associated with some coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. We aimed to quantify the risk of GBS according to the type of COVID-19 vaccine in a large population. METHODS: Using the French National Health Data System linked to the COVID-19 vaccine database, we analyzed all individuals aged 12 years or older admitted for GBS from December 27, 2020, to May 20, 2022. We estimated the relative incidence (RI) of GBS within 1-42 days after vaccination up to the first booster dose compared with baseline periods using a self-controlled case series design. We then derived the number of cases attributable to the vaccination. Analyses were adjusted for the period and stratified by age group, sex, and for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or common acute infections. RESULTS: Of 58,530,770 people aged 12 years or older, 88.8% received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose and 2,229 were hospitalized for GBS during the study period. Patients had a median age of 57 years, and 60% were male patients. The RI of GBS between 1-42 days was 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.6) for the first dose of ChAdOx1-S and 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-5.0) for the unique dose of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. We estimated 6.5 attributable GBS cases per million persons having received a first dose of ChAdOx1-S and 5.7 cases per million for the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. Except for the age group of 12-49 years after the second dose of the messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 vaccine (RI 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.5), none of the RI estimates were found significantly increased for the mRNA vaccines. DISCUSSION: In summary, we found increased risks of GBS after the first administration of ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines. In this comprehensive assessment at the French population level, there was no statistically significant increase in the risk of GBS after the administration of mRNA vaccines. This is reassuring in the context of the ongoing and future use of mRNA-based booster vaccination.

Protection of COVID-19 Vaccination Against Hospitalization During the Era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 Predominance: A Nationwide Case-Control Study Based on the French National Health Data System.

Background: Knowing the duration of effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster doses is essential to providing decision-makers with scientific arguments about the frequency of subsequent injections. We estimated the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations (Omicron BA.4-BA.5) over time after vaccination, accounting for breakthrough infections. Methods: In this nationwide case-control study, all cases of hospitalizations for COVID-19 identified in the comprehensive French National Health Data System between June 1, 2022, and October 15, 2022, were matched with up to 10 controls by year of birth, sex, department, and an individual COVID-19 hospitalization risk score. Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations conferred by primary and booster vaccination, accounting for history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results: A total of 38 839 cases were matched to 377 653 controls; 19.2% and 9.9% were unvaccinated, respectively, while 68.2% and 77.7% had received ≥1 booster dose. Protection provided by primary vaccination reached 45% (95% CI, 42%-47%). The incremental effectiveness of booster doses ranged from 69% (95% CI, 67%-71%; ≤2 months) to 22% (95% CI, 19%-25%; ≥6 months). Specifically, the second booster provided an additional protection compared with the first ranging from 61% (95% CI, 59%-64%; ≤2 months) to 7% (95% CI, 2%-13%; ≥4 months). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred a strong, long-lasting protection (51% ≥20 months). There was no incremental effectiveness of a second booster among individuals infected since the first booster. Conclusions: In the era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 predominance, primary vaccination still conferred protection against COVID-19 hospitalization, while booster doses provided an additional time-limited protection. The second booster had no additional protection in case of infection since the first booster.

Age and sex-specific risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA vaccines.

Cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported following the receipt of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. As vaccination campaigns are still to be extended, we aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the association, by vaccine and across sex and age groups. Using nationwide hospital discharge and vaccine data, we analysed all 1612 cases of myocarditis and 1613 cases of pericarditis that occurred in France in the period from May 12, 2021 to October 31, 2021. We perform matched case-control studies and find increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis during the first week following vaccination, and particularly after the second dose, with adjusted odds ratios of myocarditis of 8.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7 to 9.9) for the BNT162b2 and 30 (95% CI, 21 to 43) for the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The largest associations are observed for myocarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination in persons aged 18 to 24 years. Estimates of excess cases attributable to vaccination also reveal a substantial burden of both myocarditis and pericarditis across other age groups and in both males and females.