Optimal use of lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndromes: A Position Paper endorsed by the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP).

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and consequent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality across Europe. Much of these diseases burden is modifiable, in particular by lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Current guidelines are based on the sound premise that with respect to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), "lower is better for longer", and the recent data have strongly emphasized the need of also "the earlier the better". In addition to statins, which have been available for several decades, the availability of ezetimibe and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) are additional very effective approach to LLT, especially for those at very high and extremely high cardiovascular risk. LLT is initiated as a response to an individual's calculated risk of future ASCVD and is intensified over time in order to meet treatment goals. However, in real-life clinical practice goals are not met in a substantial proportion of patients. This Position Paper complements existing guidelines on the management of lipids in patients following ACS. Bearing in mind the very high risk of further events in ACS, we propose practical solutions focusing on immediate combination therapy in strict clinical scenarios, to improve access and adherence to LLT in these patients. We also define an 'Extremely High Risk' group of individuals following ACS, completing the attempt made in the recent European guidelines, and suggest mechanisms to urgently address lipid-medicated cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Characteristics of lipid profile and effectiveness of management of dyslipidaemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes - Data from the TERCET registry with 19,287 patients.

Despite well-defined therapeutic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target in the highest-risk population, low percentage of patients is administered with intensive lipid-lowering therapy and achieves recommended levels. Therefore, based on the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry data we investigated the characteristics of lipid profile and management of dyslipidemia in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. 19,287 consecutive patients hospitalized between 2006 and 2016 have been included in the study. The lipid profile on admission and long-term laboratory effects (namely the efficacy of achievement of the therapeutic target of LDL-C <70 mg/dl [1.8 mmol/L]) after follow-up of twelve months were assessed. Acute coronary syndromes occurred in 36.1% of the Registry patients including 14.3% with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), 10.2% with NSTEMI and 9,9% with unstable angina (UA). The highest LDL-C concentration on admission was observed in the STEMI subgroup (mean level: 127.0 mg/dL [3.28 mmol/L]). In 76.6% of the Registry patients LDL-C concentration was lower than 130 mg/dL and in 20.7% was lower than 70 mg/dL at baseline. The patients with baseline LDL < 70 mg/dL were usually presented with the worst clinical profile. In 91,6% of the patients admitted due to acute coronary syndrome, statin treatment was administered at discharge. Among them, 37.6% received intensive statin therapy. In the 12-month follow-up, in 32.4% of patients admitted due to STEMI, LDL-C concentration was lower than 70 mg/dL, compared to 29.9% in patients with NSTEMI and 27.8% in patients with UA. In conclusion, STEMI patients are less clinically burdened with concomitant risk factors and comorbidities, but present significantly worse baseline lipid profile values. Among the patients already treated with statins, patients with ACS regardless of its type have significantly higher LDL-C than patients with SA. Despite discrepancies in the clinical profile on admission, achievement of the therapeutic target equalizes the outcomes in 12-month follow-up, however with the best results for STEMI patients.

Evaluation of dyslipidaemia and the impact of hypolipidemic therapy on prognosis in high and very high risk patients through the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry.

The use of statins in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia leads to a significant decrease in cardiovascular (CV) endpoints, and therapy effects are proportional to the reduction of cholesterol levels. In Poland, information about the effects of statin therapy is scarcely available. The information gathered in the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in the tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry on high-risk and very high-risk patients might improve our knowledge on this issue and help to introduce suitable activities. The main aim of the TERCET Registry is to achieve the target value of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during a 1-year follow-up: LDL-C <70 mg/dL in very high-risk patients and LDL-C <100 mg/dL in high-risk patients. All consecutive patients with either stable coronary artery disease (sCAD) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been included in the Registry, and the information on all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and planned or ACS-caused revascularisation have been being gathered within 12-month follow-up. At the moment, the TERCET Registry includes 14,873 patients (66.8% male) at an average age of 64.8 ±â€¯10.2 with a significantly higher age of women (67.5 ±â€¯10.3 vs. 63.5 ±â€¯9.7; p < .001). The causes of hospitalisation were as the following: sCAD (n = 9375 patients, 63% of the investigated population), ST-elevated myocardial infarction (n = 2328 [15.6%]), non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (n = 1700 [11.4%]), and unstable coronary artery disease (n = 1466 [10%]). 62,7% (n = 9144) of the patients were diagnosed with hyperlipidaemia before hospital admission, with no significant difference between male and female patients. The TERCET registry will allow unveiling real lipid profiles of the high- and very-high risk patients treated in the tertiary hospital. The results may play an essential role in establishing the patients' future clinical outcomes and help to assess if the lipid lowering therapy modifications changed the occurrence of CV endpoints. The registry data will summarize the number of patients unable to reach their LDL-C goals, and who in the future might become candidates suitable for new hypolipidemic therapies (ID: NCT03065543).

Red cell distribution width is associated with long-term prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the association between red cell distribution width (RDW) values and mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease are scarce. We aimed to investigate the link between mortality and RDW in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We analyzed 2550 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent PCI between 2007 and 2011 at our institution. The patients were divided into four groups according to RDW quartiles. The association between the RDW values and the outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional regression analysis after adjusting for clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic and laboratory data in the whole population and in subgroups stratified by gender, presence of diabetes, anemia or heart failure. RESULTS: In the entire population, there was a stepwise relationship between RDW intervals and comorbidities. Patients with the highest RDW values were older and more often burdened with diabetes, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. There was an almost 4-fold increase in mortality during an average of 2.5 years of follow-up between the group of patients with RDW values lower than 13.1% (25th percentile) and the group with RDW values higher than 14.1% (75th percentile), (4.3% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for the covariates, RDW remained significantly associated with mortality in the whole cohort (HR-1.23 [95% CI (1.13-1.35), p < 0.0001]) and in the subgroups stratified by gender, age (over and under 75 years), presence of anemia, diabetes, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Higher RDW values correspond to higher comorbidity burdens and higher mortality. RDW is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Intensive Statin Therapy Versus Upfront Combination Therapy of Statin and Ezetimibe in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on the PL-ACS Data.

Background We aimed to compare statin monotherapy and upfront combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Methods and Results The study included consecutive patients with ACS included in the PL-ACS (Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes), which is a national, multicenter, ongoing, prospective observational registry that is mandatory for patients with ACS hospitalized in Poland. Data were matched using the Mahalanobis distance within propensity score matching calipers. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis, including all variables, was next used in propensity score matching analysis. Finally, 38 023 consecutive patients with ACS who were discharged alive were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching, 2 groups were analyzed: statin monotherapy (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin; n=768) and upfront combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe (n=768 patients). The difference in mortality between groups was significant during the follow-up and was present at 1 (5.9% versus 3.5%; P=0.041), 2 (7.8% versus 4.3%; P=0.019), and 3 (10.2% versus 5.5%; P=0.024) years of follow-up in favor of the upfront combination therapy, as well as for the overall period. For the treatment, rosuvastatin significantly improved prognosis compared with atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR], 0.790 [95% CI, 0.732-0.853]). Upfront combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality in comparison with statin monotherapy (OR, 0.526 [95% CI, 0.378-0.733]), with absolute risk reduction of 4.7% after 3 years (number needed to treat=21). Conclusions The upfront combination lipid-lowering therapy is superior to statin monotherapy for all-cause mortality in patients with ACS. These results suggest that in high-risk patients, such an approach, rather than a stepwise therapy approach, should be recommended.

Assessment of the Level of Anxiety for COVID-19 Vaccinations.

Research published especially in the last decade indicates the influence of anxiety on the human decision-making process. This study analyzes the anxiety among individuals who decided to undergo vaccinations for COVID-19. The study assesses that the level of education, especially medical education, age, and gender, had an influence on the level of anxiety in terms of vaccination situations. The STAI self-assessment questionnaire was used. The study was conducted anonymously using the paper-pencil method during two rounds of vaccination; therefore, the respondent sample included mainly medical personnel and elderly people. A total of 898 questionnaires were issued. Age did not affect the trait and state of anxiety, but highly educated people tested during vaccination had a lower anxiety level. Gender had no influence on the trait but did influence the state of anxiety. Overall, women were the group that exhibited a higher level of anxiety than men. Nurses were particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of situational medication in this group.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Stent Underexpansion: The Multicenter IVL-DRAGON Registry.

Background: Whereas the efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) have been confirmed in de novo calcified coronary lesions, little is known about its utility in treating stent underexpansion. This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVL in treating stent underexpansion. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with stent underexpansion treated with IVL entered the multicenter IVL-Dragon Registry. The procedural success (primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as a relative stent expansion >80%. Thirty days device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel myocardial infarction) was the secondary endpoint. A total of 62 patients were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 72.6% of patients. Both stent underexpansion 58.5% (47.5−69.7) vs. 11.4% (5.8−20.7), p < 0.001, and the stenotic area 82.6% (72.4−90.8) vs. 21.5% (11.1−37.2), p < 0.001, measured by quantitative coronary angiography improved significantly after IVL. Intravascular imaging confirmed increased stent expansion following IVL from 37.5% (16.0−66.0) to 86.0% (69.2−90.7), p < 0.001, by optical coherence tomography and from 57.0% (31.5−77.2) to 89.0% (85.0−92.0), p = 0.002, by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary endpoint occurred in one (1.6%) patient caused by cardiac death. There was no target lesion revascularization or target vessel myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: In this real-life, largest-to-date analysis of IVL use to manage underexpanded stent, IVL proved to be an effective and safe method for facilitating stent expansion and increasing luminal gain.

Practical aspects of endomyocardial left ventricular biopsy - own experience.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (LV-EMB) is the only procedure that allows a direct assessment of the left ventricular myocardium, thus enabling the diagnosis of myocarditis or other myocardial diseases. AIM: To describe the characteristics of a population that underwent LV-EMB, as well as to address the periprocedural and technical aspects of the LV-EMB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since its initiation in our center in 2016, a total of 43 patients have undergone LV-EMB. In the manuscript, the indications for LV-EMB and the detailed technical aspects of its safe performance, including the equipment used, are described. A large part of the text is also devoted to the possible complications of LV-EMB. RESULTS: The results of the initial population that underwent LV-EMB in our center are presented. The patients who were qualified for LV-EMB were predominantly male (85.7%), with a mean age of 38.8 years. Of those, 38 (88.3%) had acute heart failure. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 19.6%. The primary indications for LV-EMB were unexplained heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% and (1) hemodynamic abnormalities or electrical instability of the heart and/or (2) recent worsening of heart failure (NYHA class II, III, or IV) with no response to standard therapy for 2 weeks. The mean fluoroscopy time was 5.4 min, and the mean radiation dose was 87 mGy. No periprocedural complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis indicate that LV-EMB can be performed safely by skilled physicians in an experienced center.

Risk-factors associated with extremely high cardiovascular risk of mid- and long-term mortality following myocardial infarction: Analysis of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk-factor identification and risk stratification are prerequisites to the effective primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients at the highest risk benefit the most from the intensive risk-factor reduction. However, the high-risk patients' group is heterogeneous, and it is increasingly recognised that there is an 'extreme-risk' category of patients who may require particularly close attention and intensive therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of patients at the highest risk of death following myocardial infarction (MI) that might be considered as those at extremely high CVD risk. METHODS: We used data from 19,582 participants of the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry (NCT03065543) of patients with ischaemic heart disease in Poland from 2006 to present. Characteristics of 13,052 patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) were compared with those of 4295 patients with myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise backward elimination was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality in the 12-36 months following the index hospitalisation. RESULTS: The mortality rates were significantly higher in patients after MI than in patients with CCS. In the multivariable analysis, the risk factors most strongly associated with 12-month mortality in patients after MI were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% (hazard ratio [HR] 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.14-4.67), age >75 years (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.55-2.35), multivessel coronary artery disease (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.30-1.99), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.21-1.94) diabetes mellitus (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.11-1.64) and increased LDL-C (HR per 1 mmol/l 1.09, 95%CI 1.01-1.19) or creatinine levels (HR per 10 µmol/L 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.05). The risk factors that influenced mortality after 24-36 months were consistent with those after 12 months, with additional low haemoglobin (20-25% risk increase per 1 mmol reduction) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (65% risk increase after 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: In our large, single-center real-world analysis, we identified the patients with the highest risk of death who could probably benefit the most from the most intensive therapy, and hence should be considered to be an 'extreme risk' population.

Inclisiran-New hope in the management of lipid disorders?

Drugs reducing plasma concentrations of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in both primary and secondary prevention. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of statins and ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration and long-term CVD risk, a large number of patients do not achieve their therapeutic goals. The introduction of monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein was a milestone in the treatment of lipid disorders, as their administration leads to unprecedentedly low LDL cholesterol concentrations. Inclisiran represents an entirely new mechanism of PSCK9 protein inhibition in hepatocytes, targeting the messenger RNA for PCSK9. Its administration is necessary only every 3 to 6 months, which is an essential advantage over statin and monoclonal antibody therapy. The infrequent administration regimen can increase the number of patients who maintain their therapeutic goals, especially in patients struggling to comply with daily or biweekly pharmacotherapy. Preclinical studies and Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of inclisiran have demonstrated its tolerability and efficacy in promoting long-term reduction of both PCSK9 protein and LDL cholesterol. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran will continue to be assessed in ongoing and forthcoming trials on larger patient groups. If the results of these trials reflect previously published data, they will add further evidence that inclisiran might be a revolutionary new tool in the pharmacologic management of plasma lipids. This review summarizes the currently available literature data on inclisiran with respect to its mechanism of action, effectiveness, and safety as a lipid-lowering drug for CVD prevention.

Long-term outcomes of 11 021 patients with chronic coronary syndromes and after coronary angiography: the PRESAGE registry.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of real­world registries concerning patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the long­term outcomes of patients with CCS and after coronary angiography performed in accordance with the treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis involved 11 021 patients treated in a single center between 2006 and 2016 who were enrolled into the ongoing PRESAGE registry. Based on the results of coronary angiography and the treatment strategy adopted, patients were classified into 4 groups: with nonsignificant lesions (n = 3637), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 4678), undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 997), and receiving conservative treatment (notwithstanding significant lesions on an angiogram; n = 1709). All­cause death, assessed in every study group at 1-, 3-, and 5­year follow­up, was regarded as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 64.6 (9.5) years, and women constituted 35% of the cohort. Patients treated conservatively were the oldest (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.3] years) in the group and showed the highest prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (50.5%), CABG (31.8%), diabetes (40.3%), chronic total occlusion (65.5%), and left ventricular ejection fraction below 35% (24.4%). Death from any cause in patients with nonsignificant lesions, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, undergoing CABG, and receiving conservative treatment occurred 5 years following the index hospitalization in 11.2%, 16.2%, 9.7%, and 21% of those patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PRESAGE registry provides valuable information about the clinical characteristics and long­term outcomes of patients with CCS. The population of CCS patients is heterogeneous, and long­term prognosis is also varied. The poorest characteristics and outcomes were reported in patients with significant lesions and ineligible for revascularization procedures.

The prevalence and management of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Polish tertiary centre: Results from the TERCET registry with 19,781 individuals.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is high among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data on FH on admission among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are still relatively scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence, lipid-lowering therapy and short- and long-term outcomes in patients with FH among ACS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The investigation was performed in a cohort of 19,781 consecutive patients from the TERCET Registry. There were 7319 patients admitted with ACS: 3085 due to STEMI, 2256 due to NSTEMI, and 1978 due to UA. The stable CAD group (n = 12,462) was considered the reference group. Based on the personal and familial history of premature cardiovascular disease and LDL cholesterol concentration, the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) algorithm was used for FH diagnosis. The overall occurrence of probable/definite FH and possible FH was 1.2% and 13.5% respectively. Among patients with ACS, 1.6% had probable/definite FH and 17.0% possible FH. The highest occurrence of FH was observed in the STEMI subgroup (20.6%). Patients with definite and probable FH had higher 30-day mortality than patients without FH (8.2% and 3.8% vs. 2.0%, respectively; p = 0.0052). No significant differences were observed between the FH groups in the 12-, 36- and 60-month follow-up. Propensity-score matching analysis showed that definite/probable FH patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality at 36- and 60-month follow-up in comparison to non-FH subjects (11.4% vs. 4.8% and 19.2% vs. 7.2%, respectively; p ≤ 0.021 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FH according to the DLCN criteria in the Polish very high-risk population is significantly higher in patients with ACS than in patients with sCAD. FH is a cause of increased all-cause mortality in the long-term follow-up.

[Dual antiplatelet drug resistance in a patient allergic to clopidogrel: a case report]. / Niepelna odpowiedz na podwójne leczenie przeciwplytkowe u kobiety uczulonej na klopidogrel.

In the present report we describe a 70-year-old woman after antimitotic stent implantation who developed an allergy to clopidogrel. We monitored her platelet activity while on different drug regimes and at different time points during the allergic reaction. Tests showed incomplete platelet inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel (dual antiplatelet drug resistance) during the acute allergic reaction with gradual improvement together with patient clinical status.

Comparison of outcomes of direct stenting versus stenting after balloon predilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIRAMI).

Due to recent advances in stent design, stenting without balloon predilation (direct stenting) has become more extensively used in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We performed a randomized study with broad inclusion criteria and early randomization after presentation to compare direct stenting with stenting after balloon predilation in patients with AMI. A total of 248 patients was randomized. After exclusion of patients not suitable for stenting, the final study group comprised 217 patients. Direct stenting strategy was feasible in 88% of patients with no meaningful complications. Final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow (96% vs 94%), final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction myocardial perfusion grade 2 or 3 (68% vs 61%), and average ST-segment resolution after the procedure (49% vs 51%) were similar in the direct stenting and predilation groups, respectively (p = NS). Rate of in-stent restenosis was higher in the direct stenting group (30% vs 16%, p = 0.024), which was due to a worse angiographic result after the procedure. At 5 years, a composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization had occurred in 39% in the direct stenting group and 34% in the predilated group (p = 0.40). In conclusion, although at 5 years clinical outcome did not differ significantly between groups, direct stenting was associated with a higher incidence of in-stent restenosis at 1 year. Direct stenting did not improve epicardial and myocardial reperfusion indexes. Direct stenting strategy should not be recommended in all patients with AMI as an alternative strategy to stenting after predilation.

Usefulness of atorvastatin in patients with heart failure due to inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy and elevated cholesterol levels.

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of statin therapy in patients with heart failure secondary to inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy and moderately elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Seventy-four patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 40 mg/day or conventional treatment for heart failure. After 6 months of therapy, the predefined primary efficacy end point (an increase of >5% in the absolute left ventricular ejection fraction and > or =2 selected criteria by echocardiography and a decrease in New York Heart Association functional class) was significant in the statin-treated patients (p = 0.004). Among secondary efficacy parameters, the quality-of-life index showed a trend suggesting the benefit of statin therapy (p = 0.055). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that treatment with atorvastatin in addition to standard therapy for heart failure may significantly improve clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients.

Myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes. Results of primary coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) improved the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes remains a significant factor which worsens prognosis. AIM: To compare the immediate and in-hospital results of PCI in patients with acute MI with or without diabetes. METHODS: The outcome of 139 patients with diabetes and 528 patients without diabetes was compared. Thrombolytic therapy was administered prior to PCI to 43.2% of patients with diabetes and 42.4% of patients without diabetes. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were older, more frequently of female gender and had higher incidence of hypertension as well as multi-vessel coronary artery disease. PCI was effective in 85.6% of diabetics and 90.2% of non-diabetic patients (NS). The reocclusion rate was significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics (11.5% vs 5.5%, p=0.012) whereas the incidence of haemorrhagic complications was similar. Mortality rates were comparable in both groups (7.2% in diabetics vs 5.9% in non-diabetics, NS). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Immediate efficacy of primary PCI for acute MI is similar in diabetics and non-diabetics, however, the in-hospital reocclusion rate is higher in the former group of patients. 2) In-hospital mortality is not affected by the presence of diabetes. 3) Thrombolytic and invasive treatment of diabetic patients with acute MI is not associated with an increased risk of bleeding.